Service characteristic
|
Services not
integrated
|
Moving towards
integration
|
Partially integrated
|
Fully integrated
service
|
User involvement
|
May or may
not involve users in satisfaction surveys, etc.
|
Involves users
in satisfaction surveys, etc.
|
Involving users
in service design and planning
|
Involves users
in satisfaction surveys and service monitoring, review and identification
of improvements
|
Monitoring
user outcomes
|
No process
of follow-up assessment
|
May or may
not have process of follow-up assessment
|
May or may
not have process of follow-up assessment
|
Full assessment
and re-assessment based on user’s lifestyle / independence
choices. Role played by equipment in supporting this is identified.
|
Finance
|
Separate health
and social services budgets with strict boundaries
|
Organisations
share management information about budgets
|
Exploring ways
of sharing or pooling funding
|
Pooled budgets
|
Management
Structure
|
Separate managers
|
Lead organisation
identified
|
Lead organisation
managing managers
|
Sole manager
responsible for service operations
|
Manager’s advisory
board
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
Multi-agency
advisory board in place
|
Stock, and
purchasing
|
Separate equipment
storage and purchasing
|
Local agreements
about ‘who provides what’
|
Joint or ‘virtual
joint’ stores and joint stock inventories
|
Unified stock
inventory and person-based stock control/purchasing system. Purchasing
advisory panel. Can demonstrate achievement of best value.
|
Continuous
service improvement
|
May or may
not have
|
May or may
not have
|
May or may
not have
|
Quality improvement
system in operation
|
Equipment tracking,
delivery and collection
|
Separate services
and processes
|
May still be
separate
|
Tracking based
on joint inventory
|
Fully computerised,
using micro-chipping or other coding to help stock control. Delivery
systems achieving high standards.
|
Adverse incident
reporting
|
Should have
|
Should have
|
Should have
|
Has as part
of quality/ service improvement system
|