|
ITEM EX12 - ANNEX 1EXECUTIVE – 17 APRIL 2002PEDESTRIAN
CROSSING FACILITIES
|
|
Respondent |
Support |
Suggestions/Concerns |
Officer comment |
|
Thames Valley Police |
Y |
Supports proposal noting that anti skid surfacing should be used |
An anti-skid surface will be incorporated in the detailed design. |
|
Windmill Road Resident |
Y |
Strong support |
|
|
Windmill Road Resident |
Y |
Strong support. Thinks Pedestrian needs outweigh concerns over parking. |
|
|
Headington Residents Association |
Y |
Supports proposal.
|
|
|
Windmill Road Resident |
Y |
Standard concerns about visibility of access, noise and optical intrusion arising from the nearby pelican. |
The detailed design will seek to overcome concerns by standard means e.g. careful siting of equipment and adjusting noise levels of the audible signal. |
|
Windmill Road Resident |
Y |
Support but would prefer lollipop lady. Asks can it be switched off at night? |
Oxfordshire County Council experiences difficulties in employment and retention of School Patrol Staff. Part time operation is not recommended. The bleep level at night will be as low as possible. |
|
Disabled Drivers Association |
Y |
Alternative parking arrangements could be considered for disabled |
There is scope to accommodate this if an application is received. |
|
Windmill Road Resident |
N |
Concerned about parking and vehicular access to property as an alternative |
Parking nearby is possible or a small adjustment in position of the crossing should overcome the objection. |