Venue: County Hall, New Road, Oxford
Contact: Graham Warrington Tel: (01865) 815321; E-Mail: graham.warrington@oxfordshire.gov.uk
| No. | Item | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Apologies for Absence and Temporary Appointments Minutes:
|
|||||||
|
Declarations of Interest - see guidance note opposite Minutes:
|
|||||||
|
Minutes: The minutes of the meeting
held on 12 September were approved and signed by the Chairman. Minute 34/11 – Construction of a household waste and
commercial waste recycling centre – Langford Lane, Kidlington
– Application R3.0167/10 Following
approval at the September meeting this application had been referred to the
Secretary of State to consider whether or not the application should be called
in. The period for that had expired on
Friday 21 October 2011 but no response had been received. Officers would seek
confirmation. |
|||||||
|
Chairman's Updates Minutes: The Chairman advised that Alan Divall was attending his last meeting before taking up another appointment in the private sector. On behalf of the Committee he wished him well. With regard to the energy from waste application at Ardley Mr Dance advised that the Secretary of State had granted planning permission on 17 February 2011 following the public inquiry in 2010. That decision had been challenged by The Ardley Against Incineration Group (AAI) but dismissed in the High Court at a hearing on 7 and 8 July 2011. AAI then applied for permission to appeal the High Court decision but that application was again dismissed by an Appeal Court Judge on 9 September. However, because that decision had been based on ‘papers’ and not in open court AAI had the right to an oral 30 minute hearing which had been set for 1 November in the Court of Appeal. If that proved successful then AAI would be granted permission for a substantive appeal hearing into the High Court Judge’s decision. If not then that would be the end of the process and construction of the EfW plant could commence. |
|||||||
|
Petitions and Public Address Minutes:
|
|||||||
|
Relocation of Peppard CE Primary School to land adjacent to the B481. The proposed development includes:
construction of 903 sq metres single storey school building; new and improved
vehicle and pedestrian access arrangements onto the B481; 14 on-site car
parking spaces (including 2 spaces for
the disabled) and cycle parking; on-site drop off area; hard and soft play
areas and grass playing pitch; landscaping, new fencing and
retention/improvements to existing boundary treatments – land north of the
former Dog public house, Rotherfield Peppard – Application No R3.0065/11 Report by the Deputy Director for Environment & Economy (Growth & Infrastructure) (PN6) This application seeks permission to relocate Peppard CE Primary School 300 metres to the north of the existing school on Church Lane to a parcel of land adjacent to the B481 Nettlebed to Reading Road. The development involves the creation of a new primary school incorporating a main school building, outdoor play areas, playing field, parking and drop-off areas, a new vehicle and pedestrian access from the B481, landscaping and other associated works. The school consider that a replacement site is needed due to the unsuitability of the existing site and buildings and the limited space with which to redevelop. The application has generated letters of both objection and support. The objections include on the grounds of highway safety and the impact on the character and appearance of the existing village and surrounding area, including the Chilterns AONB. These objections are summarised in the report, along with the responses from other consultees. It is RECOMMENDED
that subject to a unilateral undertaking being first agreed to ensure that a
contribution is made towards the provision of improved highway safety measures
in the local area Application No. R3.0065/11 be approved subject to conditions
to be determined by the Deputy Director for Environment & Economy (Growth
and Infrastructure) to include the following matters: 1.
The development must be carried out strictly in
accordance with the particulars contained in the application and the plans
accompanying. 2.
Commencement of the development within 3 years. 3.
Submission and agreement of the external materials.
4.
Retained trees and hedges to be protected during
construction works. 5.
Submission and agreement of a landscaping scheme -
to include species mix, plant size, planting layout and spacing. 6.
Landscaping scheme to be implemented within first
planting season following the completion of the development. 7.
Removal of hedgerow to be carried out outside of
the bird breeding season. 8.
Submission and agreement of external lighting
details and hours of use. 9.
Submission and agreement of land contamination assessment.
Should contamination be found on site the submission and agreement of remedial
strategy. 10.
Relocation of electricity transformer before the
proposed development is brought into use. 11.
Submission and agreement of full details of
proposed renewable energy technologies within the development. 12.
Submission and agreement of fencing details. 13.
External play areas and sports pitches to be used
during school hours only. 14.
The school’s existing Travel Plan to be updated to
take account of the proposed new location. 15. Submission and agreement of the detailed ... view the full agenda text for item 43/11 Minutes: The Committee considered an application to relocate Peppard CE Primary School. Steven Malcolm congratulated the governors of the school for preparing a sound application. However, there were serious concerns regarding a number of highway issues and he asked the Committee to consider the levels of safety of the drop off and pick up areas; the major disruption likely to be caused to the B481 with an increased risk of accidents and finally did the village need a school for 100 pupils, the majority of whom did not live in the village and which would be situated on the outskirts of the village itself. He had little confidence in the plans to control traffic and urged the Committee to consider the application very carefully. Philip Collins was not opposed to the proposed school development but felt the drop off arrangements were fatally flawed. It was unrealistic to expect that parents would park any distance from the school and given any choice they would choose to park nearer, particularly in bad weather. They would also park on the verges. The park and stride route was unsafe and it was unrealistic to expect teaching staff to enforce these arrangements. He also urged the Committee to consider carefully the effects of this application. Ben Lambourne endorsed the comments made by the previous speakers. He was not opposed to redevelopment of the school but was concerned over implications for child safety. He considered the proposals unrealistic, particularly the expectation that parents would drop their children off within a 3 minute turnaround period. Recent speed tests had shown many vehicles were travelling in excess of 30 mph and Church Lane was particularly dangerous. Safety of children was paramount and he agreed it was unlikely that these arrangements could be effectively enforced by staff. He referred to an alternative development site which had not been considered but which he felt would offer considerable increased benefits for safety. Responding to Councillor Nimmo-Smith he confirmed that the alternative site was set back from the current application site. Nick Launders advised that these proposals had been discussed at great length over the past year and that Rotherfield Peppard Parish Council fully supported the school redevelopment and the traffic arrangements associated with it. Arrangements for access to Dog Lane would need to be considered but on the whole it was felt that the advantages of the scheme more than outweighed the disadvantages. There had been wide consultation and it was felt that the plan was a good one. The need for the school was not in doubt continuing to play a vital role in promoting community life. Ian Herriot considered it a well worked out project supported by the Diocese, Local Education Authority, local community and parents and governors of the school. There was a recognised need for a new school on what was an optimum size site. It would be more secure, closer to the centre of the village, was well screened and with a low impact design would ... view the full minutes text for item 43/11 |
|||||||
|
Report by the Deputy Director for Environment & Economy (Growth & Infrastructure) (PN7) This is an application for permanent consent for a covered storage
building, extension of existing concrete pad, provision of lorry wash down
facility and relocation of existing fuel tanks from southern to the northern
part of M&M site at Worton Farm, Yarnton. The site already contains a range of permanent
structures related to the waste management activities. This proposal is
intended to improve management of the existing waste activities on the site.
There would be no increase in the permitted throughput and no change to
existing lorry movements associated with the site. The main issues to consider in deciding this application are its location in the Green Belt, the need for the development, its impact on the local residents and impact on the rural landscape. The report explains that there is a need for this development as it would increase the efficiency of the operation by improving the management of the site and would assist in improving recycling rates. However, the advantages of the scheme must be balanced against its location in an area of open countryside and in the Green Belt. It must be considered whether there are very special circumstances to warrant permitting this development in such a location. It is RECOMMENDED that, planning
permission for application no. MW.0116/11 is granted subject to conditions to
be determined by the Deputy Director for Growth and Infrastructure dealing with
matters outlined below: 1.
Detailed
compliance condition 2.
Commencement
date – within 3 years 3.
Standard
operating hours. 4.
