Meeting documents

Delegated Decisions by Cabinet Member for Transport
Thursday, 23 April 2009

ÐÏࡱá>þÿ †þÿÿÿþÿÿÿ„…ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ  ÍÉÀá°Áâ\plinda.maitland B°aÀ=œ¯¼=xx;T$8X@"·Ú1Èÿ|Arial1Èÿ|Arial1Èÿ|Arial1Èÿ|Arial1@ÿ¼|Arial1Üÿ¼|Arial1 ÿ|Arial1ðÿ|Arial"£"#,##0;\-"£"#,##0"£"#,##0;[Red]\-"£"#,##0"£"#,##0.00;\-"£"#,##0.00#"£"#,##0.00;[Red]\-"£"#,##0.005*0_-"£"* #,##0_-;\-"£"* #,##0_-;_-"£"* "-"_-;_-@_-,)'_-* #,##0_-;\-* #,##0_-;_-* "-"_-;_-@_-=,8_-"£"* #,##0.00_-;\-"£"* #,##0.00_-;_-"£"* "-"??_-;_-@_-4+/_-* #,##0.00_-;\-* #,##0.00_-;_-* "-"??_-;_-@_-¤"$"#,##0_);\("$"#,##0\)!¥"$"#,##0_);[Red]\("$"#,##0\)"¦"$"#,##0.00_);\("$"#,##0.00\)'§""$"#,##0.00_);[Red]\("$"#,##0.00\)7¨2_("$"* #,##0_);_("$"* \(#,##0\);_("$"* "-"_);_(@_).©)_(* #,##0_);_(* \(#,##0\);_(* "-"_);_(@_)?ª:_("$"* #,##0.00_);_("$"* \(#,##0.00\);_("$"* "-"??_);_(@_)6«1_(* #,##0.00_);_(* \(#,##0.00\);_(* "-"??_);_(@_)àõÿ À àõÿ ôÀ àõÿ ôÀ àõÿ ôÀ àõÿ ôÀ àõÿ ôÀ àõÿ ôÀ àõÿ ôÀ àõÿ ôÀ àõÿ ôÀ àõÿ ôÀ àõÿ ôÀ àõÿ ôÀ àõÿ ôÀ àõÿ ôÀ à À à«õÿ øÀ à©õÿ øÀ àªõÿ øÀ à¨õÿ øÀ à õÿ øÀ à X à P àx@ @  àx @  àX àP à @ àx@ @  àx@ @  àx @  àx @  àx@ @  àx@  àx  àx@  àx@@  àx @  “€ÿ“€ÿ“€ÿ“€ÿ“€ÿ“€ÿ`…$©—Proposed 20 mph Speed limits…5åSheet2…<æSheet3Œ,ÁÁ"¾ü hØuConcern that existing restrictions are not enforced, so would new ones be monitored. Various personal parking issues.Florence Dudley Hughes Ref 144 Email%Central section of Marston Ferry Road1All roads within ring road to include Binsey Lane Richard Mann6Transport sub-group convener, Low Carbon West ConveneryWe feel certain roads will need lane narrowing, cycle-lane provision or widening. Detailed letter with numerous comments. Ref 145 Email.Botley road within the ring road & Binsey Lane•Greatly in favour, reduction in accidents, reduce pollution, encourage physical activity. Strongly feel Botley road & Binsey Lane should be included. Ref 146 EmailDBinsey Lane should have 30mph speed limit, traffic goes far to fast. Colin PalmerGraham Parkhurst Andrew Bond Ref 147 Email Nick Davis\Terrible idea, as a cyclist would support anything to make commute safer but this is wrong. "Edwin Southern,Kidlington ResidentRichard Whittington Neil Hicks”Is it true 20mph would be unenforceable in law, not to mention unenforced because police don't have resources. Why should we have a two tier system. Tricia Hallam`I do not think it is sensible to impose a 20mph limit on arterial routes, if you wish people to comply with speed limits they need to be fixed at appropriate levels. I note that at the same time as the consultation it has been announced in th Oxford Times changes to speed limits including arterial routes, I hope this consultation is not just a sham. Ref 126 EmailGood idea. Many larger vehicles break the speed limit in evenings & overnight and make the buildings shake. Can't work out where the 20mph ends in London Road, it must include At Andrew's school, Bury Knowle health centre, the park entrance & the old peoples home. Ref 127 Email‹Good idea, but I think better provision should be made for cyclists. Old Road will still be dangerous for cyclists to get to Cheney school. Ref 128 EmailArterial roadstIt is essential to reduce speed in residential areas, therefore roads that pass through them should also be reduced. Ref 129 EmailPAll roads within city boundary. Roads in west Oxford. Henley Avenue & Rose Hill.DA blanket 20mph or nothing. All residents should be treated equally. Ref 130 Email!All roads that are not main roadsÞFantastic around schools, but reduction in speed will be bad for the envirionment.Put this together with the stupid ideas for the traffic plan & chaos will ensue. Make all roads 20mph except main routes to avoid confusion. Ref 131 EmailI am delighted you are considering extending 20mph into the County, could I urge you to introduce 20mph into Kidlington especially School Road. Ref 132 EmailàUnnecessary, roads in question natural 20mph due to parked cars & other obstructions. Waste of money. Prefer money spent on enforcing existing crimes. Drivers concentration would be on their speedometer rather than the road. Ref 133 Email½Complete wasre of money, not legally enforceable so will be ignored. Extra signage will be an eyesore. Traffic problems will increase to the detriment of public transport & private vehicles Ref 134 Email All of themšSpend the money on educating people on the basics of road safety & cyclists on obeying traffic laws & law enforcement. Ridiculous 30mph is perfectly safe. Ref 135 Email/All but those within half a mile of city centreSpend the money on public transport, improve cycle lanes. Drivers will get annoyed & spend longer getting anywhere. The area is too widespread. Ref 136 Email Waste of time Ref 137 EmailÆNo change should be made. No anaylysis of true cost & benefits has been presented. Signage will spoil the City. It will be uneforceable. Waste of taxpayers money, scheme should be entirely rejected. Ref 138 Email Ref 148 Email Ref 149 EmailMain roads should be excludedÚAlthough agrees that 20mph limits may be appropriate in some roads, not supportive of widespread use - could result in frustration and less safe behaviour, and also grievance if enforced , and also increase pollution Micahel Rimmer²Morrell Avenue, Warneford, Old Headington, Bayswater, Parks, Crowell, Littlemore Roads, Headington Hill, Longwall Street, Cuddesdon Road & Cowley Road (Littlemore), Sandford RoadRose Hill, Iffley Road between Boundary Brook Road & Percy St, Abingdon Road north of Hinksey Park. Botley outside the ring road.øSave the money & enforce existing 30mph & parking restrictions. What evidence of numbers of accidents between 20 - 30mph. Traffic congestion, road obsructions & parked cars particularly in east Oxford is the problem, 20mph will not alleviate these. Ref 139 Email Mary Russell[In the interests of safety, urge the council to impose 20mph on side streets & Botley Road. Ref 140 Email¦For many years the residents have been wanting a 20mph speed limit. There are many parked cars in this street in the interest of safety, speed reduction is important. Ref 118 Email30mph is safe and the responsibilty of the driver to go slower when necessary. 20mph will upset drivers and will not be followed./Marston Road from St Clements to Cherwell DriveRef 119 Feedback formRef 120 Feedback formaFor the health & safety of the people of Oxford please introduce this scheme as soon as possible.?St Annes Residents Association, Fairview Allotments AssociationRef 121 Feedback formcAbingdon, Botley, Iffley, Oxpens, Donnington Bridge Roads, Thomas, Speedwell Streets, Hollybush RowkOvercomplicated moving from 20 to 30mph zone on one road, will make it less likely that drivers will complyRef 122 Feedback formBanbury, Parks, Woodstock, Botley, Marston, Windmill, Abingdon, South Parks Roads, St Clements, Headington Hill, Headley Way & Morrell AvenueUnnecessarily overbearing, most traffic is speed limited, there are few places that you can drive at 20mph. I'd rather have a congestion charge.(Proposed Oxford City 20mph Speed Limits.%Sugested changes to include any roads%Sugested changes to exclude any roadsGeneral CommentsOxford ResidentGroup RepresentativeYes*Councillor Mike Gotch, Oxford City CouncilOxford City CouncilRef No. & Type of response Ref 1 Letter"Exclude most of the 'radial roads'Ref 2 Feedback form No comment4Supports the idea of slowing traffic outside schoolsOxford resident6Board member for Emmanuel Christian School, LittlemoreRef 3 Feedback formN/ARef 4 Feedback form&Littlemore to Sandford should be 20mphQExclude Cumnor Hill, A34 Godstow, A40 East of Headington - not suitable for 20mphcPublic will not understand the split of 20/30mph in the Cumnor area, why not include Cumnor as wellRef 5 Feedback formAgree with proposed zonesRef 6 Feedback form London RoadCharwell DriveaLondon Road should not be included because traffic could choose to divert into surrounding roads Ref 7 Feedback formOTown centre ends of: Abingdon Rd, Botley Rd, Cowley Rd, Iffiey Rd, Woodstock RdSupports the schemeRef 9 Feedback formNoýHollow Way is obscured and narrowed by parked cars. The 20mph on E.Oxford /Cowley Road has not improved matters. All amin access roads to city should remain as 30mph, suggests spending the money on more pedestrian crossings. Leave out all the side roadsALeave out all the side roads off Cowley Road including Hollow Way Ref 10 Letter3All side roads in residential areas should be 20mphExclude Woodstock Road:20mph on Woodstock Road would lead to motorist frustrationRef 11 Feedback form<London Rd, Iffley Rd, Cowley/Oxford Rd and other major roadscNot a good idea. 20mph should only be used outside schools, shops and accident hot spots. UnnessaryRef 12 Feedback form3London Rd, Banbury Rd, Woodstock Road, Abingdon Rd As a bus driver for Oxford Bus Company, a grees that some areas should be reduced to 20mphAgrees with scheme but it must be applied to roads and areas that are in need and congested i.e Summertown, Cowley, Marston, Barton Headington Shops. Please do not hold up the bus service.!Bus Driver for Oxford Bus CompanyTemple Road, CowleyRef 13 Feedback for< mRef 14 Feedback formSquitchey LaneAgree with scheme 100% No comments’Very good proposal. Will need clear road signs to indicate speed limit change on the main roads. Very good for cyclists, pedestrians and residentsRef 15 Feedback formRef 16 Feedback formvGenerally a good idea although as a driver it takes some getting used to driving at that speed, 'old habits die hard!'Ref 17 Feedback form Botley RoadNo further commentsRef 18 Feedback form0Mad! Leave alone, save the money. Waste of money All roads Ref 19 Feedback form Hollow Way·Very good idea, how is it going to be enforced? Large volume of traffic on Hollow Way, many drivers speed at the northern end at all times of the day and road is used as a cut throughRef 20 Feedback form1Botley Road from Osney to Botley and Binsey Lane !This will be an improvement for road safety and the environment, but does not go far enough.Botley Road is a residential area with few places to cross the road. Also Binsey Lane, pedestrians are force to walk on road, car come round the blind corners at 40mph plus. The sooner the better. Ref 21 Feedback form(Make longer sections of consistant 20mph-We think 20mph should cover more roads so there is a constant flow. 20mph in general a good idea in town. Binsey