______________________________________


________________________________

To Members of the Executive

Notice of a Meeting of the Executive

Tuesday 7 January 2003 at 2.00 pm

County Hall, Oxford


Chris Impey
Assistant Chief Executive

Contact officer: Deborah Mitchell (Tel: 01865 815463; E-mail)

Membership

Councillors

 

 

Keith R Mitchell

-

Leader of the Council

Margaret Godden

-

Deputy Leader of the Council

Tony Crabbe

-

Executive Member for Schools

Neil Fawcett

-

Executive Member for Learning & Culture

David Robertson

-

Executive Member for Transport

Anne Purse

-

Executive Member for Strategic Planning & Waste Management

Janet Godden

-

Executive Member for Children & Young People

Don Seale

-

Executive Member for Community Care & Health

John Farrow

-

Executive Member for Community Safety

The Agenda follows. Decisions taken at the meeting will become effective at the end of the working day on Wednesday 15 January 2003 unless called in by that date for review by the appropriate Scrutiny Committee.

Copies of this Notice, Agenda and supporting papers are circulated to all Members of the County Council.

AGENDA

  1. Apologies for Absence

  2. Declarations of Interest

  3. Minutes
  4. To confirm the minutes of the meeting held on 10 December 2002 (EX3) and to receive for information any matters arising therefrom.

  5. Petitions and Public Address

  1. Provisional Local Government Finance Settlement

Executive Member: Leader of the Council
Forward Plan Ref: 2002/264
Contact Officer: David Illingworth, Financial & Business Planning Consultant (01865 815352)

The Director for Business Support & County Treasurer reports as follows:

The Government announced the provisional local government finance settlement for 2003/04 on 5 December. For Oxfordshire the main features of the settlement are as follows

    • The provisional FSS (Formula Spending Share - the replacement for SSA) is £487.3 million, a 12.6% increase on the 2002/03 adjusted position compared to the shire counties average of 11.9%.

    • The Education FSS has increased by 6.4% on the adjusted base. The Education formula incorporates a floor of 3.2% in cash terms and a ceiling of 7% per pupil.

    • The Social Services FSS is 23.1% higher than the adjusted 2002/03 settlement.

    • The 2001 census has reduced Oxfordshire’s population base from 632,113 in 2002/03 to 605,892 in 2003/04, and as a result Business Rate income has decreased from £167.9m in 2002/03 to £162.4m in 2003/04. The proposed rate per head is £268.03 compared to £265.60 in 2002/03.

    • Revenue Support Grant is £147.2m in the provisional 2003/04 settlement. The Council Tax at FSS is £177.6m.

    • The increase in Total External Support (TES) for Oxfordshire is 6.1%, compared to an average of 5.71% for shire counties and 5.91% across England.

    • There is a 3.5% floor on the increase in TES, and a ceiling of 8%. Oxfordshire is half way between these figures.

There continue to be uncertainties regarding a number of items that will affect the 2003/04 budget: for example, details are still awaited of specific grants which have transferred into the FSS from 2003/04.

Local authorities have until 14 January to make comments on the provisional settlement. Attached (EX5)(download as .doc file) is a draft response, prepared in consultation with the Leader of the Council and the Deputy Leader of the Council, which highlights those matters of potential concern.

Subject to any amendments members may wish to make to the draft letter, the Executive is RECOMMENDED to approve the draft for submission to the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister.

  1. Fire Service Dispute
  2. Executive Member: Community Safety
    Forward Plan Ref: 2002/220
    Contact Officer: John Parry, Chief Fire Officer (01865 855205)

    The Chief Fire Officer reports as follows:

    The Fire Brigades Union, having suspended the planned stoppage for the period before Christmas, has now given notice that two 48-hour stoppages will take place early in the New Year, one being planned for the end of January and the other for February, should a negotiated settlement not have been achieved by this time.

    National negotiations between Employers and the Fire Brigades Union are continuing, now informed by the publication of the Bain Report (The Future of the Fire Service: reducing risk, saving lives). Major recommendations of the report will require national negotiation, principally those relating to potential changes in conditions of service. Other areas of the recommendations cover a need for increased collaboration between brigades, further development on fire prevention using Community Fire Safety education and a greater emphasis on a risk management approach to the provision of fire cover. Although there are significant areas within the report which would assist in developing our own brigade, it is also justifiable to state that Oxfordshire Fire and Rescue Service is already making substantial progress on many of the issues.

    A Government White Paper is anticipated in February 2003 and, dependent upon the content of this, the situation as regards the current national dispute and the indication of how the Bain recommendations will be implemented at national level, further detailed reports will be presented to the Executive.

    The Executive is RECOMMENDED to note the position.

  3. Rail Projects

Executive Member: Transport
Forward Plan Ref: 2002/175, 2002/195
Contact Officer: Adrian Saunders (01865 815080)

Report by Director of Environmental Services (EX7).

The report provides the Executive with information on the key rail projects that have been progressed during 2002 plus a comprehensive list of rail projects and aspirations for consideration that takes into account the existing aspirations approved by the former Public Transport Sub-Committee in April 2000, and also amendments and additions put forward by the Rail Development Officer and parish representatives. It seeks to obtain guidance from members on the relative importance of each of the Council’s rail aspirations for the coming year.

The structure of the rail industry is in a period of great change and the report describes the environment against which the aspirations need to be considered, and the likelihood of progressing each aspiration in the coming year. In order for the Executive to consider each aspiration, an indication of the possible staff and financial implications for the County Council is given, together with an overall recommended priority.

The Executive may wish to consider revising some of the recommended overall priorities, although there is a limit to the number of projects that can be proactively taken forward at any one time. If the Executive decide to elevate some of the aspirations in overall priority, they would also therefore need to consider decreasing the priorities of a similar number of aspirations.

The report was considered by the Environment Scrutiny Committee on 18 December 2002. The Committee agreed to endorse the report, subject to the revision of the following recommended overall priorities:

Ref

Title

New Priority Recommended by Scrutiny Committee

B/16/SERV

Reopen line between Oxford,

Witney and Carterton

LOW

C/39/SERV

Better provision for cycles on trains

HIGH

C/45/STNS

Cycle and Pedestrian Access to Rail Stations

HIGH

D/62/STNS

Reopen Cropredy Halt

LOW

Littlemore Rail Station

The report includes reference (on page 23) to the possible future re-opening of the former rail station at Littlemore. In this context, the Executive are invited to consider representations from Councillor Olive McIntosh-Stedman, in accordance with a request agreed by the Executive under Executive Procedure Rule (9)(b).

The Executive is RECOMMENDED (having regard, in the case of the possible re-opening of the rail station at Littlemore, to the representations to be made by Councillor McIntosh-Stedman) to:

          1. note the progress of the key rail projects during the past year; and
          2. subject to consideration of:
            1. whether there are additional or amended details that members would like to add to existing aspirations, or any additional aspirations; and
            2. whether there are specific locations where members specifically want officers to investigate if some of the general aspirations contained in Part C of Annex 2 can be introduced;

adopt the recommended priorities and, where applicable, the recommended changes to, the proposed rail aspirations as indicated in the report.

  1. Market Square/Wessex Way, Bicester Traffic Measures to follow the Skimmingdish Lane Improvement

Executive Member: Transport
Forward Plan Ref: 2002/246
Contact Officer: David Clough (01865 815743)

The Assistant Chief Executive reports as follows:

On 29 October 2002 the Executive resolved to:

    1. approve for implementation the Phase 1 measures of the Post Skimmingdish Lane traffic management arrangements, as described in the report, subject to the consideration of any representation or objections resulting from consultation on the scheme by the Director Environmental Services, in consultation with the Executive Members for Transport & Strategic Planning and Waste Management;

    2. agree that Wessex Way (Town Centre Link Road) be included in the approved programme for the Bicester Integrated Transport Strategy; and

    3. endorse the work led by the Steering Group and agree Option 5 as the preferred Option to be developed for Market Square/Market Hill.

The decision was called in for consideration by the Environment Scrutiny Committee in accordance with the Council’s Scrutiny Procedure Rules as set out in the Constitution. The reason given was that the decision of the Executive was premature and should be reconsidered in light of the fact that there had been no public consultation on that Option, and that the Executive did not consider fully the impact of all current developments in the local area.

The call in was considered by the Scrutiny Committee on the 18 December 2002. The Committee agreed to accept the Executive’s decision, subject to the Executive positively pursuing alternative options to Wessex Way.

The Executive is RECOMMENDED to note the advice of the Environmental Scrutiny Committee and consider what action to take.

  1. Food Law Enforcement Service Plan
  2. Executive Member: Community Safety
    Forward Plan Ref: 2002/183
    Contact Officer: Nigel Strick, Head of Trading Standards (01865 815601)

    The Head of Trading Standards and Assistant Chief Executive report as follows:

    The Community Safety Scrutiny Committee considered the report on 11 December and agreed to advise the Executive that they agree with the initial proposals for the Food Law Enforcement Service Plan and in particular endorse the comments set down in paragraph 7 of the report - which refer to the need for a review on whether current funding for food sampling and analysis is sufficient for the service to be effective. (As noted by the Executive at the 12 November meeting, the review of the food sampling and analysis budget has been fed into the Budget Strategy process.)

    Accordingly a draft plan has been drawn up, giving effect to the outline presented to the Executive and now endorsed by the Scrutiny Committee (EX9).(download as .doc file) It should however be noted that at this stage the financial information in the draft still relates to the current year and the sampling figures are still subject to budget approval.

    The Executive is RECOMMENDED to RECOMMEND the Council to approve the Food Law Enforcement Service Plan 2003/04, subject to appropriate amendment to update the financial information in the light of the Council’s decisions on the budget, prior to submission to the Food Standards Agency.

  3. Learning 3 to 5 – Proposals for Single Point of Admission
  4. Executive Member: Children and Young People
    Forward Plan Ref: 2002/172
    Contact Officer: Rick Harmes, Principal Education Officer Lifelong Learning (01865 810626)

    Report by Acting Chief Education Officer (EX10)

    Over the past two years – following the Best Value Review of Early Years and Childcare in February 2001 - the County Council has been carrying out a well planned process of research and development, public discussion and, most recently, consultation on its proposals to implement the Foundation Stage of Learning in Oxfordshire.

    At the heart of the proposals is the desire to make more coherent provision for the Foundation Stage of Learning across the whole of the County, and particularly in LEA primary schools. Because of the wide variations in admissions policy, and because of the differences in funding levels between pupils at different points within the reception year, many primary schools find it difficult to offer coherent and good quality provision for young children in the Foundation Stage. If young children are to get off to the best possible start in learning within Oxfordshire’s maintained schools system, this needs to change. The proposals will also require primary schools to work much more collaboratively with other providers in their local community. The aim should be to ensure that there is continuity of early learning experience for young children in their areas. To be effective, these collaborative arrangements will need to be based on parity of esteem between all providers, no matter which sector they belong to.

    The report outlines the results of the recent consultations, including the views of the Learning & Culture and Social & Health Scrutiny Committees, and explores the strategic and resource considerations that arise.

    The Executive is RECOMMENDED:

          1. to note the outcome of the 3 to 5s Learning consultations;
          2. to consider the medium-term resource implications arising from the County Council’s proposals for implementing the Foundation Stage of Learning in Oxfordshire and to decide on the overall approach it wishes to adopt towards these;
          3. subject to the resource implications, to approve the introduction of a single main point of admission in September of each year to Oxfordshire’s primary schools starting in September 2004 at the earliest, and to commend this change of policy to the Governors of Aided and Foundation Primary Schools in the County;
          4. subject to the above, to agree the accompanying measures in relation to:

    • free school meals entitlement;
    • primary schools’ discretion to offer full time places, subject to local consultation;
    • right of parents to defer their child’s admission to primary school in the reception year;

as set out on page 4 of the ‘3 to 5s Learning’ document;

          1. subject to the above, to agree the various measures proposed in Annex 2 to the report in response to the concerns raised during the ‘3 to 5s Learning’ consultations, particularly in relation to small schools, nursery schools and the publication of guidance for parents.
  1. Youth Justice Plan
  2. Executive Member: Children & Young People
    Forward Plan Ref: 2002/181A
    Contact Officer: Mike Simm, Head of Youth Offending Service (01865 202218)

    Report by Head of Youth Offending Service and Assistant Chief Executive (EX11).

    The annual Youth Justice Plan is one of the strategic plans which are subject to approval by full Council following consideration by both the Executive and relevant Scrutiny Committee in accordance with the Budget and Policy Framework Procedure Rules set out in the Constitution. The Executive on 26 November 2002 authorised consultation with the Social & Health Care Scrutiny Committee on the basis of initial proposals to be drawn up within the constraints identified in a report to that meeting by the Head of the Youth Offending Service.

    The Social & Health Care Scrutiny Committee considered the consultation on 11 December. The Committee agreed to advise the Executive of their appreciation of the hard work undertaken by the Youth Offending Team which had resulted in recognition of the team as a leading body by both the Home Office and the Youth Justice Board. They also agreed arrangements for processing of the draft Plan, which has been facilitated by advice from the Youth Justice Board that the Plan may be submitted subject to subsequent endorsement by Council, thus enabling a draft to be drawn up for consideration by the Scrutiny Committee and the Executive in March, with submission to Council for approval at the 1 April meeting.

    The Executive is RECOMMENDED to approve the arrangements for consideration of the draft Plan outlined in the report and authorise the Head of the Youth Offending Service, in consultation with the Executive Members for Children & Young People and Community Safety, to prepare a draft Youth Justice Plan for submission direct to the Social & Health Care Scrutiny Committee for comment, in time for consideration by the Executive on 18 March, and onward transmission to Council for approval.

  3. Extension of Works Contracts to include Further Work
  4. Executive Member: Schools
    Forward Plan Ref: 2002/263
    Contact Officer: Keith Borien, Senior Education Officer (01865 428161)

    Report by Acting Chief Education Officer (EX12).

    The report presents three detailed project appraisals in respect of schemes for which exemption is requested under Rule 3.2 of the Contract Procedure Rules set out in the Constitution, to enable contracts to be let without being subject to the full tendering process. Although the Council normally relies on competitive rates obtained via an open tendering process, there are sound reasons for recommending exemption for these three schemes. These are set out in more detail in the report, but in summary are, the opportunities for cost savings in each case as contracts have been negotiated on the basis of previously tendered rates; the operational advantages of the same contractors continuing to work on the same sites; and the opportunity to develop partnership arrangements with contractors who have performed well on previous County Council projects.

    The Executive is RECOMMENDED to agree for the purpose of Rule 3.2 of the Contract Procedure Rules to exempt the contracts from the requirement to tender, for the reasons set out in the report, and authorise completion of contracts with the respective contractors accordingly.

  5. Degradable Plastic Bags

Executive Member: Strategic Planning & Waste Management
Forward Plan Ref: 2002/245
Contact Officer: Patrick Coulter (01865 815908)

The Director of Environmental Services reports as follows:-

At their meeting on 5 November 2002 the Council agreed a motion from Councillor Brian Hodgson in the following, amended form:

This Council invites the Executive:

    1. to congratulate the Co-op and any other stores for introducing 100% degradable plastic bags in their supermarkets, thereby potentially reducing landfill waste;
    2. to urge all other supermarket companies with local stores to follow suit as soon as possible; and
    3. to continue to support the idea of a tax of, say, 10p per plastic bag, possibly exempting degradable bags, with a view to encouraging the reuse and use of more durable carriers, eg wicker baskets.

Plastic bags are a major cause of litter and break down very slowly within landfill. The use of biodegradable plastic bags can offer significant environmental benefits by

    • reducing their impact when discarded as litter;

    • speeding up the environmental stabilisation of landfill sites; and

    • degrading to carbon dioxide and water within an aerobic composting environment.

The Waste Management Group is setting up a seminar to bring together the major supermarkets in Oxfordshire to discuss ways of working in partnership to reduce packaging waste. The seminar will be arranged in association with the National Waste Awareness Initiative who are working with supermarkets in other parts of the country. Measures to encourage the use of biodegradable plastic bags by all local supermarkets will be considered at the seminar.

The equivalent of a ten pence tax was introduced on plastic bags in Ireland in 2002. The evidence so far is that this has lead to a dramatic shift away from plastic bags to non-plastic bags. The Government are considering introducing a similar tax in England. Policy 1 of the Oxfordshire Joint Household Waste Management Strategy seeks to influence Government to introduce fiscal and other measures to encourage waste reduction.

The Executive is RECOMMENDED to authorise officers to

    1. write to the Co-op, to congratulate them for introducing 100% biodegradable plastic bags in their supermarket, and to any other stores which implement similar measures ;
    2. use the proposed supermarket seminar to encourage other local supermarkets to introduce biodegradable bags;
    3. write to the Secretary of State for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs urging that the Government pursue the proposal to introduce a tax on non-biodegradable plastic bags.

  1. Forward Plan and Future Business

Executive Member: All
Contact Officer: John Leverton (01865 815314)

The Executive Procedure Rules provide that the business of each meeting of the Executive is to include "updating of the Forward Plan and proposals for business to be conducted at the following meeting".

The publication date of the next Forward Plan, for the period February-May 2003, is 20 January. It will therefore be necessary to determine its content at this meeting. Recommendations for additions and amendments are attached as EX14 (download as .doc file)- Schedules 1-3.

Items from the Forward Plan (as now proposed to be updated) for the next two meetings appear in Schedule 4.

The Executive is RECOMMENDED to:

(a) agree the additions and amendments set out in Schedules 1 - 3 for the purpose of the Forward Plan for the ensuing four months;

(b) subject to (a) above, note the items currently identified for forthcoming meetings as set out in Schedule 4.

December 2002

Return to TOP