Motion by Councillor Richard Webber
“The Council’s Procurement procedures have been the subject
of concern for some time. At the latest Audit and Governance Committee meeting,
the subject of a claim made over a breach of Procurement procedures by the
Council was considered. This breach of procedure has cost the Council, and
hence Oxfordshire taxpayers, £1.6 million in compensation and legal costs.
Council notes that the role of the Audit & Governance
Committee is to ensure that the Council's procedures are robust, that
taxpayer's money is controlled properly and that it is spent wisely.
The timeline provided to the Audit and Governance Committee
meeting on this matter shows that the Portfolio Holder and the Chair of Audit
and Governance were both aware of the breach and cost of out of court
settlement in February 2020, but the Committee was only informed in January
2021. Council believes that by withholding this information from the Audit and
Governance Committee for 11 months, the Executive failed to act in the
interest of Oxfordshire taxpayers.
Council commits to ensuring that, in future, in the
interests of transparency and good governance, any breaches of procedure are
made known to members of the Audit and Governance Committee as soon as they are
known to the Executive, and that committee members are allowed to see any
reports relating to such breaches of procedure (redacted as necessary),
following any reasonable request from members of that committee and assuming
there is no legal reason why such documents should be with-held.
Decision:
With the consent of Council Councillor
Webber moved his motion amended at the suggestion of Councillor David
Bartholomew as shown below in strikethrough and bold italics:
The Council’s Procurement procedures have
been the subject of concern for some time. At the latest Audit and Governance
Committee meeting, the subject of a claim made over a breach of Procurement
procedures by the Council was considered. This breach of procedure has cost the
Council, and hence Oxfordshire taxpayers, £1.6 million in compensation and
legal costs.
Council notes that the role of the Audit
& Governance Committee is to ensure that the Council's procedures are
robust, that taxpayer's money is controlled properly and that it is spent wisely.
The timeline provided to the Audit and
Governance Committee meeting on this matter shows that the Portfolio Holder and
the Chair of Audit and Governance were both aware of the breach and cost of out
of court settlement in February 2020, but and as an independent
report was in progress, the Audit Working Group Committee was
only informed in December 2020. January 2021. Council
believes that by withholding this information from the Audit and Governance
Committee for 11 months, the Executive failed to act in the interest of
Oxfordshire taxpayers.
Council commits to ensuring that, in
future, in the interests of transparency and good governance, any breaches of
procedure are made known to members of the Audit and Governance Committee as
soon as they are known to the Executive, and that committee members are allowed
to see any reports relating to such breaches of procedure (redacted as
necessary), following any reasonable request from members of that committee and
assuming there is no legal reason why such documents should be with-held.
Following a vote
the Motion as amended was agreed unanimously.
(Recorded vote in the minutes)
Minutes:
With the consent of
Council Councillor Webber moved his motion amended at the suggestion of
Councillor David Bartholomew as shown below in strikethrough and bold italics:
The Council’s Procurement
procedures have been the subject of concern for some time. At the latest Audit
and Governance Committee meeting, the subject of a claim made over a breach of
Procurement procedures by the Council was considered. This breach of procedure
has cost the Council, and hence Oxfordshire taxpayers, £1.6 million in
compensation and legal costs.
Council notes that the
role of the Audit & Governance Committee is to ensure that the Council's
procedures are robust, that taxpayer's money is controlled properly and that it
is spent wisely.
The timeline provided
to the Audit and Governance Committee meeting on this matter shows that the
Portfolio Holder and the Chair of Audit and Governance were both aware of the
breach and cost of out of court settlement in February 2020, but and
as an independent report was in progress, the Audit Working Group Committee
was only informed in December 2020. January 2021.
Council believes that by withholding this information from the Audit and
Governance Committee for 11 months, the Executive failed to act in the interest
of Oxfordshire taxpayers.
Council commits to
ensuring that, in future, in the interests of transparency and good governance,
any breaches of procedure are made known to members of the Audit and Governance
Committee as soon as they are known to the Executive, and that committee
members are allowed to see any reports relating to such breaches of procedure
(redacted as necessary), following any reasonable request from members of that
committee and assuming there is no legal reason why such documents should be
with-held.
The motion was seconded
by Councillor Buckley.
Following a debate, the
motion as amended was agreed unanimously by 59 votes for, with none against and
no abstentions,
Councillors called for a named vote(Council Procedure Rule 17.4.1):
Councillors voting for the motion
(59)
Afridi, Bartholomew, Bartington, Bearder, Billington, Brighouse, Buckley, Bulmer, Carter, Cherry, Clarke, Constance, Corkin, Fatemian, Fawcett, Fenton, Field-Johnson, Fitzgerald O’Connor, Fox-Davies, Gawrysiak, Gray, Handley, Hanna, Hannaby, Harris, Harrod, Haywood, Heathcoat, Hibbert-Biles, Howson, Hudspeth, Ilott, Johnston, Leffman, Lindsay-Gale, Lygo, Mallon, Matelot, Mathew, Mcllveen, Phillips, Pressel, Reeves, Reynolds, Roberts, Rooke, Sames, Gill Sanders, John Sanders, Sibley, Emily Smith, Roz Smith, Stratford, Sudbury, Thompson, Turnbull, Waine, Walker and Webber.
Councillors voting against the motion (0)
Councillors abstaining on the motion (0)
It was accordingly:
RESOLVED: The Council’s Procurement procedures have
been the subject of concern for some time. At the latest Audit and Governance
Committee meeting, the subject of a claim made over a breach of Procurement
procedures by the Council was considered. This breach of procedure has cost the
Council, and hence Oxfordshire taxpayers, £1.6 million in compensation and
legal costs.
Council notes that the role of the Audit & Governance Committee is to ensure that the Council's procedures are robust, that taxpayer's money is controlled properly and that it is ... view the full minutes text for item 24
Motions by Councillors: Richard Webber, Eddie Reeves, Stefan Gawrysiak, Susanna Pressel, Damian haywood and Arash Fatemian
“The Council’s Procurement procedures have been the subject
of concern for some time. At the latest Audit and Governance Committee meeting,
the subject of a claim made over a breach of Procurement procedures by the
Council was considered. This breach of procedure has cost the Council, and
hence Oxfordshire taxpayers, £1.6 million in compensation and legal costs.
Council notes that the role of the Audit & Governance
Committee is to ensure that the Council's procedures are robust, that
taxpayer's money is controlled properly and that it is spent wisely.
The timeline provided to the Audit and Governance Committee
meeting on this matter shows that the Portfolio Holder and the Chair of Audit
and Governance were both aware of the breach and cost of court settlement in
February 2020, but the Committee was only informed in January 2021. Council
believes that by withholding this information from the Audit and Governance
Committee for 11 months, the Executive failed to act in the interest of
Oxfordshire taxpayers.
Council commits to ensuring that, in future, in the
interests of transparency and good governance, any breaches of procedure are
made known to members of the Audit and Governance Committee as soon as they are
known to the Executive, and that committee members are allowed to see any
reports relating to such breaches of procedure (redacted as necessary),
following any reasonable request from members of that committee and assuming
there is no legal reason why such documents should be with-held.
Decision:
Considered dropped in accordance with Council Procedure Rule 13.5.8.
Minutes:
Following the Motion without Notice, these Motions were considered dropped in accordance with Council Procedure Rule 13.5.8.