Return
to Agenda
ANNEX 1 ITEM CA9
CABINET
- 19 DECEMBER 2006
LOCAL GOVT.
WHITE PAPER – NOW THE LOCAL GOVT AND PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT IN HEALTH BILL
Supplementary
report by the Chief Executive
Introduction
- The White Paper
has now been superseded, as the Local Government and Public Involvement
in Health bill was laid in parliament at the end of last week. Whilst
the bulk of the proposals are in line with the White Paper, there are
a few key areas of difference and this paper briefly updates members
on the content and the main changes between the two.
Structural Change
- Whilst the criteria
for structural change outlined in the White Paper is described as a
time limited "invitation" to local authorities to put forward proposals
for change, the bill contains provisions for the Secretary of State
to both invite and direct principal authorities in two tier areas
to make proposals for a single tier of local government in the area.
- The area concerned
can comprise the county itself, one or more district councils in the
county concerned or one or more relevant adjoining areas (i.e. neighbouring
counties or districts, although not to adjoining unitaries).
- An invitation
or direction may be such that the authority may choose which type of
proposal to make or it may specify which kind of proposal is invited
or required. However, a direction will only be given where the Secretary
of State believes that it would be in the interests of effective or
convenient local government to so.
- Invitations or
directions may be given to more than one local authority in the area
concerned, and may be implemented following consultation with the affected
councils and any other person considered by the Secretary of State to
have an interest. Such invitations or directions may also be varied
or revoked
- This goes considerably
further than the proposals in the White Paper although we have no information
as yet as to the extent that the government would be likely to wish
to use the extended powers.
Elections in England
- These proposals
are consistent with the White Paper, with measures to allow councils
to change to whole council elections by resolution.
Executive Arrangements
- This part is consistent
with the White Paper and requires councils to adopt one of three types
of electoral arrangement as specified in the main report. Details are
provided on how the Elected Executive form of arrangements would work
- it is clear that members of an elected executive could not
at the same time be ordinary councillors and would be elected in addition
to the complement of councillors.
- The proposals
for the Executive Leader are straightforward and in this form of arrangements
the Leader is and remains a member of the Council and whilst having
a 4 year term can be removed by resolution of the Council although this
will be subject to regulations.
Other Governance Issues
Parishes
- This is consistent
with the White Paper and gives a choice of three styles of Parish
Councils - Community, Neighbourhood or Village. The power
of well being in Section 1 of the LG Act 2000 is extended to "eligible"
parish Councils but does not require them to produce a community
strategy. Measures are included to allow district councils
and London boroughs to carry out community governance (formerly parish)
reviews and to establish, amalgamate, alter or abolish parish councils.
In tow tier areas it is for the District Councils to carry
out these reviews.
Scrutiny
- The scrutiny proposals
are consistent with the White Paper, with the "community call for action
proposals" from the White Paper brought forward by extending the power to
all Councillors (not just those members on a committee) on an authority
to refer a matter to an Overview and Scrutiny Committee and for that
to be put on the agenda of the Committee.
- This part extends
the power of Overview and Scrutiny Committees to question any member
discharging functions under Section 166 (exercise of functions by local
Councillors). It provides powers of regulation making to the Secretary
of State to prescribe the relevant information, which must be provided
to an Overview and Scrutiny Committee by relevant partner authorities.
- The Executive
must give a response to the Overview and Scrutiny Committee's recommendations
within two months, which must be published. A relevant Partner
Authority must have regard to any report or recommendations of an Overview
and Scrutiny Committee where this relates to a local improvement target
specified in the LAA (this does not apply in the case of Crime and Disorder
Reduction Partnership or PCT as there is separate legislation covering
these).
Byelaws
- This part is consistent
with the White Paper and allows enforcement of byelaws through fixed
penalty notices and issuing by community support officers.
This might be of limited application as it can only apply
where there is a specific power to make byelaws
in particular pieces of legislation. District councils have general
powers to make byelaws in their areas but not counties.
Ethical
Standards and Member’s Interests
- These proposals
are consistent with the White Paper and the consultation papers that
preceded it by devolving most decision-making on the conduct regime
to local authorities, with a revised, regulatory role for the Standards
Board for England. The measures provide for local standards committees
to make initial assessments of misconduct allegations.
- The Standards
Committee can refer complaints to the Monitoring Officer, the Standards
Board for England or take no action. Where
the latter action is taken the person who made the allegation has the
right to request a review of that decision. The scope of the
Members' Code of Conduct is also clarified so that it is not limited
only to members acting in an official capacity.
- The Chairman of
the Standards Committee is required to be an independent person (which
is in line with our existing practice).
Partnerships
and Local Area Agreements
- These provisions
are broadly in line with the White Paper, putting Local Area Agreements
on a statutory footing, with the following changes:
- NHS Foundation
Trusts and NHS Health Trusts are omitted from the list of partners
subject to the duty to co-operate in the LAA and to have regard to
the targets in it, although Primary Care Trusts remain included
- Best Value performance
indicators are abolished as such although an upper limit to the number
of replacement targets is not explicitly set
- The required
for partners to "have regard" to targets is not well defined
- The requirements
for local authorities to consult and involve the public are limited
to circumstances where they feel it is appropriate to do so
- The Audit Commission
is given a "gate keeping" role with other inspectorates and their
duty to categorise councils (as in the Comprehensive Performance Assessment)
is removed, although this may be reinstated again by the Secretary
of State
Patient
and Public Involvement in Health and Social Care
- This section implements
the proposals in the Department of Health consultation paper A Stronger
Local Voice and creates local involvement networks for health and
social services, which will replace the existing Patient Forums.
This part also abolishes the Commission for Patient and
Public Involvement in Health.
- The County Council
is required to make contractual arrangements to deliver activities promoting,
and supporting, the involvement of people in the commissioning, provision
and scrutiny of local health and social services and for obtaining views
about their needs for and experiences of local care services.
The contractor cannot be the Council itself, any other local authority
or NHS body.
- Health and Social
Care Service providers are required to respond to requests for
information, to reports and recommendations and to permit inspections
and visits by the Local Involvement Networks. Regulations
will set out the detail of this.
- Local Involvement
Networks can refer issues to an Overview & Scrutiny Committee
of a local authority and duties are placed on those committees
as to consideration of the referral.
JOANNA
SIMONS
Chief Executive
Background
papers: Local Government and Public Involvement in Health Bill
December
2006
Return to TOP
|