Return to Agenda

ITEM EX7
DRAFT

EXECUTIVE – 27 MAY 2003

BEST VALUE PERFORMANCE PLAN 2003/04

IMPROVEMENT STRATEGY COMPREHENSIVE PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT

Report by Director for Resources

Introduction

  1. The Audit Commission developed Comprehensive Performance Assessment (CPA) as a basis for assessing authorities' progress in meeting their duties under the Local Government Act 1999. CPA is also designed to improve the value and efficiency of the Commission's inspection work, and the work of appointed auditors.
  2. All County Councils were subject to CPA during 2002. The process involved an assessment of each council, with an overall rating used to describe its overall performance. The assessment is used as a basis for planning for improvement.
  3. The CPA comprises two main components:

    • a corporate assessment which focuses on the Council’s overall performance and ability to improve (carried out in May 2002)
    • the performance of key service areas, referred to as core services

  1. Both components were combined to produce the overall rating, which was announced in December 2002.

    (BVPI Inclusions Checklist 2003 (download tables as .xls file))
  2. How we performed

  3. We have been measured as ‘Fair’ in the way we serve local people. In judging how well the Council is run, we received a measurement of 2 out of 4.
  4. In addition, each core service area was scored on a scale from 1 to 4, with 1 being the lowest and 4 being the highest. Education and social care were given more importance in reaching the overall service score than other areas. The core service scores we received for 2002 were as follows:

    Education 3 out of 4
    Social Care

    - Children's Services 2 out of 4
    - Adults' Services 2 out of 4
    Environment 3 out of 4
    Libraries & Leisure 2 out of 4
    Use of Resources 3 out of 4

  5. Overall Service Score 3 out of 4

  6. In the opinion of the Audit Commission, we deliver variable standards of service and have been unable to achieve sustained improvement across services although we have been successful in some areas, such as waste management. Our education service is satisfactory and the Education Action Zone has delivered real improvements. But we need to address weaknesses in social care for children and adults. We also need to develop clear priorities in discussion with local people and to link resources more effectively to these if we are to deliver significant improvements in services for local people.
  7. Improvement Activities Since CPA

  8. Since September 2001 – before the CPA corporate assessment of May 2002 – we have been implementing an improvement plan entitled "Raising our Performance". This set us the ambition of becoming an outstanding authority by 2005 and has led to strengthening of our corporate capacity, a fact recognised by a recent external "Peer Review" progress report.
  9. Since our CPA assessment, we have adopted a development plan to grow our corporate capacity, focussed on strengthening our corporate centre. This was entitled ‘Growing our Corporate Capacity’, the main outcomes of which are set out below:

    • Our services are now grouped in families named "directorates" to foster collaborative working. Five new Directorates - Learning & Culture, Environment & Economy, Resources, Social & Health Care, Community Safety became operational from 1 April 2003
    • Four new Strategic Directors were appointed externally, using a common job description to better promote corporate working
    • A County Council Management Team priority work programme has been agreed with The Executive (see below) and reflected in shared objectives for individual Directors
    • Operational management has been delegated to Heads of Service beneath Strategic Directors
    • Moves to strengthen corporate capacity in operational areas have taken place throughout the Council, including creating a corporate approach to ICT, agreement to have a corporate Property team, and to strengthen the corporate HR function

  1. We have also carried out a detailed analysis of its service performance to identify areas for improvement, which form part of our detailed action plan.
  2. Improvement Plans for 2003/04 – 2006/07

  3. We have set itself a target of becoming a ‘good’ authority by 2004/05. We are also seeking to be an outstanding authority and achieve a CPA rating of ‘Excellent’ by 2006/07. Our improvement plans reflect this overall ambition.
  4. Improvement plans for each core service have been developed and progress towards implementation is being tracked on a quarterly basis. Full details of the improvement plans can be found in Annex ?
  5. In improving how well the Council is run, the following key areas have been identified as priorities in the County Council Management Team priority work programme:

 

Theme

Action

Responsible Officer

1.

Political

  • Improve the effectiveness of Scrutiny

Chief Executive

Assistant Chief Executive

2.

Local responsiveness and community leadership

  • Develop area roles for directors and Executive members
  • Review local area fora
  • Improve bilateral relations with district and town councils
  • Audit and improve relations with the voluntary sector

Chief Executive Director for Community Safety

Assistant Chief Executive

3.

