Return to Agenda

Return to EX11

ITEM EX11 - ANNEX 6

EXECUTIVE – 1 OCTOBER 2002

INTEGRATING COMMUNITY EQUIPMENT SERVICES

Draft For Consultation

Oxfordshire Social Services and Oxfordshire Health Trusts Action Plan for Integrating Community Equipment Services

Version Date: 26.06.2002

Person with lead responsibility for the plan: Judith Argles
Contact number: 01865 787346
Contact email: judith.argles@oxfordshire.gov.uk

Contents

1. Introduction

1.1. Background, and further information

1.2. Summary of key local milestones in our plan to achieve the integration of the community equipment services

1.3. What will happen next

1.4. Overview of steps taken to produce the plan and partners involved in planning

to date

2. Local implementation issues and what we are going to do *

2.1. Service issues

2.2. Integration objectives

2.3. Summary of the implications of potential constraints

3. Key milestones in our plan to achieve integration of the services

  1. Introduction

    1. 1.1. Background, and further information

      This plan contains proposals for meeting the National Health Service Plan targets to integrate local community equipment services by April 2004 and to contribute to the national 50% increase in the number of people benefiting from the provision of equipment. The general context is set out in HSC 2001/008:LAC (2001) 13 and the Guide to Integrating Community Equipment Services, both published by the Department of Health in March 2001.

      Judith Argles – Service Manager Specialist Services, Oxfordshire Social Services Department, Shotover Centre, Craufurd Road, Oxford, OX4 2RA

      Mary Applegate – Head of Therapy Services, Oxfordshire Health Trust, Montgomery House Surgery, Piggy Lane, Bicester, Oxon, OX26 7HT

      1.2.Summary of key local milestones in our plan to achieve the integration of the community equipment services

Objective

By end of

Action

Cost of implementation

Responsibility of

1) Establish eligibility criteria for services

October 2003

  • Draft eligibility criteria
  • Consult with stakeholders

Cost neutral

Judith Argles (JA)

Mary Applegate (MA) and user representation

2) Identify models of service and structure for Integrating Community Equipment Services and identify the potential impact on Occupational Therapy Services

October 2002

  • Draft models
  • Discussion with Primary Care Trusts, Acute sector, Social Services, voluntary organisations, user organisations and other stakeholders

Cost neutral

JA and MA

3) Identify a centre for information, demonstration and purchase of non specialist equipment

April 2003

  • Consultation with providers of information and advice (voluntary organisations, providers)
  • Agree framework for service and provider organisations
  • Identify present services and gaps
  • Identify schedule for implementation

£££

JA MA and provider organisations

4) Single Point of Contact

April 2003

  • Consider potential providers of single point of contact taking into account the potential configuration of services
  • Identify provider and establish costs
  • Identify schedule for implementation

£££

Working Group of users, stakeholders

 

 

 

5) Identification of funding streams

April 2003

  • Discussions with Department of Health, Primary Care Trusts, Acute sector, Social Services
  • Secure new Department of Health funding
  • If no additional funding secured decide on priorities for services within existing funding

Hypothecated recurrent additional sum £698,120 Health

and £698,120 Social Services by 2004

JA MA

6) Pooling Budgets

April 2004

  • Discussions with Department of Health, Primary Care Trusts, Acute sector, Social Services about what will be pooled
  • Decision about integrating this budget with an existing pooled one or a stand alone pool
  • Lead Pool manager appointed

££

JA MA Diana Roberts (DR) Jill Brooks (JB) Martin Bradshaw (MB) Jonathan Coombes (JC)

7) Evaluation of action plan in light of vision and local and national developments

Sept 2002

April 2003

April 2004

  • Reference group and statutory organisations to ensure direction of travel is achieving objectives

Cost neutral

JA MA

8) Ensure views of users inform future service development

Post April 2004

  • Establish group to monitor quality of service
  • User surveys
  • Reference group to inform future developments

