Agenda and minutes

Strategy & Partnerships Scrutiny Committee - Thursday, 21 July 2011 10.00 am

Venue: County Hall

Contact: Claire Phillips, Tel: (01865) 323967  Email: claire.phillips@oxfordshire.gov.uk

Items
No. Item

32/11

Declarations of Interest - see guidance note on the back page

33/11

Apologies for Absence and Temporary Appointments

Minutes:

Apologies were received from Councillor Hallchurch (Councillor Hudspeth substituting), Councillor Sherwood (Councillor L Sanders substituting), Councillor Wilmshurst (Councillor Crabbe substituting).

34/11

Minutes pdf icon PDF 90 KB

To approve the Minutes of the meeting held on Thursday 26 May 2011 (SYP3) and to receive information arising from them.

Minutes:

The minutes of the meeting held on 26 May 2011 were approved and signed subject to corrections to officers in attendance and accuracy of declarations of interest.

35/11

Speaking to or petitioning the Committee

Minutes:

None

36/11

Director's Update

10.10

The Assistant Chief Executive & Chief Finance Officer will give a verbal update on key issues.

 

The Head of Strategy and Communications will give an introduction to his role.

Minutes:

The Assistant Chief Executive & Chief Finance Officer gave an update on key work areas of the directorate. The following points were noted;

  • Judicial review of the waste contract has been a significant work area for Law and Governance. Judgement has now been received.
  • Human Resources has recently managed the council’s successful reaccreditation of Investors in People. The organisation met all 39 areas of the assessment.
  • Finance has been managing the final outturn and accounts have been sent to audit.
  • The local government resource review has been launched and detailed technical papers are awaited. This will have a significant impact on how local government is financed from 2013.
  • It was AGREED that scrutiny should have an item at a future meeting about the local government resource review.
  • Repatriations of service personnel to RAF Brize Norton. A flag handover ceremony with RAF Lyneham is planned for 1 September. The county council is acting as facilitator to the repatriation issue given its responsibility for the Coroners service. The approach has been to work sensitively with media to ensure that military protocol is managed and the grief of families is respected.

 

Guy Swindle, head of Strategy and Communications gave an introduction to his role after two months in post. Guy outlined the key functions of the Strategy and Communications service area

  1. Performance

How services across the organisation are performing and how the business strategy is being delivered

Managing the service and resource planning process with Finance

Promoting a data and evidence led approach to service design

A team approach looking at delivery in the round

 

  1. Policy and Strategy

Role in looking ahead to provide advice, support, guidance and analysis to the council and its services.

Other key work areas for this part of the team include Big Society, Locality working, Equalities, Partnerships and the voluntary sector.

 

  1. Communications and Engagement

This work area includes our work with the media, internal communications and briefing for staff.

The approach is to develop more face to face communication and dialogue including listening to staff at points of change.

Work is currently underway to refresh the public website and improve its functionality.

 

Guy Swindle outlined that the service is currently being consulted on restructure proposals designed to make the service more flexible and customer focused.

37/11

Summary of 2010/11 Provisional Outturn Report pdf icon PDF 168 KB

10.40

 

Commentary by the Cabinet Member for Finance (SYP6).

 

The report provides a commentary on the Provisional Outturn position at 31 March 2011.

 

Contact Officer: Kathy Wilcox, Principal Financial Manager

Minutes:

The 2010/11 outturn report was noted.

 

It was requested that future reports identify internal and externally generated income in relation to ICT.

38/11

Long Term Debt Policy pdf icon PDF 62 KB

11.00

 

Report of the Assistant Chief Executive and Chief Finance Officer(SYP7)

 

The report sets out the reasons that Oxfordshire County Council makes use of a Long Term Debt portfolio, the current policy on Long Term Debt and Borrowing and the possible implications of keeping or amending the current policy.

 

Contact Officer: Tim Chapple, Financial Manager - Treasury Management & Pension Fund Investments

Minutes:

The Chairman invited Councillor Mathew to come to the table and participate in the discussion.

 

Tim Chapple, Financial Manager introduced the paper on the council’s long term debt policy. He outlined the three elements to the policy: current debts; interest payments and debt management; and the accumulation of further debt.

 

It was noted that we receive government grant for majority of interest payments due on borrowing and that local taxpayers only contribute to the minimum revenue contribution of principal repayments. Each year we are paying off the minimum required level of capital and interest. Councillors expressed concern that debts were therefore effectively never cleared, as new borrowing was undertaken to fund the Capital Programme.