HR Strategy

  • Improve recruitment/retention
  • Win corporate IiP accreditation
  • Improve internal communications
  • Promote staff career development
  • Improve the working environment

Director for Resources

4.

Performance Management

  • Set priorities in Oxfordshire Plan
  • Set realistic BVPI targets
  • Monitor and report progress
  • Achieve PSA targets

Director for Resources

Director for Learning & Culture

5.

Financial Strategy

  • Maximising our Resources
  • Procurement Strategy and Reviews
  • Property Review

Director for Resources

6.

ICT and Customer Relations

  • Develop a Customer Relations Strategy
  • Ensure cost-effective delivery of Broadband
  • Ensure effective ICT services
  • Maximise benefits from MIS
  • Improve briefing of Members and MPs

Director for Resources

7.

Social & Health Care

  • Social Services – achieve 2 stars in 2004
  • Improve integration with health and other partners

Director for Social & Health Care

8.

Developing Potential

  • Improve school attainment levels
  • Improve libraries

Director for Learning & Culture

9.

Safeguarding Communities

  • Clear Council priorities and service engagement in community safety

Director for Community Safety

10.

Sustaining Prosperity

  • Affordable Housing strategy
  • Economic Development strategy
  • Oxford West End redevelopment
  • City/town centre management
  • Review Highways Management

Director for Social & Health Care

Director for Environment & Economy

Best Value Review Programme 2003/04 and 2004/05

  1. An overview of the best value reviews we have carried out since 2001/02 is included in the Past Performance section of this report
  2. There is no longer a statutory requirement for us to have a five year review programme. Instead we are required to reflect the strengths and weaknesses of our CPA assessment in drawing up a suitable programme of reviews, and for the Audit Commission and other inspection bodies to be satisfied that this addresses weaknesses in a timely manner. Our Review Programme for 2003/04 and 2004/05 is:

To be included following the decision of Best Value Committee on 6 June 2003

Include:

    • Best Value Reviews
    • Informal Reviews (Heritage, Highways Maintenance, Education?)
    • Efficiency Reviews

Audit Commission Inspection Programme 2003/04 – 2004/05

  1. Our Audit and Inspection Plan, drawn up in consultation with the Audit Commission, falls into two parts: improvement work in line with our improvement plans, and assessment work that is either prescribed or necessary to meet statutory obligations

Improvement Work

Audit and Inspection Programme

2003/04

2004/05

2005/06

Performance Management

Detailed review of our arrangements focussing on:

  • Role of The Executive
  • Performance monitoring
  • Forward planning
  • Risk management

Detailed work depending on the outcome of work in 2003/04

 

Human Resources Strategy

Strategy review and initial scoping

Detailed review of the arrangements using the Audits Commission’s audit tool

 

Crime and Disorder

Detailed review of our arrangements focussing on:

  • Overview of corporate framework for community safety
  • Mainstreaming and performance management
  • Partnerships

 

Full Inspection

Procurement

Overview of the Council’s approach to procurement

 

 

Affordable Housing

Diagnosis to assess progress made by the Council

On-going support

On-going support

 

Assessment Work

Audit and Inspection Programme

2003/04

2004/05

2005/06

Cultural and Lifelong Learning

Whole Service Inspection (pilot) including CPA improvement assessment on libraries

 

 

Environment

Environment Assessment (Inspection)

Environment Assessment to feed into CPA Improvement Reporting

Environment Assessment to feed into CPA Improvement Reporting

Waste Management

Follow-up of 2001/02 Inspection and assessment of Improvement Action Plan

 

 

Use of Resources

Auditor scored judgement

Auditor scored judgement

Auditor scored judgement

Social Services Inspectorate

Annual Review of performance

Inspection of Social Care Services for Older People

Annual Review of performance

Annual Review of performance

OFSTED / DES

Monitoring of progress against agreed targets and priorities

Follow-up of OFSTED inspections

Monitoring of progress against agreed targets and priorities

Follow-up of OFSTED inspections

Monitoring of progress against agreed targets and priorities

Follow-up of OFSTED inspections

  1. There may also be a Supporting People Inspection scheduled by the Housing Inspectorate and undertaken jointly with the Social Services Inspectorate and the Probation Inspectorate.

JOHN JACKSON
Director for Resources

Background papers:

Contact Officer: Sean Gibson, Performance Review Officer Tel: (01865) 815482

May 2003

Return to TOP