ITEM EX3EXECUTIVE
– 5 MARCH 2002
|
Request from |
Agenda Item |
|
Mr William Johnson ) Mr Michael Hugh-Jones ) |
10. - Charging Policies for Home Care and other Non-Residential Services |
The addresses on item 10 are recorded below at Minute 83/02
RESOLVED: to vary the order of business as indicated in these Minutes.
(Agenda Item 5)
The Committee considered a report (EX5) which updated members on the latest estimated balances on the Committee Carry Forward Reserve and County Fund Balance as at 31 March 2002, the Capital Programme and the Capital Reserve.
The Leader of the Council advised that that in light of the current financial position, he had asked all departments to consider what projects could be deferred to the next financial year without affecting service provision.
In relation to the Social Services overspend detailed on the Addenda, he reported that members would be meeting with officers on 20 February to identify what had happened and the best way to address it. He further reported that the Executive would be starting the Budget process for 2003/04 early, to enable the task to be approached in a structured way and enable adequate preparations to be made to cater for the pressures which were anticipated.
RESOLVED: to note the report.
(Agenda Item 10)
The Executive considered a report (EX10) which set out the implications of the final guidance in relation to charging policies for Non-Residential Services and the position on consultation, and recommended the Executive to agree an action plan to phase in changes to the current charging policies over the course of 2002/03.
Mr Collins advised that the new guidance in relation to charging would cause significant loss of income to the Council.
Mr Johnson addressed the Executive on behalf of his mother who was in receipt of care services from the Council, and others in a similar position. He considered the proposed charge increases unreasonable, and referred to a letter formally submitted on her behalf illustrating their effects on her budget.
Mr Hugh-Jones addressed the Executive on behalf of the Oxfordshire Pensioners’ Action Group (OXPAG) who were against the proposals as representing excessive increases. He urged the Executive to drop the charges proposed for second careers and limit the charges proposed for 8 April to an overall increase of 13% on the basis that, if the Council made these changes to the proposals it would be seen to be genuinely responding to consultation.
Members of the Executive expressed regret at the necessity to increase charges in the way proposed, but were of the opinion that the Council had no option but to do so in the light of Government policy and the general problems of funding for social services provision.
RESOLVED: (unanimously) to:
(Agenda Item 11)
The Executive considered a report (EX11) which outlined the proposed service model for the Management of Community Mental Health Teams in Oxfordshire and the results of the consultation undertaken with affected staff.
RESOLVED: to receive the report and authorise the Director of Social Services to proceed to implement the proposals.
(Agenda Item 6)
The Executive considered a report (EX6) which invited members to consider whether there should be a new mechanism for appointing governors in secondary and community special schools in the context of the new political structure, and revised Code of Practice for the Local Education Authority.
Mr Mitchell reported receipt of a letter from Mrs Carole Thomson, Chair of Oxfordshire Governors’ Association. The Association urged the Executive that the most important consideration when appointing governors should be their interest in the school and its community, and their willingness to commit time to the governing body’s duties rather than their political affiliation.
RESOLVED: to:-
(Agenda Item 7)
The Executive considered a report (EX7) which responded to the Executive’s request to "ask officers to report on the issues raised by Councillor MacKenzie’s motion, with a view to establishing, in the first instance, whether the problems identified in the motion were limited to school transport in Sutton Courtenay or required a more general review." The report set out the financial and other implications of a change of policy, and identified other places where similar circumstances applied, and concluded that a change of policy could over time result in substantial increased costs.
In speaking to the motion, Councillor MacKenzie stressed that in her opinion the current system was unfair and that the financial implications of changing the current policy would not be extensive.
Councillor Crabbe, as the Executive Member for Schools, advised that the situation at Sutton Courtenay and elsewhere was the result of legislation relating to home to school transport, but for which he believed that the authority would be likely to provide transport only to the catchment school.
RESOLVED: (on a motion by Councillor Crabbe, amended in the cause of debate and carried nem con) to:
(Agenda Item 8)
RESOLVED: to approve Project Appraisals ED551/1 (Bartholomew School), ED581 (John Watson Special School) and ED569/1 (Carterton Community College).
(Agenda Item 9)
The Executive considered a report (EX9) which sought approval to establish a Conservation Board for the Cotswolds Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty Partnership.
RESOLVED: to:
(Agenda Item 12)
The Executive considered a report (EX12) which set out and sought endorsement of action taken to evaluate tenders submitted in respect of eleven Term Contracts for the procurement of building and electrical and mechanical engineering services, repair, maintenance, minor alteration and improvement works to County Council buildings.
RESOLVED: to authorise the acceptance of tenders and award of contracts for Building Repair and Maintenance and Electrical and Mechanical Services Contracts based on the price and quality evaluations described in paragraphs 7 to 10 of the report.
(Agenda Item 13)
The Executive considered a report (EX13) which described the Government’s proposals for reforming the planning system in its Green Paper "Planning: Delivering a Fundamental Change".
The Director of Environmental Services, in introducing the report, expressed concerns over the proposals for the development plan system. The first concern was that the proposals for abolishing structure plans would represent a serious weakening in the democratic accountability of plan making. Decisions on sub-regional planning, currently taken by elected County Councils, would be transferred to the Secretary of State, acting on the advice of regional bodies consisting of representatives who were either not directly elected or not elected at all. The green paper proposals would threaten to create a hiatus in the planning system at precisely the time when a major effort to address under-investment in the country’s infrastructure was needed. Lack of development plan coverage was likely to increase. This in turn would almost certainly lead to an increase in planning by appeal, with greater uncertainty and delay for business, local communities and everyone else involved in the system, which was precisely the opposite of what the Government was seeking.
The Chief Executive reported that a Working Group of the County Councils Network had been set up to study the Green Paper in order to identify a viable set of alternatives to its proposals.
The Leader of the Council reported that, at a recent SEERA meeting, an overwhelming majority thought that the government had got the proposals wrong and would be formally responding to the government on that basis.
RESOLVED: to:
(Agenda Item 14)
The Executive considered a report (EX14) which proposed how the transport element of the Single Capital Pot for 2002/03 (£18.613m) should be allocated between the six main budget headings set out in the Local Transport Plan and proposed a provisional apportionment of the indicative allocations for the period 2003/04 to 2005/06 to enable detailed programmes to be developed for consideration by the Executive in March.
RESOLVED: to:-
(Agenda Item 15)
The Executive considered a report (EX15) which summarised the progress that had been made on Home Zones in a number of areas, and sought approval to publish the "Home Zone Characteristics and New Housing Developments" Guidance which were the first such guidelines to be published in this country. It also reported this Council’s success in the national Home Zone Challenge Bid for a scheme at Saxton Road, Abingdon and set out machinery for identifying suitable locations of Home Zones for the purpose of trialling Home Zones in the County.
Members expressed reservations about the sites which had been put forward for further Home Zones, and identified the need to promote an appropriate profile for such Zones based on community building objectives rather than as simple traffic calming schemes.
RESOLVED: to:
(Agenda Item 16)
The Executive considered a report and Project Appraisal (EX16) which outlined the current proposal which is for a 800 space park and ride car park on a site adjacent to the A4165 Banbury Road and existing Grain Silo Building.
Councillor Robins addressed the Executive as local member. He urged the Executive to defer approval of the Project Appraisal, on the basis that alternative sites had not been given proper consideration, and to commission the Environment Scrutiny Committee to review the project as a matter of urgency, taking into account any representations which might be made by other authorities, bus operators or other interested parties, and to make recommendations as to whether or not the project should proceed in its present or revised form and whether any other actions are desirable in order to alleviate any concerns which might be raised.
Councillor Tudor Hughes, as the Executive Member for Transport advised that while he sympathised with the Kidlington Residents, the traffic impact assessment had concluded that the adverse traffic impact of the new site on Kidlington would be minimal.
RESOLVED: to approve Project Appraisal H152/1.
(Agenda Item 17)
The Executive considered a report (EX17) which outlined measures to control on-street parking outside of the Controlled Parking Zone and encouraged the use of off-street car parking in Milton Close, Queens Close, Leicester Close, Deanfield Road, West Street and Church Street/Greys Hill.
RESOLVED: to authorise the Director of Environmental Services to proceed with the implementation of the proposed parking measures as advertised but including the minor modification for Deanfield Road outlined at Annex 1 to the report.
(Agenda Item 18)
(Councillor Crabbe withdrew from the meeting for the duration of this item).
The Executive considered a report (EX18) which outlined of proposals for improved cycling facilities between Wallingford and Cholsey rail station which were the subject of public exhibitions in Cholsey and Wallingford on 29 and 30 November last year. Four possible route options were shown at the exhibitions and the report summarised the views of those who attended.
RESOLVED: to:
(a) note the results of the questionnaire survey as showing considerable support for the introduction of improved cycling and walking facilities between Wallingford and Cholsey Station and in particular Options 1 and 3 displayed at the exhibition;
(b) for the reasons set out in paragraphs 21 to 23 of the report, approve Option 1 as a basis for detailed design (including an investigation of lighting the route) and further consultations with the local councils, local members and the police; and
(c) authorise the Director of Environmental Services in consultation with the Executive Member for Transport, to determine the detailed design, in the light of the consultations, referred to at (b) above; for future decision by the Executive.
(Agenda Item 19)
The Executive considered a report (EX19) which outlined measures to introduce four controlled pedestrian/cycle crossings at Ock Street, Spring Road, Marcham Road (Tesco) and Marcham Road (Hospital).
RESOLVED: to:
(Agenda Item 20)
The Executive had before them a report (EX20) which considered comments received on changes to the Oxford central area waiting and parking restrictions advertised by the City Council under the Agency arrangements that were in place until October 2001, and in particular a representation by Debenhams, that the proposed time limit on loading in Magdalen Street West should be increased from 20 minutes to 30 minutes.
RESOLVED: to agree to the implementation of the proposed changes as endorsed by the City Highways & Traffic Committee and outlined in Annex 1 to the report.
(Agenda Item 21)
The Executive considered a report (EX21) which sought approval for disposal of Eastfield House. Mr Monaghan reported that, under the terms now agreed, the Council would have nomination rights for a period of 50 years and would receive full market value for the property.
RESOLVED: to approve the direct sale of Eastfield House to a Registered Social Landlord, upon terms to be agreed by the Director of Environmental Services but if terms could not be agreed, to authorise a sale on the open market.
(Agenda Item 22)
The Executive considered a report (EX22) which sought approval to the disposal of Dailey Hill House. Mr Monaghan reported that the purchasers had now agreed terms for the right of pre-emption for the adjoining property.
RESOLVED: to accept the inclusion of a right of pre-emption for the purchase of the Springfield School site in the sale of Dailey Hill House to Sovereign Housing Association, on terms agreed by the Director of Environmental Services.
(Agenda Item 23)
The Executive had before them a transcript (EX23) of the Oxfordshire Children’s Rights Checklist, published by the Children’s Rights Development Team in November 2001. Councillor Janet Godden commended the checklist for application in the planning of all Council services.
RESOLVED:
(Agenda Item 24)
The Executive considered Schedules (EX24) identifying items of business listed in the Forward Plan as to be conducted at the following two meetings.
The Executive also considered a request, of the Environment Scrutiny Committee on 13 February 2002 that the Executive consult the Committee before any final decisions were made on the following issues:-
|
Forward Plan Ref. |
Issue |
Executive Report Date |
|
60/2001 |
Didcot Transport Issues Study |
5 March 2002 |
|
98/2001 |
Speed Management Policy |
5 March 2002 |
|
125/2001 |
Highway Management Policies |
19 March 2002 |
|
- |
Residential Roads Guide |
Summer 2002 |
|
- |
Transport Networks Review |
Late 2002 (Stage 1) |
|
123/2001 |
Transport Interlink Study |
No date at present |
RESOLVED: to
in the Chair
Date
of signing 2002
Return to TOP