|
______________________________________
To Members of the Executive Notice of a Meeting of the ExecutiveTuesday 15 March 2005 at 2.00 pm County Hall, Oxford
Contact officer: Geoff Malcolm (Tel: 01865 815904; E-mail)
Membership
Decisions taken at the meeting will become effective at the end of the working day on 23 March 2005 unless called in by that date for review by the appropriate Scrutiny Committee. Copies of this Notice, Agenda and supporting papers are circulated to all Members of the County Council.
AGENDAAddenda
To confirm the minutes of the meeting held on 1 March 2005 (EX3) and to receive for information any matters arising therefrom. Executive Member:
Leader of the Council Report by Head
of Finance & Procurement (EX5) (download
as. doc file). This report covers the period up to the end of January 2005 for revenue and capital. There has been a net increase of £0.589m in the projected year end position on revenue balances since the last report. No further potential calls on balances are known about for the year and the forecast year end position is now a balance of £6.136m. This is net of the adjustment of £0.816m made last month in respect of the repayment of 2003/04 Revenue Support Grant and remains in line with the projections set out in the Revenue Budget and Capital Programme for 2005/06 which was agreed by Council on 15 February. The Directorate carry forward position has improved by £0.457m since the last report and now shows an overall surplus of £1.854m. Based on previous trends, this position is unlikely to worsen and may well improve further. The capital programme presented to Council on 15 February 2005 showed an expected surplus of £7.354m at 31 March 2005. A more accurate assessment will be available at the Executive meeting on 19 April. There could also be a slippage in capital receipts totalling up to £4.000m which will need to be offset against the surplus. Overall, it is anticipated that the final surplus on the capital programme at 31 March 2005 will be significantly higher than the £7.354m reported to Council. The Executive is RECOMMENDED to:
Executive
Member: Deputy Leader of the Council Report by Director for Resources (EX6). In September 2004 the Executive approved proposals for a two phase programme to address shortcomings in the Authority’s implementation of SAP and to enable effective exploitation of the investment made. The Executive agreed a virement of £1m in 2004/05 for Phase One of the Project; Council on 15 February agreed funding of £2m for each of the three financial years 2005/06 to 2007/08 to undertake Phase Two. This report is intended to:
The Executive is RECOMMENDED to:-
Executive
Member: Leader of the Council Report by County Council Management Team (EX7). This is the fourth formal quarterly monitoring progress report on RoP2 implementation, and covers progress between 1 October and 31 December 2004. Significant progress has been made towards Oxfordshire’s goal of being an outstanding local authority in 2004 as a result of the RoP2 improvement plan. At the end of the year many of the challenging and aspirational success criteria have been fully achieved, with several more on track to be achieved in the immediate future. Notable successes include:
The Executive is RECOMMENDED to note the report, and in particular the proposal to analyse RoP2 leading to recommendations for the next organisational improvement plan.
Executive Member:
Sustainable Development Report by Head
of Sustainable Development (EX8). The South East England Regional Assembly (SEERA) is consulting the public on the draft South East Plan. The consultation period is to 15 April 2005. The draft plan does not contain individual district housing allocations. Further work is needed to produce these. Following this work, which may be subject to some further consultation, the Regional Assembly aims to submit the Plan to the Secretary of State in November. He will undertake further consultation and hold a public examination. The Government hopes that the Plan will be adopted in 2006. A copy of the plan is in the Members’ Resource Centre. A copy of the Executive Summary has been sent to all Members. This report focuses on the key issues addressed by the draft South East Plan, including housing options for the region and issues in relation to the sub regional elements of the Plan that relate to Oxfordshire. The Executive is RECOMMENDED to :
Executive Member:
Sustainable Development Report by Head of Sustainable Development (EX9). On 1 June 2004, the Executive endorsed a report (EX10), (Minute 141/04) which outlined the key themes put forward in a Green Paper, A Step Forward in Housing, published by the Regional Housing Board (RHB), as the basis for a formal response from the County Council to the RHB. The Green Paper was an important first step in formulating the Regional Housing Strategy. The RHB has now prepared and is consulting on the draft Regional Housing Strategy 2006-2009. The consultation period is from 24 January to 18 March 2005. The Strategy sets out priorities for housing investment in the South East and a framework for allocating resources. It covers the period 2006 onwards and will be followed by an investment plan that will cover the two years 2006-7 and 2007-8. The final version of the strategy needs to be delivered to Ministers in May 2005. This report suggests a formal response to the RHB on the draft Regional Housing Strategy. The Executive is RECOMMENDED to:
Executive Member:
Transport Report by Head of Transport (EX10). This report seeks the Executive’s approval to the 2005/06 Transport Capital Programme. This is the final year of the current Local Transport Plan 5 year period and the programme concentrates on delivering the schemes developed over this period. This programme booklet accompanying the report provides the list of specific transport capital projects called for in the County Council’s decision on the 15 February in regard to the 2005/06 Capital Programme. The report includes an explanation of a revised approach to Better Ways to School and seeks approval of this change. Also included is an explanation of plans to advance the implementation of residents parking schemes in Oxford and a revised project appraisal for the Cowley Road Demonstration scheme, both for approval by the Executive. The Executive is RECOMMENDED to:
Executive
Member:
Transport Report by Head of Transport (EX11). This report lists the proposed expenditure on highway maintenance activities programmed for 2005/06 from both the capital and revenue budgets. The available revenue budget of £17,027,400 consists of the agreed base revenue budget, plus a standard inflation allowance of 2%, an additional contract inflation allowance and an ongoing 2004/05 Policy and Budget Plan allowance for the revenue implications of Capital Schemes. In addition there is funding to cover increased energy costs identified within the 2005/06 budget pressures. Offsetting these increases to the base budget are the agreed reductions to meet the Efficiency Savings and Budget Pressures and also budget virements which need to be agreed to cover a shortfall in the staffing budget.
The available capital budget of £16,788,000 is made up of £13,097,000 of basic capital funding for highway maintenance plus £3,691,000 emergency maintenance funding for drought damaged roads. A further £3.595m has been specifically allocated to carry out major maintenance on the A40. Approval has been obtained from GOSE to carry some of this funding into 2006/07 to enable the maintenance works to be coordinated with planned changes to Headington Roundabout. As at the end of January there is a forecast 2004/05 revenue underspend within Highways Management of £375k. This is made up mainly from additional income to budget from charges and general underspends on staff costs due to unfilled vacancies. Of this, £300k will be carried forward to fund an ongoing Business Process Review of Highway Management and the balance will help offset the 2005/06 planned reduction in the Local Safety Programme to meet part of the savings target proposals. The Executive is RECOMMENDED to;
Executive Member:
Transport Report by Joint Scrutiny Review Group (EX12) (download as .doc file). On 3 March 2005 the Corporate Governance Scrutiny Committee considered the report of the Joint Oxford City Council & County Council Review Group which was appointed to carry out a review of the Cornmarket Street, Oxford, Reconstruction Scheme. The Committee’s comment to the Executive will be reported at the meeting An executive summary of the report with its recommendations is attached at (EX12). The full report has been circulated to all Members and a copy has been placed in the Members’ Resource Centre. A copy is also available for public inspection. The Executive is asked to consider and respond to the Joint Review report and its recommendations. Executive
Member:
Transport Report by Head
of Transport (EX13) (download
as .doc file). On 25 November 2005 the Best Value Committee considered the report (EX13) of its Best Value Review Team appointed to carry out a review of Road Casualty Reduction. The Committee:
On 15 December 2004 the Environment Scrutiny Committee endorsed the report and additional recommendation of the Best Value Committee and asked the Executive to write to the Chief Executives of the NHS Trusts, Primary Care Trusts and Ambulance Trust to seek their views on road casualty reduction. The Executive is asked to consider the outcome of the Best Value Review of Road Casualty Reduction and the request of the Environment Scrutiny Committee.
