ITEM CA3CABINET – 20 SEPTEMBER 2005Minutes of the Meeting commencing at 2.00 pm and finishing at 4.35 pm Present:
Officers: Whole of meeting: Chief Executive, J. Leverton and K. Coldwell (Chief Executive’s Office). Part of meeting: Assistant Chief Executive, G. Davies, P. Edwards (Chief Executive’s Office), M. Petty, S. Scane, S. Slater (Resources), L. Brown (Social & Health Care), R. Booker, B. Fell (Environment & Economy), S. Adams, R. Harmes, J. Johnson, P. Lamb, M. Mill (Learning & Culture). The Cabinet considered the matters, reports and recommendations contained or referred to in the agenda for the meeting, together with a schedule of addenda tabled at the meeting, and decided as set out below. Except insofar as otherwise specified, the reasons for the decisions are contained in the agenda, reports and schedule, copies of which are attached to the signed Minutes.
187/05. MINUTES
The Minutes of the meeting held on 6 September 2005 were approved and signed.
188/05. FINANCIAL MONITORING
(Agenda Item 5) The Cabinet considered a report (CA5) which covered the period up to the end of July 2005 for revenue and capital, together with a supplementary report, circulated with the Addenda. Councillor Shouler commented that in his view there was no conflict between the Fairer Charging scheme and the Corporate Charging Policy. He pointed out that the increases would only affect those whose personal resources exceeded the threshold whereby they were liable to pay the full charges, and that the charging structure complied with government guidance. In relation to the removal of parking charges at Park & Ride sites, the loss of income would be contained within the County Council’s parking account. Although there was currently a surplus in the parking account there were legal constraints as to how this money could be spent. Councillor Chapman reported that she was liaising with the Head of the Youth Service regarding the budget position of the Service in the context of the Youth Green Paper and that no decisions had yet been made. She also referred to the Service and Financial Planning report (CA6) which recommended the Cabinet to approve the allocation of £0.1m per annum within the capital programme from 2006/07 to 2008/09 to provide grants for community youth facilities, subject to Cabinet approval of an appropriate scheme. Councillor Seale endorsed Councillor Shouler’s comments with regard to the increase in the Fairer Charging rate for full cost payers. He stated that this had been staggered in order to prevent a sudden large increase in charges. He pointed out that the service costs were highly volatile and referred to the increased revenue resources required as a result of the decisions not to close the residential care homes at Spencer Court, Woodstock and Castle View, Chipping Norton. RESOLVED: to: (Agenda Item 6) The Cabinet considered a report (CA6) which was the first in a series that would inform members on the service and financial planning process and issues for 2006/07 and the medium term. The Head of Finance & Procurement reported that the Government had announced postponement of Council Tax revaluation to enable the issue to be included in the remit of the Lyons inquiry into local government funding. RESOLVED: to:
190/05. OXFORDSHIRE LOCAL AREA AGREEMENT
(Agenda Item 7) The Cabinet considered the draft outline submission (CA7) for the Oxfordshire Local Area Agreement (LAA) which would be sent to the Government Office for the South East. Councillor Chapman emphasised that feedback from children and young people had highlighted the importance to them of increasing the availability of "more things which are fun to do". In her view, the document focussed too extensively on academic achievement without considering the importance of providing enjoyable activities for young people. Councillor Waine echoed Councillor Chapman’s comments in relation to the schools curriculum which in his view should be more broadly based and not limited to a narrow academic range. RESOLVED: subject to any further amendments agreed by the Leader of the Council in the light of feedback from the Public Service Board, to approve the draft outline submission to be made to the Government Office for the South East.
191/05. OXFORDSHIRE COMPACT FUNDING CODE - SUPPLEMENTARY GUIDANCE TO THE OXFORDSHIRE COMPACT WITH THE COMMUNITY AND VOLUNTARY SECTOR IN OXFORDSHIRE
(Agenda Item 8) The Cabinet considered a report (CA8) on the Funding Code proposed as supplementary guidance for the purpose of the Compact with the Community and Voluntary Sector in Oxfordshire. RESOLVED: to: (Agenda Item 9) The Cabinet considered a report (CA9) on work which had been undertaken over the last 3 years by the County Council, Oxfordshire Mental Healthcare NHS Trust and the Oxfordshire PCTs to develop improved joint working and to move towards a fully integrated mental health service for adults of working age. RESOLVED:
(Agenda Item 10) The Cabinet considered a report (CA10) responding to a request from the Chief Executive of the Thames Valley Strategic Health Authority for preliminary views on proposed changes in the way NHS services were provided both within Oxfordshire and more widely. Councillor Seale commented that, in his view, reconfiguration to one PCT for the whole of Oxfordshire would be beneficial in terms of both costs and service provision. RESOLVED: to: (Agenda Item 11) The Cabinet considered a report (CA11) which responded to a Council resolution on 5 April 2005 in the following terms: "This
Council agrees to support the principle of fair trade and also to
encourage the production and use of local produce. To further these
objectives, the Council asks the Executive to consider ways in which
it can: Councillor Godden, speaking on behalf of the Shadow Cabinet Member for Sustainable Development, expressed her full support for the proposals set out in the report. RESOLVED: to:
(Agenda Item 12) The Cabinet considered a report (CA12) outlining proposals for the negotiation with the local Learning & Skills Council of contracts for the provision of adult learning services in Oxfordshire for the three year period 2005/06 to 2007/08. Councillor Godden, as Shadow Cabinet Member for Health & Community Services, emphasised the importance of monitoring additional learning support for people with a disability and expressed regret that Oxfordshire appeared to have lost some opportunities for gaining additional funding in this area. In discussion of the report members expressed concern that the current Learning & Skills Council guidance and service specifications placed too little emphasis on learning for personal development, which was an important activity for a wide range of people. Although it was accepted that learning for work skills was important, the Cabinet felt that it should not be prioritised at the expense of other types of learning. RESOLVED: to: (Agenda Item 13) The Cabinet considered a report (CA13) which proposed formal consultation on proposals to delegate a significant amount of the statementing budget to Oxfordshire Schools. Councillor Godden, speaking on behalf of the Shadow Cabinet Member for Schools Improvement, requested that the proposed consultation highlight the issue of challenging behaviour in schools referred to in paragraph 20 of the report; expressed concern about the risk of funding delegated to schools not being spent according to individual children’s identified needs; and stated that Councillor Turner was particularly concerned that small rural schools with high numbers of pupils with special educational needs might be penalised under the proposals. Councillor Michael Waine responded that the informal consultation had indicated that many of the county’s primary schools had expressed concern with regard to fairness and entitlement. One way of addressing this issue would be not to delegate to primary schools or only to a certain size of school. However, some of the county’s primary schools were larger than the secondary schools. It was paramount that a fair system operated for all schools. Mr Adams stated that Ofsted inspected SEN provision in schools and that SEN Development Programme Officers were also tasked with inspecting SEN provision in relation to school budgets. There was a specific safeguard for parents who felt a school was not adequately meeting their child’s needs in that it would remain open to them to request a formal statement. RESOLVED: to agree to a formal consultation on the scheme outlined in paragraphs 16 to 26 of the report, including: subject
to approval by the Cabinet Member for Schools Improvement of the final
terms of the consultation. (Agenda Item 14) The Cabinet considered a report (CA14) which presented two project appraisals for schemes within the Learning & Culture Capital Programme. RESOLVED: to
approve project appraisals ED626 and ED627. (Agenda Item 15) The Cabinet considered a report (CA15) which sought to update the existing agency arrangements for Minor Highway functions with district, town and parish councils. Councillor Armitage made reference to the question he had raised at Council concerning the removal of chairs and tables obstructing the public highway and asked if the proposed agency arrangements could be extended to cover such obstructions. RESOLVED: to:
199/05. FORWARD PLAN AND FUTURE BUSINESS
(Agenda Item 16) RESOLVED: to note the items currently identified for forthcoming meetings, subject to the following:
in the Chair Date
of signing 2005
|