Meeting documents

Learning & Culture Scrutiny Committee
Tuesday, 14 December 2004

LC141204-12

Return to Agenda

COPY
ITEM LC12

JOINT HEALTH OVERVIEW & SCRUTINY COMMITTEE – 4 NOVEMBER 2004

HEALTH PROMOTION IN SCHOOLS

Report by Head of Democratic Services

  1. At each of the last three meetings of the Oxfordshire Joint Health Overview & Scrutiny Committee, presentations have been given to members about various aspects of health promotion in schools. The individuals who have addressed the OJHOSC are as follows:-

  • Kate Riddle, Clinical lead for School Nursing – SE Oxon PCT
  • Gail Stockford, Professional Lead for School Health Nursing – SW Oxon PCT
  • Monica Hanaway, Head of Youth Service, Learning and Culture Directorate, Oxfordshire County Council
  • Giti Paulin, Schools Adviser for PHSE – Learning Advisory and Improvement Service, Oxfordshire County Council
  • Bill Russell, School Drugs Education Consultant, School Development Service
  • Julie Garner, Healthy Schools Co-ordinator
  • Carrie Jackson, Smoking Cessation Adviser, Smoking Advisory Service to the Oxfordshire PCTs (telephone and written submission)

  1. Members have been impressed by the amount of well established partnership working that is already exists. It has been agreed that the information gleaned so far had been very useful but that resources did not permit the Committee to proceed further with a full in-depth review. It had been decided therefore at the last meeting of the OJHOSC that members should be invited to consider what conclusions they had drawn on the information presented to them.
  2. The following findings have emerged from the investigation:-

    1. In respect of Learning and Culture:-

    • That there is a need to focus attention on particular areas of PHSE teaching, to help reach the target for reducing teenage pregnancy in Oxfordshire.
    • That more schools need help and support to take up the option of having a ‘BodyZone’ advice service (particularly in respect of finding the necessary space for the service to operate), especially within those areas of greatest need (for example more family planning nurses in areas of high teenage pregnancy).
    • That School Consultation Teams (a multi-agency group of professionals who regularly meet on school premises) work well in delivering aspects of the PHSE curriculum but this system does not yet exist in all schools.
    • That ‘Lead Practitioner Schools’ can be very effective in the dissemination of best practice, and in the support they can provide to heavily pressed schools (suffering from ‘initiative overload’) in continuing their participation in the Healthy Schools Initiative.
    • That those schools which employ counsellors are much better placed than those which do not, in addressing the mental health needs of their students.
    • That recognition of mental health needs of school students on the part of school staff (teaching and otherwise) appears to be inconsistent.
    • That there is considerable room for raising awareness of the Healthy Eating Programme in schools and of improving the nutritional value of school meals.
    • Less than half the schools in Oxfordshire have signed up to the Healthy Schools Initiative in spite of the fact that the it can do much to improve healthy living.
    • That there are considerable advantages to be gained from making use of Police Liaison Office work in schools.

      b. In respect of the local NHS system:-

    • That the ‘BodyZone’ service is very well regarded, but that its availability and opening hours (and/or those of school health nurse services in schools which do not have ‘BodyZone’) are insufficient to fully address the level of need for drop-in advice sessions, particularly within secondary schools.
    • That the current two-days-per-week smoking cessation post in the Smoking Advisory Service allows insufficient time to allow for adequate contact time with students in schools and colleges.
    • That the effectiveness of the Smoking Advisory Service is inhibited by the current inflexible approach to the times and places in which its smoking cessation services are offered to students of schools and colleges.
    • That school nurses are not currently funded to work during the school holidays and that this can inhibit the ability of GP’s and Health Visitors to maintain contact with them.
    • That the possibility of a new dedicated Children’s Trust presents an excellent opportunity to develop new ways of working and that wide input to the discussions should be encouraged.
    • That there is insufficient public information available (in particular in Accident and Emergency units) on the health effects of binge drinking and on where patients might be able to go for further advice.
    • That more could be done at national level to provide good quality information resources, particularly ICT based resources such as videos and CDs, for schools and colleges on the subject of health promotion and healthy living.

  1. The Joint Committee is asked to agree the following recommendations:-
          1. that the findings outlined above be drawn to the attention of the Health and Social Care Scrutiny Committee in order that they be fed into the planned review on ‘Children and Healthy Eating/Healthy Living’ (Jan 2005); and to the Learning and Culture Scrutiny Committee in order that they be fed into their possible review on ‘Health in Schools’ (no date agreed);
          2. that a letter be sent to the Secretary of State for Health to argue in favour of more ICT based information to be made available nationally in support of existing work on health promotion in schools.

DEREK BISHOP
Head of Democratic Services

Background Papers: Nil

Contact Officer: Julie Dean, Tel: (01865) 815322

October 2004

Return to TOP