Return to Agenda

ITEM EX10

EXECUTIVE – 28 MAY 2002

EDUCATION CAPITAL PROJECTS

REVISED DETAILED PROJECT APPRAISAL APPRAISAL NO. ED 457/2

NAME OF SCHEME: Caldecott Primary School, Abingdon – Consolidation Into One Building

Start Year: 2002/03

BASIS OF ESTIMATE: W S Atkins Cost Estimate

  1. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
  2. The proposal is to consolidate the Infant and Junior School classes into an extended junior school building. The scheme comprises the construction of six classrooms, nursery, library, toilets and new hard play funded by the sale of the infant building.

    As part of the proposals a football pitch for the joint use of the school and community is to be provided on the site and discussions are taking place about the relocation onto the site of the Abingdon Family Centre.

    The school has obtained additional funding through a successful Seed Challenge bid. This funding will be added to the existing scheme to include remodelling and refurbishing some parts of the junior school not previously included in the projects.

  3. JUSTIFICATION AND ASSESSMENT OF NEED
  4. The original project appraisal in February 2001 outlined the additional costs incurred by the school because of its segregated nature by operating in two buildings and the operational difficulties this presents. The relocation of Kingfisher special school provides for the opportunity of a capital receipt from the sale of the Tesdale site of the Kingfisher school and the school buildings of Caldecott School to provide funding for this scheme and the relocation of Kingfisher School. Repairs and maintenance liabilities to the Infant building in excess of £50,000 would be removed by this project.

    This scheme fits within the Asset Management priorities in terms of providing opportunity funding to develop the scheme. Without the capital receipt the project would be unable to proceed and the school would continue to operate in two buildings.

  5. OTHER OPTIONS
  6. Continuing to operate in two buildings would maintain the operational problems outlined above. The option of extending the infant school building was explored but this would not create the opportunity for a suitable capital receipt

    Resource Appraisal (download as .rtf file)

  7. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
        1. Capital
        2. This updated appraisal is brought to the Executive because the costs of the scheme have risen since February 2001. There have been delays in moving the scheme forward because of planning issues. The Vale of White Horse District Council has resolved to grant planning permission for residential development on the disposal site, subject to the signing of a S106 Agreement. The estimated capital receipt for the disposal site has risen and it is anticipated that this will meet the increased costs.

          The detailed cost estimate for the work is £1,486,000 (inclusive of fees) as opposed to the previous cost estimate £1,139,000. This is an increase £347,000. £317,000 will be found from the additional estimated capital receipt, and £15,000 from the school’s successful Seed Challenge bid and £15,000 from the school itself.

        3. Revenue

    Revenue costs including day to day maintenance and structural repairs will be met from the school’s delegated budget under the Council’s Fair Funding arrangements.

  8. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPLICATIONS

This scheme will be built in accordance with planning permission and latest building regulations. It is expected that the standards obtained will ensure lower energy usage.

ROY SMITH
Acting Chief Education Officer

CHRIS GRAY
Director for Business Support & County Treasurer

DAVID YOUNG
Director of Environmental Services

Contact Officer: Michael Mill, Acting Senior Education Officer Tel (01865) 428161

May 2001

Return to TOP