£

JA MA

9) Resolve issues of co-terminosity

April 2004

  • Input into existing work on this

MA JA DR

      1.3. What will happen next

      Draft action plan agreed by all stakeholders and published in October 2002

      Reference group will continue to meet and implement actions and ensure the direction of travel is achieving the objective of integrating community equipment services. (National Standard Framework for Older People Standard 2)

      1.4. Overview of steps taken to produce the plan and partners involved in planning to date:

Local baseline audit published January 2002

Reference group of stakeholders has met 5 times

Judith Argles and Mary Applegate have attended Department of Health events

  • Social Services and Health Integrating Community Equipment Services leads – Judith Argles and Mary Applegate
  • Equipment service managers and staff – DMEED, Huntleigh National Care, British Red Cross, Contract Monitoring Officer
  • Chief Executives from 5 Primary Care Trusts - Mary Applegate on behalf of 5 Primary Care Trusts and acute sector
  • Voluntary sector organisations - British Red Cross, Dialability, Oxfordshire Association for the Blind
  • User groups - My Life My Choice, Oxfordshire Council of Disabled People, Oxfordshire Parents with Disabilities,
  • Housing Departments - Anchor Staying Put, 5 District Councils

    2. Local implementation issues and what we are going to do

      2.1. Service issues

  • Services cover Oxfordshire geographical area for Social Services and for Health the geographical areas included in Oxfordshire Primary Care Trusts. Currently these two are different.
  • Equipment in the main is supplied by Social Services and Health via a contract with an independent supplier, Huntleigh National Care or from the DMEED facilitation service who also use Huntleigh National Care for some equipment.
  • Short-term loan of equipment is supplied from British Red Cross, Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Michael Sobell House and specialist societies.
  • Information is supplied via a service level agreement that Social Services and Health have with Dialability.
  • The main gaps in current service provision have been identified as communication aids for children and adults, telecare equipment and some equipment in nursing homes which is currently unfunded.

      2.2. Integration objectives

  • To identify funding streams, new local investment and eventually pooling budgets
  • To enable 50% more individuals of all ages and types of disability to benefit from equipment that helps them to be cared for or maintain their independence at home
  • To resolve boundary issues (geographical and service-related)
  • To have management arrangements in place by 2004
  • To resolve assessment for equipment issues and agree common criteria across services
  • To identify shortcomings in provision systems, including, for example, equipment tracking, adverse incident reporting, and staffing levels to enable timely and appropriate assessments
  • To identify referral routes and choices for provision
  • To involve users in planning, and ongoing service monitoring
  • To aim for continuous service improvement mechanisms.
  • To develop a Centre for Independent Living or equivalent facility

 

2

 

Area of need identified

How identified

Objectives to meet
this need

To achieve by
end of

Who is responsible

1

Equipment display area – several options without a clear route through the system (including private purchase)

Baseline audit

Clear route through system with single point of contact for equipment

April 2003

JA/MA

2

Inadequate provision for people to choose equipment for themselves

Baseline audit

Voucher scheme and private purchase

April 2004

JA/MA

3

Repeat assessments carried out by professionals with different organisations

Baseline audit and staff information

Pooled budget and staff training

April 2004

JA/MA

4

Inadequate access to equipment at the time of need

Baseline audit

Single point of contact and clearer route through the system

April 2003

JA/MA

5

Inadequate review of major items of equipment once provided

Baseline audit

Establish review system with equipment provider

September 2003

JA/MA

6

Inadequate display area for children’s equipment

Baseline audit

Establishment of single point of contact and demonstration area

September 2003

JA/MA with reference group

7

Inadequate access to communication equipment at the time of need

Baseline audit

Identification of additional funding for this area

April 2004

MA/JA

8

Delay in fitting or adapting communication equipment once provided

Baseline audit

Fitting and adaptation of equipment to be carried out within one week of delivery

