Return to Agenda

Return to PN5

Division affected: Watlington

ITEM PN5

PLANNING & REGULATION COMMITTEE –
29 NOVEMBER 2004

COUNTY COUNCIL PLANNING APPLICATIONS

 

Development proposed:

ERECTION OF EXTENSION TO EXISTING CLASSROOM, FORMATION OF SECURE EARLY YEARS PLAY AREA AND EXTENSION TO EXISTING MAIN PLAYGROUND

Location:

LEWKNOR CE PRIMARY SCHOOL, HIGH STREET, LEWKNOR, WATLINGTON, OXON OX49 5TH

Application No: S.18/04 District Council area: South Oxfordshire

Introduction

  1. This is an application to extend the existing school building at Lewknor Primary School and extend the existing hard play area.
  2. The proposal includes toilet facilities in the new extension which would allow space in the old building to be converted to use as staff accommodation.
  3. An enlargement of the tarmac area and a picket fence around the early years play area is also proposed.
  4. Location (see plan attached) (download as .doc file)

  5. Lewknor is a small village just south of junction 6 of the M40 in South Oxfordshire.
  6. Relevant site features (see plan)

  7. The existing school comprises two main elements. The old school is a grade II listed building and a more recent barn style extension to the front is used for early years teaching.
  8. The school sits in front of St Margaret’s Church, which is a Grade I listed building. A tarmac pathway with a grass verge on either side leads across the school site from the road to the church. The fence along the front boundary of the site is a picket type fence.
  9. Details of Development/Background

  10. A recent Ofsted inspection has indicated that current staff accommodation is insufficient and the school has indicated that there is no toilet provision in the early years unit . In addition the present hard play area is inadequate.
  11. As a result, the toilet area in the existing school building is proposed to become a second staff room. Replacement toilets are proposed to be provided in the new extension to the existing school building. The extension is to be built in brick with a pitched tiled roof to match the design of the existing building.
  12. The new toilet area is to be provided in that part of the extension with the lowest ceiling height to enable the additional teaching space created to benefit from the higher ceiling areas.
  13. The present hard play area is to be extended to enable a regulation sized netball pitch to be provided. A new picket fence to match that existing within the site and along the site boundary is to be provided along the north-eastern side of the path that leads to the church to improve the site definition.
  14. Relevant Planning Policies

  15. Oxfordshire Structure Plan 2011 (adopted August 1998):
  16. G2 Development to be of a scale and type appropriate to its site and surroundings, include a high quality of design, layout and landscaping and help to reduce need to travel and encourage alternatives to car use.

    EN1 The nature, size, location or cumulative effects of a development should not have an unacceptable environmental impact.

    EN8 The fabric and setting of Listed Buildings to be preserved and character or appearance of conservation areas to be preserved or enhanced.

    Oxfordshire Structure Plan 2016 (deposit draft September 2003):

    G2 Development to be of a scale and type appropriate to its site and surroundings, include a high quality of design, layout and landscaping and help to reduce need to travel and encourage alternatives to car use.

    EN4 The fabric and setting of Listed Buildings to be preserved and character or appearance of conservation areas to be preserved or enhanced.

    South Oxfordshire Local Plan (adopted April 1997):

    CON6 Any extension must be sympathetic to the original structure.

    CON7 Developments that adversely affect the setting of a listed building will be refused.

    CON8 The council will use all its powers to preserve or enhance conservation areas.

    CON10 New work to be in sympathy with established character of the area.

    South Oxfordshire Local Plan 2011 (Revised deposit draft September 2003):

    CON7 Developments that adversely affect the setting of a listed building will be refused.

    CON10 New work to be in sympathy with established character of the area.

    Consultations/Representations

  17. South Oxfordshire District Council have yet to formally respond on the application. Individual District Council officers have commented as follows:

    1. Conservation Officer – no objection in principle but suggest some changes to windows and rooflights and relocation of toilet area.
    2. Forestry Officer – there is a mature Yew tree that could be affected by the development. To mitigate the likely impact on the tree, the proposed structure should be positioned outside the tree protection zone. There is a hawthorn to the south west corner of the building that would have to be removed. Any permission given should include a condition requiring tree protection measures (other than for the hawthorn) during construction works and details of any pruning of trees that might be required to improve the height clearance over the vehicular access into the site.

  18. Lewknor Parish Council – supports the proposal in principle but objects to some of the details of the scheme, particularly the need for a window in the south east elevation, the need for a rooflight, the extent of the glazing in the doors at both ends of the building and the proposal for a new picket fence which would define the boundary of the play area from the footpath to the church.
  19. Environment Agency – no objection.
  20. English Heritage – take into account the advice from the local Conservation Officer.
  21. County Archaeologist – Although small scale, the site lies within the historic core of Lewknor and close to the 12th Century parish church. A condition should be added to any permission given which requires an archaeological watching brief to be undertaken during construction works.
  22. County Ecologist and Rights of Way Officer raise no objection but the latter has stated that there should be no obstruction to the church path during construction.
  23. County Arboricultural Officer – has visited the site and confirmed that the only place for the extension is as shown on the application. Tree protection measures during construction works are however needed for the Yew tree.
  24. Third Party Representations

  25. None.
  26. Comments of the Head of Sustainable Development

  27. The main considerations in this development relate to the design of the extension, the use of picket fencing around the new hard play area and its effect on the setting of the school and church and the impact of the development on the Yew tree. Both the District and Parish Council have raised concerns about the design of the building particularly in respect of the amount of glazing.
  28. The proposed extension would match the existing recently approved building at the front of the school in design and materials. Some changes have been made to the scheme, notably removal of the rooflight from the proposal.
  29. A new glazed door has been added to the north east elevation to improve the natural lighting at that end of the building. Whilst a solid panelled door may be more in keeping with a barn, this modern building already has a significant amount of glazing and I do not believe this additional glazed door would alter its overall character.
  30. The obscure glazed window to the toilets in the south east elevation would be in keeping with the other windows in this elevation in terms of its frame, size and shape. This elevation of the building is well screened from view by an existing hedge along the site boundary.
  31. The glazed doors in the south west elevation are needed to allow views and free movement between the classroom area and the external play space. The amount of glazing is generally consistent with the design of the existing modern building and would enable views over the school play area.
  32. The Parish Council have raised concerns over the proposed play area and its enclosure by a picket fence. It has been designed to allow for an adequate hard play area (to include a netball pitch). The layout should retain the appearance of the grassed frontage to the church as existing.
  33. The picket fencing is of the same type that already exists on site. I do not consider that it would adversely affect the setting of either the listed church or school buildings.
  34. The Yew tree is an important feature on the site and is located tight against the old school building. It is also constrained by the hard play area. Any works around it would need to be done sensitively in order to minimise further stress on the tree. There is no space to extend the classroom in any other direction other than that proposed so mitigation measures would be needed to protect the tree. Tree protection measures should be attached as a condition on any planning permission that might be given for this development.
  35. Conclusion

  36. This is a constrained site with a need to balance the requirement for essential, well designed additional school facilities with the protection of the footpath for use by church users, the impact of the works on the setting of the church and school building and the preservation of an important Yew tree. With the mitigation measures proposed this proposal should achieve a satisfactory balance between all these disparate elements.
  37. RECOMMENDATIONS

  38. The Committee is RECOMMENDED to grant planning permission for Application No. S.18/04 subject to conditions to be determined by the Director for Environment & Economy but to include:
            1. Detailed compliance – amended plan;
            2. Detailed duration – 5 years;
            3. Tree protection measures to be approved prior to commencement of works;
            4. Materials to match existing;
            5. Landscaping (including details of any pruning of trees to be agreed) prior to commencement of works;
            6. Archaeological watching brief;
            7. Church path to be kept clear during construction works.

CHRIS COUSINS
Head of Sustainable Development

Contact Officer: Kevin Broughton Tel: 810431 File: S.18/04 8.3/7179/2

8 November 2004Tel: 815584 File Ref: 8.1/4540/47

Return to TOP