Return
to Agenda
Division(s):
Banbury Hardwick
|
ITEM CA9
CABINET
– 6 JUNE 2006
DRAYTON
SCHOOL, BANBURY: CREATION OF AN ACADEMY
Report by
Director for Children, Young People & Families
Background
- At its meeting
on 6 December 2005 the Cabinet had before it a report on discussions
about possible options for meeting secondary education needs in the
Banbury area, with a specific focus on that part of the town currently
served by Drayton School. The discussions had led to the conclusion
that of all the options identified only one – the creation of an Academy
on the Drayton School campus – would be viable. An extract from the
report is attached (Annex 1).
In the light of the report the Cabinet resolved:
- to proceed with
the proposal to replace Drayton School with an 11-19 Academy; and
- to authorise
the Director for Children, Young People & Families, in consultation
with the Cabinet Member for Schools Improvement, to take such further
action as necessary to give effect to (a) above.
- This report updates
the current position and outlines the outcome of the consultation by
the proposal’s sponsors – the United Learning Trust - on the proposal
to create a Banbury Academy and the Local Authority’s consultation on
the proposed closure of Drayton School. The report identifies the next
steps to be taken if it is decided, in the light of the consultation
responses, to proceed with the proposal.
Consultation
Process
- The Directorate
has been represented on the Banbury Academy Project Board and has participated
in developing the proposals. At an early stage it was agreed to coordinate
the consultation process for the two proposals. The United Learning
Trust are required to carry out their own consultation and employed
independent consultants for this purpose. They produced their own document
alongside the County Council’s own consultation document required as
part of the procedures necessary to close Drayton School. These documents
were circulated in accordance with government guidance to Town and District
Councils, neighbouring local authorities, local members and local schools
as well as other interested parties. The documents were also sent to
parents of those children attending Drayton and its partnership schools.
Copies are in the Members’ Resource Centre.
- Three public meetings
were held, two on 11 May and one on 18 May 2006. One of the meetings
was specifically geared towards education professionals and the others
for parents and the general public. The closing date for responses is
31 May 2006.
- The United Learning
Trust’s consultants will publish a document on the outcome of the consultation
and their findings will be reported to this meeting.
- The responses
to the Local Authority consultation document will also be reported to
the meeting. At the date of writing 39 responses have been received,
of which approximately 50% support the proposals (plus 27 relating specifically
to Frank Wise School only - see below). The main objections to the proposals
fell into the following areas:-
- There was one
objection to the proposed specialism for Drayton School of media and
communications.
- One local resident
objected to more pupils being on the school site.
- The funding
and investment into the school should be carried out without the need
for a change of status.
- 40% of those
objecting felt that changing the name and the buildings would not
make a difference.
- Some parents
preferred the previous alternative suggestion of Blessed George Napier
moving to the Drayton site.
- The view was
expressed that the proposal would have a detrimental effect on other
Banbury schools, particularly because of the potential disparity in
the quality of the buildings, as would the proposed name.
- In addition, the
United Learning Trust document made reference to discussions that had
taken place about the potential for a re-location of Frank Wise School
to the Academy site should funding become available. This proposal has
received no support from governors or parents.
- A supplementary
report will be circulated for the meeting summarising and commenting
on the consultation responses received by the close of the consultation
period. Copies of all the consultation responses are being placed in
the Members’ Resource Centre.
Next Steps
- Subject to decisions
in the light of the outcome of consultation, and to the ensuing statutory
processes, the objective is to implement the proposals for the 2007/08
school year. In order for the proposals and design work to be developed
within this timescale and with minimum risk it is necessary to take
the proposals forward with the publication of statutory notices in respect
of the closure of Drayton School, conditional upon the creation of the
academy. If the proposal is supported at this meeting the notices can
be issued on 15 June with most of the period for objections and representations
falling in term time. It is for this reason that this report is brought
to this meeting, for a decision whether to proceed to that stage.
- If there are any
objections in response to the statutory notices the proposals would
need to go to the School Organisation Committee in early September.
The Committee may approve the proposals, approve them with modifications
(subject to consultation with the Local Authority), reject them or (in
certain circumstances) refer them to the School Adjudicator. If there
are no objections it is for the Local Authority to determine whether
to implement the proposals.
Financial
and Staffing Implications
- Financial and
staffing implications remain as stated in the December report (see Annex
1).
RECOMMENDATIONS
- The Cabinet
is RECOMMENDED to:
- consider
the outcome of the consultation on the basis of this and the
supplementary report presented to the meeting and decide whether
to proceed with the proposal to close Drayton School, conditional
upon the creation of the academy in its place;
- subject
to (a) above, authorise the publication of statutory notices,
with the referral of the proposals to the School Organisation
Committee should there be any objections;
- (without
prejudice to the general authorisation agreed by the Cabinet
on 6 December 2005) authorise the Cabinet Member for Schools
Improvement to determine that the proposals should be implemented
if no objections are received.
KEITH
BARTLEY
Director for
Children, Young People & Families
Background
papers: Consultation documents; consultation responses
Contact
Officer: Michael Mill, Strategic Manager, Tel: 01865 826458
May
2006
Return to TOP
|