|
Return
to Agenda
ITEM EX7
EXECUTIVE
– 7 APRIL 2004
EDUCATION
ASSET MANAGEMENT PLAN
Report by
Director for Learning & Culture
Introduction
- This report sets
out the Authority’s priorities for capital and revenue investment in
school buildings for 2004/05 onwards as described in the attached Statement
of Priorities.
(Oxfordshire Statement of Priorities 2004 - download
as .rtf file)
Background
- The Executive,
at its meeting on 8 July 2003, approved a report setting out the draft
Corporate Asset Management Plan and Capital Strategy. As part of these
documents, the core aims and objectives of Learning & Culture which
relate to education asset management and capital expenditure were set
out. These form the basis of an updated version of the Education Asset
Management Plan (AMP) Statement of Priorities for 2004/05 onwards, which
builds on the version approved by the Executive on 10 December 2002.
- The draft revised
Statement of Priorities was submitted to the DfES for appraisal at the
end of December 2003. The outcome of this part of the appraisal process
is expected to be received late March/early April. There are only two
possible outcomes, either satisfactory, or unsatisfactory. If it is
satisfactory, the Authority has the autonomy to spend its capital allocations
according to its locally established priorities.
- This is the final
stage of the DfES appraisal. Previously, updated premises, condition
and suitability assessment data were submitted for appraisal and were
considered to be satisfactory. This meant that the Authority was eligible
for Modernisation funding for 2004-05 and 2005-06 and is able to allocate
this funding in line with locally agreed AMP priorities without further
reference to the DfES, subject to the Statement of Priorities being
assessed as satisfactory.
Statement
of Priorities
- This is the key
strategic document arising out of the AMP process. The areas to be covered
in the document are prescribed by the DfES. It shows the Authority’s
strategic priorities for capital investment arising from the Corporate
AMP and Capital Strategy and the Authority’s development and improvement
plans. It also demonstrates how these priorities align with Government
priorities. All capital and revenue investment in school buildings,
both centrally and locally managed, should contribute to achieving these
priorities. The document attached comprises:
- The local context,
which includes a vision for school standards and key local factors
– sections 1 and 2
- The strategic
priorities for investment are described in Section 3.
- Statements of
how we will be making the best use of available funds – Section 4.
- Elements subject
to bidding and contingency arrangements – Section 5.
- The basic principles
underlying the capital investment strategy – Section 6.
- A description
of the professional resources in place to deliver the plan – Section
7.
- Timescale –
Section 8.
- School capital
funding sources – Section 9.
- Annex 1, which
shows the relationship of the Education AMP to other Council plans
and priorities.
- The most important
section is Section 3 which sets out in detail the strategic priorities.
These are:
- The Building
Schools for the Future programme.
- 14-19 provision
- Completing the
reorganisation of Oxford City Schools
- Basic need –
providing statutory required places
- Removal of surplus
places
- Modernisation
of the school estate
- Early Years
development
- Special education
needs
- Support for
school causing concern
- Building learning
communities
- E-Learning and
ICT in schools
- Remodelling
of the school workforce
- Risk management
– security and health and safety needs
- Opportunity
development
Only
the first two national priorities are additions to those approved
by the Executive in 2002. All are consistent with the Corporate AMP
and capital strategy.
Consultation
- The AMP Consultation
Group has approved the statement. This is the main consultation mechanism
established in the AMP process. It comprises representatives of the
local stakeholders in the AMP – the three Headteacher Associations (OSSHTA,
OPHTA and OASSH), Oxfordshire Governors Association and the three Dioceses.
Financial
Implications
- The priorities
established in this document will be used to determine which projects
are put forward for funding in the Authority’s capital programme. They
will also be used for determining the allocation of resources either
made available to schools or to utilise centrally managed funding allocations,
grants and receipts.
RECOMMENDATION
- The Executive
is RECOMMENDED to approve the Statement of Priorities for the purpose
of the Council’s investment in school buildings, so far as consistent
with the outcome of the DfES appraisal.
KEITH
BARTLEY
Director for
Learning & Culture
Background
papers: Nil
Contact
Officer:
Gerald Hales, Education Officer, Premises Development Group, Tel: 01865
428162
March
2004
Return to TOP
|