ITEM EX7
EXECUTIVE
- 11 DECEMBER 2001
VARIATIONS
IN SUMS AVAILABLE FOR DELEGATED SCHOOL BUDGETS
Report by
Chief Education Officer and Director of Business Support & County
Treasurer
Background
- The purpose of
this report is to examine the sum available for growth to the delegated
schools budget in the light of the overall Education budget. It will
then be necessary to consult with schools as to how any such growth
is allocated. Additionally, consideration will need to be given to changes
in teachers’ pay and demographic growth.
The Education Medium
Term Financial Plan
- When the Council
agreed its budget in February 2001, the Education element of the Medium
Term Financial Plan contained £4.755m unallocated. The position is now
somewhat different. A provisional updated draft of the plan can be found
at Annex 1(Download as .rtf file) which
shows, in place of the unallocated sum, a need for a saving of £0.540m
to be found. The draft Education budget to be reported initially to
the Learning and Culture Scrutiny Committee on 18 December will examine
ways of eliminating this shortfall.
- The detail of
the changes reducing the £4.755m unallocated growth to a saving to be
found of £0.540m can be found in Annex 1. However the major factors
are set out below.
(a) SSA
- The changes to
Education SSA for 2002/03 are having a major impact.
(1) Post
16
There
will be a new funding regime for schools with sixth forms from April
2002. LEAs will be topsliced the major element of their Post 16 SSA
sub block and this will be passed to schools via the LEA from the Learning
and Skills Council. The amount topsliced is the amount currently spent
on sixth form provision in schools as per the Authority’s Section 52
Budget Statement, plus an amount for the LSC to formula fund schools
for the qualifications which their pupils achieve. This additional sum
is currently estimated at £1.865m and effectively targets growth to
secondary schools.
(2) Under Fives
The
DfES has earmarked about £0.5m of SSA to the Under Five sub block for
special educational needs in early years. The LEA will need to demonstrate
that they are undertaking this responsibility, which is a requirement
of the Early Years Development and Childcare Plan.
(b) Teachers’
Pay Award/Improved Conditions for LSAs
- The February plan
included only 3% for the teachers’ pay award. 3.5% is now provided for
at an additional £0.838m, although this may still be insufficient. Schools
have been consulted on improving the pay and conditions of LSAs. Part
of the cost of this was built into the original Medium Term Plan. There
is now an additional cost of £0.529m in 2002/03. Both of these items
will be added to the delegated schools budget, but erode the sum available
for real growth.
(c) Unavoidable
Pressures on the Central LEA
- To date central
pressures of £1m (excluding Under 5s above) have been identified. These
are mainly in respect of external funding tapering or being deleted,
pressures in respect of Home to School Transport, and the need to respond
to changes in ICT. These pressures will need to be reduced in order
to produce an Education budget in line with the Executive’s strategy
of funding Education for increases in SSA.
Distribution of the
Additional Funding to Delegated Schools
- Although at this
stage it appears that there will be no real terms growth for schools
other than in respect of those with sixth forms, it is nevertheless
necessary to plan for such an eventuality. As more work is undertaken
on putting together the Education budget before Council agrees the overall
budget in February, growth may become available. Additionally, it is
necessary to put forward proposals for dealing with changes in the teachers’
pay award and demographic growth.
(a) Growth
- Education Committee,
in both December 1999 and 2000, received reports on "Activity Led
Funding". This approach attempts to quantify an idealised Age Weighted
Pupil Unit (AWPU) value for given class sizes and teacher contact ratios.
It has demonstrated that the current AWPU values for Key Stage 2 and
Key Stage 3 in particular are in greatest need of increase. To this
extent, any growth would have best been targetted to these age groups.
- However, there
is currently significant uncertainty as to how the new Post 16 funding
arrangements will impact on individual schools. There may be opportunity
for schools with sixth forms which receive additional funding to cross
subsidise Key Stages 3 and 4. We will need to consider the possibility
of further consultation when the position is clearer.
(b) Teachers’
Pay
- The teachers’
pay award is normally announced in late January. There is little capacity
in the budget to meet the costs of the pay award over and above the
3.5% currently forecast. Should there be an award greater than the 3.5%
allowed for, the excess will need to be met by schools from the existing
delegated budget.
(c) Demographic
Growth
- Actual figures
for demographic growth will not be known until late January. In the
event of demographic growth being less than the plan, it is proposed
that the additional funding will be available for growth. In the event
of demographic growth being above the current forecast level of £1.3m,
consideration will need to be given to increasing AWPUs at less than
inflation.
RECOMMENDATIONS
- The Executive
is RECOMMENDED to authorise the Chief Education Officer to consult schools
on the proposals set out in the report.
G.M.
BADMAN
Chief Education
Officer
CHRIS
GRAY
Director
of Business Support & County Treasurer
Background
Papers: None
Contact
Officer: Matt Bowmer, Acting Head of Finance (Education). Tel:
Oxford 815474
December
2001
|