Report by Director of Planning & Place (PN7)
This report covers
an application for a replacement asphalt plant for that existing at the Appleford Sidings in the same general location. The asphalt
is required because the existing plant is over 30 years old and needs
replacement. The proposed asphalt plant would have a chimney stack height
approximately 10 metres higher than the plant to be replaced.
The application is
being brought to committee because concern has been raised by Sutton Courtenay
Parish Council that the plant is acceptable but should be removed in line with
the cessation date for the surrounding landfill site.
The report
assesses the proposals against relevant planning policy and material
considerations.
It is RECOMMENDED that subject to the
completion of a routeing agreement requiring all vehicles to access and egress the
site to and from the A4130 Didcot northern perimeter road, application
MW.0005/17 be approved subject to conditions to be determined by the Director
of Planning and Place including those set out in Annex 2 to the report PN7.
Minutes:
The Committee
considered a report (PN7) setting out proposals for an asphalt plant at Appleford Sidings to replace the existing plant which was
over 30 years old and in need of replacement.
Mr Periam introduced
the report and then responded to questions from:
Councillor
Johnston - he was unaware of proposals
to electrify the sidings at Appleford nor any
implications, which might arise from that work for security at the site itself
Councillor Matelot
– he confirmed that although the new plant would be in the same general
location the chimney stack would, at its highest point, be 10m higher than the
current site.
Councillor Webber
– the pylon adjacent to the site would be 15 metres higher than the proposed
plant. Mr Mottram added that although
there had been some concerns regarding visibility of the plant over the
existing tree cover that had been considered acceptable as the impact was not
severe.
Councillor Webber
- the proposal was closely associated with the sidings, which was currently
used to bring in hard rock. That seemed to imply a specific reason why the
plant was being proposed at this site.
Councillor
Fitzgerald O’Connor –the neighbouring BOAT (Byway
Open to All Traffic) was currently used by HGVs and that would not change.
Councillor
Gawrysiak – he confirmed that the development would cease in 2030 in line with
the main requirements of the landfill permission However, as the remainder of the industrial
site and the sidings was not subject to any restoration requirement that
industrial use would continue .
Councillor
Stratford – the routeing agreement would be the same as currently existed.
Mr Duncan
explained there were 2 plants in the County at Banbury and Sutton Courtenay.
Both had significant strategic and long term importance hence the need for
permanent permissions. Both were sited near rail sidings. With regard to the
Sutton Courtenay site the surrounding land which was now domed because of
landfill offered good screening.
He then responded
to questions from:
Councillor
Johnston – as the cost of the plant was £7m he considered it unlikely that
there would be any risks to its security or viability from any proposals to
develop the sidings.
Councillor
Phillips – although the proposed site although was not exactly in the same
position the footprint between the two differed by one metre. The chimney stack
was higher in order to meet environmental standards for emissions.
Mr Periam
confirmed that the Vale of White Horse district council had not responded.
Councillor Webber
mentioned the work undertaken by the Sutton Courtenay Local Liaison Committee
over many years. It had been instrumental in helping to promote the smooth
transition of numerous applications and he felt their work should be recognised.
RESOLVED: (on a motion by Councillor Johnston,
seconded by Councillor Lygo and carried unanimously) that subject to the completion of a routeing
agreement requiring all vehicles to access and egress the site to and from the
A4130 Didcot northern perimeter road, application MW.0005/17 be approved
subject to conditions to be determined by the Director of Planning and Place
including those set out in Annex 2 to the report PN7.
Supporting documents: