Venue: Room 2&3 - County Hall, New Road, Oxford OX1 1ND. View directions
Link: video link https://oxon.cc/EYPOSC21112025
| No. | Item |
|---|---|
|
Apologies for Absence and Temporary Appointments To receive any apologies for absence and temporary
appointments. Minutes: Apologies were received from Katie N. |
|
|
Declaration of Interests See guidance note on the back page. Minutes: Cllr Markham declared a non-pecuniary interest, in relation to the Fostering item. |
|
|
The Committee is recommended to APPROVE the minutes of the meeting held on 26 September 2025 and to receive information arising from them. Minutes: The Committee APPROVED the minutes of the meeting held
on 26 September 2025, as a true and accurate record. |
|
|
Petitions and Public Addresses Members of the public who wish to speak on an item on the
agenda at this meeting, or present a petition, can attend the meeting in person
or ‘virtually’ through an online connection. Requests to speak must be submitted no later than 9 a.m.
three working days before the meeting, i.e., 18 November 2025 Requests should be submitted to the Scrutiny Officer
at scrutiny@oxfordshire.gov.uk. If you are speaking ‘virtually’, you may submit a written
statement of your presentation to ensure that if the technology fails, then
your views can still be taken into account. A written
copy of your statement can be provided no later than 9am on the day of the
meeting. Written submissions should be no longer than 1 A4 sheet. Where there are a number of requests
from persons wishing to present similar views on the same issue, the Chair may
require that the views be put by a single spokesperson. It is expected that
only in exceptional circumstances will a person (or organisation) be allowed to
address more than one meeting on a particular issue in any period of six
months. The public is reminded that the Committee is not a
decision-making body and that it cannot investigate individual
complaints. The Committee requests that no individual children are
named when addressing the Committee. Minutes: There were none. |
|
|
Attainment Including Attainment Gaps The Committee has requested a report on attainment including attainment gaps. Cllr Sean Gaul, Cabinet member for Children and Young People, Lisa Lyons, the Director of Children’s Services, Annette Perrington, Interim Deputy Director: Education, and Kim Wilson, Assistant Director: Schools and Settings – Standards, Effectiveness, and Performance , have been invited to present the report and to answer the Committee’s questions. The Committee is asked to consider the report and raise any questions, and to AGREE any recommendations it wishes to make to Cabinet arising therefrom. Report to follow Minutes: Cllr Sean Gaul, Cabinet member for Children and Young
People, Lisa Lyons, the Director of Children’s Services, Annette Perrington,
Interim Deputy Director: Education, and Kim Wilson, Assistant Director: Schools
and Settings – Standards, Effectiveness, and Performance (ADSS), were invited
to present the report and to answer the Committee’s questions. The Assistant Director presented provisional, unvalidated
attainment data, explaining that, whilst Oxfordshire’s attainment score of 46.2
was marginally above the national average (45.9), progress could not be
measured owing to pandemic-related exam cancellations. She noted that white
British children in Oxfordshire achieved at or above national levels across key
metrics; however, disadvantaged children, particularly disadvantaged white
British children, continued to lag behind, widening
the attainment gap. The Assistant Director stressed that schools account for
only around 20% of children’s outcomes, with wider factors such as family
health and deprivation having significant effects. Members engaged in a wide-ranging discussion about the
interventions available to support schools with attainment challenges. The
Council’s approach involved categorising schools by need, with improvement
advisers working across more than 130 maintained schools. Those requiring
strategic support benefited from tailored interventions, such as lead reviews
and strategy meetings, while all schools have access to a school improvement
partner. Intensive help was provided for those with greater needs, especially in
leadership and governance, and new headteachers received mentoring. Finance and
Special Educational Needs (SEN) teams also contributed to the support package.