Lane not 30mph? NSL too fast. Are we going to take any notice /action on public comments or will they be ignored like with the permit parking scheme which was an exercise in anti-democracyEBanbury Rd, Headington Rd/London Rd, Cowley Rd Iffley Road, Botley RdA misuse of public resourcesSupports proposals? Ref 22 Feedback formRef 23 Feedback form«A very good idea. Hopefully the 20mph speed limits initially implemented will be open to possible change for modification. Needs to be enforced or will be a waste of moneyRef 24 Feedback form Weirs Lane’A good idea long awaited. Weirs Lane should be included as a residential road with history of accidents, used as a rat run to avoid the ring road Ref 25 Feedback form/The plan is a complete waste of time and money.Ref 26 Feedback form Iffley RoadNone!SThis proposal will only hold up buses further. Iffley Road is not a busy road and 20mph is introduced it will slow traffic and cause more traffic jams and more pollution. In Cowley Road since the pavements have been widened, traffic is worse. This road should have been widened, get rid of the chicanes. Too many cyclists on the pavements.:Total waste of time and money. If the police spent more time with mobile cameras, even illegial drivers would keep to the speed limits. If this goes ahead pollution caused by idling traffic will increase and cause slower traffic. To impose speed limits on the main arteries out of town centre borders on stupidity.Ref 27 Feedback form Ref 28 Letter‰More risk of persons overtaking than if the limit is 30mph. Pedestrians and cyclists will be confused. Pedestrians and cyclists will misguidedly think the road will be safer and take more risks. Drivers will continue to drive at 30mph plus. Normally tolerant drivers will be frustrated by the unrealisting speed limit. Increase potential for accidents. Increase fuel consumption and pollution.¯Objects strongly to the scheme. The proposal drawn up does not appear to be designed to reduce carbon footprints. To maintain a 20mph speed, cars will be moving in third or even second gear, which in turn will result in more petrol being used over a longer period of time resulting in more pollution. As a tax payer, I would like to know how my taxes will be effected by your attempts to enforce such a law over such a large area.Ref 30 Feedback formHMember of North Oxford Planning Committee of The Oxford Pedestrian Trust[Excellent - As an elderly cyclist I welcome the lower speed limits in busy traffic areas. Ref 31 Feedback form In favourRef 32 Feedback formMore of the Cowley Road»Generally good - the more the better. Oxford is a dangerous city to travel in and the buses are the biggest culprits. Recent traffic calming on Cowley Road is dangerous and does not work.Ref 33 Feedback formCornwallis RoadØThe 20mph speed limits don't go far enough and I know that cars don't observe 30mph on Iffley and Cowley Roads. Cornwallis Road is a minor road and so should be 20mph. I think that the plan should be implemented ASAPRef 34 Feedback form720mph is only nessary onwhen near schools or collages. There are not many roads in and around Oxford that you can get up to 20mph anyway. Drivers will get frustrated with the lower speed limit which creates more road rage and mistakes. Pedestrians and cyclists have their own responsibilities for safety as wellRef 35 Feedback formHeadington Hill route{Traffic often not this fast anyway. Suggest apply in set time periods not all day (Use motorway type temp restriction signsBicester Chamber of CommerceRef 36 Feedback form Windmill Road“I feel that the speed limit for the whole of Windmill Road should be 20mph to Include the Nuffield Orthop Centre and Windmill House which are opposite eachother. On parts of the road vehicles are parked on both sides half way over the road and the pavement is very narrow on the east side. Could be confusing to have a continuous change of speed limits. As a driver, I am quite happy about the scheme. Ref 37 Feedback form,Cowley Road from Hollow Way to Divinity RoadŒNot before time, well thought out. I think Cowley Road from Hollow Way to Divinity Road should be 20mph because it is highly pedestrianised Ref 38 Feedback formResident of Garsington?I think it is a good idea. It is important to encourage cyclingRef 39 Feedback formBotley Road & Cummor Hill‹Who will the speed limits be enforced by? How will the 20mph improve the environment? As a disabled person this will have no benefit for meRef 40 Feedback formkThe full length of Hollow Way because it is a major cycle route and is dangerous near the pedestrian islandRef 41 Feedback formàPlease paint '20' on the roads instead of signs on lamp posts. Signs on lamp posts are very ugly The full length of Hollow Way should be 20mph. Leaving part of it at 30mph will encourage drivers to go faster to make up time.Ref 42 Feedback form8Don't agree with them. None of the roads should be 20mphRef 43 Feedback form˜We warmly welcome them and consider that safety in the area will be much increased especially If the police are given instructions to inforce the limitsRef 44 Feedback formµWe don't need these proposals, spend the money on something that we as council tax payers want and what you were elected for. Not your own pet projects. To bring Oxford to its knees. The traffic levels in Oxford are such that you can't do much more on average than 20mph. I think that this is a waste of hard earned money. We would be better off with you concentrating on finishing the road works all round the city and get them finishedWest Oxford MattersBotley Road & Binsey LaneRef 45 Feedback formRef 46 Feedback form«This is fantastic news for the City of Oxford. Lets hope other cities follow your example. Extending the 20 zone west to the Binsey Lane junction. The Botley Road narrows sharply at the Binsey Lane junction and so would seem a natural point for traffic to slow as it enters Oxford from the east. Binsey Lane under current proposals will remain as the only NSL road within the whole of Oxford, can this road be included as well?”Top of Headington Hill to top of Headley Way. Bayswater Road to Crematorium. Morrell Avenue, Warneford Road, Old Road, South Parks Road & Manor Road No Comment¡Frequent changes of limits e.g. Hollow Way, London Road, Botley Road will lead to to signage clutter & driver confusion. Various complaints about the map & form.0Secretary of Oxfordshire Pensioners Action Group Ref 29LetterNorth Hinksey Village Friends of North Hinksey VillageÒIt is hoped that a speed restriction in North Hinksey will discourage motorists using North Hinksey as a rat run from the Botley Road to A34. Also reduce speeds for motorists going to fuctions at the Rugby Club Ref 47 Lette< rRef 48 PetitionFBotley Road, Abbey Road to Binsey Lane. Binsey Lane to Binsey Village 85 Oxford residentsLife begins at 20ÛWe the undersigned would like to see the proposed 20mph speed limit extended west from Abbey Road to the Binsey Lane junction. We would also like to see a 20mph speed limit on the whole of Binsey Lane to Binsey Village.,All roads that are bus routes to be includedOxford Pedestrian Association¼Roads with bus routes is where most pedestrian activity occurs. Inconsistent speed limits will create confusion. Accidents will be reduced & be less severe. Costs & signage will be lower. Various but all outside the zone-Various comments but all are outside the zone?Botley Road & other arterial routes. Green lane for Binsey Lanen20mph limits on all the roads would make it easier for drivers to remember to stick to the limit. Children would be able to anticipate speeds easier & enforcement with speed cameras easier. Publicise the journey times at 20 & 30mph this should remove much of the opposition to the 20mph limits. A green lane for Binsey Lane which is currently 60mph & very dangerous.ECouncillor Susanna Pressel, Oxford City Council. Lord Mayor of OxfordlCowley Road between existing 20mph & The Plain. Headington Road/London Road between Pullen Lane & Osler Road#Average bus speeds in Oxford are very low, if speeds could be increased through effective traffic management & other measures it would have a significant impact on the bus network. Concern that 20mph on other than residential side roads will result in temptation for drivers to exceed 20mph.Martin Sutton Managing DirectorStagecoach Bus Company>All roads except where 20mph are currently & Headington centre´Speed limits are a balance between the need to move around in a reasonable timeframe and the safety element. 30mph limits are perfectly sensible if correctly & consistently policed*To include the lower part of Windmill RoadwTo include the lower part of Windmill Road because of the safety of clients at Windmill House, Margaret Road & Old Road18 Oxford ResidentsResidents of Windmill HouseTo include Kennington2Kennington area for similar reasons as Oxford CityRef 49 Formal Consultee Ref 50 Email Ref 51 Email Ref 52 LetterRef 53 Feedback FormRef 54 Feedback FormRef 55 Feedback Form Ref 56 LetterThe main roads/Main roads with bus routes & shopping centres where most pedestrian & cycling activity occurs. Inconsistent speed limits will create confusion. Accidents will be reduced & be less severe. Costs & signage will be lower. It will take drivers longer to adjust to 20 mph speed limit if many roads are 30mph.Coordinators for LB@20'Richard Bradley & Corinne Grimley EvansRef 57 Formal ConsulteeThames Valley Police Mick DoyleïNo data provided to show the roads in question are subject to speeds of 20mph currently. No evidence of planned engineering measures that will bring speed limits down to 20mph. The proposals ignore current and previous Dft advice & without engineering measures the limits will be contravened. There will be calls for TVP to enforce the limits , leading to an unacceptable burden on the organisation. The limits are unlikely to meet the Councils safety justification without engineering measures.*Oxford City Council, Cowley Area CommitteeKThe Committee agreed to support the proposals and to inform OCC accordinglyRef 58 Formal ConsulteeRef 59 Formal Consultee)Oxford City Council, North Area Committee Binsey LaneTThe minimum additional street furniture 'Clutter' on the streets. Roundels at the entrance of roads to remind people of 20mph speed limits. Physical measures to slow traffic between Woodstock Road roundabout & the railway bridge on Godstow Road. That roads such as Binsey Lane where footpaths are non-existent are included in the proposals. Ref 60 Email+Suggests Brasenose Driftway should be 20mphåMost traffic calming measures in Oxford are counter productive, chicanes and road humps are 'car killers'. No point in reducing speed if not going to be enforced, several vehicles including council vehicles exceed 30mph regularly>Very positive, all residential roads in Oxford should be 20mphvSupports the proposal to slow traffic in the residential roads. Main request is to keep sign clutter down to a minimumæMorrell Avenue - Old Road, Grenoble Road - Cuddesdon way, Cowley Road Littlemore - Crowell Road, Godstow Road, Fove Mile Drive, Linkside Avenue, Lakeside, Old Marston Road, Barton Road, Ashurst Way, St Margarets Road, Moreton Road Hugh Jaegar Ref 61 Email¢Casualty rates on Oxford's residential side roads is negligible. The proposal includes wide straight road, speed limits will be ignored, thus reducing respect for speed limits. OCC has neglected to provide projections of the effects on fossil fuel, air quality, climate change, bus services or bus users. OCC should not change speed limits on any road unless it obtains studies from qualified and independent sources. 6The 20mph proposals do not appear to have been prepared responsibly. OCC has neglected to provide projections of the effects on fossil fuel, air quality, climate change, bus services or bus users. OCC should not change speed limits on any road unless it obtains studies from qualified and independent sources. Ref 62 Email0 British Motorcyclists Federation Representative#Oxford Representatives Bus Users UKkWaste of money. Main issue how speed limits can be enforced. We don't want any more cameras or speed humps. Peter West Ref 63 EmailÞSlower speeds cause more pollution. Commuting time in Oxford already 3rd longest in UK, this will make it worse. Retime or remove existing traffic lights. Waste of money on road signage after removing clutter from High St. Edward Byard Ref 153 Emailmwould like limit on B4495 Windmill Road to be extended to south to include hopsital entrance / Windmill HousetConcenred about abuse of existing 20mph zone in Walton Street / Kingston Road area and would like to see enforcementÀMost accidents occur on main arteries roads, which are unaffected by the propsals. More signage adds to clutter. Cost. More pollution. Policing the speed limit will be impractical & expensive Caterine Richenburg Ref 64 Email Ref 65 Email•A large number of children cross St Margarets Road to go to various schools would it be possible to incorporate a zebra crossing into the proposals. Bridget MaierƒBinsey Lane is very narrow, has pedestrians & limited visibility. It may not be included in this survey but please note for future. Ref 66 Email Ref 67 EmailÿI think it is unenforceable. There will be more cars & pollution if the speed limit is lowered. Around schools, hospitals, leisure centres & Old Peoples Homes etc is a good idea. The ring road makes a natural boundary, all 20mph speed limits within that.)Ashurst Way, Roads outside the ring road.Ref 68 Feedback formAll roads within ring road9It will be excellent if you do it, not the usual hot air.Ref 69 Feedback formHeadington Hill, Marston RoadbWon't solve congestion or pollution problems & may make them worse. However safety will be better. Ref 70 EmailNorth Hinksey/Botley®I stronly suggest North Hinksey is included. The village has no pavements. The village has growing traffic problems due tp vehicles accessing the pub and rugby & tennis club. Ref 71 Email?Botley, Iffley, Donnington, Abingdon, Banbury & Woodstock RoadsvGreat idea, hope people won't abuse it. Don't be derailed by the motoring fraternity, who are opposed to anything safe Ref 72 EmailgAll except the existing one in Cowley Road & possibly Summertown & Headington & minor residential roadsÄExisting laws for motorists/cyclists should be enforced. The cost should be spent on more worthy causes. Don't be forced by vociferous pressure groups and respect the needs of the wider community. Ref 73 Email?All except narrow roads in densely populated areas eg Sunnymead%Ronald Richenburg Kidlington residentoGenerally we can not make anything 100 per cent safe. We should move to having electric cars to help p< ollution. Ref 74 EmailShould go further!Banbury, Woodstock & Botley RoadsVIf the Banbury, Woodstock & Botley Roads are made 20mph it will be cheaper for signage Ref 75 EmailOShould go further but if that is going to hold things up then keep it as it is. Ref 76 Email The full length of Windmill RoadOGood idea, people drive far to fast and it may get them driving nearer to 30mph Ref 77 EmailAgainst introduction of blanket 20mph, scheme is anti car. The scheme will result in a plethora of signage. Object to taxpayers money being spent this way. It shows a lack of imagination, drivers will become fixated on the ever changing speed limit rather than concentrating on driving Ref 78 Email¦Unless there is enforcement the limits of the exercise will be a waste of time, the new 20mph in Summertown is not enforced and generally traffic travels much faster. Ref 79 Email8Almost all of them but especially Old Road & London Road`It is pointless & detrimental to my envirionment. To much of the city is covered by the proposal Ref 80 Email0London Road between Osler Road & Headington HillÛI think the basic proposals are a good idea. It is unnecessary for London Road between Osler Road & Headington Hill to have a 20mph limit. The speed limit on London Road is only needed for the stretch through the shops. Ref 81 EmailAll of Hollow WayzHollow Way although an arterial road it is quite short & vehicles would be at a constant speed & therefore less pollution. Ref 82 Email'Botley Road should start at Binsey LaneVIf traffic speeds were reduced to 20mph east of Binsey Lane hazards would be mitigated Ref 83 EmailWantage resident®Total waste of money, estimate is suspect, total cost would be higher.Unlikely to have any impact on accident figures. Moneymaking scheme as speed cameras are sure to follow. Ref 84 Email@Headington Hill, Banbury Road south of Summertown, Abingdon RoadEastern ring road is 50mph & will lead directly into 20mph road, suggest 50mph turned into 40mph to a point south of the traffic lights at Headinton roundabout. Changes from 30 to 20mph need to be reviewed it will make life confusing for motorists & pedestrians. Ref 85 Email’20mph may not improve air quality. Cars generally would need to be in 3rd gear rather than 4th so the engine speed would be greater than at 30mph. Ref 86 EmailBotley Road, Binsey LaneChair of West Oxford MattersWConsultation is poor & patchy, forms difficult to write on, website unsatisfactory. OCC should use existing groups to ask for views. Warmly welcome 20mph provided police have capacity to enforce them. Botley Road should be included to eliminate inconsistency & Binsey Lane needs speed management but not in a form that will ruin its character. Ref 87 Email\Most residential roads Davenant Rd, Harefields, Five Mile Drive, St Margarets Rd, Walton St.ÎWill add to much time to bus journeys. Vehicles already adjust their speeds to conditions. Cyclists will have to monitor there speed so as not to speed. Money would be better spent on subsidising bus travel Ref 88 LetterRichard Bradley Eastern ring road is 50mph & will lead directly into 20mph road, suggest 50mph turned into 40mph south of the traffic lights into Beaumont Road & Risinghust.FNorth East Oxford Area Committee Meeting notes taken by Richard Luxton Ref 152 EmailService Manager, Windmill House%Potential congestion for slow moving traffic. Increased level of pollution as a result of vehicles travelling at 20mph. Request all of Windmill Road be 20mph. Level of signing will creat clutter. Limit enforcement. What will happen if representation is received after closing date. Request 50mph on eastern bypass between Headington Roundabout & Beaumont Rd/Kiln Lane traffic lane junction be reduced to 20mph, to avoid vehicles turning into Beaumont Road straight into 20mph. Will the road humps in Titup Hall Drive be removed when 20mph installed.6London Road only 20mph between Stile Road - Osler RoadGStrongly in agreement but doubt it will be effective without policing. Ref 89 Notes from Meeting Ref 90 Email Ref 91 Email©No objection to the area shown, but would object to it being extended. Money should be spent on improving cycle lanes especially at Botley Road Railway Bridge & potholes Ref 92 Email4Most people spoken to will not respond because they think the Authority has already made up its mind. Most are reassured it will not be enforced. Difficult speed to maintain & very inefficient for emissions & fuel costs. It will increase journey times & frustrate drivers, also discourage visitors to Oxford.eAll major thoroughfares should be excluded 6.30pm to 7.30am except where pedestrian movement is high. Ref 93 Email(London Road other than area around shops]Good idea in residential roads and busy shopping areas, should not be applied on main routes. Ref 94 Email6All roads in Cowley,Temple Cowley & Horspath Road area Main arterial routes & ring road2The sooner the better. A step towards safer roads.(Representaive of Horspath Road Residents Ref 95 Email7Brasenose Driftway, Crammer Road, All residential roadsQExtremely positive I back it 100%. Thank you for working to make our roads safer. Ref 96 EmailGBotley Road, Abingdon Road, Iffley Road maybe Woodstock & Banbury RoadsEGood idea, cars should only be doing this speed on residential roads.^Great concern about signage clutter, a Citywide announcement at entrances best solution. If the limit is not going to be enforced does it need a full complement of signs. A sledgehammer to crack a nut in most residential streets, most justified on main central routes and even suggest 10mph in historic core. Binsey Lane extensively used 20 or 30mph. Ref 97 Email©Botley Road to Railway Bridge, Abingdon Road to Folly Bridge, Woodstock Road from St Giles, Banbury Road From St Giles except Summertown shops, Marston Ferry Road to Roundabout, Headington Road & London Road except the existing designated 20mph, The Slade & Horspath Driftway, Cowley Road beyond the shopping area, Iffley Road to Donnington Road over Donnington Bridge, Iffley Road to Donnington Bridge Road to the ring road.Graham LovelockCA slow moving Oxford will be a pleasure. What about policing, this could lead to road rage. Cyclists at a good speed do about 20mph so they should be entitled to full use of the road with no need for cars to overtake. My own residential road (Sandfield Road) is used as a rat run perhaps the OCC could give it some thought. Ref 98 Email Ref 99 EmailFIffley, Abingdon, Banbury, Woodstock, Marston Ferry, Old Marston RoadsªLike the principle but main routes do not need 20mph, cannot see it being policed. Not happy having public money spent in an area which will not be consistently enforced. Ref 100 EmailIs OCC trying to generate more revenue, by introducing automatic numberplate recognition. To suggest that reducing speed from 30 to 20mph will encourage more people to walk is ridiculous. It makes more sense to reduce speed where there is heavy traffic, which could reduce accidents. Ref 101 EmailTOld Road from Windmill Toad traffic lights to Morrell Avenue and down to St Clements=I think that at quiet times 20mph is to low in a lot of areas Ref 102 Email Woodstock & Banbury RoadÖI support a blanket 20mph speed limit for all Oxford's residential streets, where road design seem unrealistic for 20mph, it would enable lanes to be narrowed for dedicated cycle lanes and removal of road markings. Ref 103 EmailQI agree that residential streets need this limit, it already happens in Scotland. Ref 104 EmailRThe proposals to change to 20mph are madness. When will the Council stop meddling. Ref 105 Email Jo LinzeyµI would like to see 20mph introduced. Since Cowley Road has been 20mph Iffley Road has got like a race track. If we can't have 20mph how about speed cameras to deter those speeding. Ref 106 Email½Good idea, I am a cyclist as well as a motorist and would feel a lot safer at 20mph. I live in Cornwallis Road part of which is 20mph I hope it is extended to my area & throughout the city.< Ref 107 Email{Excellent idea, should improve safety for pedestrians & cyclists. Speed sensitive signs (the ones that light up) to remind Ref 108 EmailStephen TuckerÆObject to the 20mph scheme the current 30mph is not enforced & reducing to 20mph will make no difference. It is difficult to exceed 20mph in most minor streets. Sign clutter would pollute our city. Ref 109 EmailyIt is critical to enforce this for Conservation areas such as Old Headington. Particularly importanrt for the side roads. Ref 110 EmailÆSignage clutter, please do not put up loads of signs, if this cannot be avoided keep limit at 30mph. If you insist on putting up signs in Crammer Road/Hollow Way please consult me on their position. Ref 111 EmailNorth Hinksey Parish"Chair of North Hinksey Parish PlanvI am concerned North Hinksey parish has not been included, are the roads in North Hinkey being dealt with separately. Ref 112 EmailAll A & B roads Ref 150 Email?Supports extension on Cowley Road and inclusion of Marston RoadAWould like removal of uncessary signs and minimisation of clutter Ref 151 EmailCity CouncillorkVery supportive of proposals especially from pedestrian and cyclists perspective and for cutting emisssionsÛI agree with the residential proposals, I've seen them work on the Channel Islands as bwell as the Isle of Man. Leave A & B roads as they are, there are ample pedestrian crossing facilities and cyclists are catered for. Ref 113 EmailThe artery routesThe more roads the better, a blanket 20mph throughout the City, it will make it so much safer and you'd be championed as a progressive council. Kaihsu TaiDMuch safer survival rate for pedestrians if involved in an accident. Ref 114 Email Ref 115 Email¤Need roundels in roadway otherwise people will claim they did'nt know there was a limit. All roads should be 20mph, but I accept main arteries can't yet be covered. Councillor Ref 116 EmailUI think its costly, token, inadequate, ugly idea, I hope this sad idea gets abandoned Ref 117 Email Moreton Road+Chair of Moreton Road Residents AssociationDAll country roads coming into Oxford especially Elsfield & WoodeatonnMost of Oxford roads are safe with few accidents, what is needed is 20mph through all vilages & country roads. Ref 123 Email Ref 124 Email Marston RoadbHow many deaths caused by soneone travelling betwee 20 - 30mph in the last 5 years. Who is going to compensate bus, taxi & local companys for loss of revenue due to longer journey times & drivers for extra fuel for using lower gears. Also breathing difficulties from the pollution. Waste of taxpayers money, only being done to boost anti car minorities. Ref 125 EmailArterial RoutesTotal waste of taxpayers money Ref 141 Email Botley Road ¤Good idea, if it went far enough, properly enforced & incorporate facilities for cyclists. Botley Road should be 20mph, will finally improve provision for cyclists. Ref 142 EmailAHugely concerned that Botley Road & Binsey Lane are not included. Ref 143 EmailÿÚ Û Í; -¦ ˜ZL»­ I; &ˆzŒ~ÞÐ.! "|#n¯$¡ƒ&u)ø3*U+#ä-²…0Só2Á U8#k:9¯<}£?qBìÿDÍrH@îJ˜ŠN4 QJjR HTò 9Wã f[7_áýa§}c'·eaÑg{ÏiU89¬ZøãEÜÖÂ-¬?