Venue: Rooms 1&2 - County Hall, New Road, Oxford OX1 1ND. View directions
Contact: Colm Ó Caomhánaigh, Tel 07393 001096 Email: colm.ocaomhanaigh@oxfordshire.gov.uk
| No. | Item |
|---|---|
|
Apologies for Absence and Temporary Appointments Minutes: An apology was submitted by Counciullor Michael Waine (Councillor Les Sibley substituting). |
|
|
To approve the minutes of the meeting held 13 December 2018 and to receive information arising from them. Minutes: The Minutes of the meeting held on 13 December 2018 were approved and signed as a correct record. |
|
|
Corporate Plan 10.05 The Corporate Plan sets out the County Council’s overarching strategy. It states our vision for ‘thriving communities’ in Oxfordshire and describes the council’s main priorities. The Corporate Plan 2018-2021 was agreed by Council in July 2018. A light touch review and update has been done to this document to ensure it accurately reflects Council priorities and areas of focus for 2019/20 and beyond. A Corporate Plan for 2019-2021 is therefore presented to provide this update. The intended audience for the Plan is Councillors, staff, partners, inspectors and residents with a specific interest. The Committee is RECOMMENDED to: a)
consider
the draft Corporate Plan 2019-2022 ahead of its presentation for agreement by
Council on 12 February 2019; and b)
provide
any comments on the outcomes and indicators to ensure corporate performance
reporting remains effective. Additional documents:
Minutes: The Corporate
Plan sets out the County Council’s overarching strategy. It states our vision
for ‘thriving communities’ in Oxfordshire and describes the council’s main
priorities. The Corporate Plan 2018-2021 was agreed by
Council in July 2018. A light touch review and update had been done to this
document to ensure it accurately reflects Council priorities and areas of focus
for 2019/20 and beyond. The Committee had before them a Corporate Plan for
2019-2021. Members considered the format of the report and whether it
was useful at this stage to have a further draft of the whole Plan to
Committee. Ben Threadgold, Policy
and Performance Service Manager in response to a request undertook to circulate
a summary of the changes to the Plan to Committee members.
|
|
|
Service and Resource Planning 2019/20 - 2028/29 10.35 To consider draft
capital proposals and draft Treasury Management Strategy and provide comment to
the Cabinet before proposals are reviewed on 22 January. Council will meet to
agree the budget and MTFP on 12 February 2019. (Note: this item will
no longer include a discussion about the Investment Strategy.) The Committee is RECOMMENDED
to consider and comment on the a)
Review of Charges for 2019/20; b)
Capital & Investment Strategy
incorporating the Treasury Management Strategy Statement 2019/20; and c)
proposed capital programme portfolio
allocations for 2019/20 to 2028/29. Additional documents:
Minutes: The Committee considered draft capital proposals and the draft Treasury
Management Strategy in order to provide comment to the Cabinet before proposals
are reviewed on 22 January. Council will meet to agree the budget and MTFP on
12 February 2019. In relation to
proposals for the capital programme members raised the following points: Capital Budget
Proposals: ·
The
committee requested that officers provide a briefing to provide more detail
about the location of housing numbers associated with the Housing
Infrastructure Fund (HIF) bid in the Didcot Garden Town and A40 Smart Corridor
area. ·
The
committee recognised that the exact route of the Oxford-Cambridge Expressway is
not yet known but were keen that planning and scenario testing is undertaken as
soon as more information is provided by Highways England as they recognise that
this is likely to have a significant impact on future capital budgets. ·
The
committee were keen to understand the relationship between capital investment
and revenue savings using real examples. Members asked for further information
about the development of children’s crisis care provision as an opportunity for
capital investment to drive down revenue expenditure in a service area. ·
The
committee queried plans to recruit additional staff with appropriate skills to
manage the large capital sums being proposed and to ensure a return on
investment. ·
The
committee highlighted that further work would be required to understand the
implications of the Carillion liquidation and to ensure that there is
appropriate funding in place to manage the legacy of this. Capital and
Investment Strategy: ·
The
committee were supportive of the organisational change in culture towards
considering more ‘invest to save’ measures and encouraged greater exploration
of innovation. ·
The
committee were keen to see more examples of invest to save work as these emerge
and to scrutinise the Investment Strategy as this is developed. ·
The
committee felt that the biggest examples of investing to save would be found in
public health. Review of
Charges: ·
The
committee queried whether increasing the charges for the Music Service could
have a detrimental impact on participation and negate the potential increases
in income. ·
-
The committee were pleased to see a reduction in the cost of season ticket
parking at Thornhill and Water Eaton Park and Ride sites. |
|
|
Highways Deep Dive Report 11.15 The condition of roads has a significant impact on levels public satisfaction with the Council and their local area. As a result, the Performance Scrutiny Committee commissioned a deep dive into the factors affecting public perception and experience of highways and the Council’s approach to improving this. From July to November a small group of councillors worked with officers to identify opportunities for improving the condition of the road network, tackling congestion, better managing the impact of street works and adapting our approach to maintenance contracts and partnership working on highways. This report presents the findings and recommendations from the deep dive for the Performance Scrutiny Committee to consider. The Performance
Scrutiny Committee is RECOMMENDED to: a)
Ensure there
is councillor input into the review of the Highways Asset Management Plan, and
that this includes consideration of flexibility for local prioritisation. b)
Ask Cabinet to ensure there is a smarter
process for developing a programme of work to utilise the additional
capital investment in highways and that a robust capital governance process is
in place to help shape this and improve risk management. c)
Ensure officers consider the impact on
public perception when developing a programme of work and improve opportunities
for councillors to influence this based on local priorities. d)
Ask officers to work with SKANSKA to
explore a business case for greater levels of supervision that will ensure the
quality of work remains high, including a consideration of how in-house
resources could be utilised differently. e)
Ensure that opportunities to
utilise staff in flexible ways are explored further with SKANSKA, so that the
maximum benefit of having staff on site can be realised. f)
Encourage officers to explore more
innovative maintenance methods and tools. g)
Ask Cabinet to ensure an effective
approach to publicly publishing and communicating the highways programme of
work is in place. h)
Ask
officers to develop a more robust process for informing councillors of local
road improvements in their division, so that they can advise on works that need
to be prioritised and support early communication with residents. i)
Ask officers to ensure all responses to
highways enquiries / reports through Fix My Street include a named officer
contact. j)
Ensure direct points of contact are
communicated and established for key stakeholders (e.g. town and parish
councils) to ensure that local highway priorities can be followed up and dealt
with more efficiently. k)
Support the Council’s ambition to become a
Permitting Authority and request a report on the expected impact of this in
mid-2019. l)
Support
the development of a comprehensive out of hours traffic management provision to
ensure effective management of the impact of major incidents and network
failures at these times. m)
Support the principle of a having greater
focus on enforcement. n)
Ask the Cabinet to instruct officers to
explore a case for employing dedicated resource for enforcement across all
Highways services/functions. o) Ask the Director of Infrastructure Operations to ensure that a structured and robust approach to managing ... view the full agenda text for item 5/19 Minutes: The condition of roads has a significant impact on levels public satisfaction with the Council and their local area. As a result, the Performance Scrutiny Committee commissioned a deep dive into the factors affecting public perception and experience of highways and the Council’s approach to improving this. From July to November a small group of councillors worked with officers to identify opportunities for improving the condition of the road network, tackling congestion, better managing the impact of street works and adapting our approach to maintenance contracts and partnership working on highways. The Committee considered a report that presented the findings and recommendations from the deep dive for the Performance Scrutiny Committee to consider. Councillor John Sanders who sat on the Deep Dive group was welcomed to the table for this item. Councillor Jenny Hannaby, who led the Deep Dive presented the findings of the Group and their recommendations. During discussion the following points were made: · There was general support for the recommendations with members noting that a great deal of work had been undertaken. · Member involvement had been a key theme of the work of the Group. Members welcomed the recent initiative to seek input from local councillors on priority repairs for their areas. · Providing councillors with timely information of road works and incidents in their area would be extremely helpful. · Members felt it was important that the Committee be assured that their work was being considered and taken forward. It was agreed that the Committee receive a progress report. · Referring to the resource implications of the recommendations it was highlighted the need to look at charging regimes and penalties for sub-contractors. · Members highlighted particular problems in their local areas. · It was suggested that work by utilities be added to the list of notifications to councillors with tighter lines of communication. Responding to comments officers and Group members commented: · That although looking primarily at road ways, footpaths and cycleways had been part of the review. In the timescales it had not been necessary to limit the scope of the review and some areas merited a deep dive of their own. In terms of notification of works to councillors then cycleways and footpaths were part of the same process. · That member involvement in the review of the Highways Asset Management Plan would be considered and it was possible that a Cabinet Advisory Group would be established. · Officers had found the review valuable and were supportive of the recommendations but they would need to be costed and would need additional detailed work. RESOLVED: to: (a) support and approve the following RECOMMENDATIONS for submission to
Cabinet: 1.
Ensure there is councillor input into the review
of the Highways Asset Management Plan, and that this includes consideration of
flexibility for local prioritisation. 2. Ask Cabinet to ensure there is a smarter process for developing a programme of work to utilise the additional capital investment in highways and that a robust capital governance process is in place to help shape this and improve risk management. ... view the full minutes text for item 5/19 |
|
|
Scrutiny of Partnerships 11.35 This report sets out the way in which work with key partnerships in Oxfordshire has been presented to Councillors. It proposes that in future, scrutiny of each partnership will be undertaken throughout the year via specific, targeted discussions at appropriate meetings and reported on as part of the scrutiny annual report to Council in July. The Committee is
RECOMMENDED to: a)
note
the revised approach to scrutiny of partnership arrangements moving forward;
and b)
agree
which Partnerships they may wish to scrutinise in more detail as part of their
forward plan. Minutes: The Committee considered a report setting out the way in which work with key partnerships in Oxfordshire has been presented to Councillors and making proposals for future scrutiny. During discussion the Committee: · Supported the general approach but felt that more information was needed on a number of the Partnerships and the Committee’s role in and approach to scrutinising them, particularly with regard to the LEP, Growth Board and the Oxfordshire Environment Partnership. · Noted the role of the Education Scrutiny Committee in relation to the Oxfordshire Strategic Schools Partnership Board and Oxfordshire Early Years Board. · Noted that although there were three scrutiny committees the Audit & Governance Committee also carried out a scrutiny function. RESOLVED: to: (a) note the revised approach to scrutiny of partnership arrangements moving forward; and (b) agree that further information be supplied on a number of the Partnerships and the Committee’s role in and approach to scrutinising them, particularly with regard to the LEP, Growth Board and the Oxfordshire Environment Partnership. |
|
|
Committee Work Programme 11.45 To agree the Committee’s work programme for future meetings based on key priorities and discussion in the meeting. Minutes: The Committee agreed it’s work programme for future meetings based on key priorities and discussion in the meeting. |
|
|
Vote of Thanks Minutes: The Committee noted that Katie Read was about to take
maternity leave and placed on record their thanks for her magnificent support
of the Committee. |