 

Total level of debt had risen from £308M in 2009 to £434M in 2011. Committee members expressed concern at this increase which was attributed to the borrowing required to fund the capital programme.

 

It was noted that in future prudential borrowing will be the only borrowing available to us.

 

Councillor Brighouse asked a question about the impact of handing over assets to communities through the Big Society and what effect this would have on our ability to borrow and make repayments.

 

In response it was noted that these transfers are currently small in value and that debt charges are not linked to individual assets but to the whole asset portfolio.

 

Councillors suggested that it would be more prudent to look at our potential to borrow each year and agree the programme from this.

 

The committee acknowledged that the Treasury Management Policy is reviewed on an annual basis and that the local government funding model is not the same as private business and is very transparent.

 

Councillors commented on the requirement to transfer schools to trusts where they become academies and that this has a further impact in reducing the council’s asset portfolio.

 

Councillor Mathew suggested that the policy should be revisited, reviewed and represented.

 

It was AGREED that a seminar for councillors should be organised to discuss the policy further. 

39/11

Business Strategy pdf icon PDF 49 KB

11.25

 

Business Strategy

 

The Committee will be given an overview presentation on the council’s Business Strategy and corporate approach to business management for 2011/12. Attached is an overview paper on the Business Strategy (SYP8a).

 

This item is brought forward from the last meeting when it was not considered.

 

Contact officer: Alexandra Bailey, Senior Policy Manager, Chief Executive’s Office

 

11.45

 

ICT Strategy

 

Update report on the ICT Strategy (SYP8b). The Head of ICT Business Delivery will provide an update on the strategy and progress on implementation.

 

Contact officer: Graham Shaw, Head of ICT Business Delivery

 

12.05

 

Big Society Fund

 

Report (SYP8c) on the Big Society Fund and first wave of applications.

 

Contact officer: Alexandra Bailey, Senior Policy Manager, Chief Executive’s Office

Additional documents:

Minutes:

  1. Business Strategy Programme

 

Guy Swindle introduced the Business Strategy and the eight key work strands as set out in the overview paper. It was also noted that each directorate has a business strategy to drive delivery. Each directorate sets out in scorecard progress in delivering against these priorities.

 

It was AGREED that progress reports to the Business Strategy Programme sponsor will be brought to scrutiny in future enabling scrutiny to focus on a key work strand each meeting.

 

  1. Big Society Fund

 

It was noted that Cabinet allocated funding in the first round of the Fund on 19 July and that this round had largely reflected youth projects in response to changes in council service provision.

 

It was noted that applications for library related projects are not currently being accepted. This will be reviewed in light of the outcome of the Future Library Service consultation.

 

The committee AGREED to recommend to Cabinet that the Big Society Fund is continued in the next financial year.

 

The committee noted that the criteria for the Fund are fixed for this year but would like the opportunity to review the criteria for future years.

 

  1. ICT Strategy Update

 

Graham Shaw introduced the item and gave an update on progress of the ICT strategy.

 

It was noted that in 2010/11 ICT was in budget and targets are expected to be met in 2011/12.

 

Delivery of the strategy is focussed in three areas

  1. Finance and better value for money
    • Pressing suppliers robustly on price
    • Recycling equipment and software
    • Prioritising projects appropriately

 

  1. Governance
    • ICT strategy board meets fortnightly to manage the work programme
    • Directorate representatives involved in programme and
    • Clear link to Business Strategy Group

 

  1. Programme of work
    • Roll out of projects corporately including Windows 7 and Office 10. These are scheduled to roll out in one year and will be dependent on strong communications and training plan.

 

It was requested that acronyms in reports are explained in full or a glossary provided at the end of the report.

 

Partnerships with Hampshire County Council was discussed including the many similarities between authorities in terms of our use of technology. It was noted the opportunities to work together, share resources and develop pooling arrangements.

40/11

Forward Plan

12.20

 

The Committee is asked to suggest items from the current Forward Plan on which it may wish to have an opportunity to offer advice to the Cabinet before any decision is taken, together with details of what it thinks could be achieved by looking at any item and propose any other relevant items for the Committee to consider.

Minutes:

It was noted that an overview of the 2011/12 Service and Resource Planning Process would be welcome and an item will be brought to the next meeting about Partnerships.