Scrutiny
Committee
|
Scrutiny
Observations
|
Officer
Comments
|
Learning
& Culture
(7 May &
16 July)
|
- Use of Smartcards
should be investigated if there is scope for savings and greater
efficiency.
- Charges
should not be increased so much that they impinged on people who
could not afford them.
|
1. Included
in the Action Plan. Bid to the Innovation Fund is being prepared
2. The Policy
recommends that charges be reviewed in annual plans and the rationale
for their level and any concessions justified
|
Community
Safety
(13 May
& 8 July)
|
- Requested
further information (including the Corporate Charging Policy –
which had not been circulated at the first meeting).
- Consideration
should be given to :
- inclusion
of carers within target groups for concessions;
- including
the agreed Social Services policy for exclusion of urban/rural
differentials in charging for travelling expenses for home support
staff.
|
1. Subsequently
considered and no further comment made by the Committee
2. There is
flexibility in the Policy to enable the addition of further groups
if justified. However the Review recommends the groups as defined,
as being the most generally applicable
|
Corporate
Governance
(16 May)
|
- Recognised
the important contribution which the Audit Commission publication
"The Price is Right" had made to informing this review.
- Noted that
all services would have freedom to set their own policies and
detailed practices regarding the application of concessions under
the Corporate Charging Policy.
|
1. This is
acknowledged. The Best Value Committee has asked for some feedback
on whether there have been shifts in charging strategies(after the
2003/04 Budget charging schedules are agreed.)
2. Strictly,
there is only freedom to vary from the policy guidelines and concession
groups as defined, if this can be justified. Service management
teams should monitor all the implications of managing concessions.
|
Environment
(22 May)
|
- Age should
not be the only determining factor when applying concessions.
- It was doubtful
whether consistency could or should be sought across all services
in setting policies and detailed practices either on charges or
the application of concessions under the Corporate Charging Policy.
|
- This was
a misunderstanding – age is not the only factor
2. The Policy
sets broad standards and guidelines. There should be enough flexibility
for services to accommodate the requirements of the many and varied
departmental charges
|
Social &
Health Care
(29 May)
|
- Urge the
Executive to remove the references to "People outside the
normal working age" in order to avoid the possibility of
age discrimination.
- Draw the
Executive’s attention to the need for concessionary factors which
take into account rural isolation.
- Urge the
Executive to ensure that the wording of the preliminary standard
letter sent out during the process of debt recovery was viewed
to ensure that the Council displayed an awareness to the possible
difficulties a client may be having.
|
1. This has
been done in the current (annexed) version of the Corporate Charging
Policy
2. As comments
re Community Safety item 2 above
3. Reminder
letters have been reviewed and wording used set as appropriate for
the type and potential circumstances of the debtor
|