ITEM EX3EXECUTIVE
– 14 MAY 2002
|
Voting Members: | |
Councillor Keith R Mitchell – in the Chair | |
Councillor Tony Crabbe | |
Councillor John Farrow | |
Councillor Neil Fawcett | |
Councillor Janet Godden | |
Councillor Margaret Godden | |
Councillor Anne Purse | |
Councillor David Robertson |
Other Members in Attendance: | |
Councillor Brian Hodgson (for Agenda Item 7) | |
Councillor Julian Cooper (for Agenda Item 11) | |
Councillor Shereen Karmali (for Agenda Item 17) | |
Councillor Mrs Diana Ludlow (for Agenda Item 18) |
Officers: | |
Whole of meeting: Chief Executive, J. Leverton and G. Warrington. | |
Part of meeting: J. Hydari (Business Support Directorate); D. Dent, D. Lines and M. Stott (Strategy Directorate); M. Brown (Cultural Services); S. Bingham (Education Department); E. Luck and N. Monaghan (Environmental Services); A. Sinclair and N. Welch (Social Services). |
The Executive considered the matters, reports and recommendations contained or referred to in the agenda for the meeting, together with a schedule of addenda tabled at the meeting, and decided as set out below. Except insofar as otherwise specified, the reasons for the decisions are contained in the agenda, reports and schedule, copies of which are attached to the signed Minutes.
Apologies for absence were received from Councillor Seale.
The Minutes of the meeting of the Committee held on 17 April 2002 were approved and signed subject to the following amendments:
Minute 171/02 (Social Services Budget 2002/03), paragraph 3 line 2 "Her" to read "He".
Minute 180/02 (Measures to Reduce the Risk to Asthma Sufferers):
Minute 171/02 : Social Services Budget 2002/03
The Leader of the Council reported that notice had been given of a call in on the grounds that, in the light of the Chancellor’s announcement of additional resources for personal social services in 2003/04, the decision of the Executive had been premature. He, with the Deputy Leader of the Council, would be considering concerns raised as to whether this use of the call in process was appropriate.
Minute 174/02 : Minor Traffic Scheme Assessment Framework
Mr Leverton reported notice of a call in concerning the role of local members in the assessment process. The matter was expected to be submitted to the Environment Scrutiny Committee in May.
(Agenda Item 5)
The Executive considered a report (EX5) which presented the outturn position for 2001/02, updated the Executive on the latest estimated balances on the Committee Carry Forward Reserve and County Fund Balance as at 31 March 2002 and the Capital Programme and Capital Reserve.
RESOLVED:
(Agenda Item 6)
The Executive on 22 January 2002 had asked the Director for Business Support to report on arrangements for restructuring and refreshing cost centre management, ensuring effective use of the new Management Information System (MIS) and for tightening financial monitoring and control. The Executive now considered a report (EX6) which presented an initial scoping for the project.
RESOLVED:
(Agenda Item 7)
This item had not been included in the Forward Plan; however, it was not considered that the decision being sought amounted to a key decision, and that it was therefore open to the Executive to consider the report and determine the recommendation.
The Executive considered a report (EX7) which sought approval of a "self-assessment" submission to the Audit Commission as part of the "comprehensive performance assessment" (CPA) process which had been introduced to assess and classify all local authorities. The report set out the background to CPA and outlined the basis on which the self-assessment submission had been drawn up. The Leader of the Council thanked those officers involved in preparing the self-assessment submission within the very tight deadline imposed by the Audit Commission.
The Corporate Governance Scrutiny Committee had considered the draft self-assessment submission and their comments were circulated at the meeting. Ms Dent tabled a revised draft submission which sought so far as possible to reflect the Scrutiny Committee’s comments. Other points agreed by the Executive in the course of discussion are summarised in the Annex to these Minutes.
Councillor Hodgson raised concerns about the use in Section 1.3 of the draft submission of the word "significant" in relation to the increase in the ethnic minority population; the lack of comment on the Youth Service; the need for targets, such as that relating to reducing exclusions from school, to be specific and timed; and the effects of Council Tax increases on people on modest incomes. The Executive’s responses to these points are included in the Annex.
RESOLVED: to:
(Agenda Item EX8)
The Executive considered a report (EX8) which considered the "Priming" arrangement whereby an organisation could transfer its buildings to a private sector company which would then undertake to improve, maintain and manage the buildings for a period of years. The Executive also considered a supplementary report setting out the main points of a presentation by the property consultants CB Hillier Parker who had been commissioned to give advice to the County Council on the options available for priming or other public/private partnership arrangements.
RESOLVED: that:
(Agenda Item 9)
In December 2001 the Executive had considered a proposal for the apportionment between services of the provisional Repair and Maintenance Budget for 2002/2003 and asked Service Departments for their observations on the provisional apportionment.
The Executive now considered a report (EX9) which presented a revised apportionment of the repair and maintenance budget between services taking account of the transfer of the Councils Homes for Elderly People to Oxford Care Partnership and the observations of service departments on apportionment of the repair and maintenance budget.
RESOLVED: to:-
(Agenda Item 10)
The Executive considered a report (EX10) which reviewed the current legislative and institutional position in the economic development field, set out a framework for the implementation of economic development activities by the Council, in the context of the Economic Strategy for Oxfordshire adopted by the Executive in January 2002, and proposed how resources available to the Council through the Economic Development Initiatives budget could be used.
RESOLVED: to:
(Agenda Item 11)
Following the transfer of the County Council’s Homes for Older People to the Oxfordshire Care Partnership (OCP) the Executive had before it a report (EX11) which considered the best methods and process for achieving the re-provisioning programme.
Councillor Julian Cooper addressed the Executive. He urged that this programme should be dealt with carefully and within existing local agreements. He referred specifically to Spencer Court, Woodstock and Castle View, Chipping Norton, which were highly valued by their respective communities.
RESOLVED: to:-
(Agenda Item 12)
The Executive considered the Review and Action Plan (EX12), which the Best Value Committee had recommended to the Executive as an interim statement, together with the comments of the Social & Health Care Scrutiny Committee.
RESOLVED: to:
(Agenda Item 13)
The Executive had before them a project appraisal (EX13) for the installation of a high quality 80-seat education facility in the Coach House at the rear of the Fletcher’s House site and the removal of the existing museum workshop to the Oxfordshire Museum Store at Standlake.
RESOLVED: to:
(Agenda Item 14)
The Executive considered a report (EX14) which detailed the Oxfordshire, West Berkshire and Wokingham New Models Project which had begun in February 2001 to look at options for the future delivery of LEA services that would have potential gains and benefits for school improvement.
RESOLVED: to note the report and authorise officers to take forward the necessary development work to explore the feasibility of operational pilots during 2002/2003.
(Agenda Item 15)
The Executive considered a report (EX15) which detailed the responses to consultation on a package of measures devised to assist cyclists and pedestrians, reduce speed and improve safety in Hollow Way Oxford. The proposed scheme formed part of the B4495 corridor study that was considering integrating facilities for pedestrians, cyclists and public transport into general improvements of the road network.
RESOLVED: to approve:
(Agenda Item 16)
The Executive considered a report (EX16) which detailed the results of a public consultation carried out in February 2002 on plans for traffic calming in Ferry Hinksey Road, Oxford.
RESOLVED: to authorise the formal steps necessary for the promotion of Option 1 described in the report, subject to:
The Executive considered a report (EX17) which set out proposals to prohibit vehicles driving in both directions at the point where Freelands Road met Radcliffe Road, with exemptions for cycles and emergency vehicles. The report reviewed the comments received during the public consultation on the proposed closure.
Councillor Shereen Karmali referred to the strong local support for this measure and to a recent injury accident involving a child.
RESOLVED: to authorise the making and implementation of the Order as advertised.
(Agenda Item 18)
The Executive considered a report (EX18) which outlined a proposal to introduce a new cycle link between Thame (Oxon) and Haddenham and Thame Parkway railway station (Bucks). The cycle link crossed the county boundary and would require joint funding on a 50/50 basis with Buckinghamshire County Council.
Councillor Mrs Diana Ludlow addressed the Executive. She was not convinced that local people supported the link and questioned whether the scheme represented good value for money.
RESOLVED: to:-
(Agenda Item 19)
The Executive considered a list of items from the Forward Plan for the next two meetings (EX19).
It was noted that the Executive Members for Transport and Strategic Planning & Waste Management would be attending a Major Transport Conference on 25 June 2002 and that it would be desirable to avoid business relating to their responsibilities on the Agenda for the Executive meeting on that day.
RESOLVED: to note the items currently identified for forthcoming meetings, subject to the deferment of:
in the Chair
Date
of signing 2002
Return to TOP