|
Review Recommendation
|
Executive
Member Response
|
|
R2 to
ask the Director for Environment & Economy to ensure that
in job roles/job descriptions as appropriate, all responsibilities
relating to Inland waterways' policies and targets are adequately
covered.
|
accepted subject
to amendments (in italics).
|
|
R2. that
delivery of those roles and responsibilities (in 1 above)
are monitored and evaluated to assess whether the most effective
delivery of the responsibilities within the Directorate is taking
place and to assess what the Council can expect/anticipate to
achieve in this area.
|
believed to
be no longer needed as covered by the other recommendations.
|
|
R3. to
request the relevant agencies and partners to provide manageable
and useable access measures such as ramps and footgrips on Inland
Waterways, provided that these measures are in balance and take
account of the biodiversity/overall environment of the waterside.
|
accepted; (Executive
to send letters as appropriate in general terms and follow up issues,
including rights of way, which arise individually).
|
|
R4. to
ensure that the CC meets its responsibilities in the next LTP
for maintenance of public rights of way that adjoin the waterside,
subject to resources.
|
accepted subject
to amendment (in italics).
|
|
R5. that
given the increased attention to the tourism element of the
Economic Development function at OCC, to put in place plans
to promote the tourism potential of the IWs network in Oxfordshire.
|
deleted in
the light of amended R6.
|
|
R6. that
a the joint tourism strategy
is developed further between the County and the City and
District Councils to promote tourism on the Oxfordshire
IWs and to extend this to other main partners in the IWs.
|
accepted subject
to amendments (in italics).
|
|
R7. that
given the examples of successful generation of external funds
by officers at other local authorities (paragraph 39, page 15
refers), that responsibility for accessing external grants and
funding sources generally, is appointed to a designated officer
within the E&E Directorate either by reallocation of existing
duties or by creation of a new post (at a cost of up to £40,000).
|
noted as the
County Council is exploring a structure and process for accessing
external funds.
|
|
R8. an
officer should be designated within the E&E Directorate
to have overall responsibility for co-ordinating IW issues.
|
noted - in
place.
|
|
R9. that
the new Rights of Way Improvement Plan (ROWIP) that will be
included in the next Local Transport Plan, should specifically
address issues affecting the particular canal towpaths
and footpaths adjoining rivers, including erosion, and have
targeted action plans for these areas.
|
accepted subject
to amendments (in strikethrough and italics).
|
|
R10. to
develop a distinct IWs strategy, linking together the co-ordination
of IW issues in (8), the LTP priorities and targets and the
ROWIP to be included in the second LTP period.
|
noted as a
long term goal but not considered to be a priority at the moment.
However in the meantime we will endeavour to undertake a mapping
exercise of waterway matters countywide.
|
|
R11. given
that £500 of a budget of almost £24 million in the LTP
was totally inadequate for IWs (see page 18), that to achieve
recommendation 10, the targets concerning IWs generally in the
LTP and Rights of Way in the future ROWIP, are made more specific
and deliverable and that the Director for E&E (via
the officer designated in 8. above) is responsible for delivery
of these targets.
|
noted. Officers
asked to investigate the possibility of separating out money spent
on IW responsibilities.
|