Executive Member:
Transport Report by Head of Transport (EX14). This report seeks approval for a revised detailed project appraisal for the Witney: West End Link Road Stage 1 with a total cost of £1.610 million. The Executive is RECOMMENDED to approve the Detailed Project Appraisal H163/2 as set out in Annexes 1 and 2 to the report. Executive Member:
Community Care & Health Report by Director for Social & Health Care (EX15). On 21 September 2004 the Executive invited the Oxfordshire Care Partnership (OCP) to submit proposals for the provision of 20 registered care home places in Chipping Norton on a site to be agreed following a full site option appraisal. This was subject to the Cherwell Vale PCT agreeing to purchasing an additional 12 places in the same facility. This was subsequently agreed by the OCP. This report describes the site option appraisal process, and sets out the conclusions. If accepted, the recommendations will lead to the provision of a new care home to replace an existing care home in Chipping Norton and the development of a new NHS Day Hospital and Primary Care facility. Our provisional assessment is as follows:
The Executive is RECOMMENDED to:
Executive Member:
Community Care & Health, Children & Young People Report by Director for Social & Health Care (EX16). The Social & Health Care Directorate has purchased increasing amounts of service from the independent sector since 1993, to the point where some 80% of adult care services are now provided externally - at a gross value of £130m per annum. A Procurement Review was completed in October 2004, which identified a number of issues that require measures to be taken, which have been activated. The review also highlighted that a significant number of contracts were expiring at the end of March 2005 and during 2005/6, and that full tendering procedures were not appropriate to certain of these areas of service where alternative approaches to procurement would secure value for money and effective provision. The report identifies the circumstances in which alternative approaches would be appropriate. The report also deals with a specific request for exemption – for a number of contracts with Age Concern Oxfordshire to an aggregate value of £909k per annum. These are due to expire on 31 March 2005, and cover a range of day and support services to Older People. It is not considered appropriate for these contracts to be let under full open competition, and an Exemption report is attached to the main report which sets out the circumstances in detail. The Executive is RECOMMENDED to:
Executive Member:
Deputy Leader of the Council Report by Deputy Leader of the Council (EX17). This report proposes adoption of a revised statutory Race Equality Scheme for 2005-08 and a consistent Corporate Equality Plan for 2005-08, including a combined Equality Impact Assessment process, in line with previous decisions of the Executive and legislative requirements. The Race Equality Scheme sets out the Council’s arrangements for meeting the requirements of the general and specific duties specified in Race Relations legislation, in particular, monitoring, reviewing and assessing our functions and policies for their impact on race equality; consulting on and assessing new functions and policies for relevance and impact; ensuring public access to information, services and to the Race Equality Scheme, and informing and training staff. In working toward the achievement of Level 2 of the Equality Standard for Local Government, a Corporate Equality Plan, covering race, sex and disability equality, has also been developed in conjunction with the development of the revised Race Equality Scheme and following the same processes. The Executive is RECOMMENDED to:
Executive Member:
Deputy Leader of the Council Report by County Council Management Team (EX18). On 19 October 2004 the Executive adopted a draft Social Inclusion Strategy which addresses the issues in the Corporate Governance Scrutiny Committee’s social inclusion scrutiny review report. The Executive also noted that the Social Inclusion Strategy would be supported through the development of a prioritised corporate Social Inclusion Action Plan. The report proposes a Corporate Social Inclusion Action Plan in line with the Executive’s decision on 19 October 2004. The Executive is RECOMMENDED to agree the Social Inclusion Action Plan Framework set out in Annex 3 to the report as the basis for a prioritised corporate Social Inclusion Action Plan to be developed during 2005/06. Executive
Member: Community
Safety Report by Director for Community Safety (EX19). The Crime & Disorder Act 1998 (as amended) requires the County Council to work in partnership with District Councils, Thames Valley Police, the Primary Care Trusts, Fire and Rescue, and Thames Valley Police Authority (the "Responsible Authorities") to reduce crime and disorder in Oxfordshire. These partnerships are the five Oxfordshire Crime and Disorder Reduction Partnerships (CDRPs), coterminous with each district council area. The CDRPs are required to produce three-year community safety, or crime and disorder reduction strategies and the Council, with its partners, must bring its services to bear in the delivery of the strategies and supporting action plans. The Council and the other Responsible Authorities are required to agree and in April publish new strategies for 2005-2008. Accordingly, this report:
The Executive is RECOMMENDED to note the views expressed by members in general, and the Community Safety Scrutiny Committee in particular, and RECOMMEND the Council to approve the CDRP strategies.
