At its meeting on 9 May 2010 the Children’s Services Scrutiny Committee
will consider a call in requested by the following Councillors:
Cllr Liz Brighouse
Cllr Larry Sanders
Cllr Richard Stevens
Cllr Val Smith
Cllr John Sanders
Cllr John Tanner
Cllr Roy Darke
Cllr Saj Malik
Cllr Sarah Hutchinson
Cllr Susanna Pressel
The decision of Cabinet on 19 April 2011 was:
"RESOLVED: to approve the proposed service redesign and
implementation of services for children, young people and families as detailed
in this report."
The reasons given in the call-in request are:
We request that the decision taken by the Cabinet on 19th April to set
up an Early Intervention Service and to end provision of youth work across the
County be considered by the Children's Scrutiny Committee so that:
1. Risks involved in pursuing this strategy, in particular those related to
1996 Education Act be mitigated.
2. The situation in relation to the provision of services delivered using Youth
Work methods and approaches can be clarified for those communities who are
listed as losing this provision.
A copy of the report to Cabinet (CA7) is attached.
In the event of the decision taken on 19 April 2011 being referred back to Cabinet for reconsideration a paper will circulated separately setting out the material concerns found by the Scrutiny Committee.
Additional documents:
A request has been received to call in the
decision for scrutiny.
The following Councillors have requested the
decision be called in for
scrutiny:
Cllr Liz Brighouse
Cllr Larry Sanders
Cllr Richard Stevens
Cllr Val Smith
Cllr John Sanders
Cllr John Tanner
Cllr Roy Darke
Cllr Saj Malik
Cllr Sarah Hutchinson
Cllr Susanna Pressel
The decision
was:
"RESOLVED: to approve the proposed
service redesign and implementation of services for children, young people and
families as detailed in this report."
The reasons
given in the call-in request are:
We request that the decision taken by the
Cabinet on 19th April to set up an Early Intervention Service and to end
provision of youth work across the County be considered by the Children's
Scrutiny Committee so that:
1. Risks involved in pursuing this strategy, in particular those related to
1996 Education Act be mitigated.
2. The situation in relation to the provision of services delivered using Youth
Work methods and approaches can be clarified for those communities who are
listed as losing this provision.
A copy of the report to Cabinet (CA7) is attached.
Additional documents:
Minutes:
The Committee was required to
consider the following motion for a call-in.
We
request that the decision taken by the Cabinet on 19th April to set up an Early
Intervention Service and to end provision of youth work across the County be
considered by the Children's Scrutiny Committee so that:
The Scrutiny
Committee had before it the report of the Director for Children, Young People
and Schools to the Cabinet on 19 April 2011 together with the draft minutes of
that meeting.
The Chairman explained that, if the call-in were to be supported the
issue would be referred back to the Cabinet for further consideration. The
Committee was not expected to consider the whole issue of the future of the
youth service but the specifics of the call-in motion. Did the Cabinet take
account of the risks associated with the project? Would the proposed changes
“end provision of youth work across the County”? Would referral back be
necessary to achieve clarification of the nature of the future service?
Those supporting the call-in proposal were then invited to speak.
Ms Cat Hobbs spoke on behalf of “Oxford Save Our Services” in support of
the call in being referred back to Cabinet for further consideration. Ms Hobbs
stated that she considered that there were risks attached to the proposed
changes. Vulnerable children could be put at risk if they had no youth service
to turn to.
The proposals for hubs and satellites were unclear and left a number of
questions unanswered. For example: Would open access continue? Would youth work
be targeted at specific groups? Why was there apparently no requirement for
professionally trained youth workers? How many centres would there be? What
level of Big Society provision would be needed? Where would young people go if
their local youth centre were to close?
Ms Hobbs ended by stating that, in the view of “Oxford Save Our
Services” the Cabinet decision had been based on shaky evidence with unclear
plans that left the future uncertain.
Councillor Larry Sanders spoke in support of the call in being referred
back to Cabinet for further consideration. He considered that there was a
serious lack of information and that made the decision unsafe. Councillor
Sanders also raised a number of questions: Where will the youth services take
place? How will they be delivered? How can meaningful consultation take place
when there is such paucity of information? More information, Colonel Sanders
said, is needed.
Councillor Val Smith spoke on behalf of the Councillors calling in the decision. Councillor Smith also referred to the lack of information. She referred to the Education Act which requires local authorities to provide activities including youth work. Councillor Smith asked whether the Act would be complied with? ... view the full minutes text for item 120
46 Children, Young People & Families Service Redesign
PDF 50 KB
Cabinet Member: Children, Young People & Families
Forward Plan Ref: 2011/032
Contact:
Report by Director for Children, Young People & Families (CA7).
This report sets out a proposed new direction for the provision of
services for children, young people and families in Oxfordshire, including the
creation of a new, single integrated Early Intervention Service and changes to
the provision of Education Services and Children’s Social Care Services.
The proposals set out how services will be redesigned and reshaped to better meet the needs of children, young people and families and to address the financial challenges and new national policy direction set out in the Children, Young People & Families Directorate Business Strategy. This report seeks Cabinet approval to proceed with the implementation of service redesign taking account of the outcomes of extensive consultation, an assessment of equality and inclusion and a financial appraisal.
Additional documents:
Minutes:
Cabinet considered
a report that set out a proposed new direction for the provision of services
for children, young people and families in Oxfordshire, including the creation
of a new, single integrated Early Intervention Service and changes to the
provision of Education Services and Children’s Social Care Services. The report
sought Cabinet approval to proceed with the implementation of service redesign
taking account of the outcomes of extensive consultation, an assessment of
equality and inclusion and a financial appraisal.
Councillor Janet Godden, Shadow Cabinet
Member for Children, Young People & Families noted that consultation on the
current proposals had been very thorough but commented that there had been two
other restructures in recent years, the latest in 2008. She referred to the low
number of schools responding and was concerned that schools and Governing
Bodies were not ready and that attainment would suffer. She commented on the
early intervention proposals and would have liked to have seen more in the
proposals about health and well being, highlighting the concerns in the
consultation about the loss and dilution of skills. She felt that there was not
sufficient information about the budget and to the financial outcome and
reputational risks to the Council of the proposals.
The Cabinet Member for Schools Improvement
commented that the previous changes had not been as far reaching as the current
proposals.
Councillor Zoe Patrick, speaking as a local
member referred to the potential closure of facilities in Grove and Wantage.
She was working together with Councillor Hannaby to see what could be done. An
application under the Big Society Fund had been submitted but there were many
calls on this funding. She referred to the work of the Sweatbox and Beatbox and
the high levels of local use. Beatbox provided a valuable service for people with
learning difficulties. She asked that the Cabinet rethink how the service
redesign would impact on those areas without a hub and what could be revised to
help.
Councillor Liz Brighouse, speaking as a local member, expressed frustration around contradictions she found in the paper between statutory responsibilities, the concept of universal provision and targeted services. She highlighted the position of Wood Farm Youth Club which was run by volunteers and noted that it was in one of the most deprived wards. She believed that the report did not look at the specific impact of the proposals on the families in deprivation and poverty. The proposals would lead to a lack of the universal services they required and she asked that Cabinet look again at how areas in deprivation could be best served to provide the best outcomes for young people. She commented that young people wanted somewhere to go and without the Youth Club were more likely to be perceived as likely to offend. The aim should be to help young people stay out of the higher end of social care provision. Some facilities had been given an extra year and she asked that Wood farm Youth Club be given the ... view the full minutes text for item 46