Meeting documents

Cabinet
Wednesday, 22 June 2005

Return to Agenda

Return to CA3

ITEM CA3 - ANNEX A

CABINET – 7 JUNE 2005

ITEM 9: FUNDING AND THE VOLUNTARY SECTOR

Response of the Cabinet Member for Health & Community Services

Minute 121/05

  1. That the S&HC small grants budget - which was reduced from £25,000 in 2002 and is currently £18,600 - be increased to at least £40,000 p.a. and the availability of grants be better publicised.
  2. Response: Social & Health Care have no resources to increase the small grants budget, indeed some of the year’s money is still to be allocated for the last minute emergency requests and it has to be said that without a specific call on the need for an increased budget I will decline to accept this invitation.

  3. That work be done to assess the feasibility of and, if possible, implement a centralised procedure for giving small grants across all Directorates.
  4. Response: Agreed and will be actioned, but I am not sure how effective this will be regarded by other Directorates who may not be as closely involved with the voluntary sector in the field of activity as Social & Health Care were and the new Directorate for Adult Social Services will be.

  5. That information relating to grant funding on the OCC website be updated, including the provision of an online application form.
  6. Response: Agreed and will be actioned. Good idea and thank you.

  7. That a list of all small grant applications be circulated to all County Councillors, to enable them to use their local knowledge and experience to comment on the requests.
  8. Response: This could be an onerous undertaking for distribution of what is a small amount of funding, and I am unsure what it would achieve, but of course the details of grant applications will be placed in the Members’ Resource Centre.

  9. That officers from S&HC and Legal Services work together to draft a new standard form contract for small voluntary organisations, that will better meet the needs of both parties than the present document. This process should include consultation with appropriate voluntary sector bodies.
  10. Response: Agreed and will be actioned, and thank you.

  11. That the possibility be explored of negotiating with an insurance provider for lower cost public liability insurance for voluntary sector organisations.
  12. Response: Agreed and will be actioned if it is possible.

  13. The use of letters of intent or similar temporary extensions of funding arrangements should be strictly limited to covering unexpectedly protracted contract renegotiations. Interruptions of service should otherwise be avoided by ensuring that work necessary to renew funding should be done in time for the end of the contract period.
  14. Response: Agreed and will be actioned. Letters of intent are for exceptional situations only.

  15. That the possibilities of the OCVA’s proposal to employ a Funding Officer be explored, for the potential benefits that such a person might bring to this Council’s relationships with voluntary organisations. In particular, their capacity to provide advice and assistance for voluntary organisations in respect of contract negotiations should be investigated.
  16. Response: I am note sure about this one, whether it is worthwhile in terms of the cost, nor who would fit the bill. This needs further study.

  17. That the development of the relationship between OCC and the voluntary sector be made the responsibility of a single officer, who would provide a strategic lead on voluntary sector-related issues, including working towards the better co-ordination of the Council’s approach to the voluntary sector; developing closer working relationships with the District Councils; acting as a central point of information on contracts with and grants to the voluntary sector; and overseeing the further development of the Oxfordshire Compact and its subsidiary Codes of Practice.

Response: The single point of contact is Nicholas Welch, and this works well enough, although I accept that the point of contact needs re-publishing. I do not agree that the appointment of a new post for this task could be justified.

Return to TOP