|
Return
to Agenda
ITEM EX6
EXECUTIVE
– 7 SEPTEMBER 2004
FUTURE DEVELOPMENT
OF THE SAP MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
Report by
the Director of Resources
Introduction
- The initial deployment
of the County Council’s Management Information System (SAP) has fallen
short of expectations in terms of financial management, reporting and
support for change initiatives. The shortcomings have been documented
in a review recently concluded by IBM. It is now essential that a remedial
programme is undertaken to correct these problems and to extend the
scope of SAP into operational areas that can improve management information
and achieve operational efficiencies.
- This report sets
out the proposed way forward to undertake the necessary improvements.
It will require an additional £1m investment this financial year above
existing budgeted resources and, if the programme is carried forward
for the subsequent three years, will require additional investment of
£2m per annum in each of those three years. The proposed programme will
be the centre of a substantial change initiative within the Authority
and bring with it the potential for substantial savings, estimated at
between £1m and £2m per annum when completed. This approach is consistent
with the efficiency savings strategy agreed by the Best Value &
Audit Committee.
Background
- The decision to
implement SAP and to use ITnet as our partner was taken by the former
Strategy & Resources Committee in June 2001.
- The SAP financial
and payroll software modules went live within the Authority in November
2002. This go live operation was the culmination of a multi year
project by a cross service development team, spearheaded by a management
team from Finance.
- Financially, go
live represented a financial commitment in excess of £18m at the
time to be paid over a 10 year contract span with our prime SAP support
and integration organisation, ITnet Plc from Birmingham. ITnet is one
of the larger IT outsourcing groups working in the UK public sector
and was seen as a safe pair of hands for the development.
- Operationally
go live represented a commitment to SAP – one of the leading
financial and human resource Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) systems
in both the public and private sectors. The SAP system replaced both
in house and contracted out technology that was more than two decades
old.
- The Council saw
go live as the dawn of a new age in accountancy, financial management,
budgeting, payroll administration, human resource administration, procurement
and a solution to many of the IEG requirements handed down from central
government. SAP was to be the answer to a range of management issues
within the authority.
- Almost two years
after go live, there have been many positive developments; but
also there remains much that now requires urgent attention.
Accomplishments
- The original SAP
project team launched the SAP financial, payroll and parts of the HR
software modules. This is a major accomplishment as SAP is a very large
and comprehensive package. They also accomplished this more or less
to time and to budget. The staff involved in this project should be
congratulated on the success that they enjoyed, given the resources
available to them.
- The payroll modules
are working and calculate a wide range of pay regimes for the thousands
of OCC employees and the system does so effectively.
- The HR modules,
even though only partially deployed, provide some segments of OCC with
more and better information than was previously available.
Challenges
- Many areas of
the development did not and have not met expectations. In some cases
the aspirations for the new package were unrealistic, in others the
goals were simply not met:
- Financial reporting
with the OCC implementation is still poor and probably less effective
than that available with the previous system.
- Coding structures
within SAP were devised by each directorate, service and budgeting
unit with a lack of central guidance. The lack of uniformity is creates
major problems for reporting but also for obtaining good quality information
on how the authority uses its financial resources.
- Payroll calculations
and payments with SAP are thought to be an improvement but the administration
for payroll is devolved into multiple regimes within the authority
and within the HR realm. This is seen as both inefficient and not
optimal.
- No effective
budgeting regime has been created.
- No effective
monthly reporting regime has been created.
- Almost no controlled
procurement is done through SAP.
- Debtor management
was never fully implemented.
- SAP ownership,
support and governance was not clarified and structured. In many cases,
the same overworked and dedicated staff do their day job and
do SAP support and do SAP development.
- Internal SAP
support is not structured with appropriate call support, escalation,
change management and incident recording.
Achievements
and Unfulfilled Requirements in Perspective
- To gain a perspective
on SAP, what has been accomplished, what needs to be done, and how we
should move forward, a short contract was let to IBM Business Consultancy
Services to provide a Gap Analysis. (This was agreed by the Executive
on 4 May 2004.) The analysis has been done and is available for inspection
in the Members’ Resource Centre. IBM Business Consultancy Services have
given two presentations of their work: one to the Executive and a second
session on 19th August to which all members were invited
along with senior managers from across the Council.
- The outcome of
the analysis was to confirm the points made above: attainments should
not be over looked, but much remains to be done. SAP, a competent choice
as an ERP financial support package for the Authority, is not providing
the desired information, financial management and enterprise facilities.
SAP is capable of providing a wide range of services for the Authority;
OCC is receiving only modest value from the implementation.
- SAP cannot be
left in its current state without further development; it is the key
financial management tool within the authority. As long as the tool
is broken, it will be very difficult to move forward with the change
agenda or to gain the financial controls outlined in the RSM Robson
Rhodes report.
- Developing SAP
will require significant investment and qualified SAP technical input.
Internal staff are dedicated and have produced good outcomes with the
resources available to them, but they do not have the broader prospective
and multi-year experience necessary to manage the required SAP development
programme going forward.
- SAP offers the
very real prospect of significant operational savings and significantly
improved financial management. To gain these benefits, major improvements
must be made in the system.
- Several points
were highlighted as to why the original promise of SAP remains unfulfilled:
- Insufficient
original investment. Good faith attempts were made to save the Authority
costs. In retrospect, this was a mistake.
- Unclear governance
and ownership of the original project. Those persons who stepped forward
to own the project were too far down in the organisation to deliver
the structure and efficiencies required.
- Unrealistic
expectations. The view was that SAP could do the proverbial everything,
rather than a more realistic view that OCC could do much for itself
with the properly implemented support of SAP technology.
- Too few SAP
qualified persons were engaged in the project; too much was demanded
of in house staff who did not have sufficient training, experience
and support.
- SAP has been and
is being successfully introduced by other authorities in the UK. Many
of the other SAP implementations are also experiencing challenges and
set backs owing to the comprehensive nature of SAP and the complexity
of handling large scale change programmes. It is a fair statement, however,
that the OCC implementation of SAP is as challenged as any other; we
have more difficulties than most. This may reflect the fact that we
implemented relatively early. It almost certainly reflects the fact
that we did not invest sufficient resources into the project.
Objectives
- Fixing SAP is
paramount. It is the key financial and ERP system in house. Moving to
another technology is not a reasonable financial or technological decision
(as IBM Business Consultancy Services confirm). We must make SAP work
and work well. With this is mind, a project to revitalise SAP has been
developed.
- The SAP Revitalisation
Project addresses the shortcomings that have been learned from the original
project. Specifically it addresses:
- Governance at
the highest level.
- Realistic investment
levels.
- Realistic objectives.
- Deployment of
SAP qualified specialists to work alongside our dedicated in house
resources.
- Targeting of
fundamental financial requirements – coding, reporting and financial
processes - as the first phase.
- Targeting of
realistic efficiency and modernisation developments – HR extensions,
eProcurement and Management Information – as the second phase.
- Implementation
of a dedicated SAP services desk, incident management, change management
procedures, call tracking and escalation.
- A unified approach
to development – vetting, prioritisation, technical architectural
ownership, tracking and implementation.
- This proposal
now being made to improve SAP for OCC is not unusual in the industry.
It is a common and proven approach to ERP development.
Project
Definition
- The project is
defined as two phases, running in parallel but with different time lines.
Phase
One: Target completion date: 1 April 2005
- Rectification
of the coding structure in SAP.
- Development
of standard and effective reporting; distribution of live monthly
cost centre reports.
- Deployment of
standardised budgeting.
- Creation of
a sustainable SAP support arrangement, independent of line staff with
full duties elsewhere.
- Creation of
a SAP development authority that will focus and administer SAP development
going forward.
- Analysis of
the options for meeting the needs of schools. Development of a business
case for the use of SAP in schools, and, if the results recommend
SAP, the development of a comprehensive proposal for the rollout of
SAP into the OCC school system.
Phase
Two: Target date: phased through 2007.