April 2004

JA/MA with Liz Shaw

9

Inadequate provision for specialist assessment and then provision of equipment

Baseline audit

Identification of specialist referral route and identification of funding (see 1)

April 2003

Liz Shaw

10

Waiting list for assessments

Baseline audit

Clear and easily available eligibility criteria and provision of information in a variety of formats

April 2004

JA/MA


2.3. Summary of the implications of potential constraints

  • If insufficient new funding is identified in the first few years: The plans will need to be reviewed and revised. with an emphasis on elements that can be achieved by remodelling services using existing resources and establishing priorities for the service
  • If insufficient numbers of therapists are recruited and if inadequate resources are available to fund them, to increase substantially the rate of assessments: We will work closely with local disability and independent sector organisations to increase opportunities for people to self-select equipment, and to capture this information on our information systems. We will also reconsider skill-mix issues regarding who can be trained to assess for which types of equipment. Doing so may delay the timescale for achieving a substantial increase in the number of new people able to receive community equipment.
  • Primary Health Trusts, Acute sector, Housing, Social Services not working in partnership to integrate community equipment services

 3. Key milestones in our plan to achieve integration of the services

Objective 1: Establish eligibility criteria for services

By end of

Task

Responsibility of

Additional resource implications

October 2002

Draft eligibility criteria

Judith Argles

Mary Applegate

and user representation

Cost neutral

April 2003

Consult with stakeholders

Objective 2: Identify a centre for information, demonstration and purchase of non-specialist equipment

By end of

Task

Responsibility of

Additional resource implications

April 2003

Consultation with providers of information and advice (voluntary organisations, providers)

Judith Argles

Mary Applegate

and provider organisations

£££

October 2003

Agree framework for service and provider organisations

April 2004

Service Operational

Objective 3: Single point of Contact

By end of

Task

Responsibility of

Additional resource implications

October 2002

Consider potential providers of single point of contact taking into account the potential configuration of services

Working Group of users, Stakeholders

£££

April 2003

Identify provider and establish costs

October 2003

Commence Implementation

 

Objective 4: Identification of funding streams

By end of

Task

Responsibility of

Additional resource implications

December 2002

Discussions with Department of Health, Primary Care Trusts, Acute Sector, Social Services

Judith Argles

Mary Applegate

Hypothecated recurrent additional sum £698,120 Health and £698,120 Social Services by 2004

April 2003

Secure new Department of Health funding

Objective 5: Pooling Budgets

By end of

Task

Responsibility of

Additional resource implications

March 2003

Discussions with Department of Health, Primary Care Trusts, Acute sector, Social Services

Judith Argles, Mary Applegate, Diana Roberts, Jill Brooks, Martin Bradshaw

££

March 2003

Decision about integrating this budget with an existing pooled one or stand alone pool

April 2004

Lead Pool manager appointed

Objective 6: Evaluation of action plan in light of vision and local and national developments

By end of

Task

Responsibility of

Additional resource implications

April 2003

Reference group and statutory organisations to ensure direction of travel is achieving objectives

Judith Argles

Mary Applegate

Cost neutral

Objective 7: Ensure views of users inform future service development

By end of

Task

Responsibility of

Additional resource implications

April 2003

Establish group to monitor quality of service

Judith Argles

Mary Applegate

£

April 2004

User surveys

April 2004

Reference group to inform future developments

 

Objective 8: Resolve issues of co-terminosity

By end of

Task

Responsibility of

Additional resource implications

April 2004

Input into existing work on this

Judith Argles

Mary Applegate

Diana Roberts

 

 

Objective 9: Identify models of service and structure

By end of

Task

Responsibility of

Additional resource implications

October 2002

Draft Models

Judith Argles

Mary Applegate

Cost neutral

April 2003

Discussion with Primary Care Trusts, Acute sector, Social Services, voluntary organisations, user organisations and other stakeholders

Return to TOP