______________________________________
To All Members of the County Council Notice of a Meeting of the CouncilTuesday 15 June 2004 at 10.00 am County Hall, Oxford
Contact officer: Ann Lowe (Tel: 01865 815384; E-mail)
AGENDA
To approve the Minutes of the meeting held on 6 April 2004 (CC1) and to receive for information any matters arising therefrom.
No of Votes AITKEN,
Euan Hunter 222 David Arthur Laver was accordingly elected county councillor for the Thame Division.
Following the by-election held on 29 April 2004 in the Thame Division, Councillor David Laver has given formal notice requesting that a review be undertaken of the allocation of seats on committees to political groups. The Council is asked to:
In relation to Item 2 (Financial Control Systems), the Executive RECOMMENDS the Council to approve the establishment of strengthened credit control arrangements in Social & Health Care, the cost to be funded by way of a supplementary estimate in 2004/05 and to be built into the budget for 2005/06 and future years. In relation to Item 3 (Oxfordshire Community Strategy), the Executive RECOMMENDS the Council to adopt the Oxfordshire Community Strategy. In relation to Item 4 (Oxfordshire Plan 2004/05), the Executive RECOMMENDS the Council to adopt the Oxfordshire Plan/Best Value Performance Plan and Programme. In relation to Item 11 (Adult Learning Plan 2004/05), the Executive RECOMMENDS the Council to approve the Adult Learning Plan 2004/05 for submission to the Learning & Skills Council.
The
Committee RECOMMENDS the Council (by 6 votes to 2) to:
a.
revise the Committee’s terms of reference as they relate to the
Council’s internal audit provisions in the Council’s Constitution
as follows (changes are shown in brackets)
and draw to the attention of the Corporate Governance Scrutiny Committee any issues which in the Committee’s view would benefit from a scrutiny review or further investigation." b amend the Committee’s title to Best Value & Audit Committee.
The
schedule of meeting dates proposed for the 2005/06 Council year is attached
for approval (CC10).(Download as
.xls file) (Key to table (download
as .doc file)) The schedule has been drawn up to reflect the various rules regarding frequency of meetings set out in the Council’s Constitution and generally follows the pattern of meetings agreed for the current year. An attempt has been made to even out the cycles of scrutiny committee meetings but a degree of bunching cannot be avoided. It should also be noted that, because of the County Council Election in May 2005, the scrutiny cycle that would ordinarily have been scheduled for that month has been omitted. The Council is RECOMMENDED to approve the proposed dates of meetings for 2005/2006 as set out in CC10.
The Scrutiny Co-Ordinating Group RECOMMEND the Council to receive the Scrutiny Report 2003-2004.
Motions with Notice from Members of the Council
This Council notes the comments made by the District Audit officer to the effect that the Council’s audit and risk management functions should be independent from the Administration of the Council. This Council also believes that neither the audit nor the best value function is well served within the democratic process by having one committee covering the two functions, especially with that committee having a Chair and Deputy Chair drawn from the Administration. Accordingly, this Council resolves to create an Audit & Risk Management Committee, independent of the Executive and separate from the Best Value Committee, and agrees that it should be chaired by a member who is not a member of any of the political groups from which the Executive members are drawn. This Council welcomes the prospect of a referendum on approval of a new Constitution for the European Union. It is clearly in the interests of all Oxfordshire people and businesses that the population should be well informed across the complete breadth of the issue on which they are being asked to express a view. This Council is also aware that opponents of the United Kingdom’s membership of the European Union have been responsible for wide circulation of myths and untruths, designed to distance people’s understanding of what Europe is about, and to loosen this country’s belief in its place in Europe. Accordingly this Council asks the Government to arrange for the production and wide-scale distribution of copies of a leaflet explaining the real issues facing the European Union, including the extent of EU Funding in each region in the UK. Such information has already been produced by GOSE for the South East. This Council notes that Section 71 of the Race Relations Act 1976, as amended by the Race Relations (Amendment) Act 2000, places a statutory general duty on local authorities to promote race equality. Under this duty, the Council must have due regard to the need to eliminate unlawful racial discrimination; to promote equal opportunities; and to promote good relations between people from different racial groups when carrying out its functions. Under the Act, the term ‘functions’ means the full range of the Council’s duties and powers. The Act also imposes additional specific duties on local authorities, including the requirement to train staff on meeting the general duty. Accordingly, and mindful of the importance of these duties, and of the relevant legal and democratic responsibilities of the Council’s political leadership in these matters, this Council recommends the Executive to arrange for its own members to undertake appropriate training, learning and development on the extent and nature of the Council’s duties under the Act, as a matter of considerable urgency. This Council
The Council is also concerned that research on both sides of the Atlantic suggests that tiny particulates from vehicle exhausts can sidestep the body’s natural defences and set off asthma. Noting that the new findings have raised serious questions about the safety of diesel cars in particular, the Council resolves to ask the government to fund greater efforts to design much more effective particulate traps to be fitted to diesel exhausts.
Whilst the elderly with certain medical conditions can receive free podiatry treatment both inside and outside hospital, and Age Concern run the very excellent Sole Mates scheme for a limited number of clients without medical need, this in no way addresses the serious problem that a large number of elderly people cannot avail themselves of this most basic service and are suffering considerable hardships, as well as being in great danger of falling or even of serious infection caused by in-growing nails. The hospital service is reviewing its criteria in order to relieve budget pressures and those in the least medical need will obviously be the sufferers. Whilst Sole Mates can only serve limited numbers in the Vale and West Oxfordshire, with a view possibly to expanding to the City and South Oxfordshire, their funding is uncertain and their service limited by a lack of trained volunteers. The magnitude of this problem needs to be assessed urgently, starting by establishing a tripartite approach by the Social & Health Care Directorate, the lead Primary Care Trust and Age Concern. To this end the Council calls on the Executive to:
In view of government pending decision to abandon the AS levels, this Council supports the urgent review of year 12 and 13 education to give the young adults a qualification suitable for universities and employers to assess their academic attainment. This
Council confirms its opposition to any third Thames bridge that would
significantly increase car movements in southern Oxfordshire but recognises
the need to find, in partnership with other relevant authorities,
a solution to the existing bottlenecks. To this end the Council asks
the Executive to reconvene the Cross-Thames Steering Group (comprising
members representing this Council, South Oxfordshire District Council
and the neighbouring Berkshire Councils) to consider measures to relieve
those bottlenecks.
|