______________________________________
________________________________
To Members
of the Cabinet
Notice
of a Meeting of the Cabinet
Tuesday 21
February 2006 at 2.00 pm
County Hall,
Oxford
Derek Bishop
Head of Democratic
Services
Contact
officer: Kath Coldwell (Tel: 01865 815902; E-mail)
Membership
Councillors
|
|
|
Keith R Mitchell
|
-
|
Leader of
the Council
|
David Robertson
|
-
|
Deputy Leader
of the Council
|
Jim Couchman
|
-
|
Cabinet
Member for Policy Coordination
|
C.H. Shouler
|
-
|
Cabinet
Member for Finance
|
John Howell
|
-
|
Cabinet
Member for Change Management
|
David Robertson
|
-
|
Cabinet
Member for Transport
|
Roger Belson
|
-
|
Cabinet
Member for Sustainable Development
|
Louise Chapman
|
-
|
Cabinet
Member for Children, Young People & Families
|
Michael Waine
|
-
|
Cabinet
Member for Schools Improvement
|
Don Seale
|
-
|
Cabinet
Member for Social & Community Services
|
Ray Jelf
|
-
|
Cabinet
Member for Community Safety
|
Decisions
taken at the meeting will become effective at the end of the working day
on 1 March 2006 unless called in by that date for review by the appropriate
Scrutiny Committee.
Copies
of this Notice, Agenda and supporting papers are circulated to all Members
of the County Council.
If
you have any special requirements (such as a large print version
of these papers or special access facilities) please contact the
officer named on the front page, but please give as much notice
as possible before the meeting
|
AGENDA
- Apologies for Absence
- Declarations of Interest
– see guidance note
- Minutes
To
confirm the minutes of the meeting held on 7 February 2006 (CA3)
and to receive for information any matters arising therefrom.
- Petitions and Public
Address
(See Addenda)
- Financial Monitoring
Cabinet Member:
Finance
Forward
Plan Ref: 2005/169
Contact:
Sadie Slater, Financial Manager, Mike Petty, Principal Financial
Manager (01865 815989/815622)
Report by Head
of Finance & Procurement (CA5).
This
report covers the period up to the end of December 2005 for revenue
and capital. The consolidated forecast to date shows a balance of £12.187m.
This is an increase of £0.431m since the previous report and is made
up of a net reduction of £0.711m in the forecast Directorate overspend
offset by calls on balances of £0.280m. The overall Directorate position
is now forecast to be an overspend of £0.625m. Action Plans are in place
to address expenditure pressures and it remains likely that the position
will continue to improve as the year goes on.
For
the remainder of the financial year the budgets of the two realigned
Directorates will continue to be treated for financial reporting purposes
as if the realignment had not taken place, although from 1 January management
responsibility for some areas of those budgets has changed. In this
report, therefore, the ‘Learning & Culture’ and ‘Social & Health
Care’ groupings are retained. However, from the next monthly monitoring
report a summary of the position for the realigned directorates will
be included as an Annex.
The
Cabinet is RECOMMENDED to:
(a) note
the report;
(b) approve
the adjustments to the capital programme as shown at paragraph
49.
- Performance Management
Cabinet Member:
Change Management
Forward
Plan Ref: 2005/115
Contact:
Paul Edwards, Corporate Performance Manager (01865 815307)
Report by County
Council Management Team (CA6).
This
quarterly report is for our performance to date for 2005/06.
Performance
against Oxfordshire Plan 2005/6 priorities has improved from the position
reported in quarter 2. The number of priorities reported as on target
has increased and the number unlikely to achieve target has reduced.
The
3-year Local Public Service Agreement between the Council and the Government
identifies 12 areas in which performance is to be stretched beyond normal
expectations. Overall performance can be summarised as follows: 7 are
on track to receive reward grant (100% of reward grant in 3 cases);
for 2 it is unsure at this stage whether they will achieve
60% of the target threshold; and 3 are showing improvement but will
not achieve the 60% reward grant threshold.
There
are 115 Best Value Performance Indicators for which we are required
to report for 2005/06 and which have targets associated with them. The
Audit Commission has reported that nationally last year, the 'best'
performance against targets was in the mid-50%'s. Currently, we are
on track to achieve targets for 57% of BVPIs.
The
Cabinet is RECOMMENDED to note the report.
- Shared Service Centre
Cabinet Member:
Change Management
Forward
Plan Ref: 2005/207
Contact:
David Lines/Sue Hunt, Business Development (01865 810150/816036)
Report
by Director for Resources and the Chief Executive (CA7).
On
22 July 2005 the Cabinet approved progression to Stage Two of work on
a Shared Services model for support services in Oxfordshire County Council,
which broadly would entail moving the majority of HR, finance and procurement
activities from across the organisation into one Shared Services Centre,
with minimal services in these functions remaining in Directorates.
Stage
Two of the work is now complete. The research findings from this stage
support the hypothesis that a Shared Services model will have significant
financial and operational benefits for the Council. It illustrates significant
potential efficiency savings (i.e. doing the same things in a more efficient
and effective way) and an opportunity for delivering value for money
to the people of Oxfordshire. The efficiency savings Shared Services
offers are high. Cumulative savings in the region of £27.1m are achievable
over an eight-year period, with annual gross efficiency savings of £4m
from year four onwards. This equates to an annual recurring net saving
of £2.4m. Full pay back will be achieved by year five of the programme.
The
report summarises these findings in more detail, describing the results
of investigation and consultation, the proposed model, the resources
required and associated risks. It concludes that adopting the Shared
Services model can achieve not only financial but substantial operational
benefits. These will not be achieved with ease and Shared Services represents
an ambitious change programme for the Council. However the risks involved
will be managed through effective programme management, the monitoring
of implementation by CCMT and the Change Management Board and by sufficiently
funding the programme to proceed.
The
Cabinet is RECOMMENDED:
(a) on
the basis of the Business Case and the proposed cost benefits
and risks as outlined in the report, to authorise the full implementation
of the Shared Services proposals;
(b) to
approve the creation of a new Head of Service post for the Head
of Shared Services, and authorise recruitment to this position
immediately;
(c) to
agree the release of appropriate funds to support the implementation
programme as described in the report, subject to a project appraisal
for the necessary capital expenditure being brought to the Cabinet
for approval prior to the commitment of capital expenditure;
(d)
to authorise officers to pursue negotiations for the acquisition
of accommodation for the Shared Services Centre;
(e) to
advise the Corporate Governance Scrutiny Committee as to the
intended implementation of Shared Services to enable the Committee
to review and advise on elements of the programme as it sees
relevant.
- Local Transport Plan
2006-11
(See also Addenda)
Cabinet Member:
Transport
Forward
Plan Ref: 2005/168
Contact:
Roger O'Neill, Principal Planning Officer (01865 815659)
Report by Head
of Transport (CA8).
The
Local Transport Plan (LTP) is a document which the County Council, as
a local transport authority, is required to produce at least every 5
years. Guidance on the Plan is produced by the Government. The County
Council’s existing Local Transport Plan, approved in June 2000, runs
until March 2006 and a Provisional Plan for the 2006-11 period was submitted
to Government in July 2005. This Report outlines the comments received
on the Provisional Plan, both from Government and from consultation,
and outlines the changes that it is proposed will be made for the final
submission to be made at the end of March 2006. The report also outlines
the capital settlement for 2006/07 and the revised Financial Planning
Guidelines for the whole LTP period (2006/07-2010/11).
The
Local Transport Plan is one of the strategic plans which comprises the
Council’s Budget & Policy Framework and therefore must be approved
by Council. A draft version of the Local Transport Plan and Bus Strategy
has been considered by a panel of the Environment & Economy Scrutiny
Committee and their comments are listed in Annex 10. The drafts are
now circulated to Cabinet Members only, but copies are in the Members’
Resource Centre and are on public deposit. Revised versions taking into
account the Cabinet’s decisions at this meeting will be circulated to
all members for the 4 April Council meeting.
The
Cabinet is RECOMMENDED to:
(a) RECOMMEND
the Council to approve the draft final Local Transport Plan,
including the Bus Strategy, for submission to the Department
for Transport, subject to the inclusion of changes in the text
as agreed by the Director for Environment & Economy in consultation
with the Cabinet Member for Transport;
(b)
authorise the Director to send the Local Transport Plan, as
amended in accordance with (a) above, to the Department for
Transport by 31 March 2006 on the basis that it remains subject
to approval by the Council on 4 April;
(c) delete
the protected lines for those schemes which are not to be included
within the Local Transport Strategy, namely:
-
Woodstock Bypass
- Burford Bypass
- Tiddington Bypass
- Shilton Dip Bypass
(d) approve
the Air Quality Action Plan for Central Oxford, subject to its
also being approved by Oxford City Council.
- Rights of Way Improvement
Plan
Cabinet Member:
Sustainable Development
Forward
Plan Ref: 2005/212
Contact:
Keith Wheal, Countrywide Services Manager (01865 810202)
Report by Head
of Sustainable Development (CA9) (download
as .doc file).
Section
60 of the Countryside and Rights of Way Act 2000 requires local highway
authorities to prepare and publish a rights of way improvement plan
(RoWIP) by November 2007. The report presents a summary of the RoWIP’s
production and scope, which has been linked to the second Local Transport
Plan timetable.
The
plan is divided into two parts. Part one, the statement of action, sets
out the vision and aims for the RoWIP. Part two contains a summary of
the assessment of need and an analysis of the extent to which local
rights of way meet the present and likely future needs of the public.
The
preparation of a RoWIP is a statutory duty but there is currently no
duty on the authority to implement the plan. Achieving the plan’s ambitions
will depend on the amount of funding and support that can be successfully
obtained from internal and external sources.
The
main partner in preparing the plan has been the Oxfordshire Countryside
Access Forum (OCAF) and the Forum will play an important advisory role
in identifying sources of potential funding and the prioritisation and
delivery of the plan’s ambitions. OCAF advice to the County Council
regarding the RoWIP is included with the report.
The
Cabinet is RECOMMENDED to:
(a)
note the Oxfordshire Countryside Access Forum’s specific advice;
and
(b) adopt
the Rights of Way Improvement Plan for the period 2006-2011.
- Review of Housing Supply
and Planning Gain
Cabinet Member:
Sustainable Development
Forward
Plan Ref: 2005/216
Contact:
Fiona Mullins, Planning Officer (01865 810434)
Report by Head
of Sustainable Development (CA10) (download
as .doc file).
On
5 December 2005 the government announced a package of measures as part
of its response to Kate Barker’s Review of Housing Supply. As part of
this response, the government is consulting on two policy documents
which have considerable implications for the planning system:
· a
draft Planning Policy Statement 3 (PPS3) Housing; and
· a
proposed Planning Gain Supplement.
This
report suggests a County Council response to these consultations.
The planning policy
statement for housing emphasises the need for the planning system to
respond to the housing market. The market is one important factor in
planning for housing growth. However, without sufficient regard to other
considerations this emphasis could jeopardise delivery of sustainable
communities, overburden infrastructure and create resource and environmental
problems. The government is relying too heavily on house building to
solve affordability problems. Requirements to provide housing in areas
of high demand could undermine the protection of green belts.
The
proposed Planning Gain Supplement is a levy that would be collected
by HM Revenue and Customs and would be implemented together with scaled
back planning obligations. The government’s stated principles of streamlining
and increasing infrastructure funding are welcome. However, it is not
clear that the proposed system could deliver the amount of funding that
is required for both local and strategic infrastructure, how much of
the funding would be returned to the local level, and whether the new
system would work effectively.
The
Cabinet is RECOMMENDED to:
(a)
endorse the response set out in paragraph 11 and Annex 2 on
draft Planning Policy Statement 3 (Housing);
(b) endorse
the response set out in paragraph 16 and Annex 3 on the proposed
Planning Gain Supplement;
and
agree that they should be sent to the Government as the County Council’s
response to the consultation papers subject to authorising the Head
of Sustainable Development to carry out any minor editing that may be
necessary before submission
- Forward Plan and Future
Business
(See also Addenda)
Cabinet Member:
All
Contact
Officer: John Leverton, Head of Committee Services (01865 815314)
The
Cabinet Procedure Rules provide that the business of each meeting
at the Cabinet is to include "updating of the Forward Plan and proposals
for business to be conducted at the following meeting". Items from
the Forward Plan for the immediately forthcoming meetings of the Cabinet
appear in the Schedule at CA11.
This includes any updated information relating to the business for
those meetings that has already been identified for inclusion in the
next Forward Plan update.
The
Schedule is for noting, but Cabinet Members may also wish to take
this opportunity to identify any further changes they would wish to
be incorporated in the next Forward Plan update.
The
Cabinet is RECOMMENDED to note the items currently identified for
forthcoming meetings.
February 2006
Return to TOP
|