2.55 p.m.
Report by
the Director of Finance
This report presents a summary of activity against the Counter Fraud Plan for 2021/22, presented to the July 2021 Audit & Governance committee meeting. The Counter Fraud plan supports the Council’s Anti-Fraud and Corruption Strategy by ensuring that the Council has proportionate and effective resources and controls in place to prevent and detect fraud as well as investigate those matters that do arise.
The Committee is RECOMMENDED to note the summary of activity against the
Counter Fraud Plan for 2021/22.
Minutes:
The Audit &
Governance Committee considered a report by the Director of Finance presenting
a summary of activity in relation to the Counter Fraud Plan for 2021/22 which
had been presented to the Audit & Governance Committee meeting in July
2021.
The Counter Fraud
Plan supported the Council’s Anti-Fraud and Corruption Strategy by ensuring the
Council had proportionate and effective resources and controls in place to
prevent and detect fraud as well as investigating matters that might arise.
It was recommended
that the Audit & Governance Committee note the summary of activity against
the Counter Fraud Plan 2021/22.
The report was
presented by Sara Cox, Chief Internal Auditor.
The Chair referred
to Paragraph 7 of the report, “National Fraud Initiative” (NFI), noting the
number of Blue Badges and Concessionary Travel Passes that had been cancelled
and the estimated future loss to the Council that had been prevented because of
the cancellations. She also noted that, on the death of a Blue Badge or
Concessionary Travel Pass holder, there was a requirement that the relevant
authorities were informed of the holder’s death and that the holder’s Blue
Badge or Concessionary Travel Pass was cancelled.
In the subsequent
discussion, the following points were raised.
(a) As part of the On Street Enforcement Exercise, there was a detailed
Enforcement Plan which set out procedures to be followed in seizing and/or
returning Blue Badges.
ACTION: Officers to consider publishing the
Enforcement Plan and any appeals procedures on the Council website.
(b) Referring to Paragraph 4: Key Performance Indicators & Trends, it was
confirmed that the number of investigations and cases was consistent with the
number of cases in previous years. In addition, the outcomes of the
investigations that had been conducted was in accordance with officers’
expectations.
It was proposed that the statistics presented in
Paragraph 4 of the report were indicative of there being strong controls and
processes in place.
(c) The financial value to the holder of a Blue Badge or a Concessionary
Travel Pass was calculated nationally based on parking and travel fees that
were waived for holders of a Blue Badge or a Concessionary Travel Pass.
(d) Regarding levels of abuse of the Blue Badge Scheme, it was anticipated
that, as the On Street Parking Enforcement Exercise progressed, and work was
carried out with Blue Badge Enforcement Officers, Blue Badge “hot spots” would
be identified, and the necessary enforcement action taken.
(e) Regarding “New Cases by Referral Source”, category referred to in the
report, it was noted that “whistleblowing” cases could originate from several
sources including Members of the Public, Service Providers and Council
employees. It was whether the case met the definition of whistleblowing that
determined how it was categorised.
(f) Regarding fraud within schools, if the school concerned was a maintained
school, responsibility for investigating the fraud and any loss because of
fraud would lie with the Council as the Local Education Authority.
In bringing the
discussion to a close, the Chair thanked officers for the work carried out in
relation to Counter Fraud Plan 2021/22.
RESOLVED: to note the summary of activity against the Counter Fraud Plan for 2021/22.
Supporting documents: