|
Return
to Agenda
ITEM EX7
- ANNEX 2
EXECUTIVE
– 5 FEBRUARY 2003
SECONDARY
EDUCATION IN WANTAGE AND GROVE AREA
CURRENT COLLEGE
STRUCTURE: OPERATIONAL PROBLEMS
KEY
STAGE 3 (Years 7-9)
- Upon entry to
the college, students join either East or West site, where they remain
for the first three years. This provides a stable environment for the
students, and performance at KS3 is generally good. There are problems
in terms of student integration, and common ethos, though views may
differ over whether these are important matters, or whether they add
to diversity. Visitors to the school comment from time-to-time on the
different "atmosphere" on the East and West sites.
KEY
STAGE 4 (Years 10-11)
- Students are based
on their original KS3 sites but spend alternate days on the Centre site.
This removes the need for student movement between sites during the
course of a school day, but it raises other problems. These include
registration difficulties, and tutoring. King Alfred’s is one of the
few (possibly the only) Oxfordshire secondary schools that does not
use a computerised registration system. To do so would require ICT links
between the sites to provide a central computerised administration system.
This does not exist. At present, registers for KS4 tutor groups are
moved between sites each day. Each group has a tutor on each site. This
causes confusion for students and parents as well as a lack of continuity
in student approach and care. Those students most in need of support
suffer at this stage because of the alternate site arrangements.
- Performance at
KS4 is, to a degree, disappointing, below the level that might be reasonably
predicted from KS3 results. The site structure does not seem to affect
the progress of the able and motivated pupils, but does have a detrimental
effect on the performance of children who require nurture or direction.
SIXTH
FORM
- Sixth form students
are based on Centre site, and are well served by present arrangements.
STAFF
- Eliminating student
movement during the school day between sites means that staff movement
has to take place. On the present timetable (50 hour long lessons over
a 10-day cycle) there are 600 staff journeys and of these some 350 occur
during breaktime, lunchtime, or non-contact time. There are 250 staff
journeys to be made in zero time between lessons 1 or 2, or lessons
3 and 4. The majority of these journeys are between Centre-East, or
Centre-West: only a few staff work across the East-West (at the present
time, there are only two zero time journeys between East-West sites
timetabled).
- Staff travel between
sites raises other problems, including:
- Transfer of
books and resources between sites;
- Duplication
of resources;
- Lack of a fixed
teaching base for any teacher involved;
- Difficulty of
organising teamwork, departmental meetings, supervising/mentoring
NQTs;
- Suitable staff
cover for absent colleagues;
- Availability
of transport, and its cost.
Travel
between sites does not fall evenly between all subject areas. One
of the worst areas to be hit is Science (175 across-site movements).
Over the Science team as a whole the movements affect staff to varying
degrees, individual cross-site movements varying from 2 to 22 over
the 50-period cycle. However, because of overall site area/space constraints,
the theoretical option of building additional laboratories on outer
sites, to reduce travel, would lead to congestion.
- At the time of
the preparation of this paper, the DfES was expected to announce its
revised KS4 curriculum requirements/framework. College structures and
systems, in common with other secondary schools, will doubtless need
modification in the light of these.
TIMETABLE
- During the preparation
of this report, a recently retired Headteacher was asked to look at
the school organisation, and to offer advice as to whether there were
improvements to present arrangements which could be made either through
a revised approach to timetabling, or changes to the balance of accommodation
available on the respective sites. This Headteacher reported that:
"It
is doubtful if there could be many, if any, improvements to the present
timetable to further reduce staff travel between the sites. Every trick
known to reduce staff travel to a minimum and to accommodate as much
of the necessary travel in non-contact time, breaktime or lunchtime,
is used."
- The Head goes
on to offer the following comments:
"King
Alfred’s operating on three sites does not serve the best interests
of students, is too demanding and makes inefficient use of staff and
is too expensive to run;"
"The
present use of the three sites is probably the best that can be achieved
in the circumstances in terms of efficiency of the timetable and least
movement of staff and students between the sites;"
"It
seems to be the view of all those who have to work in King Alfred’s
that the three-site set up should be abandoned as soon as possible."
Return to TOP
|