Existing
vegetation to be retained and protected 5.
Tree planting
and boundary fencing scheme to be carried out as agreed. 6.
Bund
specifications (including height, angles and maintenance requirements) to be
implemented as agreed. 7.
Effective
silencers on vehicles, plant and equipment to be implemented 8.
External
building materials to be agreed 9.
Site signage
on A40 to be kept to a minimum 10.
Sweeping of
access road and adjacent site to be carried out at regular intervals as
required. 11.
Existing dust
control measures to be maintained Minutes: The Committee considered an application for a covered storage building, extension of existing concrete pad, provision of lorry wash down facility and relocation of existing fuel tanks from southern to the northern part of the site at Worton Farm noting an amended officer recommendation as set out in the addenda sheet and also the need for this application to be referred to the Secretary of State to consider whether or not to call in the application. RESOLVED: (on a motion by Councillor Mrs Fulljames,
seconded by Councillor Jelf and carried by 15 votes
to 0) that planning permission for application
no. MW.0116/11 be granted subject to conditions to be determined by the Deputy
Director for Growth and Infrastructure dealing with matters outlined below: 1.
Detailed compliance condition 2.
Commencement date – within 3 years 3.
Standard operating hours. 4.
Existing vegetation to be retained and protected 5.
Effective silencers on vehicles, plant and
equipment to be implemented 6.
External building materials to be agreed 7.
Site signage on A40 to be kept to a minimum 8.
Sweeping of access road and adjacent site to be
carried out at regular intervals as required. 9.
Existing dust control measures to be maintained |
|||||||
|
Report by the Deputy Director for Environment & Economy (Growth & Infrastructure) (PN8) Planning permission was granted in 2009 for
the redevelopment of Didcot Parkway Railway Station forecourt
as part of a programme of investment in strategic transport infrastructure in
the county in general and Didcot in particular. Work on the project is due to commence
shortly and a contractor's compound is required as part of the management of
the project. The site the subject of
this current application, off Station Road in Didcot,
has been used as a contractor's compound previously (as part of the
redevelopment of Didcot Town Centre). The compound would be required for a
temporary period of 2 years, the timescale for the forecourt redevelopment
works. The application has been brought
to the Planning & Regulation Committee because of an objection and concerns
raised by local residents and those are outlined in the report along with responses
from other consultees. It is RECOMMENDED that Application No.
R3.0103/11 (for the construction of a temporary works compound ( for a
temporary period of 2 years) in association with the redevelopment of the Didcot Parkway Station forecourt) be approved subject to
conditions to be determined by the Deputy Director (Growth and Infrastructure)
but to include the following matters: 1.
Detailed compliance. 2.
Temporary permission – 2 years only. 3.
All activities relating to the compound shall be
carried out in accordance with the submitted Construction Environmental
Management Plan and Site Waste Management Plan. 4.
No screening or crushing of aggregate in the
compound. 5.
No maintenance of vehicles or heavy machinery to
take place within the compound. 6.
Site entrance/exit gates to open inwards only. 7.
Details of works to site entrance/exit points (e.g.
provision of dropped kerbs) to be submitted, agreed and implemented before site
brought into use. 8.
Measures to be implemented to ensure there is no
mud/debris brought onto the highway. 9.
No parking of vehicles on Station Road particularly
opposite the site entrance. 10.
Existing shrubs/trees on site perimeter to be
retained. 11.
Working hours be restricted to 08.00-18.00 hours
Monday-Friday, 08.00-13.00 hours Saturdays.
No Sunday or Bank Holiday working. 12.
Existing boundary fence to be repainted and
repaired where necessary. 13.
Surface water drainage details to be submitted and
agreed. 14.
Any stockpiles of materials shall not exceed 3m in
height. 15.
