Decision Maker: County Council, Cabinet
Decision status: Recommendations approved
Is Key decision?: Yes
Is subject to call in?: No
To seek approval of changes in the LTP required to keep the Plan up to date and relevant.
The first amendment proposed by Councillor Tanner as set out in the Schedule of Business, Annex 1 was lost by 16 votes to 50.
The second amendment proposed by Councillor Tanner as set out in the Schedule of Business, Annex 1 was lost by 7 votes to 54.
The third amendment proposed by Councillor Tanner as set out in the Schedule of Business, Annex 1 was lost by 9 votes to 58.
The fourth amendment proposed by Councillor Tanner as set out in the Schedule of Business, Annex 1 was lost by 19 votes to 48.
The fifth amendment proposed by Councillor Tanner as set out in the Schedule of Business, Annex 1 was lost by 7 votes to 56
The substantive motion was carried by 46 votes to 8, with 11 abstentions.
(Councillor Shouler requested that his abstention be recorded due to having a personal interest in the item).
Report author: Roger O'Neill
Publication date: 16/07/2012
Date of decision: 10/07/2012
Decided at meeting: 10/07/2012 - County Council
Accompanying Documents: