19 Youth Opportunity Fund PDF 324 KB
Cabinet Member: Local Communities
Forward Plan Ref: 2019/192
Contact: Fulya Markham, Senior Strategic Commissioning Officer Tel: 07776 997956
Report by Corporate Director of Children’s Services (CA10).
The Youth Opportunity Fund was introduced by Cabinet in 2019 to increase opportunities for young people across Oxfordshire. This fund aims to support voluntary and community organisations to establish new youth opportunities and extend existing activities to additional sessions, areas or groups of young people between the ages of 11 to 18 (25 where young people have special educational needs). The total value of the Fund is £1 million for two years from the date of award, and up to a maximum of £70,000 per application across the two years. Once the available resource is used the Youth Opportunity Fund will be closed.
Following the application process, as per the agreed cross-party decision-making process, the cross-party panel reviewed the applications and assessed them against grant criteria.
This paper sets out the final cross-party panel recommendations for allocation of the Youth Opportunity Fund for decision by Cabinet.
The Cabinet is RECOMMENDED to:
(a) award a total of £999,800 (details can be found at Annex 2); and
(b) close the Youth Opportunity Fund.
Decision:
Recommendations agreed
Minutes:
The Youth Opportunity Fund was introduced by Cabinet in 2019 to increase opportunities for young people across Oxfordshire. Following the application process, as per the agreed cross-party decision-making process, the cross-party panel reviewed the applications and assessed them against grant criteria.
Cabinet had before them a report that set out the final cross-party panel recommendations for allocation of the Youth Opportunity Fund for decision by Cabinet.
Councillor Gill Sanders, local councillor for Rose Hill & Littlemore, thanked the cross-party panel for their work and for supporting the bid from the Rose Hill Junior Youth Club. The funding to this Group and other successful groups would be put to good use. She sympathised with the unsuccessful bidders and referred to the funding agreed at full Council in February to develop an up to date assessment of need and of the services young people in Oxfordshire want and need; to identify whether these services are currently being delivered and to investigate future service delivery options to meet that need. She hoped that this might be a start to replace those services lost as a result of cuts to local government funding.
Councillor Liz Brighouse, speaking as the Opposition Leader and local councillor for Churchill & Ley Valley thanked all those on the cross-party working panel for sifting through all the 95 applications. The volume of applications was an indication of the need to recognise that youth work in Oxfordshire needed to be funded. Organisations were struggling and the grant funding would make a difference.
Referring to her local project it was recommended for funding. In the past her area had had a full-time youth worker who had supported a number of volunteers in addition to young people on the street. There was a video available of the work done. She hoped that some of that legacy could be picked up again.
In
thanking Cabinet for the money, she stressed that it was important
to learn from how the money was used, with schemes being well
evaluated.
Councillor Richard Webber, local councillor for Sutton Courtenay
& Marcham, spoke as someone who had served on other panels and
was fully aware of the difficult task they faced and the heavy time
commitment. There were 71 unsuccessful bids, almost all doing
wonderful work. Many of these groups did not understand why they
were falling short. No one had heard why they were unsuccessful. In
his area the DAMASCUS Youth Project was unsuccessful, but he was
speaking for all those unsuccessful groups. Lack of funding could
damage groups’ further opportunities to attract funding as
they would be unable to demonstrate council support.
Councillor Webber added that the fund seemed to be about innovation with no support for sustainability. He hoped that the Council budget decision referred to by Councillor Sanders would be carried out to understand sustainability issues.
Councillor Webber suggested that Cabinet was being asked to ratify the decisions without all the information in front of them. He also queried why the Fund had taken so long to ... view the full minutes text for item 19