Return to Agenda

Division(s): All

ITEM BV13

BEST VALUE COMMITTEE – 23 JUNE 2004

BEST VALUE REVIEW OF THE IMPACT OF CENTRAL EDUCATION SERVICE ON THE QUALITY OF LEADERSHIP AND MANAGEMENT IN SCHOOLS - UPDATE

Report by the Director for Learning & Culture

Introduction

  1. On 29 November 2001, the Best Value Sub-Committee approved the outcomes of the Review specifications and accepted five implementation objectives, with 14 specific action points, that the Core Review Team recommended for improving this aspect of the service. At their meeting on 4th December 2002, the Sub-Committee endorsed the first year’s implementation report and asked for a further report in a year’s time.
  2. At the meeting on December 10 2003, the committee endorsed the second year’s development work and asked for an update on progress within six months.
  3. Updated information

  4. The actions required from the initial recommendations were:

      3.1. Improve the quality of management decisions, so that development plans are realistic and attainable and that overall, Oxfordshire schools are judged to be in the top quartile of performance by summer 2003.

The LEA Statistical profile (which aggregates Ofsted school inspection judgements to July 2003) shows a 23% improvement in ‘very good’ grades for primary school management compared with those of ‘Statistical Neighbours’ at 18%. In secondary schools the ‘good’ and ‘very good’ grades are at 81% (Statistical Neighbours are at 82%). The Secondary Action Group – established as a result of the Best Value Review of Secondary Achievement - is aware that the proportion of ‘very good’ schools is below that of similar authorities.

Management in 27 out of 36 primary schools inspected in 2002-3 (75%) was judged to be good or better This compares with figures of 68% and 57% in the previous two years. 16 out of the 36 improved their grade; in 7 schools it declined. Of nine secondary schools inspected, 4 had improved their previous grade; in two it declined; all were judged to be good or better in management and efficiency.

The Council’s self- assessment grade in preparation for the LEA inspection is judged at ‘3’ (on a 1-7 scale. In 199-200 this grade was ‘4’.

3.2. Improve the level of progress and quality of education so that Oxfordshire is judged by OFSTED to be in the top quartile of performance by 2003

The 2003 test and examination results are the most recent and were analysed in the previous report. An analysis of the 2004 results will be available in October.

      3.3. Reduce the number of schools in special measures or with serious weakness to zero within two years.

      The number of schools in the Ofsted categories of serious weakness or special measures remains at 5 compared with 15 when the review specifications were agreed three years ago. Whilst some schools have been removed from a category since the last report two have been found to require Special Measures The zero target has not been achieved and whilst it is important that this should remain an aim, it is unlikely that the target get will be achieved within the next year. Considerable efforts have been made, over the last year, to support and challenge those schools who may be vulnerable to a critical inspection and, with one exception, these have been successful, and will continue to be a priority for the next year

      3.4. Reduce the levels of unnecessary administrative pressures on all schools to enable them to concentrate on their core task of improving teaching and learning in all schools.

Since the last report, there have been two major developments in this area. The Council’s response to the national initiative for ‘Workforce Remodelling’ has resulted in the re-designation of one senior adviser’s and one school adviser’s specialist responsibilities to undertake the necessary work. Progress so far has included support to 24 schools through a change management process to ensure that teachers are most effectively used and routine administration and clerical work is performed by support staff. The support includes four one-day training events and up to three visits by trained consultants. This work will be extended to all schools over the next four terms so that every school will have had the opportunity to consider how best to implement the contractual changes in the School Teachers’ Pay and Conditions Document and how the school can be structured to raise standards of educational achievement. This work is support by a Standards Fund Grant and a national DfES Remodelling Team A note from the Regional Coordinator for Workforce Reform of 16th May suggest that Oxfordshire is well placed to develop this work: "It was good meeting up last Wed. I was really impressed by all you managed to achieve so far and your remodelling plan is the best I have seen so far in our region. With your permission I have already shared it with several LEAs. So a big thank you for that from other LEAs".