The Committee noted a strong emphasis on early years reading and writing, with
ambitious targets to narrow the disadvantage gap, and initiatives like free
book distribution to encourage reading. Collaboration with external organisations was highlighted,
particularly the Council’s work with the Dolly Parton Foundation and the
Welcome project, which addressed both literacy and child health. The
conversation reflected on the importance of foundational skills in early
reading and writing, recognising that development in these areas extended
beyond formal instruction. Some Members voiced concerns about the risks of
starting formal literacy too early, especially compared to international
practices. The upcoming 2025 curriculum and assessment review was seen as an
opportunity to modernise the curriculum, with a renewed focus on the arts. Creativity and the arts were recognised as vital for child
development, and Members considered how multi-agency interventions might
reflect the growing emphasis on these areas. Schools would need to adapt to
curriculum changes, and collaboration between safeguarding, education, and
virtual school teams was seen as essential. The new inspection framework was
identified as a key driver for schools to respond to evolving educational
priorities. Ambitious targets for good levels of development among
children were discussed, with Oxfordshire aiming for 77.8%, surpassing the
national average. The Cabinet Member drew attention to significant
inequalities, particularly for children eligible for free school meals, whose
development rates lagged behind their peers. He
stressed the importance of closing this gap and described ongoing efforts to
address disparities through strategic planning and collaboration within the
Children’s Trust Board. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on attainment scores and progress measurement was another focus. ... view the full minutes text for item 57/25 |
|
|
Virtual School Annual Report The Committee has requested a report on the Virtual School. Cllr Sean Gaul, Cabinet member for Children and Young People, Lisa Lyons, the Director of Children’s Services, Annette Perrington, Interim Deputy Director: Education, and Clare Pike, Head of the Virtual School, have been invited to present the report and to answer the Committee’s questions. The Committee is asked to consider the report and raise any questions, and to AGREE any recommendations it wishes to make to Cabinet arising therefrom. Report to follow Additional documents:
Minutes: Cllr Sean Gaul, Cabinet member for Children and Young
People, Lisa Lyons, the Director of Children’s Services, Charlotte Davey,
Assistant Director, and Annette Perrington, Interim Deputy Director: Education,
were invited to present the report and to answer the Committee’s questions. The Interim Deputy Director presented a retrospective report
on the virtual school, reviewing the 2024/25 academic year with a focus on the
progress and attainment of children in care and care leavers. She explained
that, while the virtual school’s remit had expanded to include support for
children with social workers and those in kinship care, the report concentrated
on its core statutory responsibilities. The main priorities identified were
ensuring suitable school placements, improving attendance and reducing
absences, supporting educational progress, and encouraging participation in
cultural activities. The Interim Deputy Director highlighted notable
improvements, such as a reduction in the time children spent out of school
following placement moves and an increase in the number of care leavers
progressing to higher education. She reported that attendance rates in both
primary and secondary phases were either above or improving on national
averages, and that there had been a decrease in persistent absences and
suspensions, with only one permanent exclusion recorded during the year. The Interim Deputy Director emphasised the significance of
trauma-informed practice and the ongoing training of designated teachers. While
acknowledging the positive direction of travel, she concluded that the
identified priorities would remain for the coming year due to persistent
challenges. During the discussion, Members sought clarification on the
effectiveness of partnerships supporting the virtual school, requesting
examples and information on how their impact was monitored. In response, the
Interim Deputy Director explained that the strength of partnerships varied,
particularly between in-county and out-of-county placements. She cited strong
regional collaboration through the National Association of Virtual School Heads
(NAVSH), which had proved instrumental in overcoming barriers for children
placed outside Oxfordshire, and also referenced close working relationships
with health professionals and the Corporate Parenting Board. The Director added
that the virtual school maintained robust links with the Youth Offending
Partnership Board and provided integrated support, including in-house
psychological services, to ensure effective collaboration for vulnerable
children. Further points were raised regarding persistent absences
among children supported by the virtual school, with particular interest in the
actions that had contributed to reducing these rates and how the Council might
further improve to meet the national average. The Interim Deputy Director
explained that attendance had been a central focus, with each child’s
attendance discussed at personal education plan meetings to identify and
address barriers. She stressed the importance of targeted, individual interventions,
reasonable adjustments, and multi-professional collaboration. The Director and
Assistant Director added that social care teams closely monitored absences on a
weekly basis, worked directly with families and carers, and utilised support
services to encourage attendance, attributing improvements to this detailed,
hands-on approach. The Committee also explored how the system supported the Council as corporate parent in fulfilling informal parental duties, such as attending parents’ evenings and engaging at the school ... view the full minutes text for item 58/25 |
|
|
The Committee has requested a report on the fostering service. Cllr Sean Gaul, Cabinet member for Children and Young People, Lisa Lyons, Director of Children’s Services, Delia Mann, Deputy Director of Children’s Social Care, Charlotte Davey, Assistant Director, and Julie McNally, Service Manager: Fostering, have been invited to present the report and to answer the Committee’s questions. The Committee is asked to consider the report and raise any questions, and to AGREE any recommendations it wishes to make to Cabinet arising therefrom. Additional documents: Minutes: Cllr Sean Gaul, Cabinet member for Children and Young
People, Lisa Lyons, Director of Children’s Services, Charlotte Davey, Assistant
Director, and Julie McNally, Service Manager: Fostering, were invited to
present the report and to answer the Committee’s questions. The Assistant Director outlined the fostering service’s
scope, covering mainstream fostering, kinship care, relief carers, and special
guardianship assessments. Kinship carers, often relatives or friends, commonly
took on care roles unexpectedly. The service saw a reduction in registered
foster carers in 2024/25, mainly due to retirements and adoptions. In response,
a Fostering Improvement Board was formed to address standards. Persistent
challenges remained in recruiting carers for adolescents, sibling groups, and
unaccompanied asylum-seeking children. Recruitment, training, and support had
been prioritised, with successes including bringing children formerly placed
out of county back to Oxfordshire families. The Director addressed the specific difficulties faced by
the Council in fostering, noting that the county, like others nationally, had
experienced a decline in foster carers. Only children with complex needs were
entering care, necessitating careful matching. The Council was found to have
fewer fostering and residential beds compared to other areas, a situation
partly attributed to higher property costs, which made it more difficult to
attract independent providers. Nevertheless, the service’s offer was described
as highly competitive, with remuneration and support packages comparable to
those in London, alongside a robust training programme. Additional options
included fostering-friendly policies, flexible and respite care, and enhanced
support for kinship carers and those under special guardianship orders. Concerns were raised regarding the fact that nearly twice as
many foster carers were leaving the Oxfordshire system as were joining, and the
implications this held for future recruitment. The 2024/25 report indicated a
high proportion of carers over the age of 50, with many departing for personal
reasons such as retirement and financial pressures. Efforts to attract younger
carers had been undertaken, including locality campaigns, word-of-mouth
referrals, and financial incentives. The appointment of a marketing officer
aimed to address the recruitment gap and the shortfall in provision for
specific groups. It was clarified that kinship carers had always existed, but
recent government recognition highlighted that their support had been lacking
nationally. The Council had responded by establishing a dedicated team for
kinship carers, offering bespoke support and matching fostering allowances for
those transitioning to permanent arrangements. This initiative had led to a
significant increase in special guardianships. It was explained that “personal circumstances” as a reason
for foster carers leaving the service encompassed a wide range of factors, not
limited to kinship carers. These included retirement, adoption, and other
individual situations. While conversions from kinship to permanent arrangements
had not significantly contributed to deregistrations
in 2024/25, it was anticipated that this trend might become more apparent in
future years as more carers transitioned to permanent roles. Further clarification was provided regarding the meaning of “standards of care” in relation to foster carer deregistrations. It was emphasised that this term covered various scenarios, such as carers developing health issues, experiencing increased stress, or ... view the full minutes text for item 59/25 |
|
|
Co-optee recruitment update The Committee has received
a report updating it on co-opted membership.
The Committee is recommended to: - 1.1 NOTE
the update on activity undertaken to fill the Committee’s vacant co-optee post for a parent governor; 1.2 AGREE
to terminate Hana G’s appointed as a co-opted young person members; and, if
agreed, 1.3 AGREE
to begin a recruitment process for the subsequently vacant post. Minutes: The Committee received a report updating them on the
co-opted membership. The Committee NOTED recommendation 1.1 and AGREED
to recommendations 1.2 and 1.3. |
|
|
Committee Forward Work Plan The Committee is recommended to AGREE its work programme for forthcoming meetings, having heard any changes from previous iterations, and taking account of the Cabinet Forward Plan and of the Budget Management Monitoring Report. Minutes: After initially discussing holding an additional meeting in
December 2025, the Committee resolved to add an additional meeting in January
2026 to consider the SEND Local Area Partnership report and the refreshed
Priority Action Plan. The Committee
agreed that the EOTAS Guidance could also be considered at that meeting. The Committee also decided that the Oxfordshire Education
Inclusion Partnership strategy and related items, such as safeguarding in
schools and the curriculum review, could be scheduled for February and March,
with flexibility to adjust timings as needed. The policy review was suggested
for the summer. The Committee agreed that the Scrutiny Officer and the
Director should discuss practicalities of timings, in consultation with the
Chair. The Committee AGREED its forward work programme. |
|
|
Committee Action and Recommendation Tracker The Committee is recommended to NOTE the progress of previous recommendations and actions arising from previous meetings, having raised any questions on the contents. Minutes: The Committee NOTED the action and recommendation tracker. |
|
|
Responses to Scrutiny Recommendations Attached are the Cabinet responses to the Education and Young People Overview and Scrutiny Committee reports on School Catering Services and Corporate Cleaning Services, and the Oxfordshire Safeguarding Children’s Partnership Annual Report. The Committee is asked to NOTE the responses. Additional documents: Minutes: The Committee NOTED the cabinet responses to the Education and Young People Overview and Scrutiny Committee reports on School Catering Services and Corporate Cleaning Services, and the Oxfordshire Safeguarding Children’s Partnership Annual Report. |