ITEM EX3EXECUTIVE – 21 & 28 JANUARY 2003Minutes of the Meeting commencing at 2.00 pm on 21 January and adjourned at 4.20 pm and resumed at 10.00 am on 28 January and finishing at 11.07 am
Present: Voting Members:Councillor
Keith R Mitchell – in the chair Other
Members in Attendance: Officers: Whole of meeting: Chief Executive, J. Leverton and G. Warrington. Part of meeting: Chief Fire Officer; Director of Cultural Services; J. Hydari and M. Petty (Business Support Directorate); M. Bowmer and A. Davy (Education Department); R. Helling (Environmental Services); and L. Brown (Social & Health Care).
The Executive considered the matters, reports and recommendations contained or referred to in the agenda for the meeting and decided as set out below. Except insofar as otherwise specified, the reasons for the decisions are contained in the agenda and reports, copies of which are attached to the signed Minutes.
BUSINESS CONDUCTED ON 21 JANUARY 2003
24/03. DECLARATION OF INTEREST
Councillor Janet Godden declared a personal interest under Item 12 insofar as she was a Non-Executive Director of the Oxfordshire Mental Healthcare Trust.
25/03. MINUTES
The Minutes of the meeting held on 7 January 2003 were approved and signed subject to the following amendments:-
26/03. PETITIONS AND PUBLIC ADDRESS
The Chair reported that the following request to address the meeting had been agreed:-
27/03. FIRE SERVICE DISPUTE
The Executive received an oral report from the Chief Fire Officer which set out the latest position regarding the current pay dispute between the Fire Brigades Union and the national employers. He reported that the Fire Brigades Union was due to begin its next 24 hour strike at 9 am the following day with further 2 day strikes planned for 28 and 29 January and 1 and 2 February 2003. He was confident that the Service would continue to provide a response to life threatening incidents and that the public would continue to be vigilant. Further talks were scheduled for 22 January 2003 and he hoped that a resolution to the dispute could be found. RESOLVED: to note the report.
28/03. BUDGET MONITORING
(Agenda Item 5) The Executive considered a report (EX5) which detailed the budget monitoring position of the Council for 2002/03 as at 30 November 2002. Mr Alan Lester addressed the Executive. He expressed his concern over the current levels of underspends in the County Council’s budget. This had been money raised through Council Tax and he suggested that rather than being asked to pay an increase in Council Tax at the level currently anticipated when inflation currently stood at 2½% the Council tax payers of Oxfordshire should be entitled to a refund. There was a need for more detailed consultation and he called for a referendum in order to gauge public opinion on the budget measures proposed. Councillor Gatehouse expressed her concern over the increasing costs of the OCN/Broadband Project and called for a report to explain why this was so. Councillor Power questioned the need to impose a Council Tax increase of over 14% in view of Oxfordshire’s settlement being above the average for Shire Counties, the high level of underspends across the County Council’s budget and the current level of inflation. Councillor Mitchell pointed out that the current level of stated underspends was a consequence of holding back expenditure where this had been practicable to ensure that overspending in other areas could be offset without drawing on balances. He advised the meeting that to keep any increase in the level of Council tax equal to the level of inflation would require cuts of £22m to County services, which would be undeliverable. Furthermore whilst the County Council had indeed received a better than hoped for Government settlement this had been offset by a withdrawal of £2½m of grants for Learning & Culture and additional central costs imposed such as the Unison pay award and increased employee insurance costs. Councillor Margaret Godden sympathised with the views put forward by Councillor Gatehouse. The increased costs had to some extent been unforeseen and identified as the project had continued to develop. However, she considered the project to be worthwhile but agreed that a further report should be prepared in order to bring members up to date on its development. RESOLVED:
29/03. SCHOOLS’ DELEGATED BUDGETS FORMULA 2003/04
(Agenda Item 7) The Committee considered a report (EX7) which sought agreement to the introduction of changes to the formula in the light of the consultation responses carried out under the Schools Standards and Framework Act 1998. Mr Bowmer summarised the outcome of the consultation and drew particular attention to a letter from Marlborough School relating to post 16 funding, which suggested that the Council should allocate additional funds for Key Stage 3 to avoid any abatement in the allocation to schools with sixth forms. The Executive considered that the report’s proposals were the fairest solution, when seen in the light of the large increase to budgets for schools with sixth forms in the current year. RESOLVED: to agree the proposals set out in the report.
30/03. BUS SERVICES REVIEW
(Agenda Item 9) On 6 February 2002 the Executive had agreed to commission the Environment Scrutiny Committee, using consultants employed through the Department of Environmental Services, to undertake a review of bus services across the County. On 18 December 2002 the Environment Scrutiny Committee had considered the outcome of the review and its recommendations were now before the Executive. Councillor Julian Cooper addressed the Executive with regard to the provision of Postal Buses. He considered that a limited service would be feasible and could provide a lifeline to some of the more remote rural parts of the County. He felt that the Post Office should be asked to justify why a level of service could not be provided in Oxfordshire when it supported similar services in Berkshire and other areas of the Country. Councillor Hodgson addressed the Executive on behalf of Councillor Mold. He suggested that public consultation on the bus strategy should take place in the context of the level of budget allocated for bus subsidies. Councillor Hudson commended the recommendations of the Environment Scrutiny Committee and advised that that Committee would like to retain an ingoing involvement in this area of work, including the question of Postal Buses, as part of its work programme. Councillor Robertson thanked the Scrutiny Committee for its work and felt that the recommendations confirmed current County Council policies. He also agreed to consult Councillor Hudson further on the possibility of asking the Environment Scrutiny Committee to explore further with the Post Office the provision of Postal Buses. Other points raised by members during discussion included support for the flexible approach recommended towards identification of need and achievement of modal shift; the possible further examination of coordinated procurement of school and public transport; the practicality of the "cost per passenger kilometre" formula for assessing justification for service subsidy; and the particular importance of customer care training in public transport services. RESOLVED: to:
31/03. EARLY YEARS DEVELOPMENT AND CHILDCARE PLAN - IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 2003 – 04
(Agenda Item 10) The Committee considered a report (EX10) which set out progress on targets and business objectives for 2002/03 as well as setting further milestones for 2003/04. The Executive noted the following changes to Annex 3 (page 86) of the Plan:
Councillor Janert Godden congratulated those officers involved in the production of the report and on the 2 national awards gained for work in this area of service. She also thanked Dr. Marjorie Evans for her contribution as Chair of the Early Years Development and Childcare Partnership. RESOLVED: to:
32/03. CRITERIA FOR CONTINUING HEALTH CARE
(Agenda item 11) The Committee considered a report (EX11) which outlined the development of eligibility criteria between health organisations and the Local Authority for NHS funded continuing care since 1995. Councillor Seale commended the report to the Executive. RESOLVED: to:
33/03. INTEGRATION OF ADULT MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES
(Agenda Item 12) The Committee considered a paper (EX12) which examined the proposal to further develop the integration of mental health services for adults of a working age between Oxfordshire Mental Healthcare NHS Trust and Oxfordshire County Council set out against the background to the proposal and options available. RESOLVED: to:
34/03. FORWARD PLAN AND FUTURE BUSINESS
(Agenda Item 13) The Executive considered a list of items from the Forward Plan for the next two meetings. RESOLVED: to note the items currently identified for forthcoming meetings, subject to Item 4 for the 5 February meeting being amended to read "Secondary Schooling in the Wantage and Grove Area.
The meeting thereupon adjourned and reconvened on 28 January 2003
BUSINESS CONDUCTED ON 28 JANUARY
35/03. REVENUE AND CAPITAL BUDGET 2003/04 AND MEDIUM TERM FINANCIAL PLAN 2004/05 – 2007/08; OXFORDSHIRE PLAN 2003/04
(Agenda Item 6) The Executive at this meeting needed to make recommendations to the Council on the Revenue Budget, Medium Term Financial Plan and Capital Programme. The meeting had before it the following reports:
Councillor Hodgson addressed the Executive and posed a number of questions: EX6 Supplement:
EX6
Finally, he referred to the letter from the Headteacher of Marlborough School which had been reported on 21 January 2003 (Minute 29/03 above refers) and declared a personal interest insofar as he was a Governor of the School. The matter was of great concern to the School and he enquired if a reply had been sent. In response, Councillor Mitchell advised that efficiency savings were only indicative at this stage but that it was intended that the base budget would be examined as soon as the budget had been settled. A further report would be submitted to the Executive and comments from Scrutiny Committees would be welcomed. He confirmed that the Performance Reward Grant figure had not been included in the budget at this stage, and agreed that the Asset Management Plan rating had been disappointing. He undertook to send Councillor Hodgson a copy of an explanatory paper which set out reasons why officers felt that the rating achieved had been lower than expected. Councillor Margaret Godden advised that the job evaluation figures in the budget represented costs involved in any increases that might be required to pay levels. Officers undertook to circulate to members the latest position regarding outstanding grants and a list setting out a breakdown of reserves. Councillor Fawcett advised that the matter of clawback of additional LSC funding had been fully discussed fully by the Executive, and it had been accepted that the proposals for 2003/04 were fair. He undertook to ensure that a copy of the reply sent to Marlborough School would be sent to Councillor Hodgson. The Leader of the Council and Deputy Leader of the Council introduced their report and draft budget proposals (EX6 Supplement). Councillor Mitchell referred to the significant pressures on the budget and the effects of reductions in specific grant that had offset the better-than-expected formula grant settlement. He acknowledged the advice and guidance received from the Scrutiny Committees and the MORI-led community workshop. The revised 13.6% Council Tax increase was within the range discussed at the workshop and would enable the maintenance of services for the residents of Oxfordshire. There were however concerns about pressures in future years, particularly in 2003/05 when there was to be a substantial loss of grant in respect of education. He thanked the County Treasurer’s staff for their assistance to members throughout the budget process. Councillor Margaret Godden also paid tribute to the Scrutiny input, and expressed appreciation of the co-operative discussions on budget priorities between Executive members. It had been possible in putting forward a recommended budget to avoid identification of service reductions. She supported the intention to make an early start on preparations for the 2004/05 budget and referred to a shared determination to progress the sound management of the Council’s resources. The Chief Executive highlighted a number of issues, which included the value of the community workshop and the need to strengthen the current level of balances. He welcomed the initiative to examine the base budget in order to find efficiency savings so as to promote investment in service provision and also welcomed the move to target investment from within the job evaluation programme area towards those areas which traditionally experienced difficulties in recruiting staff. He paid tribute to managers in the Social & Health Care Directorate for their work in improving the financial control on that budget which had been undertaken during a period of intense transition and change. Councillor Mitchell advised that under the Council’s Constitution the Executive would need to meet to consider any objection to the budget that might be made by the Council. If that was the case then it was proposed that the Executive meet on 12 February 2003 to consider its response and report back to Council on 18 February 2003. RESOLVED:
in the Chair Date
of signing 2003
|