|
______________________________________
To Members of the Executive Notice of a Meeting of the ExecutiveTuesday 6 July 2004 at 2.00 pm County Hall, Oxford
Contact officer: Deborah Mitchell (Tel: 01865 815463; E-mail) Membership
Decisions taken at the meeting will become effective at the end of the working day on 14 July 2004 unless called in by that date for review by the appropriate Scrutiny Committee. Copies of this Notice, Agenda and supporting papers are circulated to all Members of the County Council.
AGENDAAddenda
To confirm the minutes of the meeting held on 16 June 2004 (EX3) and to receive for information any matters arising therefrom.
Executive
Member: Leader of the Council Report by Head of Property (EX5). The West End Steering Group has considered the potential for the City and County Councils relocating some or all of their Headquarters offices and civic functions as part of the West End project, possibly sharing accommodation. The Steering Group agreed to investigate the opportunities for co-location of civic functions (as a priority) and of some front-of-office and back-office functions for consideration by both Councils. A report prepared jointly with the City Council’s Property Co-ordinator, which is also to be submitted to the City Executive Board on 19 July, is presented alongside the Head of Property’s report and outlines a range of options (and their implications) for the two Councils for providing accommodation in the future. Financial and feasibility issues are also highlighted. It is not possible or appropriate at this stage for there to be any firm decisions about the future provision or reorganisation of the Council's Headquarters accommodation. However, it would be helpful for the County and the City Councils to come to a joint view as to the scope for relocating and sharing accommodation in the medium-term in the context of the West End project. The Executive is RECOMMENDED to consider the range of options outlined in the joint report and:
Executive
Member: Schools Report by Director for Learning & Culture and Head of Property (EX6). On 7 April 2004 the Executive approved statutory consultation in relation to proposals to re-designate Woodeaton Manor school for 40 pupils with emotional and social difficulties including up to 17 residential places and reduce the number of pupils at Northfield school from 80 to 60 places; and agreed to commission Conservation Plan in relation to Woodeaton Manor School. The Executive is now asked to consider the feedback from the statutory consultation process and a progress report in relation to the Conservation Plan. No objections to the statutory notices have been received at the time of writing this report. Any received will be circulated or reported at the meeting. A report from Oxford Archaeology, advising whether the revised proposals under consideration may be considered appropriate in terms of risk to the building, will be available for the meeting. It is likely that the Conservation Plan will advise that whatever types of educational use are adopted as appropriate for the historic building, they would need to be accompanied by a range of policies and procedures, designed to protect its significance. The Executive is RECOMMENDED to:
Executive
Member: Transport Report by Head of Transport (EX7). The County Council is required to submit an Annual Progress Report (APR) to Government in July each year to detail the work it has carried out to implement its Local Transport Plan and to finalise its bid for funding support for the following financial year. After the success of the APR last year, where the County Council made significant steps forward in the implementation of its LTP, it is important that this year’s report maintains that progress. This year’s report should reflect this and in turn result in a good financial settlement for 2005/06. There are a few areas where progress has not been as good as expected. There are no easy or clear solutions to any of the problems identified this year, apart from the County Council continuing to promote alternative modes of transport. The revised total expenditure figure of £28.055m is an increase on the approved £24.94m single capital expenditure allocation for 2004/5. Therefore, for the delivery of this programme to be possible, a funding increase from Government would be necessary. The APR also includes any submission that the County Council wishes to make for funding support for major ( i.e. >£ 5million) schemes. In the submission this year it is recommended that a bid for £28.055 million be made for structural maintenance and integrated transport schemes and that a major scheme submission be made for Marcham Bypass. The Environment Scrutiny Committee resolved on 12 May 2004 to convene a Panel to consider this report before it was submitted to the Executive. The Panel will meet on 24 June 2004 and their comments will be reported to the meeting. Subject thereto the Executive is RECOMMENDED to:
