|
Return
to Agenda
ITEM CG13
EXECUTIVE
– 2 APRIL 2003
TREASURY
MANAGEMENT STRATEGY FOR 2003/04
Report by
Director for Business Support & County Treasurer
Introduction
- This report sets
out a Treasury Management Strategy for the authority for the financial
year 2003/04. The report covers background information which supports
the Treasury Management Strategy and deals in detail with the Council’s
Debt Management Strategy and daily cashflow. It also advises of the
revised Chartered Institute of Public Finance and Accountancy (CIPFA)
Code of Practice on Treasury Management in the Public Services.
- Regulations under
the Local Government Act 2000 reserve the approval of any "… plan or
strategy for the control of the authority’s borrowing …" to the full
Council. This description applies to a substantial part of this report
(the Debt Management Strategy in particular), which should accordingly
be referred for comment to the Corporate Governance Scrutiny Committee
for comment before the Executive makes a formal recommendation to Council,
in accordance with the Budget and Policy Framework Procedure Rules set
out in the Constitution.
Revised
Code of Practice for Treasury Management
- CIPFA has produced
a revised Code of Practice for Treasury Management in the Public Services.
The Code has been revised to reflect the increasing scale and complexity
of treasury management activities and the demands placed on them, particularly
with regard to risk management, performance management and the pursuit
of best value and also, the increasing sophistication of money markets.
The Code makes four key recommendations and these are set out in Annex
1.
- A draft revised
Treasury Management Policy Statement, which meets the requirements of
the CIPFA Code, is included at Annex
2. It proposes that the Executive be nominated
as having overall responsibility for monitoring the implementation of
treasury management policy and the Head of Finance be nominated as the
relevant responsible officer for the execution and administration of
treasury management activities. The Council already undertakes a large
proportion of the revised requirements, but some work will be required
to ensure full compliance. In particular the detailed treasury management
practices recommended by the Code are currently being developed. If
there is any need to change the strategy in 2003/04 this will be taken
to the Executive as part of a Monthly Monitoring Report.
Economic
and Market Factors expected to impact on Interest Rates
- Short-Term
Interest Rates. For the purposes of this report short-term interest
rates are defined as being for 364 days or less.
- The Bank of England
Monetary Policy Committee effectively determines the level of UK short-term
interest rates. The Government has set the Bank of England an inflation
target of 2½% (measured by the Retail Prices Index excluding mortgage
interest). The underlying inflation rate has been slightly above this
target for the past three months. Current predictions anticipate that
inflation will remain above the 2½% target in the short term, although
it will return to target in the medium term.
- During 2002/03
the UK bank base rate was cut from 4% to 3.75%. This last cut brought
rates down to the lowest levels seen in the UK for almost fifty years.
With uncertainty about the world economy running high and growth in
Britain set to slow, the Bank of England is seen in the markets as likely
to cut interest rates in the short term, although it is expected that
there will be an overall rise by the end of the financial year 2003/04.
The market predictions on short term interest rates are shown at Annex
3.
- The level for
Long-Term Interest Rates is determined by short-term interest
rates and expectations for inflation. Investors will only invest in
longer term fixed interest bonds if they expect to receive a higher
return than for shorter-term investments. Investors are reluctant to
invest longer term if they fear inflation may rise because the value
of their tied up capital will be eroded more quickly. Globally long
term interest rates have fallen in the past few years due to the world
central banks have taking a tough stance on controlling inflation.
- Due to uncertainty
in the stock market, demand for 20-year plus UK long-term government
stock (known as gilts) had increased in recent years, leading to a reduction
in interest rates.
- However there
is some optimism that the value of the stock market will increase by
the end of the year. Also it is anticipated that the Chancellor will
issue billions of pounds of government bonds over the next few years
to fund increased public spending and this is expected to result in
higher returns. These factors would point towards higher long-term interest
rates.
Forecast
changes to the Council’s Debt Portfolio for the 2003/04 Financial Year
- The Council is
allowed to borrow set amounts each year to finance its capital expenditure.
Annex 4 (download as .doc file)
gives the Council’s debt financing requirement for 2003/04. The notes
to the annex provide details of the forecast composition of the County
Council’s debt at 1 April 2003 showing that the major sources of funding
is with the Public Works Loan Board (PWLB), which is a Government Agency.
- The Council’s
overall debt is projected to increase from £228 million at 1 April 2003
to £261 million at 31 March 2004, which is a net increase of £33 million.
In addition to the net increase in debt the Council has £5 million of
PWLB loans and £5 million of money market loans maturing, which will
need to be replaced.
Points
to consider in formulating the Council’s Debt Management Strategy
- The Council should
borrow long term and at fixed rates of interest when rates are
"low" and borrow short term or at variable interest rates when
rates are "high".
- The Council’s
percentage of debt that is fixed is projected to increase from 93% to
95% between 1 April 2003 and 31 March 2004. At 1 April 1993 the debt
was 52% fixed and 48% variable. The Council has progressively increased
its level of fixed debt since the second half of the 1990’s, a period
of rapidly falling interest rates.
- The maturity debt
profile should be reasonably smooth to avoid having to replace large
amounts of maturing debt in any future year. There is also the possibility
of debt being repaid early if this can be achieved on favourable terms.
Annex 5 (download as .doc file)
gives a breakdown of the Council’s long-term debt by year of maturity.
The longest period over which we can borrow from the PWLB is now 25
years.
The Council’s
Debt Management Strategy 2003/04
- The Council has
a PWLB quota of £45.4 million in 2003/04, which is determined by credit
approvals (£40.4 million) and maturing PWLB debt (£5 million). Credit
approvals are the amount the Council can borrow in any one year to finance
the capital programme (the notes to Annex 4 explain credit approvals
in more detail).
- PWLB interest
rates continue to be the cheapest source of borrowing available to local
authorities. It is intended to take up the whole of the PWLB quota in
2003/04 and we continue to favour fixed interest loans in the 15-year
plus period. Taking the whole quota in 2003/04 will increase the Council’s
percentage of fixed debt from 93% to 95%. The Council’s agreed range
of fixed debt is between 75% and 100%. It is recommended that this range
continues.
- Opportunities
to repay loans early will be taken if it is demonstrated that there
are guaranteed savings and only where prematurely repaid debt is replaced
with loans of a similar maturity period.
- The Council took
£10m of Money Market Loans during the early 1990s and the final repayment
(£5m) will be made in 2003/04. This will cause no problems for funding
the Council’s Debt.
- From 2004/05 the
government will implement a set of Prudential Guidelines to control
Local Authority debt levels. This may give the Council power to borrow
more money through unsupported credit approvals. It is not yet clear
how the system will operate in detail, and I will report to the Executive
when this has been established.
Cashflow
Management
- The Council’s
internal balances include provisions, reserves, capital receipts unapplied
and the difference between creditors and debtors. Where these balances
are not required to fund the Council’s debts, they are lent out short
term in the London wholesale money market for periods up to 364 days.
- The Council operates
its own approved lending list, which is made up of financial institutions
and other local authorities. Each institution is ascribed a maximum
lending limit to ensure a spread of risk within the total lending portfolio.
The Council subscribes to the Fitch IBCA credit rating service, which
evaluates the credit worthiness of financial institutions and assigns
them an individual rating. The Council only lends to top rated institutions,
all of which are either authorised by the Bank of England or European
Union to accept sterling deposits.
- The Bank of England
determines the interest rates in the wholesale money market. Most independent
City forecasts (Annex 3) are
predicting the Bank will decrease short-term interests rates in the
short term, but that they will increase by the end of 2003/04.
- The Council currently
operates three call accounts, with LloydsTSB, Abbey National and Bank
of Scotland, and these will continue to be used. A call account is where
a cash deposit can be withdrawn with immediate notice. The operation
of these accounts enables the smooth and efficient management of the
Council’s day-to-day cash flow. The call accounts have maximum deposit
limits of £15 million. The choice between the three accounts is dependant
on the interest rates on offer.
Alliance
Capital
- In addition to
the wholesale cash market local authorities may invest surplus funds
in Certificates of Deposit, gilt-edged stock or Supranational bonds
(e.g. World Bank). Few authorities invest directly in such instruments,
since they have neither the time nor expertise to monitor performance
in this area. Exposure is normally achieved by appointing a specialist
external manager.
- Members will be
aware that approval was received to appoint an external manager to manage
up to £15 million in this way. This was done in order to diversify funds
and to achieve higher returns on the Council’s surplus balances. Alliance
Capital has been managing these funds since 28 August 2002, in a mixture
of cash (70%) and gilts (30%). It should be noted that the performance
on this type of investment needs to be viewed in the longer term and
therefore it is too early to decide whether or not any additional sums
of surplus cash should be invested with Alliance Capital. Their performance
will continue to be monitored, and a review of the performance in 2002/03
will be included in a report to the Executive on Treasury Management
Activity in 2002/03 on 24 June 2003.
New Flexible
Investment Options for Local Authorities
- From April 2002,
local authorities have been given wider investment powers. There are
now two additional means of investing the Council’s surplus funds and
it is considered that it would be in the Council’s interests to add
these facilities to the approved list of investments. These facilities
are described below.
(i) Money
Market Funds
- Money Market Funds
are shared investment funds run by many of the commercial financial
companies. They work by pooling together the investments from a range
of participating organisations and then placing short-term loans with
a variety of companies. Technically investors hold units in the Fund,
but in practice the Fund operates like an instant access account, with
the facility of investing or withdrawing money at a few hours’ notice.
Investments are only made with those companies that are triple A rated
by at least one of the major credit rating agencies. By bringing together
a large number of smaller investments, these funds will typically be
able to achieve very competitive rates. In addition, by spreading the
pooled investment funds across a range of companies, these funds will
be able to minimise the level of risk.
- Money Market Funds
will be a useful addition to the approved list of investments. They
produce a return which is comparable with other very short term investments
and they are of the very highest credit limit. For this reason, it is
proposed that there is a limit of £15 million for each Fund. Since all
Funds operate in a similar way, it is proposed that the Head of Finance
be delegated to select one fund initially that will provide the most
administratively effective service to the Council.
(ii) Debt
Management Account
- The second new
service that is now available to local authorities is a deposit-taking
service from the Debt Management Office, which is an executive agency
of HM Treasury. This service will take deposits for fixed periods and
will be suitable for amounts that can be placed for several weeks or
months. The Debt Management Account will also be triple A rated, since
it will be based on the Government’s own ‘sovereign’ credit rating.
We would also be able to deposit smaller amounts than in a Money Market
Fund. Again, since this is a very low risk investment, it is recommended
that there is a limit of £15 million for investment in this account.
Revision
of the County Council’s Approved Lending List
- Some institutions
have been removed from the list since last year under delegated powers
for technical reasons or minor credit downgradings. The remaining institutions
on the list meet the County Council’s credit rating criteria in full.
There are no proposals to add further institutions to the list.
- The total average
lending to date on a daily basis in 2002/03 has been £33.5m. There is
a range of choice available to ensure a suitable diversification in
depositing our surplus cash safely as follows:
- a lending list
comprising major banks and building societies with appropriate lending
limits for each institution;
- three call accounts,
of £15 million;
- in 2002/03 we
advanced £15m to Alliance Capital for them to invest in alternative
financial investments;
- in 2003/04 we
will be adding both a Money Market Fund and the Debt Management Account
to our lending list with limits of £15m on each.
Overall
Summary
- The Authority’s
Treasury Management Strategy 2003/04 may be summarised as follows:
- take up the
maximum PWLB quota of £45.4 million to finance the capital programme;
- continue to
monitor interest rates to ensure that we borrow from the PWLB at the
most advantageous rate;
- continue to
monitor the performance of Alliance Capital;
- expand our short-term
investment options by using new low risk areas available to local
authorities, namely Money Market Funds and Debt Management Account;
- implement the
revised CIPFA Code of Practice on Treasury Management in the Public
Services.
RECOMMENDATIONS
- The Executive
is RECOMMENDED to:
- adopt
the key recommendations of CIPFA’s Code of Practice for Treasury
Management in the Public Services, as set out in Annex
1 to the report;
- adopt
the Treasury Management Policy Statement attached at Annex
2;
- subject
to (d) below, endorse the proposals set out in the report:
(i) to
keep the range for fixed interest debt at 75 to 100%;
(ii) to
add a Money Market Fund to the approved list of investments
with a limit of up to £15 million and to delegate the selection
of a Fund to the Head of Finance; and
(iii) to
add the Debt Management Account to the approved list of investments
with a limit of up to £15 million;
- refer
the report to the Corporate Governance Scrutiny Committee for
comments, particularly in respect of the proposed strategy for
the control of the Council’s borrowing, with a view to making
a recommendation on the strategy to the June 2003 Council.
CHRIS
GRAY
Director for
Business Support & County Treasurer
Background
Papers: Nil
Contact
Officer: Mike Petty Tel: Oxford 815622
March
2003
Return to TOP
|