The second area is to do with supporting schools in the Well-Being Project. This is being developed through the work of an Officer and seconded headteacher, together providing the equivalent of a full-time post. Creating the sense of well-being in the workplace is both an individual and employer responsibility. Using a confidential questionnaire as a benchmark starter, the results provide a starting point for establishing priorities and action that can be implemented collectively. Each school has a facilitator initially until a Well-Being team is established on behalf of all staff to continue the process of improvement over time. Established through Worklife Support Ltd the Well-Being project is gathering momentum nationally. Research conducted among headteachers in Norfolk schools, who have experienced the project over a number of years, demonstrates the project’s real benefits for improved staff well-being, school effectiveness, recruitment and retention, pupil behaviour, communication and ultimately pupil achievement. Currently 9 schools in the County are signed up for the programme. Centrally employed staff within Learning and Culture will also have the opportunity to take part in the programme.

      3.5. Improve the information and mechanisms whereby all schools can purchase advice, training and support in the event that locally agreed provision does not fully meet their needs.

Three documents making changes to the Oxfordshire Quality Schools Association (OQSA) provision have been sent to schools and five Headteacher briefing sessions by the Director, Principal Adviser and Senior Adviser for Staff Development have taken place, attended by 117 headteachers. The documents have been placed in the Members’ Library and will be circulated for discussion at the meeting.

      3.6. Increase the number of schools who have prioritised the provision of a rich curriculum entitlement for all their pupils from 80% to 95% over 2 years

      The LEA Statistical Profile indicates that judgements for ‘Breadth, balance and relevance of the whole curriculum’ and ‘The quality and range of learning opportunities’ – two indicators which relate to this target – suggests that an average of 88% was reached by July 2003, whilst that of statistical neighbours averaged 91%. ‘Provision for extra-curricular activities’ was judged at 96%, similar to that of similar authorities.

      3.7. Enable up to five senior staff (in total contributing to 1fte post, by means of secondment) to contribute to improvement of leadership and management by providing increased advice and training to developing schools.

      This area has moved on considerably since the original recommendations. Eleven consultant leaders and 25 strategy consultants have been appointed for 2004-5. Nine consultant leaders, working at 0.2 or 0.4 (full time equivalent) are current primary headteachers, two are recently retired; the strategy consultants are full time appointees coming from coordinator posts in primary or middle managers in secondary;

      3.8. Gain accreditation, in partnership with the Universities, for management development courses for subject coordinators, heads of department and deputy head teachers

      There are close links with the two local HEIs: joint course teaching with Brookes University for Early Professional Development; Learning Support Assistants; Summer Schools; Gifted and Talented programmes; student mentoring programmes with Oxford University Department of Educational Studies; and with the wider HEI community:

      Research in transition from Foundation Stage to Key Stage 1 learning and curriculum with Bristol University; Middle management programme with Reading University. In terms of postgraduate courses, leading to Master qualifications Oxfordshire has the highest number of teacher participants amongst partner LEAs; last year there were 511 teachers on 19 courses.

      3.9. Increase the number of Beacon Schools from 7 to 12 over the two years and to make Specialist College status available to all secondary schools; at least matching the previous opportunities for 35 teachers to become Advanced Skills Teachers (ASTs)

As explained in the last report, the award of Beacon status has been discontinued, with schools being offered the opportunity to apply for ‘Leading Edge’ status in future years. The five rural Beacon Schools have contributed to a good practice document which is shortly to be published and a copy will be placed in the Members’ Library.

A further secondary school has been added to the list of specialist colleges making a total of 17. 4 Secondary schools have also been granted Training School status.

21 Advanced Skills Teachers (ASTs) have been appointed for 2004-5. 12 more teachers are in the process of being assessed as ASTs for September 2005. The ASTs (0.2 fte) are teachers from either phase working predominantly in their partnership schools on agreed local programmes.

3.10. Ensure that all schools able to meet OFSTED inspection and Audit Commission requirements for efficiency – as measured by leadership and management grades of satisfactory or better at inspection.

The LEA Statistical Profile of the judgement on ‘Management and Efficiency’ of 202 primary schools inspected in the second cycle indicates that 98% reached this level compared with 97% in similar authorities; in the same period 37 secondary (including some former middle) reached a 95% level compared with 97% for statistical neighbour schools.

3.11 Improve the number of schools with good resource deployment and personnel management from 65% to 85% in two years

Within the same cycle of inspection, the judgements applied to these areas are carried out in full inspections only. In terms of ‘Adequacy of staffing, accommodation and learning resources’ good judgements were recorded in 42% of primary schools ( 46% in statistical neighbours) and 33% in secondary ( 29% in sn); for ‘Educational priorities are supported through the school’s financial planning 64% of primary schools (72% sn) and 80% of secondary schools (76% sn) were judged as good or better.

3.12. Investigate the extent to which new management Information Systems (MIS) can be best accessed by schools. Pilot schools to be involved by 2002.

The development and use of SAP (financial and human resource modules) has been explored through pilots involving ten schools during 2003-4. The L&C and Resources Directorates and the schools themselves agreed in April 2004 that the systems were insufficiently developed to allow implementation across all schools. Therefore, to provide schools with robust financial monitoring the Capita-SIMS financial system (MFS6) is being rolled out to the majority of schools between June and December 2004. This will provide a well-tested and suitable system for the medium term. Meanwhile, SAP development continues in the pilot schools to ensure local and specific development is fully tested and appropriate for schools before making further commitments. The aim remains to provide a fully integrated system across the Council, including schools, in the longer term.

3.13. Establish a formalised, annual consultation between the LEA and head teachers, deputies and governors by March 2002.(and) To use the information gained from the consultation programme in future service planning

This recommendation has largely been met by the establishment of the Schools’ Forum. Meetings with representatives of primary, special and secondary schools headteachers, teacher and governor associations continue at Director and Heads of Service levels on a regular basis. Formal consultation has recently taken place on the revised School Improvement Strategy and the Traded Services element of OQSA. Planning at Directorate, Service, Team and Individual levels follow the Council’s Medium Term Strategy. A further development worth considering is an annual report on Standards and Quality in Oxfordshire Schools drawn from the range of formal and informal consultations, local monitoring and analysis of external audit and inspection and submitted to the Executive following discussion with all stakeholders.

Conclusion

  1. Much of this update is included in section 3 ‘Support to improve education in schools’ which is part of the L&C self-assessment in preparation for the Ofsted Inspection later this year. Within that section - key judgement 3.1. – there is the requirement to assess ‘Support to leadership and management, including schools’ approaches to continuous improvement’. The outcomes of this Best Value Review have contributed significantly to this section. Of particular note, is the improvement in school leadership, particularly in the primary phase; the growing confidence by schools in the quality and accuracy of their own self-evaluation; the reduction of the number of schools in Ofsted categories; the quality and support of the continuing professional team in SDS and the increasing opportunities for partnership in research and development. This update report makes one further recommendation beyond those of the original BVR: an Annual Report of Standards and Quality in Oxfordshire Schools should be discussed with all stakeholders and scrutiny working parties and then published widely after Executive approval
  2. RECOMMENDATIONS

  3. The Committee is RECOMMENDED to:
          1. receive the update report and acknowledge that the implementation plans are now embedded in existing monitoring and evaluation practices;
          2. agree that an Annual Report on Standards and Quality in Oxfordshire schools should be implemented;
          3. identify whether there are any further matters in the report which should be drawn to the attention of the Executive Member; and
          4. ask the Chair of the Learning & Culture Scrutiny Committee to consult the Deputy Chair on scrutiny committee consideration.

KEITH BARTLEY
Director for Learning & Culture

Background papers: Nil

Contact Officer: Richard Howard, Principal Adviser for Schools, Head of School Development. Telephone 01865 428084

June 2004

Return to TOP