The
first six months, until April 2005, would be used to study and verify
the business cases for the developments indicated in this phase. Given
that the business need is proven, the developments would move ahead
as indicated:
- Deployment of
effective purchase orders and eProcurement
- Consolidation
of payroll outside of HR and deployment of a unified administration.
- Deployment of
Employee Self Service (ESS) modules in SAP to allow each staff member
controlled access to and ability to change pertinent information.
- Deployment of
the Manager Self Service (MSS) modules to allow cost centre managers
access to pertinent information.
- Given the business
case for SAP in schools in proven in the preliminary work, the actual
rollout to schools would take place as part of Phase Two.
- Several other
aspects of the project represent significant changes:
- The project
will accept ownership and governance of the SAP system and development.
It will focus and coordinate all SAP development going forward.
- Additionally
the project will own the processes, procedures and improvement of
all subsidiary systems that relate to and interface to the
SAP implementation. This will provide for the first time a unified
change authority within OCC that is responsible for the full range
of financial and related process and procedures – a development in
line with the RSM Robson Rhodes report recommendations.
- It will deploy
a unified accountancy and reporting system as determined by the Head
of Finance
- It will be administered
by a Steering Group comprised of senior representatives from each
Directorate and chaired by either a member of CCMT or the Executive.
- It will allow
the SAP development, a development that has much wider reach than
just financial systems, to be directed by an authority wide group.
It will not be an ICT project.
- The progress
of the project will be reviewed on a three monthly basis. Should the
project not be running as required, shortcomings can be addressed.
- Financial BPR
will be centralised in the project group, bringing together the delivery
of the system assets, business process engineering and training in
an integrated development.
- The most efficient
operational structure moving forward could be an internal shared services
centre. Back office shared service centres are now being set up by a
number of local authorities to handle high volume transactions such
as payroll data administration, eProcurement, procure to pay, financial
reporting, and invoice processing. The benefits of a shared service
centre seem quick attractive on first inspection. A significant element
of the work within the first six months of the project will be to look
further at the setup of a shared centre for OCC. Given a positive result
from the research, a proposal could be brought forward in Spring 2005
to include the elements of a shared service centre within the scope
of the project development. This decision is seen more as a way forward.
Any additional costs of setting up the centre would need to be met directly
from the savings that it would create.
Schools
SAP
- The requirement
for financial support in schools mirrors that of the Authority as a
whole. The delivery of a supportable and appropriate SAP schools’ module
will be an integral part of the project. To assure that the special
requirements of schools are met, a stream leader will be appointed to
be the lead officer for schools development and will be responsible
for a successful outcome. The development of a business case for the
use of SAP in schools will be one of the first deliverables from the
work stream. Provided that the business case is positive, then a user
requirements catalogue and associated product specification will be
developed, culminating in a plan to rollout SAP to all participating
schools in the Authority.
Composition
of the Project Team
- A tender is now
being developed to recruit a business partner to manage and structure
the project. The basic outline of the project team will look like this,
supplemented by internal and external staff.
Programme
Manager
Phase
One:
- Financial Coding
and Budgeting Stream Leader (SL)
- Financial Reporting
SL
- Financial Procedures
and Policies SL
- Financial Interfaces
SL
- S&HC Related
Financial SL
- Schools Requirements
SL
- Shared Services
Centre Investigation SL
- Training SL
Phase
Two (new areas):
- eProcurement
/ Purchase to Pay SL
- Employee Self
Service/Manager Self Service SL
- Management Reporting
SL
- HR Extensions
SL
Support
Development
- SAP Service
Desk Development SL
Investment
- The proposed additional
investment in 2004/05 is £1m. This sum will be combined with the sums
already committed for SAP development and support, to fund the build
up of the project team and the delivery of Phase One and (as noted in
the July Financial Monitoring report) will require a supplementary estimate.
- Supplemental investment
in subsequent years will be £2m per annum for a minimum of 3 years to
continue the project into Phase Two. Since this would require ongoing
financial provision it would be subject to the Council’s agreement in
setting the budget for 2005/06 and would not proceed unless such agreement
was forthcoming. The strategy set out above assumes that the proposals
for Phase Two will come forward for consideration by the Executive in
the first instance and then by Council.
- The total additional
investment for the development as outlined is therefore £7m up to 2007/08.
- The investment
estimate for the project is based on the recruitment of individuals
necessary to do the development work and to lead the teams necessary
to install the changes. Longer term investment, beyond the scope addressed
here, will need to be funded by savings achieved in the early phases
of the project.
Potential
for Savings
- IBM Business Consultancy
Services have had experience of implementing SAP in other local authorities.
They estimate that savings of £2m a year are possible based on their
experiences at other local authorities.. Their report provides further
details. They have stressed that they have taken a cautious approach
to these figures.
- As SAP is the
key support system for business process re-engineering in the authority’s
financial and HR processes, rectifying the SAP installation is essential
to a wide range of efficiency measures. Without SAP rectification the
ability to achieve meaningful efficiencies would be substantially reduced.
Team Structure
- Currently estimates
are that 30 persons will be dedicated to the project. In rough numbers,
approximately 10 of these posts will be represented by internal transfers
to the project of staff who are currently working with SAP, approximately
10 posts will be permanent new hires that will be employed for support,
business analysis and development. The remaining 10 will be contract
specialists to help with the rollout of individual SAP modules. The
contract staff will be phased out at the end of the project.
- In the project
definition section, a Programme Manager and 12 work stream leaders were
identified. Every attempt will be made to use existing staff in these
key positions however, a majority of these key positions may need to
be provided by the business partner identified as the outcome of the
tendering for SAP support process mentioned earlier. (At the end of
the project it is hoped that all support services for SAP will have
been internalised through the training of existing staff or the recruitment
of trained staff, and, that the dependency on external contractors will
have been reduced to an absolute minimum.)
- Having established
the project cadre, additional support staff will be provided from internal
and external sources. In general it is believed that each work stream
should be comprised of two persons. An additional person will be required
for project administration and at least six persons are likely to be
retained for support positions. Sufficient training resources already
exist in house.
- It is unlikely
that all 12 work streams will be fully active for the entire life
of the project. Some of the Phase One modules will close out in the
first year. Some of the Phase Two modules cannot really start until
Phase One has been completed. Average FTE commitment to the project
will average between 22 and 24 persons.
- The Programme
Manager is key to the overall development. He/she will lead the overall
project, reporting to the Steering Committee. A key factor in the
choice of a SAP support business partner will be the availability
of a SAP qualified programme manager of sufficient calibre to lead
this engagement.
- As the majority
of costs associated with the project will be staff costs, the numbers
employed and the speed of the Phase Two development will be adjusted
to assure that the project remains within its financial limitations.
Savings found early in the project could be used to accelerate the
change process and subsequent SAP developments.
- Housing for
the project team will be at Clarendon House in Oxford, adjacent to
the ICT Services Unit. ICT Services will provide the technical support
for the staff involved.
- The new SAP
Service Desk will share the same technical facilities, though probably
not the same staffing resources, as the existing Schools and ICT Service
Desks.
Ongoing
Support Requirements
- A support team
will be assembled within the project that will continue to provide support
for SAP after the project has terminated.
- Dedicated support
desk with a call administration system linked to both internal ICT
and to our external contract support organisation.
- The SAP Service
Desk will be organised according to industry best practice guidelines.
- Dedicated support
staff for each of the major modules deployed
- Change Management.
- Development
coordination.
RECOMMENDATIONS
- The Executive
is RECOMMENDED to:
(a) endorse
the report as the preferred way forward for SAP including the
principle of moving to the shared delivery of services where this
is more efficient;
(b) confirm
a supplementary estimate of £1m in respect of the delivery of
Phase One of the revitalisation project, on the basis that further
expenditure post 2004/05 will be subject to the Council agreeing
appropriate budgetary provision.
JOHN
JACKSON
Director of
Resources
Background
papers: IBM Gap Analysis
Contact
officer: Stephan Conaway Head of ICT 01865 815590.
August
2004
Return to TOP
|