|
______________________________________
To Members of the Transport Implementation Committee Notice of Meeting
February 2004 MembershipChairman – Councillor David Robertson Councillors:
The agenda follows. Decisions taken at the meeting will become effective at the end of the working day on 12 March 2004 unless called in by that date for review by the appropriate Scrutiny Committee AGENDAAddenda
To approve the minutes of the meeting held on 8 January 2004 (TIC3) and to receive for information any matters arising therefrom. Report by Head of Transport (TIC5). The report provides details of changes made to the scheme since its consideration by the Executive on 15 April 2003. Note:
the plans attached could only be printed in black and white.
b. add
"Ferry Pool Road - the whole road" to Schedule 4 Part A – Postal
Addresses from which Residents are Eligible to Apply for Permits;
c. carefully
consider the objection to the scheme made by Spratt Endicott,
Solicitors regarding the omission of a Conference Permit Parking
Scheme from the proposals and whether to support the officer
recommendation to confirm the Order as advertised;
d. instruct
the Head of Transport to proceed with the design and implementation
of the North Summertown Zone in the next two financial years,
subject to the necessary resources being available.
Report by Head of Transport (TIC6). The report provides details of changes made to the scheme since it was considered by the Executive on 15 April 2003, the subsequent Formal Consultation process and sets out changes to the scheme in light of objections and responses received. Note: the plans attached could only be printed in black and white. The
Committee is RECOMMENDED to:
St Clare's College, 139 Banbury Road, Oxford, OX27AL Ephraim College, 145 Banbury Road, Oxford, OX2 7AN;
b. authorise
the Head of Transport to contact with all schools and
colleges in the area in order to identify their actual
Business Permit requirements within the zone and determine
the detail of any future Traffic Regulation Order changes.
Report by Head of Transport (TIC7). The report considers comments received in response to a number of variations to traffic management, parking and cycle parking Traffic Regulation Orders. The Committee is RECOMMENDED to authorise officers to:
Report by Head of Transport (TIC8). The report details responses received to a public consultation carried out in December 2003/January 2004 on a proposal to install traffic signals at the Beaumont Street/Gloucester Street/St John Street junction in Oxford. In the light of the objections received it is considered that the ‘signals’ proposal should not be pursued but that an alternative minor junction improvement be provided. The Committee is RECOMMENDED:
Report by Head of Transport (TIC9). The report details responses received to a public consultation on the proposed introduction of a ‘one-way’ system in Merrivale Square, Oxford. The Committee is RECOMMENDED not to implement a ‘one-way’ system in Merrivale Square. Report by Head of Transport (TIC10). Observatory Street is one of many roads providing a link between Woodstock Road and Walton Street, but is the only road with no form of traffic calming to deter use by extraneous traffic. Following consultation with residents and local Councillors formal consultation was undertaken on a traffic calming scheme and the report considers the comments received. The Committee is RECOMMENDED to approve the implementation of the proposals outlined in paragraph 3 and Annex 2 to this report, subject to available finance.
Report by Head of Transport (TIC11). The City Council is promoting a traffic-calming scheme in Barton Lane, Oxford, which would be funded from developer contributions. The report considers the comments received from the formal consultation and discusses resulting amendments. The Committee is RECOMMENDED to agree the implementation of the amended scheme as shown on drawing No MP/4/122 in Annex 3 to this report. Report by Head of Transport (TIC12). The leasehold owners of Temple Square Shopping Centre have asked for the existing walkway agreement to be terminated. No objections to the proposal were received during the consultation exercise. The Committee is RECOMMENDED to:
Report by Head of Transport (TIC13). The report considers the outcome of a review undertaken by the County Council’s consultants Babtie into traffic congestion and safety at the Wolvercote Roundabout. The Committee is RECOMMENDED to:
c. instruct
officers to commission the cost/benefit study for a left
turning lane from the A40 west to the A44 subject to confirmation
of funding for 2004/05.
