Return to Agenda

ITEM CC11

COUNTY COUNCIL – 5 NOVEMBER 2002

REPORT OF THE EXECUTIVE

4 September 2002

  1. Draft Regional Transport Strategy
  2. In June 2002 the South East England Regional Assembly (SEERA) published for consultation a draft revised Regional Transport Strategy "from crisis to cutting edge" which will form part of guidance to local authorities on how their transport and land use policies should assist in addressing priorities within the region. Members of the Environment Scrutiny Committee considered the consultation on 2 September and the Executive has incorporated their comments in formulating a response to SEERA.

    The response agreed by the Executive lays particular emphasis on the failure of the consultation document to recognise the need to pursue the Multi Modal Study which had been proposed by the government for the A34, which is in crisis and heavily congested and of National, European and local importance. The Executive also highlighted the importance placed by this Council on the East West Rail Link; the lack of clarity in SEERA’s proposals for Mobility Management Plans; the dangers of setting congestion charging policies in the absence of agreement with the appropriate highway authorities; and the financial implications of some of the draft strategy. The Executive also agreed to urge SEERA to liaise with other Regional Assemblies to ensure that Oxfordshire’s interests are taken into account in the development of Regional Transport Strategies for adjacent regions.

    17 September 2002

  3. Public Service Agreement (PSA) - See ITEM 2
  4. In May 2002 the Executive authorised the Chief Executive and the Leader and Deputy Leader of the Council to draw up the formal submission for the PSA for negotiation with the Government. The submission eventually comprised 12 targets, which were the subject of negotiations with relevant Government Departments. By September the Executive noted that 7 targets had been agreed with a further 3 expected to achieve agreement within a matter of days. Negotiations were also continuing with District Councils to develop and negotiate targets and promote County/District partnership working in a number of areas of joint involvement.

    The Executive approved the negotiated targets and authorised the Leader and Deputy Leader of the Council to conclude the PSA with arrangements for a Ministerial signing ceremony. (This has subsequently been agreed in principle with the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister, and is expected to take place at some time in December.)

  5. Charging Policies for Home Care and Other Non-Residential Social Services
  6. In February 2002, the Executive authorised consultations to be undertaken on changes to the Council’s charging scheme in the light of Government guidance, issued under the title "Fairer Charging Policies for Home Care and Other Non-Residential Social Services".

    The consultation process identified some support for the proposals although not all was unqualified. A number of responses expressed concern that the Council were proposing changes in the way charges were levied at the same time as reducing the level of services provided. Some respondents expressed the view that the increases in charges for those recipients of services who were better off were excessive. However there appeared to be broad acceptance that the proposals were the only realistic option given the financial situation facing the Council; in fact for many people charges will reduce, and the Council has made budgetary provision in anticipation of this.

    The Executive agreed the implementation of a new charging scheme based on the consultation proposals set out in the consultation letter, with exemptions based on the Government’s minimum income levels, but without introducing charges for carers services pending further investigation. The Executive has asked officers to report on the impact of the implementation of the charging scheme in 12 months’ time.

  7. Race Equality Scheme
  8. The Executive has approved a draft Race Equality Scheme for publication and implementation, which complies with guidance from the Commission for Racial Equality and the requirements of the Race Relations Amendment Act. The scheme reflects the Government’s response to a number of initiatives including the Macpherson Report of the Stephen Lawrence Inquiry and the need for systemic change in the relationships between public authorities and ethnic minority communities both as service provider and employer. The Scheme builds on the Council’s established and successful track record in this field and has drawn on a wide range of experience in its conception.

    A key aspect is consultation. In addition to a general public consultation strategy there will be consultations with ethnic minority communities mainly through the two Racial Equality Councils that exist in the County. Systems for consultation are in any event well established but will also follow closely the County Council’s own published guidance on consultation and CRE guidance, which includes the development of a consultative Reference Group and ensures that no groups are overlooked.

  9. Establishment of an Oxfordshire Local Access Forum
  10. The Countryside and Rights of Way (CROW) Act 2000 requires local highway authorities to establish statutory non executive advisory bodies to be known as local access forums. Focussing on the implementation of the new right of access to open country and common land, Forums will provide advice on the improvement of public access to land for open-air recreation and the enjoyment of the area; the preparation of the new statutory rights of way improvement plans; and the development of countryside recreation and access strategies generally.

    Each appointing authority is free to decide how many forums to establish in its area, either singly or jointly with other appointing authorities, but following consultation with partners the Executive has approved the formation of a single local access forum for Oxfordshire, to be known as the ‘Oxfordshire Countryside Access Forum’.

    The local access forum is required to consist of no fewer than 10 and not more than 22 members, appointed in accordance with the provisions set down in the Act and balanced between representatives of users of rights of way or access land and land management interests. To run the appointments process the Executive has appointed a Panel consisting of the Executive Member for Learning & Culture, the Chairman of the Planning & Regulation Committee (or her nominee), the Leader of the Opposition (or his nominee) and the Countryside Services Manager and Strategic Countryside Access Officer.

    The Executive RECOMMEND the Council to agree the inclusion of the Oxfordshire Countryside Access Forum in the list of strategic outside bodies for the purpose of appointment of the County Council’s representative on the Forum in accordance with Section H of the Constitution.

  11. Cornmarket Street, Oxford
  12. The Executive has agreed funding within the Transport Capital Programme to meet the increased predicted outturn costs of the revised scheme to improve Cornmarket Street introduced after the failure of the granite block-paving scheme. The City Council’s decision to retain its level of financial contribution secures a level of co-operation between the City and County Councils which will enable work to commence in the New Year with time to talk to interested parties about how the scheme can proceed to the benefit of traders and shoppers alike.

    1 October 2002

  13. Financial Strategy and Budget Issues
  14. The Executive has approved a draft strategy for the development of the 2003/04 budget and capital programme for initial consultation with the Scrutiny Committees. As part of the process the Executive has asked the Director for Business Support & County Treasurer to brief Scrutiny Committees on the scope for economies within the base budget using updated material prepared earlier in the year, to enable the committees to consider relative priorities for possible savings in existing budget alongside possible bids identified as possible additions to the budget. The Executive has also begun preparations to deal with the consequences of potentially massive cuts in funds granted from central government to councils across the South of England. The worst scenario for Oxfordshire County Council would be a £43 million loss, with an £18 million gain being the best outcome at the other end of the spectrum.

    The Executive is for the present working on the assumption that the Council will have to cover a loss in between those two figures, equivalent to 8% on Council tax. This would be in addition to any spending plans which the Council might wish to agree. The Executive will report further to the Council at the meeting on 4 February 2003, when it makes recommendations on the 2003/04 budget in the light of advice from the Scrutiny Committees.

  15. Corporate Parenting
  16. The Government’s Quality Protects Initiative has placed responsibility corporately on all councillors, with regard to children in care, and in particular for optimising the life chances for these children.

    The Executive has approved proposals to set up a member/officer children’s panel to ensure that the Council is fulfilling its responsibilities for the children in its care, including participating in inspections of Children’s Homes. The Panel will comprise 3 members from each political group, together with relevant officers from Social Services and Education, and representatives of Connexions and Primary Care Trust currently leading on children’s health. It will receive regular reports on a range of issues relating to children in care and care leavers, and have the authority to make suggestions for improvement of existing systems.

  17. Draft Care Homes Redevelopment Strategy
  18. In December 2001, the Executive approved the transfer of 19 operational residential care homes with 797 elderly residents and 784 staff to the Oxfordshire Care Partnership. Of the 19 homes, 10 did not meet, and could not effectively be made to meet, the new National Minimum Standards. The contract between the County Council and the Oxfordshire Care Partnership contains requirements to produce a jointly agreed redevelopment strategy for the 10 homes subject to full public consultation.

    The Executive has approved arrangements for the formal consultation on proposals for the development of new care homes to replace Lincoln House, Banbury; Blue Mountains, Wallingford; Ladygrove House, Didcot; St. Edburgs, Bicester; Witan House, Witney; Iffley House, Rose Hill; Orchard House, Sandford-on-Thames; and Meadowcroft, Thame. The outcome is expected to be reported to the Executive in December 2002. For three others - Spencer Court, Woodstock; Castle View, Chipping Norton; and Langston House, Milton-under-Wychwood – the Executive has instructed officers to carry out full option appraisals working with the District Council, the local Housing Association, the PCT’s and other interested parties and has authorised consultation on the appraisals with a report back to the Executive within six months.

  19. Guided Transport Express for Oxfordshire
  20. The Executive has approved funding towards the development of the Guided Transport Express (GTE) project which is a proposal to provide Oxford with guided busways alongside the railway corridor, to allow an express bus network to connect the city centre to key Park & Ride sites and surrounding towns (in particular the County’s growth towns). Two guided busways are proposed, linking Peartree Park & Ride to the City Centre (the northern guideway) and Redbridge to the City Centre (the southern guideway). It is envisaged that the two guideways will meet at Oxpens, where Oxford railway station could potentially be relocated.

    The aim of GTE is to provide very high quality public transport facilitating direct journeys from surrounding towns into Oxford (without the need for interchange) and to support growth/vitality of the city (for example the proposed extension of the Westgate Centre and redevelopment of the Oxpens area).

  21. Delegation Arrangements
  22. The Executive has agreed arrangements in respect of certain operational matters in order to concentrate more on its strategic priorities. Following consideration by the Corporate Governance Scrutiny Committee, the Executive has agreed the setting up of a Transport Implementation Committee comprising the Executive Members for Transport and Strategic Planning & Waste Management to consider and determine individual local highway, traffic and parking matters within the ambit of the transport capital programme and support for individual public transport services, including area reviews and service subsidy agreements.

    In line with a recommendation of the Scrutiny Committee the Executive has specifically agreed that there will be positive notification to the local member(s) for each division directly affected by the schemes to be considered under this procedure to enable them to make their views known to both officers and the Executive Members. Access to the Committee for both councillors and members of the public will be similar to those applying to the full Executive, as will the arrangements for call in for consideration by the relevant Scrutiny Committee (the Environment Scrutiny Committee in this case.)

    15 October 2002

  23. SSI Inspection of Children’s Services

The Executive has endorsed an action plan developed by County officers to respond to the report and recommendations of the SSI inspection of the County Council’s Children’s Services in March this year. The Social & Health Care Scrutiny Committee on 25 September also accepted the report, commended the action plan and recorded the following views:

    • Whilst accepting the SSI report, the Committee nevertheless believes that the judgement stating that the future is "uncertain" is disappointing, particularly as the report identifies extensive positive practice.
    • It is clear that officers were not complacent in acknowledging and working on improvement.
    • The Committee commend the managers and staff in the Children & Families division, for all their hard work towards improving services.
    • The Committee note that the inspection was a snapshot impression in March and that significant improvement had taken place since that time.

The Executive sees these comments as an endorsement of the excellent work undertaken by the Children & Families Division and the Action Plan as a very positive and encouraging document to support that work.

  1. Best Value Review: Behaviour, Attendance and Exclusions (Supplementary Report on Children in Public Care)
  2. On 8 January 2002 the Executive considered a Best Value Review Report on Behaviour, Attendance and Exclusions. In view of concerns over the increase in the number of children in the care of this authority permanently excluded from school and the number of children in care without a school place the Executive asked the Best Value review team to reconvene to consider these issues in more depth, and to report with an action plan for implementation.

    The team has now reported via the Best Value Committee and the Social & Health Care and Learning & Culture Scrutiny Committees. Following consideration of their comments - all of which were largely supportive - the Executive has approved the identified actions for service improvements, subject to identification of any necessary additional resources in the context of the budget process.

  3. Call-In of Executive Decision

Growing our Corporate Capacity

On 17 September 2002 the Executive approved the proposals for structural change set out in the consultation paper Growing our Corporate Capacity, subject to the Chief Executive being asked to review further the best location for Countryside Services, Registration and Emergency Planning in consultation with staff and members, and to decide the way forward by mid-December.

That decision was called in for consideration by the Corporate Governance Scrutiny Committee on 4 October 2002 who referred the issue of one single Director for Resources back to the Executive with the following comments:

    • A wide range of views was expressed on the decision, ranging from support for the overall proposals to opposition. In referring the matter back to the Executive there was no criticism of the general thrust of the overall proposals or of the Chief Executive.
    • Members supporting the reference back were concerned as to whether one Director could manage all the corporate resource functions and undertake the extensive role effectively, or whether the resource functions would be better allocated between (at least) two Directors. Irrespective of there being Heads of Service within the Resources Directorate, fears were expressed that the strategic corporate resource issues facing the Council would be difficult for one Director to handle.
    • The delay in the appointing process was unfortunate, but a delay to ‘get it right’ at this stage was better than a problem in the longer term.

The Executive has considered these points and recognises that some members still have a number of concerns but, having regard to the objectives of a single unified resources directorate, to the good performance of other, well established, large directorates, and practice in other counties, has decided to proceed with the proposals.

  1. Delivery Framework for E-Government and IEG2 Statement

Each local authority is required to submit an updated statement on its plans for implementing electronic government ("IEG2") to the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister. The Executive has endorsed a draft IEG2 statement and referred it to the Corporate Governance Scrutiny Committee for comments. These will be incorporated into the final submission which the Executive has authorised the Leader and Deputy Leader of the Council to agree for submission by the 31 October 2002 deadline.

Consultants have been commissioned to advise on an appropriate delivery framework and further guidance is being sought from them on a number of aspects, including the feasibility of extending the negotiations for a public private finance agreement to include issues relating to the Oxfordshire Community Network, E-workplace and the provision of start up finance for ICT for under-funded services. Officers have been asked to report back to the Executive by the end of December 2002 on the outcome of further guidance.

KEITH R. MITCHELL
Leader of the Council

Return to TOP