Issue - meetings

Oxford: Various sites (A420 High Street, New Road, Little Clarendon Street, Cowley Road and Manzil Way) - Amendments to Waiting and Loading Restrictions to Accommodate New and Amended Taxi Ranks

Meeting: 15/11/2018 - Delegated Decisions by Cabinet Member for Environment (including Transport) (Item 60)

60 Oxford: Various Locations - Proposed Amendments to parking and Loading Places pdf icon PDF 2 MB

Forward Plan Ref: 2018/106

Contact: Hugh Potter, Team Leader – Area Operations Hub Tel: 07766 99704

 

Report by Director for Infrastructure Operations (CMDE5).

 

The report presents responses received to a statutory consultation on proposals to amend parking and loading places in High Street, New Road and Little Clarendon Street, Oxford.  These changes would allow the city council to carry out the necessary consultation for changes to taxi rank provision in these locations.

 

The Cabinet Member for the Environment is RECOMMENDED to:

 

(a)             approve the proposals as advertised for High Street and New Road and request that the city council carry out the necessary formal consultation on the provision of taxi ranks;

 

(b)             note the response to the proposals on Little Clarendon Street and request that the city council carry out the necessary formal consultation on the provision of the taxi rank.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Decision:

Original recommendation not approved. Amended resolution see bold italics in left hand column.

 

 

 

Approved

Minutes:

The Cabinet Member for Environment considered (CMDE5) responses received to a statutory consultation on proposals to amend parking and loading places in High Street, New Road and Little Clarendon Street, Oxford. The proposals had stemmed from requests by the City of Oxford Licensed Taxi Association (COLTA) in relation to their general concerns about limited taxi rank provision in the city centre and the changes would allow the city council to carry out the necessary consultation for changes to taxi rank provision in these locations.

 

Sajad Khan spoke specifically to the blackcab trade element emphasising its importance as an integral part of the local transport service in Oxford.  COLTA whilst supporting proposals for the 2 new ranks and reinstatement of the rank outside the Mitre and with regard to the latter understood concerns regarding removal of the loading bay but the Shepherd and Woodward rank was in an unsuitable location and not fit for purpose.  Highlighting concerns expressed regarding zero emissions COLTA felt that it was unfair to penalise the blackcab trade as they were not the highest polluters and particularly when there ongoing discussions regarding this issue.

 

Tim Gresswell spoke against reinstatement of the rank outside the Mitre.  As an owner of a business adjacent to that site he advised that in 15 years he had only seen 1 taxi waiting there whereas the loading bay was in constant use with  3 deliveries daily to his shop in addition to dray deliveries to the Mitre.  There would also be consequences for other businesses in the High Street which could lead to more closing.  He had already closed down one business in the market and it would be a travesty to lose anymore. In any event the proposed rank would only accommodate 2 taxis and it was easy enough in his opinion to hail one. He tabled photographs showing congestion which would only be worsened by taxis.

 

The Cabinet Member confirmed that the issue of loading bays would be addressed.

 

Councillor John Sanders welcomed the proposed provision for taxi ranks but also suggested reconsideration be given to provision in other locations such as Norfolk Street.  He also raised the issue of prioritising access for stallholders in Market Street.

 

Mr Rossington advised that since the report had been published a further 20 responses had been received making a total of 36. The final, updated summary of the response to the consultation was as follows:

 

Location

Support

Object

Neither

No opinion

High Street

17

14

3

2

Little Clarendon Street

18

5

4

9

New Road

22

1

3

10

 

This meant for High Street there had been an additional 11 responses supporting the advertised proposals with a further 8 objecting.

 

For New Road an additional 15 responses supporting the advertised proposals with 1 objecting.

 

For Little Clarendon Street an additional 12 responses supporting the advertised proposals with 3 objecting.

 

Of the additional objections to the High Street proposals, it was possible to identify 4 from Covered Market or High Street businesses  ...  view the full minutes text for item 60