Report by Head of Transport (TIC14). The B430 serves the villages of Weston-on-the-Green, Middleton Stoney, and Ardley but also provides a useful link between the M40/A43 at Junction 10 and the A34 to Oxford, Newbury and the South Coast. It is therefore increasingly used as a shortcut by lorry drivers wishing to avoid the congestion which frequently occurs at Junction 9. The report considers the responses received to an informal consultation on a proposed Traffic Regulation Order restricting heavy commercial vehicles travelling southbound on the B430 at Weston-on-the-Green. The Committee is recommended to:
Report by Head of Transport (TIC15). The installation of a pelican crossing on Peppard Road, Sonning Common, has been included in the Community Safety Schemes Programme for 2003/4. This report considers comments received to response to a consultation and seeks authority to progress the scheme as proposed. The Committee is RECOMMENDED to authorise detail design and implementation of the scheme in 2004/5 subject to the allocation of funds.
Report by Head of Transport (TIC16). Formal consultation has been carried out on this scheme and objections received. The results were presented to Henley Traffic Advisory Committee Advisory Committee who voted not to proceed with the scheme and the Transport Implementation Committee are being asked to consider how to proceed with the scheme. The Committee is RECOMMENDED to:
Report by Head of Transport (TIC17). The report details the results of a formal consultation advertising proposals to implement a Better Ways to School Scheme for Abingdon St Nicolas CE Primary School and seeks approval for the detailed design and implementation to proceed in 2004/05 (subject to funding being available) and the conversion of the footways, to shared cycle/footways under Sections 65(1) and 66(4) of the Highways Act 1980. The Committee is RECOMMENDED to:
Report by Head of Transport (TIC18). The report sets out the results of consultation for traffic calming in Grove Street Wantage as part of the planning permission for the Limborough Road Development in Wantage. The Committee is RECOMMENDED to authorise the Director for Environment & Economy to implement the proposed scheme, as detailed on Drawing No. ML230439/100 as set out at Annex 1 to this report. Report by Head of Transport (TIC19). The report considers comments received in response to a formal consultation on proposals to introduce cycle facilities on Thorney Leys and Ducklington Lane. The Committee is RECOMMENDED to authorise:
Report by Head of Transport (TIC20). The report invites the Committee to consider future funding for various Community Transport services, including services specifically provided for people with mobility impairments which are currently funded by the County Council. In each of these cases, current County Council funding arrangements end on 31 March 2004. The report also deals with two related community transport issues. The Committee is RECOMMENDED:
EXEMPT ITEMS The meeting will be invited to resolve to exclude the public for the consideration of the following exempt items (marked E) by passing a resolution in relation to each such item in the following terms: "that the public be excluded during the consideration of the following items in the Agenda since it is likely that if they were present during those items there would be a disclosure of "exempt" information as described in Part I of Schedule 12A to the Local Government Act, 1972 and specified below each item in the Agenda". NOTE: The report relating to Item 21E does not contain exempt information and is thus available to the public. The exempt information is contained either in a confidential annex and has been circulated only to members and officers entitled to receive it, or will be reported orally at the meeting. The report relating to Item 22E is exempt. MEMBERS AND OFFICERS ARE REMINDED IN PARTICULAR THAT FINANCIAL INFORMATION RELATING TO SUBSIDY AGREEMENTS REPORTED AT THE MEETING IN THE EXEMPT PART OF THE AGENDA (WHETHER IN WRITING OR ORALLY) MUST NOT BE DIVULGED TO ANY THIRD PARTY. 21E. Shipston-on-Stour
and Banbury/Chipping Norton Bus Services Review Report by Head of Transport (TIC21E). The report describes bus services in the Chipping Norton area for which subsidy agreements run out shortly and for which changes are suggested. Tenders have been invited for the services concerned or de-minimis prices quoted where relevant. These, plus reports on other proposed changes, will be reported subsequently to the Committee. The financial position of the bus subsidy budget is also described in the report. (Information Exempt in that it relates to the financial or business affairs of any particular person (other than the authority).) The Committee is RECOMMENDED to make its decisions on subsidy for the future provision of the Chipping Norton to Shipston service, the Sunday Chipping Norton to Oxford service and the Shipston/Sibford Gower to Banbury service on the basis of the tender prices contained in Exempt Annex 2 to this report, plus the comments from, and the financial contributions requested by, Warwickshire County Council.
Report by Head of Transport (TIC22E). The report deals with the two Bicester North Taxibus services (urban and rural). The Rural Taxibus operation was established following a successful Rural Bus Challenge bid and is currently jointly funded by Oxfordshire County Council and Chiltern Railways. The current contracts ends on 29 May 2004 and a decision as to their future is required. (Information Exempt in that it relates to the financial or business affairs of any particular person (other than the Authority)). The Committee is RECOMMENDED to:
|