|
Type of
Evidence
|
Essential
Features
|
What Education
Officers and the Assessment Panel will look for ….
|
|
School Action
IEPs
|
|
|
|
|
|
A rough guideline
would be one term duration for each IEP where learning difficulties
are being addressed.
For cases where
emotional and behavioural difficulties are a priority, it may be
appropriate for the IEP to be planned termly but supported by action
plans planned and reviewed more frequently according to need.
Intervention
at School Action should certainly have been systematically tackled
over two terms.
|
|
|
|
Targets are
related to reviews.
Start dates
and review dates follow on logically.
|
|
|
- Individual
Education Plan clearly addresses the grounds for statutory assessment
|
The school
has been systematically addressing the current difficulties. For
example, for a child with a behavioural difficulty, there has been
a sustained attempt to address the behaviour with relevant targets,
strategies, resources and parental involvement.
|
|
|
- Targets
set are specific, measurable and achievable (See section E)
|
For example:
‘Reads aloud
200 key words with 95% accuracy’ not ‘increase sight vocabulary’.
‘Settles to
task set by teacher for 5 minutes’ not ‘improve attitude to work’.
|
|
|
|
For example,
progress checks on reading attainment, observation records on behaviour.
|
|
|
- Parent,
and where appropriate, pupil involvement
|
For example,
strategies involving home, evidence of discussions with parents,
signatures on IEPs.
|
|
School Action
Reviews
|
- Reviews
relate to the IEPs submitted
|
All IEPs are
reviewed and review record has been kept and submitted.
|
|
|
|
Evidence of
actions determined at review being implemented.
For example,
refined or different targets, decision to consult with support service,
registration at School Action Plus.
|
|
|
|
Parent signature,
agreed activities at home, agreed strategies for use at home, evidence
that school has made efforts to involve parents in the review process.
|
|
School Action
Plus
|
Pupils must
have been formally registered at School Action Plus for a minimum
of two terms. All features detailed at School Action should
be included but at School Action Plus should demonstrate a more
intensive programme with additional resources to address the pupil’s
difficulties.
|
|
|
School Action
Plus IEPs
|
- Appropriate
resource allocation
- The school
would be expected to fund from its delegated budget additional
support equivalent to 5 hours per week LSA time for that child.
|
Allocation
of appropriate resources to allow School Action Plus programme to
be delivered
Timetable demonstrating
above.
This does not
necessarily imply one to one teaching – the pupil’s needs should
be addressed in an appropriate learning context.
Appropriate
arrangements can be, for example:
- an individualised,
supported learning programme delivered within a whole class context
- participation
in a group learning programme addressing a common special need
There should,
however, be a minimum of 5 hours weekly, supported, individualised
learning activities addressing targets on the pupil’s IEP.
|
|
School Action
Plus Involvement of Support Services/ External Specialist Services
|
- Consultation
with and/or direct involvement of the Educational Psychologist
- Further
involvement of other support services and/or external specialists
appropriate to the pupil’s needs.
|
|
|
School Action
Plus Reviews
|
All features
detailed at School Action should be included but at School Action
Plus should demonstrate support service involvement with subsequent
IEPs reflecting advice.
|
Targets, strategies,
provision developing through series of IEPs reflecting advice (second
or subsequent IEPs at School Action Plus should demonstrate this).
|
|
Type of
Evidence
|
Essential
Features
|
What Education
Officers and the Assessment Panel will look for ….
|
|
Request
for Statutory Assessment
|
- Clear evidence
of the significance of the pupil’s learning difficulty (request
form – section 1)
|
National Curriculum
levels for AT’s in English, Science, Maths.
Attainment
in other curriculum areas.
Other relevant
assessment information eg standardised assessments of literacy.
|
|
|
- Clear evidence
of SEN provision made and the pupil’s progress in response to
provision (request form – section 2)
|
|
|
|
- Comparison
with the Oxfordshire criteria for statutory assessment (request
form – section 3)
|
|
|
|
- Essential
attachments (request form - section 4)
|
Pupil details
(front sheet of SEN Action Record or SIMS SENCo Record).
Standardised
test results (from SEN Action Record or SIMS SENCo Record).
Record of external
support (from SEN Action Record or SIMS SENCO Record).
Copies of assessment
information; for example, consultation feedback, reports or letters
from the Educational Psychology Service, other LEA Support Services,
other agencies such as Health (Speech and Language Therapist, Physiotherapist,
Occupational Therapist, Paediatrician, Psychiatrist) or Social Services.
The pupil’s
current IEP at School Action Plus and support timetable showing
resources and time deployed to support the pupil.
The three
previous IEPs and reviews at School Action Plus and/or School
Action with support timetables showing resources deployed to support
the pupil.
Pastoral support
plans, where appropriate.
Relevant pages
from the OCC Criteria for Statutory Assessment D5 to D31
|
|
|
- Agreement
to request assessment between school, parent(s)/carer and Educational
Psychologist
|
School,
parent(s)/carer or Educational Psychologist signatures on request
form.
|