ûÏh¾W]¡¥8â ?4OKf¦œØxÚÁB8š{m¶XŸ¹_¬5–_†áh5¨ÔëÅ6N"aSF鯠0’;ö']% žÿ؉L …Sè"ɹÄà¼;_¡7«r ÚÕꢝý†f¡" d€XX ƒÁ`à? ƒÁ`à?U} ’ €} ’ €} m€} ¶€} m"€} Û €} ¶€} $ €} $ €¨ À°€°°°4„° Ü Œ  „ Ü ¸ ` „Ü°„„¸ ä Ü4Ü„ä ¸ <hÜý Qý Zý ›ý Sý Rý Tý Uý Vý [ý Wý \ý ý Xý Yý ]ý Wý $^%ý _ý `ý aý bý Wý ý ý `ý cý dý Wý fý eý gý `ý cý hý Wý $^%ý iý `ý cý jý Wý ký lý mý `ý cý ný W ý oý pý `ý cý qý rý t ý sý `ý cý uý Wý wý vý xý `ý cý yý rý z ý {ý `ý cý |ý Wý } ý ~ý `ý ý ý rý €ý ý cý ‚ý Wý ƒý „ý `ý cý ‡ý Wý $…%ý †ý `ý cý ˆý Wý $…%ý ‰ý `ý cý Šý Wý ‹ý Œý `ý cý ý rý ý Žý `ý cý ý Wý ‘ý ’ý `ý cý “ý Wý ”ý •ý `ý cý –ý Wý —ý ˜ý `ý cý œý rý ™ý šý `ý cý ý Wý $…%ý žý `ý cý Ÿý Wý  ý ¡ý `ý cý ¢ý rý $…%ý £ý `ý cý ¤ý rý ¥ý ¦ý §ý `ý cý ©ý rý $…%ý  ¨ý `ý cý ªý rý $…%ý «ý `ý cý Ýý rý $…%ý ¬ý `ý cý ­ý Wý $…%ý ¯ý `ý ®×BŽ Xb^^^b^b^^b^^Z^^^^^^^^^^^^b^^^ „!"` #ä $Ü%h&Ü'„()°*Œ +„,Ü-h.”/ä 0` 1` 23X4<5¸ 647Ü8„9¸ :ì;„<=À>h?°ý °ý Wý $… %ý ±ý `ý cý !²ý !W!ý !³ý !´ý !`ý !cý "!µý "W"ý "¶ý "·ý "`ý "cý #¸ý #rý #$…#%ý #¹ý #`ý #cý $ºý $Wý $»$ý $¼ý $rý $½ý %¾ý %W%ý %¿ý %Àý %`ý %cý &!Áý &W&ý &Âý &Ãý &`ý &cý 'Äý 'Wý '$…'%ý 'Æý 'rý 'Åý (!Çý (W(ý (Èý (Éý (`ý (cý )Êý )W)ý )‘ý )Ëý )`ý )cý *Ìý *W*ý *‘ý *Íý *`ý *cý +Îý +rý +$…+%ý +Ïý +`ý +cý ,Ðý ,Wý ,$…,%ý ,Ñý ,`ý ,cý -Òý -rý -$…-%ý -Óý -`ý -cý .Öý .W.ý .Õý .Øý .`ý .Ôý /"×ý /#Wý /#Ùý /#Úý /#Ûý /`ý /#Üý 0áý 0#Wý 0#Úý 0#Þý 0#à0ý 0#ßý 1âý 1#Wý 1#Úý 1#ãý 1#æý 1äý 1#åý 2ûý 2#Wý 2#Úý 2#çý 2#éý 2`ý 2#èý 3üý 3#Wý 3#Úý 3#êý 3#ëý 3`ý 3#cý 4ýý 4#Wý 4#Úý 4#ìý 4#íý 4îý 4#Yý 5þý 5#Wý 5#ïý 5#Úý 5#ðý 5ñý 5#òý 6ÿý 6rý 6#ó6#ý 6#ôý 6`ý 6#cý 7ý 7#Wý 7#Úý 7#õý 7#öý 7÷ý 7#øý 8ý 8#Wý 8#Úý 8#ùý 8#úý 8`ý 8#cý 9ý 9#W9#ý 9#ý 9#ý 9ý 9#ý :¾ :###ý :# ý : ý :#ý ; ý ;#Wý ;#Úý ;#Úý ;# ;ý ;# ý <ý <#Wý <#Úý <#ý <#<ý <#ý =ý =rý =#=#ý =#ý =ý =#ý >ý >r¾ >##ý >#ý >ý >#ý ?ý ?r¾ ?##ý ?#ý ? ?#×D2l^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^b^bbbbb^bb^H^^^T@` A4BÜC°DŒ E„F°GHI` J°K„L„M„N¸ OP°Q4R°S„TUŒ VÜWX4YZD[°\]¸ ^°_Üý @!ý @r¾ @##ý @#"ý @#@#ý A)ý Ar¾ A##ý A#'ý A(A#ý B*ý B#W¾ B##ý B#+ý B,B#ý C.ý C#Wý C#Úý C#ý C#-ý C`C#ý D/ý D#Wý D#1ý D#Úý D#0ý D`D#ý E2ý E#Wý E#Úý E#3ý E#4ý E`E#ý F5ý F#Wý F#6ý F#Úý F#7ý F`F#ý G8ý G#Wý G#Úý G#9ý G#:ý GG#ý H;ý H#Wý H#Úý H#<ý H#=ý H`H#ý I>ý Irý I#?ý I#Úý I#@ý I I#ý JAý Jrý J#Bý J#Úý J#Dý JCJ#ý KEý K#Wý K#Fý K#Gý K#Hý K`K#ý LIý L#Wý L#Fý L#Úý L#Jý L`L#ý MKý M#Wý M#Úý M#Lý M#Mý M`M#ý NNý Nr¾ N##ý N#Oý N`N#ý OPý O#Wý O#Úý O#Úý O#Qý O`O#ý PRý Prý P#SP#ý P#Tý P`P#ý QUý Q#Wý Q#VQ#ý Q#Wý Q`Q#ý RXý R#WR#ý R#Yý R#Zý R`R#ý S[ý S#Wý S#Úý S#\ý S#]ý S`S#ý T^ý Tr¾ T##ý T#`ý T_T#ý Uaý U#WU#ý U#bý U#cý U`U#ý Vdý Vr¾ V##ý V#eý V`V#ý Wfý W#WW#ý W#gý W#iý W`ý W#hý Xjý Xrý X#kX#ý X#l¾ X#ý Ymý Y#Wý Y#Úý Y#Úý Y#oý YnY#ý Zvý Z#WZ#ý Z#¿ý Z#sZý Z#pý [wý [#Wý [#tý [#Úý [#uý [`[#ý \xý \#Wý \#Úý \#Úý \#yý \\#ý ]zý ]rý ]#|ý ]#Úý ]#{ý ]`]#ý ^}ý ^#Wý ^#~ý ^#Úý ^#ý ^`^#ý _€ý _#Wý _#‚ý _#ý _#ƒý _`ý _#„×DÎ lPPP^^^^^^^^^^^P^ZZZ^PZP^P^Z^^^^`ÜaÜbcþdeä fg` h„i„j4kl°m4n°o4p°q` rÜs„tu„vwÜx„yz` {¸ |Ü}~Œ ý `…ý `#W`#ý `#†ý `#‡ý ```#ý aˆý a#Wý a#Úý a#‰ý a#Šý a`a#ý bŒý b#Wý b#Úý b#ý b#‹ý b`b#ý cý c#Wý c#c#ý c#ý cŽc#ý d‘ý d#Wý d#’d#ý d#“ý d`d#ý e”¾ e###ý e#•ý e`e#ý f–ý f#Wý f#—f#ý f#˜ý f`f#ý g™ý g#Wg#ý g#šý g#›ý g`g#ý hœý h#Wý h#Úý h#Úý h#ý h`h#ý ižý ir¾ i##ý i#Ÿý i`i#ý j ý j#Wý j#Úý j#Úý j#¢ý j¡j#ý k£ý k#Wý k#Úý k#¶ý k#¤ý k`k#ý l¥ý l#Wl#ý l#3ý l#¦ý l`l#ý m§ý mr¾ m##ý m#©ý m¨m#ý nªý n#Wý n#Úý n#Úý n#«ý n`n#ý o¬ý o#Wo#ý o#Yý o#­ý o`o#ý p®ý p#Wp#ý p#¯ý p#±ý p`ý p#°ý q²ý q#Wý q#³q#ý q#ºý q`q#ý r»ý r#Wr#ý r#¼ý r#½ý r`r#ý sÀý s#Wý s#Úý s#Úý s#¿ý s¾s#ý tÁý t#Wý t#Úý t#ý t#Âý t`ý t#Ãý uÄý urý u#Úý u#Úý u#Åý u`u#ý vÆý v#Wý v#Úý v#Çý v#Cý vý v#Èý wDý wrý w#Úý w#Úý w#Eý w`w#ý xGý x#Wý x#Úý x#Fx#ý x`x#ý yHý y#Wý y#Úý y#3ý y#Iý y`ý y#Jý zKý z#Wz#ý z#Lý z#Mzý z#Ãý {Ný {rý {#Oý {#Úý {#Pý {`{#ý |Ëý |r|#ý |#Éý |#Êý |`|#ý }Ìý }rý }#Í}#ý }#Îý }`}#ý ~Ïý ~rý ~#Ð~#ý ~#ý ~~#ý ý #W¾ ##ý #ý `#×DÐ lZ^^ZZDZZ^P^^ZP^Z^ZZ^b^b^ZbZ^ZZZ€Ü°‚ƒ` „…` †4‡ˆÜ‰XŠ4‹Œ„XŽÜ„°‘°’Ü“„”„•–º @—º @˜º @™º @šº @›ÿœÿÿžÿŸÿý €ý €#Wý €#Úý €#Úý €#ý €`€#ý ý #Wý #Úý #ý #ý `#ý ‚ ý ‚#Wý ‚#Úý ‚#!ý ‚#"ý ‚`‚#ý ƒ#ý ƒ#Wƒ#ý ƒ#$ý ƒ#%ý ƒ`ƒ#ý „&ý „#W¾ „##ý „#'ý „„#ý …(ý …r¾ …##ý …#)ý …`…#ý †*ý †rý †#¿ý †#rý †#+ý †`†#ý ‡,ý ‡rý ‡#-‡#ý ‡#.ý ‡`‡#ý ˆ/ý ˆrý ˆ#0ˆ#ý ˆ#1ý ˆ`ˆ#ý ‰2ý ‰rý ‰#-‰#ý ‰#3ý ‰`‰#ý Š4ý Šrý Š#-Š#ý Š#5ý Š`Š#ý ‹6ý ‹rý ‹#<ý ‹#=ý ‹#>ý ‹`‹#ý Œ?ý Œ#Wý Œ#Úý Œ#‹ý Œ#Aý Œ@Œ#ý Bý rý #-#ý #Ñý `#ý ŽÒý Ž#Wý Ž#Úý Ž#Óý Ž#Ôý Ž`Ž#ý Õý #Wý #Úý #Õý #Öý `#ý ×ý #Wý #Úý #Úý #ý #ý ‘ý ‘#Wý ‘#ý ‘#ý ‘#ý ‘ý ‘#ý ’ý ’#Wý ’#Úý ’# ý ’# ý ’`’#ý “ ý “#W¾ “##ý “# ý “`“#ý ”ý ”r¾ ”##ý ”#ý ””#ý •7ý •#Wý •#Úý •#Úý •#ý ••#ý –8ý –#rý –#9ý –#Úý –#:ý –;–#ý —´ý —#Wý —#rý —#µý —#¶—ý —#¸ý ˜·ý ˜#Wý ˜#rý ˜#Úý ˜#¹ý ˜`˜#ý ™qý ™#W™#ý ™#%ý ™#¶™ý ™#rý š$ý š#W¾ š##ý š#&ý š`š#›œžŸ×D> l^^^ZPP^ZZZZ^^Z^^^b^PP^^^^ZP  ÿ¡ÿ¢ÿ£ÿ¤ÿ¥ÿ¦ÿ§ÿ ¡¢£¤¥¦§×ðŒ >¶@d A ó*ë ]]]] ]] ` `` å‚'' ##++,,--ï7  ÍÉÀ íå  dü©ñÒMbP?_*+‚€%ÿÁƒ„¡"ÿ'à?à?U>¶@,,,ï7  ÍÉÀ ôæ  dü©ñÒMbP?_*+‚€%ÿÁƒ„¡"ÿà?à?U>¶@ï7 þÿà…ŸòùOh«‘+'³Ù0¸HP\t Œ ˜ ¤°äcarole.hudsonMicrosoft Excel@€|ëu'¹É@”ø(º»@€ÖMx'¹ÉþÿÕÍÕœ.“—+,ù®0ð PXd lt|„ Œ Ëä' Proposed 20 mph Speed limitsSheet2Sheet3  Worksheets  !"#$%&'()*+,-./0123456789:;<=>?@ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ[\]^_`abcdefghijklmnopqrsþÿÿÿuvwxyz{þÿÿÿ}~€‚ƒþÿÿÿýÿÿÿýÿÿÿþÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿRoot Entryÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ ÀF¡T­½ÉþÿÿÿWorkbookÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿCçSummaryInformation(ÿÿÿÿtDocumentSummaryInformation8ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ|