Venue: County Hall
Contact: Geoff Malcolm, Tel: (01865) 815904; E-Mail: geoff.malcolm@oxfordshire.gov.uk
| No. | Item | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Election of Chairman for the 2011/12 Council Year Minutes: RESOLVED: (on a motion by Councillor Shouler, seconded by Councillor Darke and carried nem. con.) that Councillor Wilmshurst be elected to chair the Committee for the current Council year. |
|||||
|
Election of Deputy Chairman for the 2011/12 Council Year Minutes: RESOLVED: (on a motion by Councillor Shouler, seconded by Councillor Stratford and carried nem. con.) that Councillor Mathew be elected as Deputy Chairman for the current Council year. Members thanked the former Deputy Chairman, Councillor Ray Jelf for his work in that role. |
|||||
|
Apologies for Absence and Temporary Appointments Minutes:
|
|||||
|
Business Strategies Briefing by the Chief Executive, Assistant
Chief Executive and Directors on the Corporate and Directorate Business
Strategies and the process of governance that underpins the delivery of the
Strategies. Minutes: On 20 April 2011
the Committee had resolved, at the suggestion of the Chairman who was also
Member Champion for Risk Management, to hold this additional meeting with the
main business being the Corporate and Directorate Business Strategies and the
process of governance that underpinned their delivery, to be led by the Chief
Executive with Directors in attendance.
Committee members had before them copies of the Business Strategies of
the Chief Executive’s Office and Directorates, which had been circulated
previously. The Chief
Executive thanked the Committee for the opportunity to update councillors on
the Business Strategy whose success was a critical matter for the Council. She then presented an overview of the Strategy
which focused on four main areas, namely challenging current methods of
working, the financial pressures, Government policy and local needs /
feedback. The presentation looked at the
background in terms of structures which had emerged during periods of economic
growth, the legacy of different initiatives and the growth of bureaucracy,
information silos and multiple management layers. The presentation then looked forward to the
aims and objectives of the Strategy, changing the way we work, the reshaping of
management, the Customer Service Centre and improved customer focus, asset
management, service and resource planning, community self-help / Big Society
and ICT. The Governance arrangements
were clearly shown together with monitoring, the timetable and red, amber &
green rated reporting with a summary of savings and estimates for
2011/12-2014/15. The Chief Executive,
the Assistant Chief Executive & Chief Finance Officer and the Head of Human
Resources then responded to members’ questions and comments including the aims
of the Strategy, the reshaping of management and rationalisation of structures,
tiers and establishment/posts, training and development of staff, further
planned reductions to 2013/14 and members’ roles in the formal decision making
process. The officers considered that
the Strategy was placing the Council in a good position to participate fully in
the localism agenda. (A copy of the
presentation slides is attached to the signed Minutes and is available on
request). The Chairman
thanked the Chief Executive for the comprehensive presentation and for the
reassurance that appropriate and adequate governance and monitoring
arrangements were in place. Ms. Callanan,
Performance Improvement & Development Manager who represented the Director,
Children Education & Families then outlined the context of and planning and
transformation process underway in the directorate to improve services through,
for example management review/restructuring and the continuous review of
quality, compliance and joint commissioning.
She also reported on mechanisms to seek user/public participation/views,
the management of key risks during the process and monitoring the impact and
savings achieved. The Director for Social & Community Services spoke about the four key elements of the directorate’s overall strategy (prevention, personalisation, protection and partnerships), changes in the directorate including planning, staffing &resourcing and the rationalisation and management of projects through the directorate Change Board, performance management and the management of key risks. There was regular liaison with and inputs from finance, legal and HR together with mechanisms for effective engagement with stakeholders and ... view the full minutes text for item 30/11 |
|||||
|
Department for Communities & Local Government - Consultation Paper on Local Public Audit Members are invited to comment on the draft
response (AU7 - to be circulated
separately following the Audit Working Group on 16 June 2011) to the Department
for Communities & Local Government (DCLG) consultation on the future for
Local Public Audit. Following the Committee meeting, a final version will be
submitted to the DCLG before their deadline of 30 June 2011. Minutes: Members considered the draft response (AU7)
to the Department for Communities & Local Government (DCLG) consultation on
the future for Local Public Audit following consideration by the Audit Working
Group (AWG) on 16 June 2011. Mr Dyson reported that he had amended the
initial draft response to take on board AWG members’ views. The paper contained a response to all 50
questions and he had pulled out the key
issues/messages as a summary at the beginning.
He commented on two issues in the draft that
in particular: - he had included a statement that we
believe that appointed auditors should not be allowed to provide any other
services to the Council during the term of their contract. This could have a
detrimental impact on the cost and reduce the overall market place. What was
proposed by the DCLG included the Audit Committee being the body who had to
approve the provision of other services, once they were satisfied the risk of
compromising independence was not material; and - there was much debate
about the Value for Money (VFM) role of the public auditor (Q29); he
thought the Group may have been minded
towards option 2, whereby the Auditor was required as now to provide a VFM
opinion. In the draft response he had left in Option 1, but provided more
context as there were cost/control implications that may need further
consideration. Committee members’ expressed themselves to
be content with the text in AU7 and thanked Mr Dyson for his work. RESOLVED: to
approve the draft response at AU7 and note that following the Committee meeting
it would be submitted to the DCLG before their deadline of 30 June 2011. (The
response as submitted to the DCLG is attached).
|