|
Return
to Agenda
ITEM CC10
COUNTY COUNCIL
– 1 APRIL 2003
MOTION FROM
COUNCILLOR BRIAN HODGSON – FAIR WAGES CLAUSE
Report by
the Monitoring Officer
Introduction
- At the Council’s
meeting on 14 January 2003 Councillor Hodgson moved and Councillor McIntosh-Stedman
seconded the following motion:
"This
Council resolves to amend its Constitution in order to provide for a
fair wages clause in its contracting procedures as part of its plans
to improve public services. The intention is that this will give staff
who work for private contractors and voluntary organisations pay, sick
pay, holiday entitlements and pensions that are at least as good as
those employed directly by the Council and doing equivalent work.
The
advantages of a fair wages clause include the following:
- Prevents
a two-tier workforce;
- Promotes
contracting based on quality, not on cuts in service and staff
numbers;
- Tackles
low pay and local poverty;
- Promotes
ethical employment practices."
- In accordance
with Council Procedure Rule 21(b) the motion was deferred for consideration
at this meeting in the light of a report from the Monitoring Officer.
Background
to the Motion
- The motion follows
a campaign by Unison calling on all local authorities to introduce a
fair wages clause in their contracting procedures. Such a clause would
require companies contracting with public authorities to pay the equivalent
of public service wages and pensions to all staff affected by contracting
out. Unison argue that this is needed to give staff working for contractors
pay and conditions that are at least as good as those received by directly
employed staff doing equivalent work. It would also remove the incentive
to privatize simply to save on labour costs.
- Unison identify
the following reasons in support of such a clause:-
- It will prevent
a two-tier workforce ie the terms and conditions of staff transferred
to the private sector could not be cut and new employees taken on
would have the same terms and conditions of employment.
- It would help
to alleviate low wages, long hours and minimal conditions of service
thus addressing child poverty, the gender gap and social exclusion.
- It would stimulate
the local economy insofar as workers paid an adequate wage buy more
goods and services in the local area, and are also enabled to play
a more active role in the community.
- It is legal
insofar as the Government has amended the Local Government Act 1988
to enable pay and conditions, equality issues and training to be lawful
criteria when selecting bidders and providers of services.
- The Greater
London Authority has introduced a fair employment clause into its
contracting procedures.
- Other authorities
not committing to a fair employment clause are willing to build in
"TUPE-plus Agreements" into their particular contracts. TUPE-plus
agreements build on the rights of the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection
of Employment) Regulations 1981. These arrangements guarantee no deterioration
in pay and conditions during the life of a contract, provide trade
union bargaining rights for all staff including new starters and extend
protection to staff not covered by TUPE including staff employed after
the start of a contract.
- It would demonstrate
that the Council has a clear commitment to ethical employment practices.
Developments
- Since Unison’s
campaign was started the Government announced on 13 February this year
measures to tackle the two-tier workforce issue in local government.
The proposals are:-
- A code of practice
to be applied where a local authority transfers employees to a private
or voluntary sector partner, as part of a contract to provide any
local public service.
- The code will
require contractors to confirm their obligations to protect the terms
and conditions of transferring local government employees including
the right to on-going access to the local government pension scheme
or to an alternative good quality occupational pension scheme.
- The code will
also ensure that new joiners will be offered terms and conditions
which are, overall, no less favourable than those of transferred employees.
- Under the code
new joiners will also be offered a reasonable pension provision, which
may be either membership of the local government pension scheme, membership
of a good quality employer pension scheme or membership of a stakeholders
pension scheme with an employer contribution.
- The full code
of practice on workforce matters in local authority service contracts
is attached as Annex 1. The
code will form an annex to new statutory guidance on best value and
will require local authorities to include its provisions in the terms
of any contract between them and their private or voluntary sector partner.
Local authorities will be required to confirm, in their annual Best
Value Performance Plans, that individual contracts comply with requirements
in the code.
- The code will
apply to all local authority contracts in England which are first advertised
following publication of the code in the statutory guidance. The code
will not apply retrospectively to any contracts which have already been
advertised or entered into although the Government intends to publish
statutory guidance on this for local authorities in early March.
Effect
of the Government’s Proposals on the Motion
- The Government’s
proposals address the issues raised in Unison’s campaign, which seeks
to prevent the development of a two-tier work force arising from the
contracting out of public services.
- However Councillor
Hodgson confirms that his motion goes further than this and seeks to
introduce a fair wages clause into all the Council’s contracts. This
would not be covered by the Government’s latest proposal.
Implications
for the Council of Introducing a Fair Wages Clause
- The measures proposed
by the Government to end the two-tier workforce issue may well have
cost implications for the Council. The Council will have to meet these
costs because the measures will be incorporated in statutory guidance
and audited by the Audit Commission.
- However, if the
motion were to be adopted and applied to all contracts then there could
be significant implications for the Council including:-
- potential increases
in the cost of contracts;
- difficulties
in identifying ‘benchmark’ levels of pay, sick pay, holiday entitlement
and pensions for areas of work in which the Council does not have
an equivalent workforce;
- the impact on
contractors of having to adopt different terms and conditions of employment
for those members of their workforce who may not work on Council contracts,
or are only partially employed on Council contracts;
- the impact on
providing Council services if contractors were unwilling to accept
the consequences of having to adopt such a clause;
- the impact on
the Council’s ability to use contracts negotiated by the Central Buying
Consortium or other collective buying organizations if such contracts
are not based on a fair wages clause.
- On the other hand,
the introduction of a fair wages clause would go some way to address
a series of social, local economic and ethical employment issues such
as those identified in the Unison campaign. Although the government’s
implementation of the code to end the two-tier workforce problems will
address some of these issues.
Implications
for the Council’s Constitution
- Contracting issues
are dealt with in Section CC of the Council’s Constitution which sets
out Contract Procedure Rules. I do not believe these would need amending
in order to incorporate the provisions of the Code of Practice proposed
by the Government to end the two-tier workforce problem since this will
be applied and enforced in other ways.
- If the Council
wishes to adopt a fair wages clause for all its contracts then this
could be achieved by the Solicitor to the Council incorporating a change
into the Council’s Standard Terms and Conditions of Contract rather
than making a change to the Contract Procedure Rules.
Conclusions
- If the Council
is minded to adopt the motion and to introduce a fair wages clause into
all its contracts it is suggested that the Council defer a final decision
pending consideration of a further report on the financial and practical
implications of adopting a fair wages clause for all the Council’s contracts,
and that the report should also be considered by the Executive so that
it can advise Council on these issues.
RECOMMENDATION
- The Council
is RECOMMENDED to determine Councillor Hodgson’s motion in the light
of the advice in this report.
CHRIS
IMPEY
Monitoring
Officer
Background
Papers: Nil
Contact
Officer: Chris Impey Tel: (01865) 815307
March
2003
Return to TOP
|