Lighting details to be submitted and agreed before
site is brought into use. Archaeological Informative. Minutes: The Committee considered an application for the construction of a temporary works compound in association with the redevelopment of Didcot Parkway Station. Officers confirmed that there were no proposals for the site after the 2 year permission had lapsed and outlined arrangements, which had been put in place to manage the site during the permission period itself. One of those was to address a particular issue of concern for local residents, regarding parking on Station Road. In order not to impact on current arrangements for residents, parking facilities would be provided for staff within the site itself and to further protect that facility it was agreed that Condition 9 should be amended to stipulate no staff parking on Station Road. RESOLVED: (on a motion by Councillor Mrs Fulljames,
seconded by Councillor Tanner and carried unanimously) that Application
No. R3.0103/11 (for the construction of a temporary works compound (for a
temporary period of 2 years) in association with the redevelopment of the Didcot Parkway Station forecourt) be approved subject to
conditions to be determined by the Deputy Director for Environment &
Economy (Growth and Infrastructure) but to include the following matters: 1.
Detailed compliance. 2.
Temporary permission – 2
years only. 3.
All activities relating
to the compound shall be carried out in accordance with the submitted Construction
Environmental Management Plan and Site Waste Management Plan. 4.
No screening or crushing
of aggregate in the compound. 5.
No maintenance of
vehicles or heavy machinery to take place within the compound. 6.
Site entrance/exit gates
to open inwards only. 7.
Details of works to site
entrance/exit points (e.g. provision of dropped kerbs) to be submitted, agreed
and implemented before site brought into use. 8.
Measures to be
implemented to ensure there is no mud/debris brought onto the highway. 9.
No parking of staff
vehicles on Station Road particularly opposite the site entrance. 10.
Existing shrubs/trees on
site perimeter to be retained. 11.
Working hours be
restricted to 08.00-18.00 hours Monday-Friday, 08.00-13.00 hours
Saturdays. No Sunday or Bank Holiday
working. 12.
Existing boundary fence
to be repainted and repaired where necessary. 13.
Surface water drainage
details to be submitted and agreed. 14.
Any stockpiles of
materials shall not exceed 3m in height. 15.
Lighting details to be
submitted and agreed before site is brought into use. Archaeological
Informative. |
|||||||
|
Minerals & Waste Site Monitoring and Enforcement Report by the Deputy Director for Environment & Economy (Growth & Infrastructure) (PN9) The report updates the Planning & Regulation Committee on regular monitoring of minerals and waste planning permissions and progress on enforcement cases. It is RECOMMENDED that the
Schedule of Compliance Monitoring Visits in Annex 1 and the Schedule of
Enforcement Cases in Annex 2 to this report be noted. Additional documents:
Minutes: The Committee considered an update on regular monitoring of minerals and waste planning permissions and progress on enforcement cases. Mr Dance advised of progress achieved in joint working with District Councils on monitoring issues. However, officers were aware that there were major issues with regard to the Ardley in vessel composting operation at Ashgrove Farm, which involved close working and co-operation between 3 agencies. Councillor Mrs Fulljames reported the contents of an email she had received a few days before regarding the stench emanating from the site. The local authority had a responsibility to protect people’s environment but the problems seemed far from being resolved. Mr Dance advised that on the issue of odour control the Environment Agency who were the lead authority were yet to approve an odour control management scheme, which had been submitted to them and the County Council by Agrivert. Agreement of that scheme would provide a mechanism to improve control of the site. He undertook to contact the Agency at a high level to inform them of the Committee’s concerns and its desire to progress this situation. With regard to Finmere Mr Hodgkinson confirmed that compliance was good and that the Environment Agency were content with the current situation. With regard to Waterstock Mr Dance advised that the matter was due back to Court on 15 November but there had been little sign of intention to comply so far with the recent Court order. RESOLVED: (a)
that the
Schedule of Compliance Monitoring Visits in Annex 1 and the Schedule of Enforcement
Cases in Annex 2 to the report (PN9) be noted; (b)
high level representations
be made to the Environment Agency to progress agreement of the odour control
management plan for the Ardley composting site at Ashgrove Farm as a matter of urgency |