The Committee has requested a report on the fostering service.
Cllr Sean Gaul, Cabinet member for Children and Young People, Lisa Lyons, Director of Children’s Services, Delia Mann, Deputy Director of Children’s Social Care, Charlotte Davey, Assistant Director, and Julie McNally, Service Manager: Fostering, have been invited to present the report and to answer the Committee’s questions.
The Committee is asked to consider the report and raise any questions, and to AGREE any recommendations it wishes to make to Cabinet arising therefrom.
Minutes:
Cllr Sean Gaul, Cabinet member for Children and Young
People, Lisa Lyons, Director of Children’s Services, Charlotte Davey, Assistant
Director, and Julie McNally, Service Manager: Fostering, were invited to
present the report and to answer the Committee’s questions.
The Assistant Director outlined the fostering service’s
scope, covering mainstream fostering, kinship care, relief carers, and special
guardianship assessments. Kinship carers, often relatives or friends, commonly
took on care roles unexpectedly. The service saw a reduction in registered
foster carers in 2024/25, mainly due to retirements and adoptions. In response,
a Fostering Improvement Board was formed to address standards. Persistent
challenges remained in recruiting carers for adolescents, sibling groups, and
unaccompanied asylum-seeking children. Recruitment, training, and support had
been prioritised, with successes including bringing children formerly placed
out of county back to Oxfordshire families.
The Director addressed the specific difficulties faced by
the Council in fostering, noting that the county, like others nationally, had
experienced a decline in foster carers. Only children with complex needs were
entering care, necessitating careful matching. The Council was found to have
fewer fostering and residential beds compared to other areas, a situation
partly attributed to higher property costs, which made it more difficult to
attract independent providers. Nevertheless, the service’s offer was described
as highly competitive, with remuneration and support packages comparable to
those in London, alongside a robust training programme. Additional options
included fostering-friendly policies, flexible and respite care, and enhanced
support for kinship carers and those under special guardianship orders.
Concerns were raised regarding the fact that nearly twice as
many foster carers were leaving the Oxfordshire system as were joining, and the
implications this held for future recruitment. The 2024/25 report indicated a
high proportion of carers over the age of 50, with many departing for personal
reasons such as retirement and financial pressures. Efforts to attract younger
carers had been undertaken, including locality campaigns, word-of-mouth
referrals, and financial incentives. The appointment of a marketing officer
aimed to address the recruitment gap and the shortfall in provision for
specific groups.
It was clarified that kinship carers had always existed, but
recent government recognition highlighted that their support had been lacking
nationally. The Council had responded by establishing a dedicated team for
kinship carers, offering bespoke support and matching fostering allowances for
those transitioning to permanent arrangements. This initiative had led to a
significant increase in special guardianships.
It was explained that “personal circumstances” as a reason
for foster carers leaving the service encompassed a wide range of factors, not
limited to kinship carers. These included retirement, adoption, and other
individual situations. While conversions from kinship to permanent arrangements
had not significantly contributed to deregistrations
in 2024/25, it was anticipated that this trend might become more apparent in
future years as more carers transitioned to permanent roles.
Further clarification was provided regarding the meaning of
“standards of care” in relation to foster carer deregistrations.
It was emphasised that this term covered various scenarios, such as carers
developing health issues, experiencing increased stress, or undergoing
significant life changes like divorce or relocation. Such circumstances
sometimes led to discussions about whether carers should continue, alter the
type of care they provided, or cease fostering, with the child’s best interests
always being paramount. It was not simply a matter of carers suddenly being
deemed unsuitable.
The training and support available for foster carers,
particularly in managing children with significant mental health needs, were
outlined. Foster carers received trauma-informed training delivered by the
clinical team, Attach, and completed skills training addressing the
complexities of caring for vulnerable children. Carers were expected to keep
their training up to date and had access to regular newsletters, support
groups, one-to-one support, and reflective sessions. The training offer was
extended to both in-house and kinship carers.
Carers received regular supervision and reflective sessions
with their allocated social worker, and the deregistration process spanned
several months, including assessments and panel reviews during which reasons
for leaving were discussed. The service maintained ongoing conversations with
carers to support them and gather insights, which informed the data on reasons
for departure.
In conclusion, the Cabinet Member highlighted ongoing
efforts to improve the fostering offer and attract more foster parents. He
referenced discussions about introducing a dedicated on-call helpline for
foster carers and exploring the ambitious idea of a council tax offer, which
would require collaboration with district councils. The importance of
councillors acting as advocates for the fostering service was emphasised, with
a suggestion that a simple summary of the package be provided to members to enable
confident promotion. These steps were intended to strengthen support for carers
and enhance recruitment across Oxfordshire.
The Committee AGREED to recommendations under the
following headings:
Supporting documents: