|
Return
to Agenda
ITEM CC10
COUNTY COUNCIL
– 4 NOVEMBER 2003
REPORT OF
THE PENSION FUND COMMITTEE
Review of the Oxfordshire
Pension Fund’s Management Structure
- The last report
to Council from this Committee on 14 January 2003 explained the reasons
behind the decision of the Committee to review the management structure
of the Pension Fund and to adopt a fund specific benchmark. The Fund
had been managed by two multi-asset managers who covered all the main
classes of investment. It was seen that other funds employed specialist
fund managers for parts of the fund, for example UK equities, and that
this could improve performance in those areas, rather than relying on
fund managers having equal expertise in all asset classes.
- Following a rigorous
process, the Committee concluded that the option to have one multi-asset
active manager, with a range of specialist managers and no passive management,
should be adopted. A named company was appointed to manage the tendering
process and to provide the necessary analysis to select a shortlist
of fund managers. The Committee also agreed to appoint an independent
Global Custodian for safe-keeping of assets, dividend and income collection
and settlement of trades in all asset classes and markets. This was
a change, as the custody arms of the two existing Fund Managers had
carried out this function previously.
Revised
Structure
- The interviewing
process for the new Fund Managers took place during the late spring.
An Appointments Sub-Committee was set up to carry this out, comprising
three members of the Pension Fund Committee with the addition of one
of the district council co-optees. Following an extensive pre-interview
process and detailed interview the following organisations were chosen:
|
Multi
Assets -
|
UBS
Asset Management
|
|
Property
|
UBS
Asset Management
|
(this
was combined with Multi Assets to form a single mandate)
|
UK
Equities
|
Baillie
Gifford
|
|
Global
Equities
|
Alliance
Bernstein
|
|
UK
Fixed Interest
|
Legal
and General
|
- These changes
took effect on 11 July 2003. In the interim, and in order to avoid undue
expense, the Committee appointed a transitional Fund Manager (Legal
& General) to manage all aspects of the restructuring process. Their
role was to take the existing Schroder and Deutsche Asset Management
portfolios and complete the restructuring in order to deliver the new
portfolios to the four newly appointed managers. This process has been
successfully concluded with all four management agreements having been
signed and sealed. The Committee has joined in thanking and congratulating
the Council’s Pension Fund Investments Manager (Mr Tony Wheeler) and
the Committee’s Independent Financial Adviser (Mr Bushell) for such
a smooth transfer at such an efficient cost.
Investment
Strategy
- Another change
to the management arrangements of the Pension Fund has been the recent
decision that 2% of the Pension Fund’s assets should be invested in
Hedge Funds, in line with the customised benchmark. This decision followed
an asset liability study that had been carried out by the Actuary in
early 2002 and which was seen as a further means of reducing the level
of risk within the Pension Fund as a whole. However, before we did so
we decided to ask the Independent Financial Adviser to explore that
option. Following some research he recommended that the Committee should
go ahead and invest in a fund of funds (a fund made up of a number of
Hedge Funds). The Committee has since authorised officers to go ahead
with the selection.
- There is no one
single definition of a Hedge Fund. They include a wide variety of investment
strategies with a broad range of risk and return objectives, designed
to produce positive returns in all market conditions. They can be invested
in any stock or commodity in any part of the world. There are two principal
benefits of investing in them:
- a reduction
in risk – because returns can be delivered in absolute terms rather
than relative to a benchmark, that is to say, achievement of a stipulated
level of gain rather than comparisons;
- a reduction
in volatility.
Funding
Level
- Finally, at the
last actuarial valuation, on 31 March 2001, the Pension Fund was 91%
funded. The next valuation will take place on 31 March 2004 and we will
therefore not know what the level of current funding will be until after
that date. The new funding level will certainly be lower than at the
last valuation but at this stage it is not possible to forecast with
any accuracy what impact this will have on employer contribution rates
and council tax bills. Any changes which might be necessary will come
into force for the three years commencing 1 April 2005 with the objective
of enabling the Pension Fund to meet its liabilities in the future.
RECOMMENDATION
- The Council
is RECOMMENDED to note the report.
C.H.
SHOULER
Chairman of
the Committee
Return to Agenda
|