Report by Head of Transport (EX8). This report sets out the findings and conclusions of the recently completed Environmental Impact Assessment of the Witney Cogges Link Road scheme. This work has comprehensively analysed the best-performing version Cogges Link (which no longer includes the link road to Stanton Harcourt or associated roundabout on Cogges Link itself) in comparison with a range of alternative schemes. This has been a five-stage process, subjecting Cogges Link and potential alternatives to an increasing degree of scrutiny and detailed analysis to progressively filter out alternatives. The penultimate stage was a comprehensive comparison of Cogges Link against a combination of an improvement to the existing Shores Green Interchange and the (already proposed) West End Link Stage 2, resulting in Cogges Link being identified as the preferred scheme, with a full Environmental Statement being produced in the final stage, to support a fresh planning application. The future transport infrastructure planned for Witney, as enshrined in both the Structure Plan and Local Plan, does include West End Link Stage 2 and the combination of Cogges Link with this scheme performed the best overall in traffic terms. A fresh project appraisal in respect of the updated Cogges Link scheme is included with the report. The scheme cost has risen to an estimated £14.2 million, approximately three quarters of which would be funded from developer contributions. The balance of funding would be sought through the Local Transport Plan. The Executive is RECOMMENDED to:
Executive
Member: Transport Report by Head of Transport (EX9). This report seeks approval for a contract strategy to be used as a framework for renegotiating the Combined Maintenance Contract with the current contractor, Isis Accord. The performance of Isis Accord since the start of the present contract gives no grounds for ending the contract at this point. The original contract award included a quality assessment that the company scored well on and overall it has delivered what was promised. The information from the National Highway Works Benchmarking Club, our own satisfaction monitoring and connections with other authorities indicate that Isis Accord’s performance is as good as any likely competitor. The renegotiation would embed within the contract terms the principles of our contract strategy. The strategy will implement a number of improvement options from best value reviews in highways and construction allowing Council objectives to improve maintenance of local roads and find more efficient ways of working to be achieved. If the renegotiations should fail, the same contract strategy will be used to draw up the documentation for re-tendering. The report sets out the programme that needs to be met to ensure the new arrangements are in place by April 2006. The Executive is RECOMMENDED to:
Executive Member:
Transport Report by Head of Transport (EX10). Council on 15 June 2004 adopted a motion by Councillor Peter Skolar in the following amended form: ‘This Council confirms its opposition to any third Thames bridge in the Reading/Chilterns area that would significantly increase car movements in southern Oxfordshire but recognises the need to find, in partnership with other relevant authorities, a solution to the existing bottlenecks. To this end the Council asks the Executive to reconvene the Cross Thames Steering Group (comprising members representing this Council, South Oxfordshire District Council and the neighbouring Berkshire Councils) to consider measures to relieve those bottlenecks.’ The report provides background information on cross-Thames travel issues and details of the current planning framework. The County Council’s position on these issues has been arrived at over many years and was confirmed following extensive study of all the issues and options for improvement in 2002. The real risks of increasing river crossing capacity include the diversion of existing traffic from more suitable strategic routes, the generation of entirely new car trips, the environmental impact of new road construction and pressures for development in southern Oxfordshire. Recognising these difficulties, the Council has been seeking a balanced approach. The broad conclusions included in the 2002 report are still valid. Since then a number of factors have changed which underline the need for renewed cross-authority liaison at Member level. The Executive is RECOMMENDED to press for the reconvening of the Cross Thames Steering Group as a forum for seeking agreement between the authorities on a joint approach towards the relief of cross-Thames travel problems.
Executive
Member: Leader of the Council Report by Head of Finance (EX11). The report reviews the Council’s Treasury Management activity carried out during 2003/04. It also reviews the Council’s lending list and makes proposals for additions to the list. The County Council is a member of the CIPFA Treasury and Debt Management Benchmarking Club and Initial indications from completed returns for the financial year 2003/4, comparing the results of 90 members, show that this authority’s treasury management and debt management costs per £m invested and borrowed are well below average. The average interest rate for our long-term borrowing was 5.5%, 1.1% below the group average. Average interest returns for combined in-house and external investments were 3.61% compared to the average of 3.60%. Debt restructuring carried out during the year produced a real saving of £47,036. The Executive is RECOMMENDED to: (a) note the Council’s Treasury Management activity carried out in 2003/04; (b) approve the credit rating criteria matrices given in Annex B to the Appendix to the report as the basis for including banks and building societies on future lending lists from 12 July 2004; (c) agree the introduction of sector and maturity limits as shown in Annex D to the Appendix to minimise credit risk to the authority; (d) authorise the Head of Finance to make amendments to the lending list from time to time in accordance with the principles set out in the Appendix.
Executive
Member: Schools The Director for Learning & Culture reports as follows: Three
project appraisals are appended (EX12). It is proposed to run these works concurrently and, cumulatively, the total value of these projects exceeds £1M. It is proposed to include both schemes within a single tender, as the Art and D+T departments are located close together on the site. It would not be good practice to have separate contractors working in close proximity and it is anticipated that greater value for money will be achieved by tendering these works together. The third appraisal relates to a scheme to provide a replacement school building for Greenmere Primary School, required to enable better utilisation of the large school campus shared by St. Birinus Secondary School and Greenmere Primary School. The new Greenmere Primary School will be constructed on part of its grassed social/habitat area. Sport England have expressed no objection to this proposal. The relocation of the school will enable the major part of existing school buildings to be demolished land and buildings released for use by the adjacent secondary school. A separate project appraisal for the secondary school extensions will be submitted to the Executive for its consideration in due course. The Executive is RECOMMENDED to approve project appraisals ED611 and 612 for the projects at Matthew Arnold School, Cumnor and ED615 for the project at Greenmere Primary School, Didcot.
Executive
Member: Children & Young People, Community Safety The Director for Learning & Culture and Director for Community Safety report as follows: The Executive on 18 May considered a report outlining progress on implementing the recommendations of the Scrutiny Review of Drugs and Alcohol Misuse. One of the issues arising from the report was the need to identify arrangements for Executive liaison on the development with the Oxfordshire Drug & Alcohol Action Team (DAAT) of a coordinated Substance Misuse Strategy, and at the 18 May meeting the Executive Member for Community Safety was nominated for this purpose. However members subsequently accepted that there are circumstances which make it necessary for the Executive to return to this issue. While the Scrutiny review itself emanated from the Community Safety Scrutiny Committee, a majority of the priority recommendations involve work with schools. In addition, the Government requires the commissioning of services for young people misusing substances to be kept separate from similar adult services. It is considered therefore that it would be appropriate if the portfolio holders for both Community Safety and Children & Young People were to be involved in taking forward the work of this review, and especially work with the DAAT. It is RECOMMENDED that the Executive Members for Community Safety and for Children & Young People be requested to oversee the further work arising from the Scrutiny Review of Drugs and Alcohol Misuse and in particular the work carried out by the Oxfordshire Drug & Alcohol Action Team.
Executive
Member: Deputy Leader of the Council The Assistant Chief Executive reports as follows: Each of the Oxfordshire District Councils has set up a Local Strategic Partnership (LSP) for its area and has either already been approved a district community strategy or is expected shortly to approve one. However the LSPs are likely to continue with regular meetings to ensure that appropriate action is implemented. Over the last two years the former Deputy Leader of the Council has been the County Council’s representative on each of the district LSPs. This has had advantages for the County Council but the workload has been significant. For the future it is suggested that the County Council representation on district LSPs should be shared between members of the Executive, who have indicated their preparedness to take on this role as follows: Cherwell
Janet Godden LSPs are designated "strategic" outside bodies and it is for the Executive to appoint members to them. It is RECOMMENDED that the five members identified be appointed to represent the County Council on the respective district Local Strategic Partnerships.
Executive
Member: All The Executive Procedure Rules provide that the business of each meeting at the Executive is to include "updating of the Forward Plan and proposals for business to be conducted at the following meeting". Items from the Forward Plan for the immediately forthcoming meetings of the Executive appear in the Schedule at EX15. This includes any updated information relating to the business for those meetings that has already been identified for inclusion in the next Forward Plan update. The Schedule is for noting, but Executive Members may also wish to take this opportunity to identify any further changes they would wish to be incorporated in the next Forward Plan update. The Executive is RECOMMENDED to note the items currently identified for forthcoming meetings.
June
2004 |