ITEM EX3EXECUTIVE – 15 OCTOBER 2002Minutes of
the Meeting commencing at 2.00 pm and finishing at 4.55 pm Present: Voting
Members: Councillor
John Farrow Other
Members in Attendance: Officers: Whole of meeting: J. Leverton and G. Warrington (Chief Executive’s Office). Part of meeting: Chief Executive, D. Bishop; E-Government Adviser; S. Bingham, A. Davy and J. Mitchell (Education Department); N. Hood (Cultural Services); P. Hodgson (Social Services); E. Luck and S. Tharme (Environmental Services).
The Executive considered the matters, reports and recommendations contained or referred to in the agenda for the meeting, together with a schedule of addenda tabled at the meeting, and decided as set out below. Except insofar as otherwise specified, the reasons for the decisions are contained in the agenda, reports and schedule, copies of which are attached to the signed Minutes.
357/02. APOLOGIES FOR ABSENCE
Apologies for absence were received from Councillor Crabbe and Councillor Mitchell.
358/02. MINUTES
The Minutes of the meeting held on 1 October 2002 were approved and signed. 359/02. PETITIONS AND PUBLIC ADDRESS
The Chair reported that the following request to address the meeting had been agreed:-
Brereton Drive, Grove - Pedestrian Crossing – Petition Presented by Councillor Zoe Patrick Councillor Patrick presented a petition of over 900 signatures on behalf of parents and children of Millbrook School in Grove and other residents who felt that a pedestrian crossing over Brereton Drive was essential for public safety. She referred to excessive traffic speeds and a particularly bad accident some years ago. The proposal had received support from Grove Parish Council, the Headteacher of Millbrook School and Thames Valley Police. RESOLVED: that the petition be referred to the Director of Environmental Services to investigate and discuss with the Executive Members for Transport and Strategic Planning & Waste Management.
360/02. SSI INSPECTION OF CHILDREN’S SERVICES
(Agenda Item 5) The Executive considered an Action Plan (EX5) which had been developed by County officers to respond to the report and recommendations following the Department of Health Social Services Inspectorate’s inspection of the County Council’s Social Services Children’s Services, in March 2002. The document had also been considered by the Social & Health Care Scrutiny Committee on 25 September who had commended the action plan. Councillor Janet Godden welcomed the positive comments of the Scrutiny Committee, which supported the excellent work of the Children & Families Division. RESOLVED: to:
361/02. BEST VALUE REVIEW (SUPPLEMENTARY REPORT ON CHILDREN IN PUBLIC CARE) BEHAVIOUR, ATTENDANCE AND EXCLUSIONS
(Agenda Item 6) On 8 January 2002 the Executive had considered the Best Value Review Report on Behaviour, Attendance and Exclusions and had asked the Best Value Team to report further on specific issues arising from concern about the increase in the number of children in the care of this authority permanently excluded from school and the number of children in care without a school place. The Executive now considered a report (EX6) which set out an action plan, together with comments of the Best Value Committee, the Social & Health Care Scrutiny Committee and the Learning & Culture Scrutiny Committee. Commending the report, Councillor Janet Godden welcomed the views of the Best Value and Scrutiny Committees. Ms Bingham reported that although some of the Scrutiny comments fell outside the strict terms of the review, steps were being taken in relation for example, provision of IT equipment and training to foster homes; progress had been ,made in the co-ordination of the resources of Education and Social Services; and positive attention was being paid to the relationship between care plans and SEN statements. RESOLVED: to welcome the comments of the Scrutiny Committees and subject to identification of any necessary additional resources in the context of the budget process, to approve the identified actions for services improvements.
362/02. NEW EARLY YEARS UNITS: CHOLSEY PRIMARY SCHOOL AND KIDMORE END CE (AIDED) PRIMARY SCHOOL
(Agenda Item 7) The Executive considered a report (EX7) which set out two applications to open new Early Years Units. The Early Years Development and Childcare Partnership (EYDCP) were also required to make a recommendation on these applications to the County Council and would be considering both applications on 17 October 2002. RESOLVED: to approve the proposals for new Early Years Units at Cholsey Primary School from January 2003 and Kidmore End C.E. (aided) Primary School from September 2003, subject to the Acting Chief Education Officer being authorised (following consultation with the Executive Members for Children & Young People and Schools) to determine either or both proposals if there were substantive adverse comments from the Early Years Development and Childcare Partnership.
363/02. CALL-IN OF EXECUTIVE DECISION GROWING OUR CORPORATE CAPACITY (Agenda Item 8) On 17 September 2002 the Executive, subject to deletion of "first and foremost" where applied to the corporate leadership role of Directors, had:-
The decision had been called in for consideration by the Corporate Governance Scrutiny Committee. The Committee’s comments were set out in the Addenda sheet. Councillor Ferriman reiterated her concern that the proposals represented a diminution of democracy and also a loss of faith in the past work and achievements of members and officers in this area of the Council’s services. She would continue to oppose them at every opportunity. Councillor Hodgson expressed the view that it was imperative to retain a separate personnel function and he remained sceptical whether one person could carry out the role proposed. The Chief Executive stated that staff comments during the consultation process had been largely supportive. Referring to Annex B of the report by the Leader of the Council he advised that this showed a national trend towards bringing together central functions, particularly finance, property and ICT, within a single Resources Directorate, although there was no national best practice model.
Members recalled that the Executive had fully considered all the points raised by the Corporate Governance Scrutiny Committee and had only disagreed with the Committee on the proposal to appoint a Resource Director. Having considered the reservations expressed by the Corporate Governance Scrutiny Committee, it still appeared to the Executive that this proposal was the best option. RESOLVED: to confirm the decisions taken at the meeting on 17 September and in particular to authorise the recruitment of a Director for Resources alongside the Director for Learning & Culture and the Director for Economy & Environment.
364/02. SPECIAL EDUCATIONAL NEEDS – SCRUTINY REVIEW: PROCESS FOR EXECUTIVE RESPONSE
(Agenda Item 9) The Learning & Culture Scrutiny Committee had commissioned a member review group to carry out a review of this service. That report had now been agreed by the Scrutiny Committee and submitted to the Executive (EX9). The Review Report recognised the good work of this service and its importance in terms of meeting the Authority’s statutory duties and two of its key priorities within the corporate strategic objective of ‘Helping People to Fulfil their Potential’, outlined areas of concern and suggested ways that the service could be improved, in keeping with the Council’s commitment to continuous improvement. Recognising the importance of the review the Leader of the Council, following consultation with other members of the Executive, had proposed that the Executive should decide on the appropriate way to consider and respond to the report. Also tabled were comments from Councillor Robert Evans, a copy of which is attached to the signed minutes. Councillor Fawcett welcomed this first substantive scrutiny review and emphasised the importance of arrangements to ensure it was properly assessed and due weight given to its conclusions. He reported that consultations with the members concerned had produced the proposal for the procedure now recorded in the resolution below. Councillor Patrick and Councillor Witcher confirmed their support for the proposed procedure. RESOLVED:
365/02. ESTABLISHMENT OF A SCHOOLS FORUM
(Agenda Item 10) The Executive considered a report (EX10) which set out proposed arrangements to establish a Schools Forum. RESOLVED: to agree to the composition of the Schools Forum as set out in paragraph 6 of the report and to ask the Acting Chief Education Officer to establish the Forum by 15 January 2003.
366/02. DELIVERY FRAMEWORK FOR E-GOVERNMENT AND IEG2 STATEMENT
(Agenda Item 11) The Executive considered a report (EX11) which set out a framework for implementing electronic government. In response to a request by Councillor Hodgson that the Executive include the Chair of the Corporate Governance Scrutiny Committee in the consultation process proposed in recommendation (c), it was pointed out that it was proposed to consult the Committee on the IEG2 statement as a whole. The Executive recognised that the implementation date of 2005 was tight and that if finance was not available then it might be necessary to rephase the timescale for implementation. Councillor Margaret Godden welcomed the agreement of the District Councils to sign up to the principle of partnership working. RESOLVED:
367/02. "IN THE SERVICE OF DEMOCRACY" – CONSULTATION PAPER ON A POLICY FOR ELECTRONIC DEMOCRACY
(Agenda Item 12) The Government had issued a consultation paper on a policy for electronic democracy, which focussed their e-democracy policy on two aspects - e-participation and e-voting. The issues relating to e-voting had been considered by the Democracy & Organisation Committee as a non-executive function on 5 September 2002. The Executive now considered a report (EX12), which explained those aspects of the consultation paper dealing with e-participation and which were the responsibility of the Executive in the light of comments from the Corporate Governance Scrutiny Committee. Mr Bishop tabled a draft response to the Government, a copy of which is annexed to the signed minutes. It was proposed that the comments of the Democracy & Organisation Committee on e-voting should be incorporated into the final response. RESOLVED: that a composite response be submitted to the Government’s consultation paper on e-participation incorporating the comments of the Corporate Governance Scrutiny Committee, the Democracy & Organisation Committee and the tabled draft response.
368/02/ TRANSPORT CAPITAL PROGRAMME 2002/03 TO 2005/06
(Agenda Item 13) The Executive considered a report (EX13) which updated the 2002/03 programme and also sought approval, in principle, to a revised allocation for the programme under the six main budget headings, as set out the Local Transport Plan (LTP), for the period 2003/04 to 2005/06 to assist with the forward planning of the programme. Mr Luck advised that the City Council had agreed the release of the developer contribution referred to in the report to fund the proposed contracted bus services from Thornhill Park & Ride to the Churchill and Nuffield Hospitals. Councillor Robertson commended the report to the Executive. RESOLVED: to:-
369/02. CARTERTON, WITNEY AND OXFORD – TRANSPORT LINKS
(Agenda Item 14) The Committee considered a report (EX14) which set out the conclusion of a review of proposals to improve transport links along the A40 corridor from Carterton and Witney to Oxford and a three-phase strategy to improve transport links to West Oxfordshire over the next fifteen years. Councillor Robertson commended the report to the Executive. RESOLVED: to:
370/02. TAXIS IN BUS LANES AND BUS LANE/GATE CAMERA ENFORCEMENT
(Agenda Item 15) The Executive considered a report (EX15) which examined the issue of access by taxis to bus lanes in Oxford and considered a request by the Oxfordshire Ambulance Trust to allow access to bus lanes and through 'bus gates' for patient transport ambulances. The Deputy Leader of the Council referred to a letter from Mr Tony Green of 001 Taxis, which he had circulated to Members of the Executive. Councillor Robertson advised that the position of private hire vehicles should be considered in the context of consultation on any future changes to the exemptions applying in the bus lanes. Mr Graham Jones argued the need to make the centre of Oxford more attractive and accessible and suggested a relaxation of the closure of High Street during non-peak hours. He asked that the report be deferred until after the meeting of the Oxford Transport Strategy Working Party on 18 October to enable discussion to be held with the business community on how these issues could be progressed. Councillor Robertson advised that the Executive was being asked to consider how current regulations should be enforced. Any relaxation of the restrictions on High Street would be a matter for the OTS Working Party and if significant changes were made then these issues might need to be reconsidered. RESOLVED: to:
371/02. VILLAGE HALL/COMMUNITY CENTRE GRANTS 2002/03
(Agenda Item 16) The Executive considered a report (EX16) which set out proposals for the allocation of the money remaining in the grant fund for 2002/03. Councillor Cooper spoke in support of the application for grant for improvements to Tackley Village Hall. RESOLVED: to approve:
372/02. FORWARD PLAN AND FUTURE BUSINESS
(Agenda Item 17) The Executive considered a list of recommended additions and amendments for the forthcoming Forward Plan update, together with a list of items for the next two meetings. RESOLVED: subject to the amendments and additions set out in the schedule of addenda to:
in the Chair Date
of signing 2002
|