Daniel Leveson (BOB ICB Place Director, Oxfordshire); Lucy Fenton (Transformation Lead – Primary, Community & Dental Care
Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust); Susannah Butt (Transformation Director-Primary, Community and Dental Care, Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust); Dr Ben Riley (Executive Managing Director- Primary, Community and Dental Care, Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust); have been invited to present a report providing an update on the Public Engagement Exercise around Wantage Community Hospital.
The Committee is invited to consider the report, raise any questions and AGREE any recommendations arising it may wish to make.
N.B A report detailing the recommendations of the HOSC
Substantial Change Working Group is to follow and to be published as an addendum.
The Committee is invited to consider this report on the Public Engagement
Exercise around the future of the Hospital, and is recommended to AGREE
to the following recommendations made by the Working Group:
1. Defer the decision as to whether the closure of beds at Wantage Community Hospital constitutes a Substantial Change.
2. Defer the decision on whether to refer to the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care the matter of the closure of beds at Wantage Community Hospital.
3. Agree an extra HOSC meeting to be scheduled in mid-January to make a final determination as to whether to make a referral to the Secretary of State is necessary in relation to the removal of beds at Wantage Community Hospital, and as to whether declare the removal of the beds as a Substantial Change.
Minutes:
Daniel
Leveson (BOB ICB Place Director, Oxfordshire); Lucy Fenton (Transformation Lead
– Primary, Community & Dental Care OH NHS Foundation Trust); Susannah Butt
(Transformation Director-Primary, Community and Dental Care, Oxford Health NHS
Foundation Trust); Dr Ben Riley (Executive
Managing Director- Primary, Community and Dental Care, Oxford Health NHS
Foundation Trust); were invited to present a report providing an update
on the Public Engagement Exercise around Wantage Community Hospital.
The Committee emphasised that it
was crucial that they were aware of the progress made as part of the
public engagement exercise around the future services to be delivered at
Wantage Community Hospital, as well as for there to be clarity on the degree to
which adequate co-production had been at the heart of determining how future
services at the hospital would be configured following the closure of the
inpatient-beds some years ago.
The Committee sought reassurance on the degree to which
viable offers were being made as to the future of the hospital’s services. It
was raised and discussed that the HOSC Substantial Change Working Group had
been involved in close and continuous scrutiny of the public engagement
exercise, and that the working group had held monthly check-ins with Oxford
Health and the ICB to be kept up to date with as well as to discuss the
exercise. The Working Group had also produced a report with its own recommendations
to HOSC, which had been published as an addenda to the
original agenda for this meeting.
The Committee thanked Oxford Health as well as the ICB for
their efforts around the co-production exercise on the hospital’s future, and outlined that this was the closest that the
system had ever been previously in helping to determine which services should
be delivered on the ground floor of the hospital following the closure of the
inpatient beds. The Committee also thanked all stakeholder groups which also
partook in the exercise.
It was also discussed that the survey that was distributed
as part of the exercise had come to an end, and that verve (the independent
facilitator of the exercise) were in the process of collating the findings.
It was also raised that there were three scenarios as to how
future services could be delivered on the ground floor of the hospital, and
that these scenarios were discussed as part of the public engagement exercise,
which included:
1. Clinic
based services (tests, treatment and therapy) for
planned care appointments.
2. Community
inpatient beds and the alternatives when care in people’s own homes was not
possible.
3. Urgent
care (minor injury, illness and mental health issues)
access needs on the same day.
The BOB ICB Place Director explained to the Committee that
the NHS understood and appreciated that the community in Wantage wanted clarity
on the future of the hospital’s services since the closure of the inpatient
beds, and that they wished to see a resolution. It was also highlighted to the
Committee that immense time, effort and resource was invested into the public
engagement exercise in Wantage, and that the exercise was well worthwhile.
The Committee emphasised that it was imperative for there to
be clarity on what the final offer would be in terms of what specific services
would be delivered on the ground floor of the hospital. It was also stated that
the offer should be made as imminently as possible, and that such an offer had
to be sustainable and long-term in nature.
The Committee AGREED to the following recommendations
made by the HOSC Substantial Change Working Group:
1.
Defer the decision as to whether the closure of
beds at Wantage Community Hospital constitutes a Substantial Change.
2.
Defer the decision on whether to refer to the
Secretary of State for Health and Social Care the matter of the closure of beds
at Wantage Community Hospital.
3.
Agree an Extra HOSC meeting to be scheduled in
mid-January, to make a final determination as to whether to make a referral to
the Secretary of State is necessary in relation to the removal of beds at
Wantage Community Hospital, and as to whether to declare the removal of the
beds as a Substantial Change.
The Committee agreed to the aforementioned
recommendations in light of the fact that the final co-produced report
that would highlight the outcomes of the public engagement exercise was yet to
be finalised and published. The Committee understood that the co-produced
report would form the basis of its ultimate decision on whether to declare the
closure of the inpatient beds at Wantage Community Hospital as a substantial
Change, as well as whether to refer this matter to the Secretary of State for
Health. During its extra meeting in January, the Committee would have received
the final co-produced report and would then be in a position
to make its final decisions on the above.
Supporting documents: