|
Return
to Agenda
Executive
– 7 December 2004
ADDENDA
Item
4. Petitions
and Public Address
|
Speaker
|
Item
|
|
Councillor
Lesley Sibley (Scrutiny Review Group)
Mrs Corinne
Grimley-Evans (Oxford Pedestrians Association)
|
5 – Air
Pollution – Scrutiny Review
|
|
|
|
|
Councillor
Jean Fooks (as mover of the motion in Council)
|
8 – Parking
Spaces for Disabled Residents
|
|
|
|
|
Councillor
Jean Fooks } (Scrutiny
Councillor
David Wilmshurst } Review Group)
|
10 – Job
Evaluation – Scrutiny Review
|
|
|
|
|
Councillor
Roger Belson (Scrutiny Review Group)
|
11 – Cost
of Agency Care Workers Scrutiny Review
|
|
|
|
|
Councillor
Barbara Gatehouse (Shadow Executive)
|
12 – Prevention
and Day Care Services for Older People
|
|
|
|
|
Councillor
Jean Fooks (as Social & Health Care Scrutiny Committee Chair)
|
13 – Children’s
Residential Review: Hollow Way, Oxford
|
|
Councillor
Neville F. Harris (Shadow Executive)
|
14 – Community
Safety Strategies
|
|
|
|
5. Air
Pollution – Scrutiny Review
(EX5- Supplementary Report)
The
decisions of the City Council Executive Board in respect of the recommendations
of the Scrutiny Review Group are set out in the attached schedule.
Also
attached is a supplementary report from the Scrutiny Review Group
members which seeks to clarify the position in relation to a number
of points in their original report.
Item 5 -
Air Pollution – Scrutiny Review
Decisions
of City Council Executive Board, 30 November 2005
in respect
of the recommendations of the Scrutiny Review Group
The joint
Review Group RECOMMENDS the Executives to extend agree that
the Membership of the Bus Quality Partnership should be extended
to all operators and to use it to set targets within two years for the
minimum percentage of buses (for each operator) that conform to the
highest emission standards (by being equipped with emission reduction
technology (including retro-fitting of tail-pipe technology)); AND
to include agreements on limiting the number of buses on competing routes.
The joint
Review Group RECOMMENDS the Executives to ask bus operators
to introduce pre-ticketing, greater through-journey ticketing, and cross-operator
ticketing arrangements, especially using stored-value cards;
The joint
Review Group RECOMMENDS the Executives to demonstrate in 12
months time how they have used a strengthened Freight
Quality Partnership has been used to reduce the congestion being
caused in the city centre from large delivery lorries, by: -
- reducing the
number and size of vehicles
- ensuring deliveries
only take place between 7 p.m. and 8 a.m.
- encouraging
increased use of transhipment to smaller vehicles at the edge of the
City, and
- increasing the
proportion of delivery vehicles with reduced emission profiles;
The joint
Review Group RECOMMENDS the Executives to support the use
of the Taxi Quality Partnership to require further emission reduction
in return for granting taxis the ability to use Botley Road bus lane.
The joint
Review Group RECOMMENDS the Executives to recognise that the
City Council already has targets in place to get all Council vehicles
to conform to the highest emission standards, and to ensure
that ask the County Council to undertakes
to: -
- set targets
for the percentage of its vehicles to be equipped with green technology;
- set targets
for the percentage of current contracts to be renewed or replaced
by contracts stipulating the use of green vehicles, especially school
buses;
- reveal the level
of improvement achieved every year through the establishment of a
fleet emissions audit, as is done by the City Council;
The joint
Review Group RECOMMENDS the Executives to ensure that periodic
road-side emission testing is carried out, perhaps in partnership with
other councils, in order to ensure greater compliance with emission
standards;
The joint
Review Group RECOMMENDS the Executives to review the quantity
and location of on-street parking in the city centre, and review
the enforcement of Residents’ Parking Zones outside the City Centre,
especially where occurring on bus routes;
The joint
Review Group RECOMMENDS the Executives agree to work
more closely with cycling and pedestrian groups, and to employ
a full-time pedestrians and cyclists officer, in order to give fresh
impetus to their walking and cycling strategies and achieve their stated
targets
(a) ask the
County Council to designate an appropriate officer to be the lead officer
on pedestrian and cyclists issues;
(b) ask City
Council officers to try to respond positively to requests from cyclists
and pedestrians;
The joint
Review Group RECOMMENDS the Executives to run a campaign to
raise awareness of air pollution issues and what how
the public can do to could help and what
advantages there would be for them, subject to achieving clarity concerning
the approach to be taken and the desired outcomes;
The joint
Review Group RECOMMENDS the Executives to increase City centre
parking charges at least in line with inflation so as to increase bus
usage, especially Park and Ride;
The joint
Review Group RECOMMENDS the Executives to implement a policy
requiring an environmental impact assessment, that specifically includes
air quality, to be done for all proposed major schemes and large developments
(e.g. the Westgate and West End proposals) and to require Travel
Plans should be required for all major developments;
The joint
Review Group RECOMMENDS the Executives ask the County Council
to include statutory air quality targets in the new Local Transport
Plan;
The joint
Review Group RECOMMENDS the Executives to establish a joint
process to manage further development and implementation of an Air Quality
Action Plan, so as to guarantee a shared corporate approach now and
in the future, and to report back to both Scrutiny Committees on their
specific proposals for achieving this closer working between the Councils;
The joint
Review Group RECOMMENDS the Executives to strengthen the Air
Quality Action Plan by including further options as listed in Appendix
5;
The joint
Review Group RECOMMENDS the Executives to ensure full public
consultation on the Air Quality Action Plan and to include improving
air quality as a priority in both the Oxfordshire Community Partnership
and the City’s Local Strategic Partnership;
16) record
concerns at the inexactitude or lack of clarity of some of the data
contained in the Joint Review document;
17) thank
all concerned for their work on the Joint Review.
Return to TOP
|