Agenda and minutes

Performance Scrutiny Committee - Thursday, 13 March 2014 10.00 am

Venue: County Hall

Contact: Sue Whitehead, Tel: (01865) 810262  Email: sue.whitehead@oxfordshire.gov.uk

Items
No. Item

6/14

Apologies for Absence and Temporary Appointments

Minutes:

Apologies were submitted by Councillor Coates.

7/14

Minutes pdf icon PDF 128 KB

To approve the minutes of the meetings held on16 December 2013 and 9 January 2014 (PSC3a, PSCb and PSC3c) and to receive information arising from them.

Additional documents:

Minutes:

The Minutes of the meetings held on 16 December 2013 and 9 January 2014 were agreed and signed.

 

The Committee agreed that the following 2 items be considered together in order to make best use of Director’s time. For ease of reference the discussion on the 2 items are recorded separately

8/14

Draft Corporate Plan and Corporate Performance Indicators for 2014/15 pdf icon PDF 44 KB

10.10

Head of Policy, Maggie Scott will present the Draft Corporate Plan for discussion and comments and introduce the proposed corporate performance indicators for 2014/15 (PSC5).

 

1025

 

In turn Directors will present their proposed dashboards for reporting performance information to the committee in 2014/15. Performance Scrutiny Committee is asked to approve the recommended performance indicators.

Additional documents:

Minutes:

Maggie Scott, Head of Policy introduced the annual refresh of the Corporate Plan, highlighting that it set out some fundamental changes to the way the Council achieved its objectives.

 

During general discussion the Committee referred to the large scope of the plan and queried how it could respond to changing circumstances such as the recent flooding. There was some discussion on the inclusion of information on the Strategic Housing Market Assessment. It was felt that there was a mismatch between the references to size of economic growth and to infrastructure. Individual examples were given which Maggie Scott agreed to take back to Environment & Economy for consideration as part of the Strategic Economic Plan. It was noted that there was no mention of agriculture. The Council needed to focus on prevention and this needed to be reflected in the report. A member highlighted the role of the Scrutiny Committee and noted that the Plan was a good statement of intent but that there was no way to use it directly to further the work of the Committee. The audience of the report was recognised with it aimed at informing the wider world. The substance beneath the Plan would appear elsewhere.

 

Environment & Economy

 

Sue Scane, Director for Environment & Economy highlighted the role of the Local Enterprise Partnership and its close working with the County Council. The City Deal was testament to that and in refuting comments that there were little infrastructure plans South of Oxford she indicated that Science Vale was a major beneficiary. Sue Scane highlighted the indicators set out in the Annex and flagged that on property they wanted to work with the localities to see what information would be useful.

(1)            The Chairman referred to the Strategic Economic Plan (SEP) going to Cabinet and urged all members to read it. Sue Scane added that flooding was a key priority in the SEP.

(2)            The Chairman raised the issue of getting the best skilled people and in particular the issues around skills and adult social care workers.

(3)            Members recognised the complexity of the challenge around property management.

(4)            There was some discussion around the target in relation to customer satisfaction and whether it was sufficiently stretching. The Committee was advised that the target was realistic based on where they currently were.

 

Children, Education & Families

 

Frances Craven, Deputy Director Education & Early Intervention, highlighted key issues in the Plan and the range of targets aimed at keeping children safe. There was more detailed information available behind the indicators.

 

During discussion the following points were made:

 

(5)            Following a number of comments relating to indicators on the work load of social workers and the complexity of this area it was AGREED that this be included for discussion at the next meeting.

(6)            In relation to comments about the lack of information about the good work done in local areas by voluntary groups it was explained that the figures focussed on the Council’s statutory responsibilities. It was suggested that information on voluntary  ...  view the full minutes text for item 8/14

9/14

Business Management Monitoring Report for the Third Quarter 2013/14 pdf icon PDF 801 KB

11.10

Head of Policy, Maggie Scott will present a report (PSC6) outlining the Council’s performance for the third quarter of 2013/14. Directors and Deputy Directors will attend to present their sections of the report and answer questions.

Minutes:

The Committee had before them the business monitoring report for the third quarter 2013/14.

 

Directorate officers attended to answer questions on the performance information.

 

Environment & Economy

 

Responding to a request for information about S81 work, Sue Scane undertook that such information would be provided through the localities meetings.

 

There was some discussion over the target of 50% set for the level of satisfaction with highways noting that the current level achieved was 50.2%.

 

Children, Education & Families

 

Responding to a query on how Oxfordshire fared nationally in terms of narrowing the gap on those areas that were red, Frances Craven suggested that more detailed figures could come to a future meeting. A Councillor highlighted the low target figure for looked after children achieving GCSEs and Frances Craven indicated it was in line with the national average. The position was monitored monthly looking at interventions and their impact. Information could be provided to councillors on what was being done.

 

Adult Social Care

 

Sara Livadeas, referring to re-ablement services stated that the overall performance continued to improve although not to the levels set when the contract was negotiated.

10/14

Contract Quality Assurance - Adult Social Care

12.10

 

Over 15,000 adults in Oxfordshire receive support services that are funded by the Council in some way. These services are provided by over 300 external suppliers. The county council has a strong commitment to work with its suppliers to ensure that good quality services are available for people who reside in Oxfordshire and need support to help meet their assessed needs. Deputy Director for Joint Commissioning, Sara Livadeas, will present information including:

 

·                    a summary of the work carried out by the Joint Commissioning Quality Procurement & Contracts team;

·                    progress towards the delivery of assurance of the quality of services funded by the Council and delivered to people in Oxfordshire; and

·                    the themes that are the focus for future assurance activity.

 

A background paper will be made available to all members of the Committee prior to the meeting.

Minutes:

Sara Livadeas and Andrew Colling attended for this item highlighting two aspects of contract work: contract monitoring and contract assurance. They referred to the report that set out the approach taken with a move to a systematic approach based on risk. It was possible to RAG rate contracts in order to better target resources. All contracts were monitored annually and some much more frequently.

 

A Member highlighted a contract where the outcomes had been disappointing and asked what could be done to improve matters. Sara Livadeas, indicated that the provider acknowledged the problem and that so long as people were being safeguarded the Council was willing to work with providers.

 

Councillor Stratford highlighted the Adopt a Care Home scheme for councillors, queried how many councillors had been accepted or refused by a care home and suggested that the scheme’s profile be raised.

 

Following discussion of the extent to which councillors could influence what went in to contracts Peter Clark commented that if there were concerns about individual contracts that this was a matter for this Committee. However if there were more general concerns this was for the Audit & Governance Committee to investigate. It was AGREED that the Chairman consider what information could usefully be included in a joint briefing for this Committee and members of the Audit & Governance Committee.

 

11/14

Review of the County Council's Governance Arrangements pdf icon PDF 267 KB

12.30

 

The Council’s governance arrangements came into effect following the May 2013 elections. It was agreed by Council that these decision-making arrangements should be reviewed a year after coming into effect.  The Monitoring Officer is therefore undertaking a review under the auspices of the Audit and Governance Committee and will present his report to Council in September 2014.  Glenn Watson, Principal Governance Officer verbal update will be given to the Performance Committee on the agreed process for review and in particular how this relates to the scrutiny function.

 

A paper which was considered by the Political Group Leaders in October is attached for information (PSC8).

Minutes:

The Committee noted the update on the review of the County Council’s governance arrangements.

12/14

Scrutiny Annual Report 2013/14

12.40

Councillor Liz Brighouse to lead a discussion on the themes to be included in the Scrutiny Annual Report.

Minutes:

The Committee supported the approach outlined and the Chairman welcomed any input from Members. It was suggested that the report should focus on the change that had been brought about, in the pooling of information across previously separated areas. It was AGREED to circulate what had been done so far.

13/14

Forward Plan

12.50

Minutes:

The Chairman indicated that she felt more meetings were needed, with some of them being seminars rather than formal meetings. There was general agreement and Councillor Fawcett suggested that there be a session on highway maintenance as it was a general concern. The Chairman indicated that Skanska was in any case coming back to Committee. It was suggested that the Audit & Governance model with the hour before the meeting used for briefings could be useful.

 

It was AGREED that officers would work with the Chairman to bring a plan to the next meeting.