Executive Member:
Community Safety Report by Director for Community Safety (EX20). On 5 October 2004, on receiving a report on Traveller strategy, the Executive instructed the Director for Community Safety to convene a Member/Officer Working Group to review current policies relating to traveller services, consulting appropriate bodies and report back to the Executive. This report provides details of progress to date. The Council assumed direct management of its six permanent sites in September 2004 in response to concerns about the quality of management of the private contractor that had had responsibility for some years. A considerable amount of work had to be undertaken immediately to rectify the neglect that was evident when the sites came under Council management. The additional work is being quantified and the Solicitor to the Council has been instructed to pursue this issue. Negotiations with site residents’ representatives over a new license agreement are now completed. This agreement, which seeks to address all issues raised in recent government guidance and as a consequence of recent legal judgements, is now seen as a model of good practice. The Working Party invited both Gypsy representatives and the residents’ legal adviser to one of its meetings to finalise these agreements. A substantial bid has been submitted to the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister for refurbishments to all six sites. If successful, the ODPM will fund 75% of the works and the remainder will be met from the projected revenue from the sites. Taken together with the on-going programme of maintenance and site cleaning, these refurbishments will constitute a significant improvement, both to the quality of life of the residents and to the appearance of the sites to neighbours and the public. The Executive is RECOMMENDED to:
Executive Member:
Schools Report by Director for Learning & Culture (EX21). In July 2004 the Executive received the report of the Learning & Culture Scrutiny Committee’s review, "Faith in our Schools". The present report has been prepared by the School Development Service and specifically addresses recommendation 2 of the "Faith in our Schools" report. (Other services within Learning & Culture will respond in subsequent reports to the implications of other aspects of the Scrutiny Committee’s report.) Recommendation 2 proposed the preparation for head teachers and governors of guidelines within a framework devised by the Scrutiny Committee and this report deals with the main themes identified in that recommendation. The Service is committed to working with schools, their governing bodies and faith communities to ensure that pupils grow and learn within a genuinely inclusive environment. There is a genuine will to explore individual and joint possibilities of supporting schools in their attempts to adopt and modify the environment and the curriculum, with the object of supporting pupils in their sense of identity, well-being and security, all of which are accepted as positive affective aspects of learning. The Service welcomes the proposal for preparation and circulation to schools of a guidance document based upon the responses to the recommendations contained in the ‘Faith in Our Schools’ report; and confirms that the Governor Services Unit can make a significant contribution in providing training to school governors regarding major non-Christian faiths. The Learning & Culture Scrutiny Committee considered a draft of this report on 22 February and its comments are set out in the report. The Executive is RECOMMENDED, having regard to the comments by the Scrutiny Committee, to:
Executive Member:
Learning & Culture Report by Learning & Culture Scrutiny Committee (EX22) (download as .doc file). On 22 February 2005 the Learning & Culture Scrutiny Committee considered the report of its Review Group appointed to carry out a review of the Museums Resource Centre, Standlake – Extension to Existing Building. The Committee agreed the report, subject to minor amendments, for submission to the Executive. An executive summary of the report with its recommendations is attached (EX22). The full report (as amended) has been circulated to Executive Members and a copy has been placed in the Members’ Resource Centre. A copy is also available for public inspection. The Executive is asked to consider and respond to the Learning & Culture Scrutiny Review report and its recommendations. Executive Member:
Sustainable Development, Transport Report by Environment Scrutiny Committee (EX23) (download as .doc file) On 23 February 2005 the Environment Scrutiny Committee considered the report of its Review Group appointed to carry out a review of Inland waterways. The Committee agreed the report, subject to minor amendments, for submission to the Executive. An executive summary of the report with its recommendations is attached (EX23). The full report (as amended) has been circulated to Executive Members and a copy has been placed in the Members’ Resource Centre. A copy is also available for public inspection. The Executive is asked to consider and respond to the Environment Scrutiny Review report and its recommendations. Executive Member:
Leader of the Council and Deputy Leader of the Council Report by Director for Resources (EX24). The Office of the Deputy Prime Minister has issued a consultation document seeking views on possible changes to the Local Government Pension Scheme. The consultation has been prompted by a need to find a way to maintain an affordable good quality pension fund for local government employees in the current and anticipated financial situation and in view of increasing life expectancy. It is generally accepted that action must be taken to make changes to the provisions of the scheme in order to maintain its viability and affordability. The target date for changes to the scheme to be implemented is 1 April 2008. The report sets out a suggested response on the main issues raised by the consultation for the Executive to consider as its official response to the consultation on behalf of the Council as employing authority. A separate response has been agreed for submission by the Pension Fund Committee on behalf of the Council in its role as administrator of the Oxfordshire Pension Fund. The Executive is RECOMMENDED to consider the suggested response set out in Annex 2 to the report and subject thereto to authorise the submission of the response to the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister on behalf of Oxfordshire County Council as employing authority. Executive Member:
Deputy Leader of the Council Report by Head of Human Resources (EX25). A new policy on the management of the employment of people with criminal convictions has been developed, prompted by: discrepancies in the management of checking procedures and standards across the Council had been identified and required regularization; the lack of a Council policy on the employment of people with convictions in areas not directly involving vulnerable groups; and the events at Soham Community College in 2002 which highlighted the need for the most stringent policies and practices in the employment of people with access to vulnerable groups. There are numerous tensions which are inevitable in drawing up a policy on the employment of people with criminal convictions. For example, there is potential conflict between the Council’s duty and responsibility to promote the rehabilitation of offenders and its duties and responsibilities to protect the public and service users from those who may put them at risk. Similarly the need to have strict checking for individuals who may gain access to vulnerable groups may present problems for the practicalities of staffing an essential service and there is an associated cost in undertaking these checks. The draft policy, therefore, contains numerous judgements arrived at on the basis of risk assessment techniques. While it is inevitable that individual opinions will differ on many of these matters, the aim must be to produce a practical system of management which minimises risk and which is workable. A draft of the policy has been referred to related bodies including Thames Valley Police and Nacro, as well as staff representative bodies and the Employees and Teachers Joint Committees. Comments have been incorporated where appropriate. The Executive is RECOMMENDED to approve the Policy on Checking Criminal Records set out at Annex 1 to the report. Executive Member:
- Report by Land Value Tax Working Group (EX26)(download as .doc file)). In July 2002, following a resolution passed at the preceding meeting of the County Council, the Executive agreed to set up a Land Tax Working Group to advise it "on the feasibility and advisability of following Liverpool City Council’s example by lobbying government to allow it to raise a Land Tax". The Working Group that was set up finally consisted of 5 county councillors (Cllrs Hodgson, M. Godden, Joslin, Roaf and Simmons), an officer from Financial Services (David Illingworth), the then Leader of the Vale of White Horse District Council (Cllr Paul Bizzell) and Tony Vickers, an academic researching in the field. Officers from the Vale of White Horse District Council and the valuer attended meetings as needed. (The District Council had agreed to support the Working Group’s study by undertaking an analysis of a representative area of the District.) The report records the outcome of the Working Party’s investigations, in terms of how practical a land value tax system would and how the resulting tax levels would compare with the present system. The Working Group has considered a range of models, ranging from a single tax rate across all categories of land; to one in the objective would be to raise the equivalent of the Council Tax from residential property and the equivalent of the NNDR from commercial; to a series which had a uniform tax rate but introduced a ‘homestead’ allowance for residential plots (a pattern used in other countries where a land value tax system has been adopted.) The Executive is asked to decide how it wishes to respond to the report. Executive
Member: All The Executive Procedure Rules provide that the business of each meeting at the Executive is to include "updating of the Forward Plan and proposals for business to be conducted at the following meeting". Items from the Forward Plan for the immediately forthcoming meetings of the Executive appear in the Schedule at EX27. This includes any updated information relating to the business for those meetings that has already been identified for inclusion in the next Forward Plan update. The Schedule is for noting, but Executive Members may also wish to take this opportunity to identify any further changes they would wish to be incorporated in the next Forward Plan update. The Executive is RECOMMENDED to note the items currently identified for forthcoming meetings. March 2005 |